About Those J6 “People”

[Correll]

Ironic because you're simultaneously wailing and moaning about the treatment of MAGA criminals.

Errr, no, it's not. It only looks like that, if you...don't understand what "civil rights" are.

But don't give a shit about black people dying at the hands of cops for no reason.

More racist lies.

"Recent" is 30 years ago.

And it wasn't even criminal.

Hilarious.

I'm a history buff. 30 years is recent. And he was not held to account for his actions.

Some of which were criminal.

You won't make an argument because that would mean you can be subject to criticism and critique of your argument.

You just demand that we accept your claims, because that's what you've been trained to do. You just accept what you're told to believe. You don't think for yourself.

And why should we accept your claims?

If we don't accept your claims, you'll get violent.

YOur shit talk is irrelevant.

 

[Marener]

Errr, no, it's not. It only looks like that, if you...don't understand what "civil rights" are.

But you don't care about the civil rights being violated when it's black people.

More racist lies.

All you do is ignore what you don't want to believe.

I'm a history buff. 30 years is recent. And he was not held to account for his actions.

Some of which were criminal.

Sexual harassment isn't criminal.

If you're a history buff, then you should have been complaining about Nixon not being held accountable. That's the kind of trend this country needs to reverse. If Nixon had been president in 2020, he would have never been in trouble. The hacks like you would have defended him and said that Watergate was "fake news".

YOur shit talk is irrelevant.

You're irrelevant because all you do is *****, moan and make empty threats.

 

[Correll]

But you don't care about the civil rights being violated when it's black people.

The riots happened not when "Civil rights" were violated, but when blacks criminals were killed by police, rightfully OR wrongfully.

Because of race mongering by the vile legacy media.

And the dems.

All you do is ignore what you don't want to believe.

Sexual harassment isn't criminal.

If you're a history buff, then you should have been complaining about Nixon not being held accountable. That's the kind of trend this country needs to reverse. If Nixon had been president in 2020, he would have never been in trouble. The hacks like you would have defended him and said that Watergate was "fake news".

You're irrelevant because all you do is *****, moan and make empty threats.

I am not threatening you, you drooling moron. I am pointing out the obvious consequences of your actions and hoping you wake the **** up, before it is too late.

Did I mention that you are an asshole?

 

[Lesh]

The riots happened not when "Civil rights" were violated, but when blacks criminals were killed by police, rightfully OR wrongfully.

Because of race mongering by the vile legacy media.

And the dems.




I am not threatening you, you drooling moron. I am pointing out the obvious consequences of your actions and hoping you wake the **** up, before it is too late.

Did I mention that you are an asshole?

Wow. When black criminals are killed wrongly that’s a violation of civil rights. How do you not know this?

 

[Political-Junkie]

Millions of Americans do not believe George Floyd was a victim of cop brutality and millions of Americans do not believe Ashli Babbitt was a victim of cop brutality.

Those millions of Americans must be crazy then since it was proven in court that George Floyd was murdered by a cop.

 

[postman]

If you're a history buff, then you should have been complaining about Nixon not being held accountable. That's the kind of trend this country needs to reverse. If Nixon had been president in 2020, he would have never been in trouble. The hacks like you would have defended him and said that Watergate was "fake news".

Trump fired twice as many Attorneys General than Nixon did.

Plus:
During the Watergate scandal, Richard Nixon’s secret campaign slush fund contained approximately $700,000 in cash.

Trumps Slush fund was $1.776 Billion.

Trump is orders of MAGA-tude bigger.

 

[postman]

The riots happened not when "Civil rights" were violated, but when blacks criminals were killed by police, rightfully OR wrongfully.

Actually riots are when criminals are WRONGFULLY killed by police.

You confuse some of the "rightful" shootings, with the "wrongful" shootings the police claim was "rightful"

Like when someone pulls out their wallet, and they mistake it for a gun.

 

[Correll]

Wow. When black criminals are killed wrongly that’s a violation of civil rights. How do you not know this?

Do you understand what it means when I typed "rightfully or wrongly"?

