About Those J6 “People”

[Correll]

Who had "dem" flags in those riots?

Who chanted fight for ____ (fill in the blank with a Democrat's name)?

Which riot tried to stop a republican president-elect from being certified?

Antifa and blm are both far left organizations that started their riots after Trump was elected, during the period of RESIST, and stopped them, right after Biden was elected.

Your pretense that there is no connection, is they type of thing that only a far left zealot would say.

Anyone else would have a soul and feel shame over saying such a bold faced lie.

 

[Correll]

Trump's FBI did that? Why?

Here the leftard will use the FLEDGLING TACTIC and pretend to not know about the way that the fbi has been politicized by the dems, into a partisan organization that runs illegal operations to support the dems, even under republican administrations.

You really have no shame at all, do you? You are disgusting.

 

[Correll]

Ok, we'll go with Miller lied. Trump didn't tell him 10,000 NG would be needed.

Happy now?

The fbi had both the proud boys and the oath keepers infiltrated.


What did they do with the information they got?

 

[Mac1958]

Thanks for admitting there's no proof Byrd murdered Babbitt.

On the day of the Insurrection, the flock was in here making excuses, lying, downplaying and spraying out conspiracy theories before the smoke had even cleared. One of them later told me that -- and I'm not making this up -- that the video of the violence that day was actually a Hollywood production.

These people think they're serious, credible, intelligent, educated, informed and strong. I presume that helps them in some way. Fine, whatever.

 

[berg80]

When are you going to prove that? Your words are meaningless.

He can't prove it because it didn't happen. There has never been any evidence of what he said and there never will be.

What's problematic about that is The Following does not require factual evidence in order to believe something. Like religion, their beliefs are based on blind faith and are therefore intractable.

 

[Correll]

On the day of the Insurrection, the flock was in here making excuses, lying, downplaying and spraying out conspiracy theories before the smoke had even cleared. One of them later told me that -- and I'm not making this up -- that the video of the violence that day was actually a Hollywood production.

These people think they're serious, credible, intelligent, educated, informed and strong. I presume that helps them in some way. Fine, whatever.

The 1/6 riot does not define maga.

The hundreds of lefty riots and the support of those riots by dem politicians, does define the dem party.

 

[berg80]

Lefties refuse to believe the cop shot the innocent victim for racist reasons.

There's a reason for that. Babbitt was not innocent nor was she a victim. Her death is being used by the Right as a means to distract from how she came to be there, trump's facilitation of the riot by doing nothing to stop it for hours, and the credible threat to congressmen posed by the mob if the barricade she was climbing through had been compromised.

 

[Mac1958]

There's a reason for that. Babbitt was not innocent nor was she a victim. Her death is being used by the Right as a means to distract from how she came to be there, trump's facilitation of the riot by doing nothing to stop it for hours, and the credible threat to congressmen posed by the mob if the barricade she was climbing through had been compromised.

That day was based on a lie that a vast majority of them believe to this day.

Sadly, tragically, Babbitt had fully fallen for it.

 

[22lcidw]

There's a reason for that. Babbitt was not innocent nor was she a victim. Her death is being used by the Right as a means to distract from how she came to be there, trump's facilitation of the riot by doing nothing to stop it for hours, and the credible threat to congressmen posed by the mob if the barricade she was climbing through had been compromised.

January 6 was really not much of anything. It was the elites making sure that no one interferes with the government by attempting to use fear in any questioning of their coup. In reality the coup happened many decades ago in different levels and over time.

 

[berg80]

That day was based on a lie that a vast majority of them believe to this day.

Wait..........your saying the 7M votes making up Biden's margin of victory weren't all fraudulent? What about the Italian satellites and the bamboo in the ballot paper?

The great bamboo hunt: Arizona’s bizarre vote-examination effort gets more bizarre​

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/05/06/great-bamboo-hunt-arizonas-bizarre-vote-examination-effort-gets-more-bizarre/

 

[Mac1958]

Wait..........your saying the 7M votes making up Biden's margin of victory weren't all fraudulent? What about the Italian satellites and the bamboo in the ballot paper?

Holy crap, I had forgotten about the bamboo and the satellites.

 

[Correll]

That day was based on a lie that a vast majority of them believe to this day.

Sadly, tragically, Babbitt had fully fallen for it.

The one republican riot does not define maga.

The hundreds of lefty riots, and the support shown to them by dem politicians and partisans, does define the dem party.

 

[Marener]

The race riots of the Trump years were lefty riots that stopped the moment that Biden won.

Your denial is you being a piece of shit.

Protests in 2020 had died down well before the election, you're making things up to suit your narrative.

They weren't political. It hade nothing to do with Dems and Biden.

The lawfare that your side is trying to normalize, is the end of democracy. We will not put up that that form of oppression.

You keep this up, and you will get increased political conflict and violence.

I think we are trying to normalize accountability even for people who are in high political office. Our country has had a problem with this, especially after Nixon. That's bad for the country. The president should have to follow the laws.

