About Those J6 “People”

[Alweysrite!]

Cool story dummy, but here what actually happened when Biden ran against Trump:

View attachment 1274902

LOL says the dummy who lost to Trump

 

[AntonToo]

LOL says the dummy who lost to Trump

...I never ran against anyone, including Trump.

Are you skipping meds or something?

 

[Political-Junkie]

Actually I didn't even respond to that, you are confused.

You didn't? Seems you did. You posted an article stating "lack of speedy trials."

It bears repeating, it would be a good idea for you to read what you post. That might help eliminate confusion.

Maybe you should look it up how many Sixers were jailed without a speedy trial.

Don't need to. I perfectly ok leaving your unproven claim unproven.

 

[Political-Junkie]

Investigated during a Democrat administration ? Yeah we see how well that went in the go along to get along BS.

No, in a case by case basis in numerous states, some led by Democrats and some by Republicans. Plus at least 2 others contracted out privately by Trump himself. No investigation, including Trump's own, found massive fraud.

 

[Political-Junkie]

So you lose the argument and then resort to ad hominem. Noted

You're funny. You don't post any evidence to show your claims are true, then pat yourself on the back as though you won anything.

 

[Political-Junkie]

The problem that you have is the Sixers where politically persecuted thus the whole prosecution of them is Tainted. A few of them are going to get away with some crap because the process was corrupt. Your fault

False. They are criminals who were rightfully prosecuted. And they're still convicted criminals.

 

[Political-Junkie]

That needs to end, otherwise if a judge goes stupid, then out they go with no exceptions.

If it was true, the way to end it would be to impeach offenders.

 

[Political-Junkie]

Judge Sullivan refused to free Flynn after an appeals court found he was wrongly convicted. Sullivan should be impeached.

This is just as false as it was last time you tried peddling it. Flynn's appeal was denied and Sullivan inquiry was allowed to continue. Trump ended the case by pardoning Flynn before Sullivan could rule on dismissing the case.

Setback for Michael Flynn as appeals court denies request to toss his case immediately

The saga of Trump's former national security adviser, who pleaded guilty to lying to the FBI, is likely to drag on for months.

www.nbcnews.com

 

[Political-Junkie]

No, it's not okay to charge someone(let alone hundreds of people) with a heinous crime(they did not commit) that could lock them up for decades when their only violation was something akin to trespassing or disturbing the peace. That's draconian. We don't do that in THIS country. That's the type of stuff they do in commie, left-wing banana republics. A corrupt effort to pull that stunt by Biden's DOJ is why ALL J6 protestors are now free. You can't target people illegally and not expect electoral backlash in a free nation.

It's the law. They broke it.

18 U.S. Code § 1752 - Restricted building or grounds

www.law.cornell.edu

No one was locked up for decades just for trespassing. That you think there were explains a lot.

No, if something is unconstitutional and/or illegal then it is ALWAYS wrong to do it. Do you think lynchings in the south 100 years ago were okay because prosecutors chose to look the other way towards the lynchers? Wrong is wrong. Trying to scrub history and pretend illegal actions were okay because someone said so wilts under honest scrutiny. This is particularly true when bias and bigotry are clearly involved (such as Biden's DOJ going after supporters of his primary political foe). The political motive here was as clear as racism was the motive behind black lynchings. You got caught and America responded in kind. Far past time to own it.

We're not talking about right versus wrong, or looking the other way. We're talking about the constitutionality of a law. All laws passed are constitutional until the Judicial branch rules otherwise. And until that happens, if it happens, prosecutors can seek indictments based on the law.

Except for the fact that segregation was almost uniformly a way of life in some areas of the country(if not most of the country) before this landmark decision. Biden's corrupt DOJ hijacking a law and twisting it in a way that it had never before been used nor intended is nowhere near the same. It was a politically motivated hitjob. You lost badly as a result.

The point is, like 18 USC 1512(c)(2), segregation was legal until the Supreme Court ruled it was unconstitutional.

 

[Political-Junkie]

"muh insurrection"!


Now comes the good part! The verdict by the American people over your claim:

J6 committee imploded and dumped into the ashbin of history
Jack Smith got slapped down and dumped into the ashbin of history
Every J6 protestor now walks free.
Last but not least.........Donald Trump and Republicans have won EVERY election since that day as America speaks! You get to call him "Mr President" as result!

If Republicans won every election since then, how was Trump's own Republican representative replaced with a Democrat?

 

[Lesh]

A federal judge ruled that President Clinton could declassify and keep any document he wanted to keep so blow your smoke somewhere else. Why not ride your leftist donkey to the courthouse and charge all the democrats who have been caught having stolen, kept, destroyed, leaked, and abused classified documents?

No federal judge ruled that way

Are you stupid or lying