 

[Marener]

The riots happened not when "Civil rights" were violated, but when blacks criminals were killed by police, rightfully OR wrongfully.

Because of race mongering by the vile legacy media.

And the dems.

Being wrongfully killed by police seems like a civil rights violation to me.

It's funny that you don't care about how police treat "black criminals", but you're constantly whining about how police treated MAGA criminals.

I am not threatening you, you drooling moron. I am pointing out the obvious consequences of your actions and hoping you wake the **** up, before it is too late.

Did I mention that you are an asshole?

That's what constitutes a threat. You're telling us to ignore MAGA crimes or else you'll get violent.

It's like at the Capitol riot where the rioters told the police to get out of their way or get beaten by the MAGA mob.

But again, all you do is whine and complain, even when asked to do something totally reasonable like explain your actual argument instead of making people guess.

 

[Correll]

Actually riots are when criminals are WRONGFULLY killed by police.

No, there were definetly times when the killings were legit, and the media and dems still riled up some riots.

You confuse some of the "rightful" shootings, with the "wrongful" shootings the police claim was "rightful"

Nope.

Like when someone pulls out their wallet, and they mistake it for a gun.

I'm not going back at this time to find shit that you know happened, so.... shit talk if you want.

 

[Correll]

Being wrongfully killed by police seems like a civil rights violation to me.

The riots happened regardless of whether it was right or wrong.

That's the tell.

So, you want to admit that, or you want to play retard some more?

It's funny that you don't care about how police treat "black criminals", but you're constantly whining about how police treated MAGA criminals.

It is funny that you are constantly whining about black criminals, but you don't care about how police treat MAGA...."criminals".

That's what constitutes a threat. You're telling us to ignore MAGA crimes or else you'll get violent.

That is not what I said. EVer. You are lying to try to hide the reality of the situtation.

It's like at the Capitol riot where the rioters told the police to get out of their way or get beaten by the MAGA mob.

It is not like that.

I have repeatedly stated that I wanted the 1/6 rioters treated teh same as all the other rioters of the time.

But again, all you do is whine and complain, even when asked to do something totally reasonable like explain your actual argument instead of making people guess.

I am not playing retard games. YOu are constantly lying about what I have said, in order to avoid addressing what I have actually said.

 

[postman]

Do you understand what it means when I typed "rightfully or wrongly"?

It means you associate riots with BOTH of them.

When they only occur when someone is "wrongly" killed.

 

[Rawley]

I am not playing retard games. YOu are constantly lying about what I have said, in order to avoid addressing what I have actually said.

It's the way she rolls.

 

[Lesh]

The riots happened regardless of whether it was right or wrong.

That's the tell.

So, you want to admit that, or you want to play retard some more?



It is funny that you are constantly whining about black criminals, but you don't care about how police treat MAGA...."criminals".






That is not what I said. EVer. You are lying to try to hide the reality of the situtation.





It is not like that.

I have repeatedly stated that I wanted the 1/6 rioters treated teh same as all the other rioters of the time.





I am not playing retard games. YOu are constantly lying about what I have said, in order to avoid addressing what I have actually said.

No. The protests (that in some cases turned into riots) happened because the killing of that black man was egregiously wrong and nearly everyone could see that

 

[postman]

Being wrongfully killed by police seems like a civil rights violation to me.

It's funny that you don't care about how police treat "black criminals", but you're constantly whining about how police treated MAGA criminals.

That's what constitutes a threat. You're telling us to ignore MAGA crimes or else you'll get violent.

It's like at the Capitol riot where the rioters told the police to get out of their way or get beaten by the MAGA mob.

But again, all you do is whine and complain, even when asked to do something totally reasonable like explain your actual argument instead of making people guess.

It's amazing how they take the opposite view, when it comes to their own.
They believe their people should be able to assault police officers. Attack them with deadly weapons. That's it's even patriotic to use the US flag on a pole to attack police.

But that's just them.

 

[postman]

No. The protests (that in some cases turned into riots) happened because the killing of that black man was egregiously wrong and nearly everyone could see that

This often doesn't happen right away. The police claim it was a justified killing. But then cellphone video comes out of what ACTUALLY happened. And that's why people see it as a "wrongful" killing, and take to the streets.

