About Those J6 “People”

It was ginned up race riots, based on anti-white racist lies.

And anti-white racism is a political issue and the anti-white racism is a LEFTY policy position, in our society today.
It was based on dead black people at the hands of cops, and has been an issue in society for centuries. It wasn't about one political party winning elections.
Bill CLinton was a sexual harrasser and your side successfully defended him.

So, "accountability" is shit talk.
Sexual harassment is a civil issue and the claim was settled out of court.

You do know that with Trump we are talking about criminal violations, including obstruction of justice and fraud. These are serious issues with significant penalties.
Politically motivated prosecutions lead to POLITICAL PRISONERS.

It is a violation of civil rights. You play this game, you are choosing violence and oppression.
They weren't politically motivated. They were motivated by wanting to hold people accountable for their crimes.
YOur denial is irrelevant. You will be judged on your actual actions. Our response will be based on your actual actions.

And more. And all true. Your denial is irrelevant.

You are being an asshole, with your stonewalling on bald faced lies and shit behavior. I am responding appropriately.

And again, you are pretending to not know what incitement is.

That is you being a dishonest asshole. That type of shit behavior, deserves insults in return.
You're not making an argument here, just whining.

You should consider making an argument with facts and evidence. You're all over the map and it's hard to know exactly what you're talking about sometimes.
Equal protection clause is the big one. As you well know. You dishonest whore.
I'd love to respond, but you need to provide a more thorough argument to respond to. What do you mean exactly by a violation of the equal protection clause
Here you are lying again. You dishonest whore.
Such a potty mouth. I'm getting tired of your whining. Are you ever going to make a coherent argument?
 
Last edited:
It was based on dead black people at the hands of cops, and has been an issue in society for centuries. It wasn't about one political party winning elections.

It was based on the lie of America being a racist society. That is a democrat platform.

THe riots were lefty, democrat anti-white riots.

It was about POLITICS.


Sexual harassment is a civil issue and the claim was settled out of court.

Sexual harassment is a POLITICAL issue and the dems gave their man a pass becasue of POLITICS.

So, take your shit talk of ACCOUNTABILITY and shove it up your ass.

You do know that with Trump we are talking about criminal violations, including obstruction of justice and fraud. These are serious issues with significant penalties.

They weren't politically motivated. They were motivated by wanting to hold people accountable for their crimes.

You're not making an argument here, just whining.

You should consider making an argument with facts and evidence. You're all over the map and it's hard to know exactly what you're talking about sometimes.

The lawfare against Trump is not compatable with democracy or peaceful transfer of power.

You keep this up, and our nation will NOT be democracy or peaceful transfer of power.

This is your choice.



I'd love to respond, but you need to provide a more thorough argument to respond to. What do you mean exactly by a violation of the equal protection clause

These issues have been debated to death for years now.

For you to demand details is a stalling tactic.

You support the oppression, because you SUPPORT THE OPPRESSION.




Such a potty mouth. I'm getting tired of your whining. Are you ever going to make a coherent argument?

What is there to argue? You are stonewalling on your support of oppression, and playing retard, to not think about the obvious eventual consequences of your actions.
 
It was based on the lie of America being a racist society. That is a democrat platform.

THe riots were lefty, democrat anti-white riots.

It was about POLITICS.
Parts of society are racist. Sorry that bothers you.
Sexual harassment is a POLITICAL issue and the dems gave their man a pass becasue of POLITICS.

So, take your shit talk of ACCOUNTABILITY and shove it up your ass.
You're changing the subject, this is about accountability for criminal actions.
The lawfare against Trump is not compatable with democracy or peaceful transfer of power.

You keep this up, and our nation will NOT be democracy or peaceful transfer of power.

This is your choice.
You just call it lawfare because you don't want to see Trump face accountability.

If someone commits a crime and is prosecuted for it, why would that be considered lawfare?
These issues have been debated to death for years now.

For you to demand details is a stalling tactic.

You support the oppression, because you SUPPORT THE OPPRESSION.
My demand is so that I don't have to make incorrect assumptions about your argument, because lord knows that if I were to get anything wrong about what you're saying, then you'd throw a big hissy fit.

So you want it both ways. You don't want me to assume anything about your argument or get anything wrong about it, but you also don't want to explain your argument.

Don't be a child.
What is there to argue? You are stonewalling on your support of oppression, and playing retard, to not think about the obvious eventual consequences of your actions.
Prosecuting criminals isn't violating their rights.

Your side has lied a lot about the January 6th defendants. It's common for people on the right to claim they were jailed for long periods of time without charges. That's a lie.

Claims of selective and vindictive prosecution have been brought up in court and always failed because there is no evidence of it.

You're threatening to destroy the country and the rule of law over a fantasy.

Grow up.
 
There's a reason for that. Babbitt was not innocent nor was she a victim. Her death is being used by the Right as a means to distract from how she came to be there, trump's facilitation of the riot by doing nothing to stop it for hours, and the credible threat to congressmen posed by the mob if the barricade she was climbing through had been compromised.
Millions of Americans do not believe George Floyd was a victim of cop brutality and millions of Americans do not believe Ashli Babbitt was a victim of cop brutality.
 