Your attitude is exactly the thing that everyone is afraid of, that prosecuting a criminal who is politically powerful will lead to violence. I don't think that's the right attitude for someone who supposedly says they're a nation of laws, not men.

Trump should have faced the criminal justice system because there was ample evidence that he committed crimes.

Only a completely dishonest asshole would pretend that my point about the way that leftards incite violence for propaganda purposes, is not their normal operating procedure.

You are a lying whore.

You're a potty mouth.

Your belief that leftists incite violence has nothing to do with January 6th. We saw where the violence came from and it all came from Trump's most devout followers.

Except republicans riot like once every generation. So, no one was EXPECTING violence. YOur words are retarded.

And yet Trump's supporters blame Nancy Pelosi for not preparing for violence. See the conflict there?

No one denies that the few people that committed real violence, or actually damaged shit, should have been prosecuted.

Apparently, Trump denies that because he pardoned all of them.

That, at this late date, you are still pretending to not know what the issue with the crackdown was, is you being a compete asshole.

The issue is that you don't like seeing people you identify with have to be prosecuted for their crimes.

You claim that there were civil rights violations, like a lot of people, but those claims are almost entirely bullshit.

YOur insistence on being divisive is not a good idea. Have you thought about what a civil war will mean for you and your people?

I'm adhering to reality. If that's divisive to you, then you're the one that needs to change.

Your threats of violence don't work on me.

 

[Lesh]

https://archive.is/vy9Gl

Explaining the Missing Context of Tucker Carlson's Jan. 6 Presentation - FactCheck.org

On Jan. 6, 2021, about 140 police officers were assaulted during the Capitol riot, and 326 participants -- more than 100 armed with weapons -- have been charged. But Fox News commentator Tucker Carlson has used recently released video from that day to misleadingly minimize the violence at the...

www.factcheck.org

 

[berg80]

Holy crap, I had forgotten about the bamboo and the satellites.

You should look in to it. It's probably going to be how the D's take back the House. That and the millions of votes from illegal immigrants. The ones that caused trump to lose the popular vote to Hillary.

 

[Correll]

Protests in 2020 had died down well before the election, you're making things up to suit your narrative.

They weren't political. It hade nothing to do with Dems and Biden.

They were clearly political. Your denial is absurd. You are being an asshole.

I think we are trying to normalize accountability even for people who are in high political office. Our country has had a problem with this, especially after Nixon. That's bad for the country. The president should have to follow the laws.

Yeah, I remember the way you libtards rallied around Bill Clinton, so you can shove that shit talk back where it came from.

Your attitude is exactly the thing that everyone is afraid of, that prosecuting a criminal who is politically powerful will lead to violence. I don't think that's the right attitude for someone who supposedly says they're a nation of laws, not men.

Trump should have faced the criminal justice system because there was ample evidence that he committed crimes.

Political arrests will lead to a political response. You keep it up, and it will lead to political violence.

We will not accept lawfare as a new normal.

You're a potty mouth.

Your belief that leftists incite violence has nothing to do with January 6th. We saw where the violence came from and it all came from Trump's most devout followers.

Except that incitement and entrapment are normal fbi tactics and normal lefty tactics.

Your denial is absurd. It might help you cope with the results of your actions, but it will not change how we view it, and we will base our response on the truth, not your lies.

And yet Trump's supporters blame Nancy Pelosi for not preparing for violence. See the conflict there?

NO, explain it, retard.

Apparently, Trump denies that because he pardoned all of them.

The pardons were because of the mass violation of their rights.

You are being a dishonest asshole.

The issue is that you don't like seeing people you identify with have to be prosecuted for their crimes.

You claim that there were civil rights violations, like a lot of people, but those claims are almost entirely bullshit.

YOur denial of the mass violation of their rights, is you supporting that violation of civil rights on a large scale.

The left, teh dem party is the party of oppression and anti-human rights.

I'm adhering to reality. If that's divisive to you, then you're the one that needs to change.

Your threats of violence don't work on me.

I'm not threatenging you. I am trying to get you to consider the obvious consequence of your actions.


YOu drooling retarded asshole.

 

[berg80]

Holy crap, I had forgotten about the bamboo and the satellites.

All of this has been known for a while, and all of it suggests that the motivation for the audit is not “transparency and answers” so much as “cobbling together a rationale for claims about fraud.” But no element of the review better captures its nature than an element that was revealed on Wednesday.
One of the people helping coordinate the review is John Brakey, founder of AUDIT Elections USA. Speaking to a reporter from a local CBS affiliate, he explained one of the tests that was being conducted as part of the review process.

“There’s accusations that 40,000 ballots were flown in to Arizona and it was stuffed into the box, okay?” Brakey said. “And it came from the southeast part of the world, Asia, okay? And what they’re doing is to find out if there’s bamboo in the paper.” Because, he added later, “they use bamboo in their paper processing, people in southeast Asia.”

He discussed the high-definition cameras being used to photograph the ballots, noting that it was a process that could identify if ballots were hand-completed. He also made clear that he didn’t really believe the bamboo-ballot theory.