When police make a "wrongful" killing, but admit it up front, you don't have riots over it. Because it's not about the killing, but whether or not justice will be served.

 

[Marener]

The riots happened regardless of whether it was right or wrong.

That's the tell.

So, you want to admit that, or you want to play retard some more?

People jump to conclusions sometimes. That's human nature. Lord knows MAGA does this all the time.

It's still not a political event. No one is rioting on behalf of the democratic party.

It is funny that you are constantly whining about black criminals, but you don't care about how police treat MAGA...."criminals".

I don't recall "constantly whining about black criminals", but at least we have concrete evidence of police mistreatment and civil rights violations.

That's not the case with your argument about MAGA criminals. For one, you had to lie about police reaction to the Capitol riot. Two, you refuse to talk about DoJ handling of their cases but won't stop complaining about it.

That is not what I said. EVer. You are lying to try to hide the reality of the situtation.
It is not like that.

I have repeatedly stated that I wanted the 1/6 rioters treated teh same as all the other rioters of the time.

I am not playing retard games. YOu are constantly lying about what I have said, in order to avoid addressing what I have actually said.

Different riots, different jurisdictions, different crimes, different treatment.

The DoJ is not responsible for how other local prosecutors handle crime in their jurisdiction. This can't be grounds for complaining about civil rights violations.

The problem is you don't say shit, and just whine almost all the time. That makes it impossible to address what you said because there's no argument to refute.

 

[postman]

I have repeatedly stated that I wanted the 1/6 rioters treated teh same as all the other rioters of the time.

And they were treated just the same as all the other rioters at the time.
Every rioter, whether on the street or at the capitol, who could be positively identified by being caught on video committing a crime, was charged with a crime. Those that police officers could positively identify, and committing crimes were charged with a crime.

Everybody who was presented to the DA or US Attorney with sufficient evidence to indict and convict them. Were indicted and tried.

You are whining that the night-time or masked rioters weren't brought to justice, because they didn't have actual evidence to indict them.

 

[Correll]

People jump to conclusions sometimes. That's human nature. Lord knows MAGA does this all the time.

It was not people "jumping to conclusions". It was nation wide orchestrated race mongering propaganda campaigns and then violent, deadly riots.

It's still not a political event. No one is rioting on behalf of the democratic party.

It was political violence to achieve political goals. Far left political goals.

Your denial of this obvious fact, is you being a lying whore.

I don't recall "constantly whining about black criminals", but at least we have concrete evidence of police mistreatment and civil rights violations.

Here you are whining about black criminals, that you just denied doing, right above.

Leftards are retarded.

That's not the case with your argument about MAGA criminals. For one, you had to lie about police reaction to the Capitol riot. Two, you refuse to talk about DoJ handling of their cases but won't stop complaining about it.

Different riots, different jurisdictions, different crimes, different treatment.

A lot of different riots, in different jurisdictions, with lot of different cfrimes, and yet, really only TWO general catogories of treatment.

The one republican riot got the HAMMER brought down, HARD.

The rest, kind of just swept under the rug and forgotten.

The DoJ is not responsible for how other local prosecutors handle crime in their jurisdiction. This can't be grounds for complaining about civil rights violations.

Someone is responsible for the difference. And it is clearly a valid grounds for complaining about civil rights.

I want my civil rights respected. Mine and those of my people.

The problem is you don't say shit, and just whine almost all the time. That makes it impossible to address what you said because there's no argument to refute.

My points are clear. That is why you lie about them so much. So that you can avoid admitting that you are the bad guy, you commie scum.

 

[postman]

A lot of different riots, in different jurisdictions, with lot of different cfrimes, and yet, really only TWO general catogories of treatment.

The one republican riot got the HAMMER brought down, HARD.

The rest, kind of just swept under the rug and forgotten.

What you refuse to admit. Is they were all treated equally, based on the evidence they had against them.
The rioters were a prosecutors nightmare, because the police had little if any actual evidence of who committed what crime. Ten people standing around a burning police car means nothing, without having evidence of who set the car on fire.