ACB absolutely wrecked KBJ

[Lisa558]

I think it’s more like they all know she’s not qualified and is just an idiot. Even the fat Latina and the dyke know.

It’s the same as the time I had someone on a job site ask me where they could order AC batteries. You can’t you ******* idiot, batteries are DC.

When your college dismisses your opinion on a Constitutional matter only to reply you’re so ******* stupid you aren’t using any Constitutional arguments at all. You may be the dumbest person on the court.

If she didn’t get lifetime benefits of being a female black, she would have gone to some third-rate law school (if that) and be working in some obscure government role.

But now the country is stuck with her.

 

[Foxfyre]

KBJ was in my HS graduating class.

Swear. She was class President as I recall. #29 in GPA.

1,2,3, and 29 went to Harvard.

Miami Palmetto 1988.

We did not interact. I do not think I had her in any classes. I was a jock, she was one of those involved in all the fruity shit.

But, she was well liked and respected as I recall.

We had some Venn diagram circle of friends that crossed over, but I dont think I ever said a word to her, the class was like 750 kids.

Kinda cool to have a SCOTUS classmate. I just wish she was one of the good guys!

Yes I've read KBJ's bio and it is pretty darn impressive. Based on that alone, I can't say she was unqualified to be on the high court.

It is being so 'woke' it takes away all judicial prudence and common sense that is KBJ's problem.

 

[IM2]

Coney - Barrett wrecked herself. Her opinion will go down in history with the likes of Roger Taney.

 

[Lisa558]

KBJ was in my HS graduating class.

Swear. She was class President as I recall. #29 in GPA.

1,2,3, and 29 went to Harvard.

Miami Palmetto 1988.

We did not interact. I do not think I had her in any classes. I was a jock, she was one of those involved in all the fruity shit.

But, she was well liked and respected as I recall.

We had some Venn diagram circle of friends that crossed over, but I dont think I ever said a word to her, the class was like 750 kids.

Kinda cool to have a SCOTUS classmate. I just wish she was one of the good guys!

29th in her class - and she gets into Harvard?! There are about 10,000 high schools in the U.S., meaning 10,000 valedictorians, and 99% of them can’t even get in!

DEI in action - and we see the results.

 

[Lisa558]

Yes I've read KBJ's bio and it is pretty darn impressive. Based on that alone, I can't say she was unqualified to be on the high court.

It is being so 'woke' it takes away all judicial prudence and common sense that is KBJ's problem.

But due to DEI, and the preferential treatment given to black females, how many of the roles she’s had were granted her, in part at least, due to her having the winning combo (female + black), when there were others better qualified but lacking the diversity points?

Work in higher education admissions, as I did, and you’d understand why I am so sour on DEI. I saw many, MANY better qualified applicants rejected in favor of much weaker ones due to diversity goals.

 

[Foxfyre]

But due to DEI, and the preferential treatment given to black females, how many of the roles she’s had were granted her, in part at least, due to her having the winning combo (female + black), when there were others better qualified but lacking the diversity points?

Work in higher education admissions, as I did, and you’d understand why I am so sour on DEI. I saw many, MANY better qualified applicants rejected in favor of much weaker ones due to diversity goals.

Same here though I wasn't working in higher education admissions. But I had first hand experience with DEI hiring. And it almost never turned out well.

As her classmate expressed though, KBJ may not have always been 'woke'. I know so many people who were not when younger, but came to be that way when they were older and subjected to heavy peer pressure. Religious seminaries are notorious for creating that kind of mentality.

So I can't in good conscience judge her experience and credentials as I don't know. But I can certainly see that she has become a 'woke' puppet of that particular mentality and that compromises her ability to think critically and competently as a judge and/or requires her to be intellectually dishonest.

 

[ColonelAngus]

Yes I've read KBJ's bio and it is pretty darn impressive. Based on that alone, I can't say she was unqualified to be on the high court.

It is being so 'woke' it takes away all judicial prudence and common sense that is KBJ's problem.

Harvard is left AF, indoctrinates almost everyone

 

[Missourian]

Here's Justice Kagan in 2022...



Imagine that. She totally understood the problem...when Biden was president.

rightwinger ... I think you're right. The liberal Justices are totally partisan and corrupt.

 

[Foxfyre]

Harvard is left AF, indoctrinates almost everyone

For sure those who graduate with honors there almost all have to be 'woke' or pretend to be.

 

[rightwinger]

Here's Justice Kagan in 2022...



Imagine that. She totally understood the problem...when Biden was president.

rightwinger ... I think you're right. The liberal Justices are totally partisan and corrupt.