I am not sure leftists really care about injuries to cops.

Copilot Search Branding

Police Officers Hospitalized with Head Injuries in 2020 Riots
There is no single, audited figure for only head-injury hospitalizations among police officers during the 2020 George Floyd protests, but multiple reports and tallies from that period provide context.

The Major Cities Chiefs Association (MCCA) estimated that over 2,000 police officers nationwide were injured during the first weeks of the summer 2020 protests, with injuries ranging from blunt force trauma to gunshot wounds factually.co+1. While the MCCA did not break out head injuries specifically, many of the reported injuries were consistent with head trauma from projectiles such as bricks, bottles, and fire extinguishers True North.

Local data show that head injuries were a common type of injury. For example:

  • Chicago reported 132 officers injured in violent riots, with one officer seriously injured and broken bones The Cullman Tribune.
  • New York City saw nearly 400 NYPD officers injured in two weeks of protests, including those struck by vehicles, bricks, and other projectiles factually.co+1.
  • Las Vegas had an officer shot in the head during a protest, and 12 others injured in the same incident The Cullman Tribune.
  • Los Angeles reported 27 LAPD officers injured, one with a fractured skull The Cullman Tribune.
While the exact number of officers hospitalized specifically with head injuries is not compiled in public reports, the aggregate injury counts and local incident descriptions suggest that a significant proportion of the 2,000+ injuries nationwide involved head trauma. This means the number of such hospitalizations was likely in the hundreds, but without a dedicated head-injury-only tally, it cannot be precisely quantified.

Summary:

  • National total injured: Over 2,000 officers (MCCA, May–July 2020) factually.co+1.
  • Head injuries: Common in many incidents; exact hospitalization count not published, but likely hundreds nationwide.
  • Examples: Chicago, NYC, Las Vegas, LA all reported multiple officers with head injuries during the unrest True North+1.
1782154456028.webp
 
It was about police killing black people. What's political about that?
Blacks kill dozens of cops each year in the US, but what drives the Black Lives Matter mobs to rioting and looting is when a cop kills a black man in self defense or when a black man dies while violently resisting arrest. In such cases of increased danger to cops attempting the arrest the perp being arrested is almost always responsible for the escalation in the violence.
 
01.23.2020

Justice Dept. Admitted it Lacked Probable Cause in Carter Page FISAs​


You are not understanding what that has to do with the claim at issue - spying on Trump

Carter Page never directly spoke to Trump.
So how the hell can you possibly spy on Trump by tapping Page's communications?
 
You are not understanding what that has to do with the claim at issue - spying on Trump

Carter Page never directly spoke to Trump.
So how the hell can you possibly spy on Trump by tapping Page's communications?
I feel inadequate when it comes to trying to explain how and why the illegal FISA spy warrants were directed at Trump.
 
I feel inadequate when it comes to trying to explain how and why the illegal FISA spy warrants were directed at Trump.

It's not because you are inedequate, it's because IT'S NONSENSE.

There is no evidence Trump himself was illicitly spied on.
 
Millions of Americans do not believe George Floyd was a victim of cop brutality and millions of Americans do not believe Ashli Babbitt was a victim of cop brutality.
Millions of assholes

And hundreds of millions realize he was killed by a rogue cop
 
Who in the world is going to understand this incoherent word salad?? What the f are you talking about?

Maybe Carter Page warrant? Thats your evidence that Trump was spied on? Listening in on a guy who never directly spoke to Trump?
Word salad, yet you addressed the content of it or rather you attempted too... 😆

Give a leftist a rope, and he'll hang himself with it every time.
 
It's not because you are inedequate, it's because IT'S NONSENSE.

There is no evidence Trump himself was illicitly spied on.
The radical leftist TDS judge who signed the illegal warrants was given the lie by James Comey that the Steele dossier was accurate information. Neither Boasberg nor Comey were that stupid but anyone who believes they were not illegally gunning for Trump is that stupid.
 
The radical leftist TDS judge who signed the illegal warrants was given the lie by James Comey that the Steele dossier was accurate information. Neither Boasberg nor Comey were that stupid but anyone who believes they were not illegally gunning for Trump is that stupid.
Link
 
Millions of assholes

And hundreds of millions realize he was killed by a rogue cop
I've heard it all before, ad nauseum. O.J. was innocent. Zimmerman was guilty. Rodney King was innocent. Darren Wilson was guilty. Jussie Smollett was innocent. His MAGA attackers were guilty. Karmelo Anthoney was innocent. Austin Metcalf was guilty. Crystal Mangum was innocent. The entire Duke lacrosse team was guilty.
 
The radical leftist TDS judge who signed the illegal warrants was given the lie by James Comey that the Steele dossier was accurate information. Neither Boasberg nor Comey were that stupid but anyone who believes they were not illegally gunning for Trump is that stupid.

NONE of that had to do with any actual illegal spying on Trump.

The target of these warrants was Carter Page, who never communicated with Trump and at the time of the warrants has already left the campaign.

Try to put togather whatever braincells you have left to understand that very simple fact.
 
Last edited:
15th post
Back
Top Bottom