 

[Correll]

All of this has been known for a while, and all of it suggests that the motivation for the audit is not “transparency and answers” so much as “cobbling together a rationale for claims about fraud.” But no element of the review better captures its nature than an element that was revealed on Wednesday.
One of the people helping coordinate the review is John Brakey, founder of AUDIT Elections USA. Speaking to a reporter from a local CBS affiliate, he explained one of the tests that was being conducted as part of the review process.

“There’s accusations that 40,000 ballots were flown in to Arizona and it was stuffed into the box, okay?” Brakey said. “And it came from the southeast part of the world, Asia, okay? And what they’re doing is to find out if there’s bamboo in the paper.” Because, he added later, “they use bamboo in their paper processing, people in southeast Asia.”

He discussed the high-definition cameras being used to photograph the ballots, noting that it was a process that could identify if ballots were hand-completed. He also made clear that he didn’t really believe the bamboo-ballot theory.

So, they are checking to see if the paper used on the ballots all match with the paper that was used on the official, legitimate ballots?


That seems completely reasonable.


Why are you acting like it's not?

 

[Marener]

They were clearly political. Your denial is absurd. You are being an asshole.

It was about police killing black people. What's political about that?

Yeah, I remember the way you libtards rallied around Bill Clinton, so you can shove that shit talk back where it came from.

Clinton was accused of a minor charge of perjury and did face minor consequences for that. No one was threatening a civil war about it.

Political arrests will lead to a political response. You keep it up, and it will lead to political violence.

We will not accept lawfare as a new normal.

It's not lawfare. You just don't want your political allies to have to face consequences of their actions. You're not even defending their innonce, you're just saying they shouldn't be prosecuted.

The justice system is supposed to operate without fear or favor.

Except that incitement and entrapment are normal fbi tactics and normal lefty tactics.

Your denial is absurd. It might help you cope with the results of your actions, but it will not change how we view it, and we will base our response on the truth, not your lies.

It's easy to deny your accusations which have absolutely zero substance to them. There was no incitement or entrapment on January 6th. Your arguments are ridiculous.

You claim that Epps was inciting the crowd when he sad to go into the capitol PEACEFULLY.

You claim that the police were inciting the crowd when they were responding with standard crowd control measures to people fighting and injuring them.

NO, explain it, retard

Such an entitled potty mouth. It's weird I have to explain this to you.

Right wingers have said that Pelosi wanted the crowd to get violent and that's why she didn't accept the National Guard. But that argument makes no sense if we believe that people didn't really think the crowd would get violent.

The pardons were because of the mass violation of their rights.

You are being a dishonest asshole.

There was no mass violation of their rights. Feel free to make an argument otherwise.

YOur denial of the mass violation of their rights, is you supporting that violation of civil rights on a large scale.

The left, teh dem party is the party of oppression and anti-human rights.

What rights were violated?

I'm not threatenging you. I am trying to get you to consider the obvious consequence of your actions.

YOu drooling retarded asshole.

Yeah, that's a threat.

 

[Correll]

It was about police killing black people. What's political about that?

It was ginned up race riots, based on anti-white racist lies.

And anti-white racism is a political issue and the anti-white racism is a LEFTY policy position, in our society today.

Clinton was accused of a minor charge of perjury and did face minor consequences for that. No one was threatening a civil war about it.

Bill CLinton was a sexual harrasser and your side successfully defended him.

So, "accountability" is shit talk.

It's not lawfare. You just don't want your political allies to have to face consequences of their actions. You're not even defending their innonce, you're just saying they shouldn't be prosecuted.

Politically motivated prosecutions lead to POLITICAL PRISONERS.

It is a violation of civil rights. You play this game, you are choosing violence and oppression.

The justice system is supposed to operate without fear or favor.

It's easy to deny your accusations which have absolutely zero substance to them. There was no incitement or entrapment on January 6th. Your arguments are ridiculous.

YOur denial is irrelevant. You will be judged on your actual actions. Our response will be based on your actual actions.

You claim that Epps was inciting the crowd when he sad to go into the capitol PEACEFULLY.

You claim that the police were inciting the crowd when they were responding with standard crowd control measures to people fighting and injuring them.

And more. And all true. Your denial is irrelevant.

Such an entitled potty mouth. It's weird I have to explain this to you.

You are being an asshole, with your stonewalling on bald faced lies and shit behavior. I am responding appropriately.

Right wingers have said that Pelosi wanted the crowd to get violent and that's why she didn't accept the National Guard. But that argument makes no sense if we believe that people didn't really think the crowd would get violent.

And again, you are pretending to not know what incitement is.

That is you being a dishonest asshole. That type of shit behavior, deserves insults in return.

There was no mass violation of their rights. Feel free to make an argument otherwise.

What rights were violated?

Equal protection clause is the big one. As you well know. You dishonest whore.

Yeah, that's a threat.

Here you are lying again. You dishonest whore.