A lower court judge can’t set nationwide policy unilaterally.

That is why we have a Supreme Court to appeal to

 

[ColonelAngus]

29th in her class - and she gets into Harvard?! There are about 10,000 high schools in the U.S., meaning 10,000 valedictorians, and 99% of them can’t even get in!

DEI in action - and we see the results.

For sure because she is a black female, but she did have bananas extracurriculars.

She is left of Mao, though. Harvard ***** you up.

 

[Missouri_Mike]

Anyone can write a Concurring or Dissenting Opinion. Sotomayor wrote one in this case. Kagan and Brown joined in that opinion (they agreed with the opinion). Neither Sotomayor nor Kagen joined in Brown's Dissent.

So her opinion was so bad not even her two cohorts would sign on.

 

[Missouri_Mike]

A lower court judge can’t set nationwide policy unilaterally.

That is why we have a Supreme Court to appeal to

Which is why they can’t bring the nation to a halt either. So you agree with the ruling.

 

[Missourian]

A lower court judge can’t set nationwide policy unilaterally.

That is why we have a Supreme Court to appeal to

Then why did the three liberal supreme Court Justices vote to continue to allow lower court judges to set nationwide policy???

"Justice Sonia Sotomayor argued in a dissent joined by Justices Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson that the decision that the majority played into the president’s hand by cutting back the ability of judges on lower courts to issue injunctions blocking Trump’s policies nationwide."

https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/5373118-supreme-court-liberal-dissent-birthright/

The liberal Justices on the Supreme Court are completely partisan and corrupt.

 

[rightwinger]

Then why did the three liberal supreme Court Justices vote to continue to allow lower court judges to set nationwide policy???

"Justice Sonia Sotomayor argued in a dissent joined by Justices Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson that the decision that the majority played into the president’s hand by cutting back the ability of judges on lower courts to issue injunctions blocking Trump’s policies nationwide."

https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/5373118-supreme-court-liberal-dissent-birthright/

The liberal Justices on the Supreme Court are completely partisan and corrupt.

Because they are not setting national policy
If SCOTUS disagrees, they can overrule

 

[Missourian]

Because they are not setting national policy
If SCOTUS disagrees, they can overrule.

That's not what Kagan said in 2022. She said exactly what we all know to be true...a lower court judge shouldn't have the authority to issue nationwide injunctions.

What happened between 2022 and 2025? I'll give you a hint. It starts with an E and ends with lection. And suddenly Kagan 'believes' the exact opposite.

The liberal Justices are partisan and corrupt.

 

[Marener]

I don’t think the rest of the SC thinks much of Jackson. She’s in so far over her head the rest of the court doesn’t even take the time to debate her position.

Most sane people don’t think much about conservative side of the SC.

 

[Marener]

29th in her class - and she gets into Harvard?! There are about 10,000 high schools in the U.S., meaning 10,000 valedictorians, and 99% of them can’t even get in!

DEI in action - and we see the results.

The result is that she graduated magma cum laude from Harvard. Obviously she was more than qualified to go there.

 

[berg80]

Man scroll down to her addressing Jackson’s dissent. It’s brutal. She doesn’t even treat her like she’s a judge at all.

Justice Amy Coney Barrett Absolutely Wrecked Ketanji Brown Jackson in the Birthright Citizenship Opinion

Supreme Court's ruling on birthright citizenship and the implications of universal injunctions.

townhall.com

I don’t think the rest of the SC thinks much of Jackson. She’s in so far over her head the rest of the court doesn’t even take the time to debate her position.

Name calling and inflammatory language removed

From Barrett......"We will not dwell on JUSTICE JACKSON’s argument, which is at odds with more than two centuries’ worth of precedent, not to mention the Constitution itself. We observe only this: JUSTICE JACKSON decries an imperial Executive while embracing an imperial Judiciary."

On the contrary, Jackson laments the imperial presidency Barrett's decision gives to the executive while decrying the notion only the conservatives on the SC feel empowered to act as a check on facially unconstitutional orders that strip Americans of their rights.

 

[berg80]

I don’t think the rest of the SC thinks much of Jackson.

Clarence has rightly been regarded as an extremist outlier until he was joined by other extremists. Now people recognize he feels entitled to be a grifter because his opinion is he's been under compensated all these years for carrying the water for conservative causes. Along with Ginny they make quite a corrupt couple.

The many ethics scandals of Clarence and Ginni Thomas, briefly explained​

The many ethics scandals of Clarence and Ginni Thomas, briefly explained

We’re keeping a running list as more and more reports continue to pile up.

www.vox.com