About Those J6 “People”

[Correll]

Yes, I support some patriotic Americans, noticing a bunch of wannabe Rambo's, that are planning on overthrowing the US government, ratting the traitors out.

LOL.
You're DELUSIONAL, Q-NUT.

You support the fbi having agents inside the proud boys;

Now, those agents want arrests.

SO, they need crimes.

Do they just sit there like lumps and hope for something to happen,

or do they try to control it?

After all, if they control it, they can make sure no one gets hurt. Have the people they need there, to make sure it gets shut down immediately.

 

[jacksonlamb]

Save the spamming of negs, ok?

A simple YES, would suffice.

So, the fbi infiltrates the group.

Now, how to arrest them. They need to witness crimes.

But, what if no crimes are being done? What then?

I mean, you KNOW that they have the intent to do crimes, or violence, somewhere or somewhen.

But you need to be there. And it would be better if it happened in a place where you could control it, you know, just so no one gets hurt.

How would you do that?

Suck your toe. You are stupid, you must be to write things. The intent is proven in their actions as well as intercepted communications.

 

[beagle9]

Bill was thirty and more years ago. Trump is living and ever-present ever-growing danger right now.

Danger to who or what ? If he was a breaker instead of a fixer then I might agree, but what you dimbulbs broke going all the way back to Bill Clinton is what Trump is addressing now. That makes Trump a fixer, and the dimbulbs can't stand it when being exposed as the breakers.

 

[beagle9]

Your 'whataboutism' is meaningless. This not tit for tat.

Violent criminals who hurt cops were pardoned.

This is definitely a score board, and you all are responding like the losers you are.

 

[Correll]

Suck your toe. You are stupid, you must be to write things. The intent is proven in their actions as well as intercepted communications.

And now you see where this leads.

The other leftards, they saw it from the first question. YOu didn't catch on till the second question.


The idea that the fbi incited the riot, so that they could complete their mission and weaken an organization that they saw as dangerous,

is completely reasonable.

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

You support the fbi having agents inside the proud boys;

They were NOT agents, you stupid fuk.
They were Proud Boys who recognized TRAITORS, when they see them.

Now, those agents want arrests.

SO, they need crimes.

Do they just sit there like lumps and hope for something to happen,

or do they try to control it?

After all, if they control it, they can make sure no one gets hurt. Have the people they need there, to make sure it gets shut down immediately.

Trump REALLY loves you, Q-NUT.

 

[beagle9]

Suck your toe. You are stupid, you must be to write things. The intent is proven in their actions as well as intercepted communications.

You focusing on an entire group that wasn't pardoned as a whole group is nothing but a deflection. TRUMP pardoned those individual's that he felt were done wrong in the biased Biden justice system, and he was right by doing so.

 

[Correll]

They were agents, you stupid fuk.
They were Proud Boys who recognized TRAITORS.

Don't have a fit lefty.

You support the fbi agents, and you want them to succeed.

Now, how are they going to do that, when they can't be everywhere and really, they don't want to see a lot of people get hurt.

After all, you KNOW that the proud boys are going to do violent crime right?

It's only a question of where and when, right?

You KNOW that, don't you?

 

[berg80]

You support the fbi having agents inside the proud boys;

Now, those agents want arrests.

SO, they need crimes.

You make all manner of reductive assertions in order to support the factually unsupported things you need to believe. Things the IG's report refutes.

What else you got?

 

[Lockback]

That was lame even by your standards

No, in fact it was brilliant.
You and your January 6 fetish have really gotten stale and old and tired.
Get some new material, pal.
In the meantime, your Democrat Congressmen are filled to the brim with creeps.

 

[berg80]

TRUMP pardoned those individual's that he felt were done wrong

Without evidence. He may have convinced himself they were wronged, he may have wanted to believe they were wronged, but there is no evidence they deserved to be pardoned.

 

[Correll]

You make all manner of reductive assertions in order to support the factually unsupported things you need to believe. Things the IG's report refutes.

What else you got?

Just building on things that you have agreed to.

After all, we agreee that it is hte job of the fbi to infiltrate organizations it deems dangerous.

YOU have agreed that you support this.

YOU oddly seem resistant to admitting that you would then want to see those agents get arrests or to weaken the organization.


Are you secretly wanting the Proud BOys to grow and prosper?

 

[berg80]

This is definitely a score board, and you all are responding like the losers you are.

Are you in denial of the fact that some of the pardoned criminals assaulted Capital policemen? Or do you admit it and think doing so were acts of patriotism?

 

[berg80]

YOU oddly seem resistant to admitting that you would then want to see those agents get arrests or to weaken the organization.

I did not. Maybe you could just get to the point you're trying to make. Cuz YOU seem oddly resistant to doing so.

 

[Correll]

I did not. Maybe you could just get to the point you're trying to make. Cuz YOU seem oddly resistant to doing so.

I can't get to the point, becasue you keep refusing to answer simple questions.

So, you agree that you want those agents to get arrests and weaken the organization.

So, if they were in place and not getting arrests, and something big was coming down, would it be ok to try to agitate to cause the guys you know are bad guys,

to **** up and do something technically illegal, ON CAMERA, so you could get those arrests?

 

[berg80]

I can't get to the point,

Of course you can. Just make it.

 

[Correll]

Of course you can. Just make it.

ANSWER THE ******* QUESTION, COWARD.


I can't get to the point, becasue you keep refusing to answer simple questions.

So, you agree that you want those agents to get arrests and weaken the organization.

So, if they were in place and not getting arrests, and something big was coming down, would it be ok to try to agitate to cause the guys you know are bad guys,

to **** up and do something technically illegal, ON CAMERA, so you could get those arrests?

 

[berg80]

So, if they were in place and not getting arrests, and something big was coming down, would it be ok to try to agitate to cause the guys you know are bad guys,

Finally, you come to the point. Which, according to the IG's report, is not supported by any evidence. You apparently still need to believe the FBI is in some way at fault for what trump's mob did on their own volition. You want to absolve them, and trump, of responsibility for the J/6 riot. I suppose to justify the pardons.

None of what you want is supported by facts.

 

[berg80]

ANSWER THE ******* QUESTION, COWARD.

GFY.

 

[berg80]

So, if they were in place and not getting arrests, and something big was coming down, would it be ok to try to agitate to cause the guys you know are bad guys,

DOJ OIG Releases Report on the FBI’s Handling of Its Confidential Human Sources and Intelligence Collection Efforts in the Lead Up to the January 6, 2021 Electoral Certification​

DOJ OIG Releases Report on the FBI’s Handling of Its Confidential Human Sources and Intelligence Collection Efforts in the Lead Up to the January 6, 2021 Electoral Certification

oig.justice.gov

You can't handle the truth.