Political-Junkie
Gold Member
- Apr 28, 2026
- 567
- 170
- 143
hold on, show me where the Capitol Grounds were restricted that day. They aren't normally, anyone can walk up to the Capitol and stand outside any yell and protest, people do it all the time
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
hold on, show me where the Capitol Grounds were restricted that day. They aren't normally, anyone can walk up to the Capitol and stand outside any yell and protest, people do it all the time
The permit was for the Ellipse, not the Capitol.1) there were permits for the rally
2) Ok, so how was anyone suppose to know prior to people coming in, they were going to come in?
3) incorrect, the NG was there from Jan 5-6th, at the request of the Mayor, and approved by the President, because they were aware of the rally.
Sure he did.True, you are right....before Trump was even done speaking there were people engaged in the riot.
Which further highlights that trump's speech didn't start it.
There was no entrapment or incitement. It was voluntary, willing insurrection.Here the leftard pretends to not know what incitement and entrapment is.
And further more, is hoping that the people reading the meme, are as retarded as he is pretending to be.
If you are reading his meme, and you are thinking it is making sense, you are being tricked by the leftard.
AND HE IS INSULTING YOU, AS A RETARD.
The 155 guardsmen you cite were among the troops on site the previous day, who were sent to the armory to re-equip from traffic to crowd control.- they were not among the 1100 additional troops authorized at or about 1400 by ASECDEF as demonstrated by the fact they were on site and available at or before the time the 1100 troops were OK'd.
There was no insurrection.There was no entrapment or incitement. It was voluntary, willing insurrection.
It was never validated. Those FBI agents were sent to the Capitol in response to the rioting, meaning they didn't incite it.It was recently validated. Keep up with the news.
You give no examples of any incitement and entrapment. Telling visitors "to leave" is neither. Refusal to obey is a crime.I have repeatedly explained that my point was to show that your pretense that the idea of the fbi INCITING, was beyond the pale, was false.
By showing that by your lefty worldview, that such a move would be morally acceptable.
You saw that coming, which is why you refused to answer simple questions about your own feelings on the topic.
Now you are playign dumb, acting as though you are too retarded, to understand my clear and obvious argument.
There sure was.There was no insurrection.
There was no insurrection.
There was no insurrection.
There was no insurrection.
There was no insurrection.
There was no insurrection.
There was no insurrection.
There was no insurrection.
There was no insurrection.
There was no insurrection.
There was no insurrection.
There was no insurrection.
Their commitment to their narrative prevents them from acknowledging even the mist basic obvious truths.There was no insurrection.
There was no insurrection.
There was no insurrection.
There was no insurrection.
There was no insurrection.
There was no insurrection.
There was no insurrection.
There was no insurrection.
There was no insurrection.
There was no insurrection.
There was no insurrection.
There was no insurrection.
You're lying.There sure was.
What did Epps say or do to incite violence?Epps was inciting a riot. Trump was calling for political pressure.
It had some peaceful protesters, yes. 1600 convictions alone tosses out "mostly peaceful." Yes, it does.Their commitment to their narrative prevents them from acknowledging even the mist basic obvious truths.
Why wasn't Jan6 characterized as a mostly peaceful protest?
Nope. You are a fascist, so you are a liar by how you walk.Their commitment to their narrative prevents them from acknowledging even the mist basic obvious truths.
Why wasn't Jan6 characterized as a mostly peaceful protest?
What grandma are you speaking about?Say way that the grandma assaulted the cop.
You look at your political enemy and decide BRING THE HAMMER DOWN and then you come up with a justification.
Except, for some reason, Epps was treated differently than Grandma, or the Shaman.
NOT ONE OF YOU LEFTIES will address that.
YOu talk a lot. Plenty of "replies". But NONE of you have any explanations that make any sense. Not in light of the behavior and actions we see.
Sure there were no entrapment or incitement. It was voluntary, willing insurrection.There was no insurrection.
There was no insurrection.
There was no insurrection.
There was no insurrection.
There was no insurrection.
There was no insurrection.
There was no insurrection.
There was no insurrection.
There was no insurrection.
There was no insurrection.
There was no insurrection.
There was no insurrection.
Look up the videos.What did Epps say or do to incite violence?
Sure he did.
You just keep doubling down on your lying.Sure there were no entrapment or incitement. It was voluntary, willing insurrection.
Your burden of proof, jackie.Look up the videos.