About Those J6 “People”

[markef]

MAGA terrorists are pretty friggin bad.

If people don't believe you just tell them to ask Jussie.

 

[markef]

The judge said there is a process but judicial watch can’t stick their noses into it.

The judge said the National Archives does not get to determine what documents a president can or cannot keep.

 

[markef]

Your TDS imagination is delusional.

Definition of delusion: Believing the unproven democrat lie that there was no significnt democrat voter fraud in 2020 in spite of the mountain of evidence to the contrary.

 

[markef]

Democrats

No, we are rejecting fascism for the return of democracy. Your communism black op has already failed.

Democrats have redefined fascism as democracy.

 

[Marener]

The judge said the National Archives does not get to determine what documents a president can or cannot keep.

Nope. That’s not in the decision.

 

[markef]

You will be soundly defeated on election day this fall. It's over for the fascist red MAGA and Alt Right.

The violent lawless lying and looting Socialist Democrat Party USSA has big plans on winning every future election in the US.

 

[markef]

They were fairly tried and convicted and sentenced, and the fascist President pardoned or commuted their sentences.

That's over in the coming elections.

No, the J-6 defendants did not get a fair trial but with apologies to racist democrats Karmelo Anthony did.

 

[markef]

The evilness of TDS MAGAtry will be eviscerated over the next two elections.

Once a faithful follower of Jussie Smollett always a true believer in Jussie.

 

[markef]

How do politicize a charge of assaulting LEO especially with video evidence?

I agree. Claiming Pretti and Good did nothing to give the impression they wree assaulting LEOs is stupid considering we have them on video.

 

[Marener]

No, the J-6 defendants did not get a fair trial but with apologies to racist democrats Karmelo Anthony did.

Sure they did. The problem is they had no defense. Half of these guys filmed their own crimes and the other half bragged about it to their buddies.

 

[markef]

Nope. That’s not in the decision.

Democrats don't care that Bill Clinton was granted freedom to keep the records he wanted to keep and democrats don't care that we have evidence that major democrats and leftists, including Hillary Clinton, James Comey, Joe Biden, Adam Schiff, John Bolton and others, violated document security laws, All democrats want, as explained by Tish James, is to find something they can jail Trump on no matter how far-fetched or twisted the charges.

 

[markef]

Sure they did. The problem is they had no defense. Half of these guys filmed their own crimes and the other half bragged about it to their buddies.

If an unsuspecting peaceful protester entered the Capitol through an open door with a Capitol police officer at the door and that protester did not know the building was off-limits at that time, then why did vengeful corrupt democrats charge that individual with a crime?

 

[Marener]

If an unsuspecting peaceful protester entered the Capitol through an open door with a Capitol police officer at the door and that protester did not know the building was off-limits at that time, then why did vengeful corrupt democrats charge that individual with a crime?

You’d have to be pretty delusional to think it was okay to storm the capitol.

Being delusional is not a legal defense.

 

[markef]

You’d have to be pretty delusional to think it was okay to storm the capitol.

Being delusional is not a legal defense.

Democrats call a peaceful entry into the Capitol through a door held open by a police officer "STORMING THE CAPITOL." That inappropriate description could be the result of several factors such as:
1. Blind and ignorant devotion to lying leftist democrat leaders' narratives.
2. Addiction to leftist only news outlets.
3. Personal animosity toward Trump, conservtives, republicans, or Christians.
4. Stupidity.

 

[Correll]

You’d have to be pretty delusional to think it was okay to storm the capitol.

Being delusional is not a legal defense.

Plenty of examples of lefty "protestors" storming various government or private spaces, without any criminal prosecution or serious police response.

So, it would be completely reasonable, at the time, to think that it was part of the "new normal" of the time.

 

[Marener]

Democrats call a peaceful entry into the Capitol through a door held open by a police officer "STORMING THE CAPITOL." That inappropriate description could be the result of several factors such as:
1. Blind and ignorant devotion to lying leftist democrat leaders' narratives.
2. Addiction to leftist only news outlets.
3. Personal animosity toward Trump, conservtives, republicans, or Christians.
4. Stupidity.

Doors weren’t held open by the police. Did your innocent little rioters not notice all the tear gas? The riot gear? The fire alarms?

Don’t be delusional.

 

[Marener]

Plenty of examples of lefty "protestors" storming various government or private spaces, without any criminal prosecution or serious police response.

So, it would be completely reasonable, at the time, to think that it was part of the "new normal" of the time.

Name some.

 

[Correll]

Name some.

Why? Even if I do, you will just dismiss it on some pretext or another.

RIght? Nothing I say, or anyone says, will effect your position.

You are committed to teh lefty agenda, and willing to see people die in large numbers,...

hell, that might be the DRAW, for you, for all I know.

 

[Marener]

Why? Even if I do, you will just dismiss it on some pretext or another.

RIght? Nothing I say, or anyone says, will effect your position.

You are committed to teh lefty agenda, and willing to see people die in large numbers,...

hell, that might be the DRAW, for you, for all I know.

Why? To prove you aren’t talking out of your ass.

Coward.

 

[Correll]

Why? To prove you aren’t talking out of your ass.

Coward.

What do you care if I am talking out my ass?


My point is that you don't care if my point is correct or not.

You are on the side of the left regardless of whether or not my point is true.