About Those J6 “People”

He offered them to his Secretary of Defense who didn't act on it because he didn't think Trump was serious.

That is your claim. Can you prove it? Recall that you demanded I "prove" a verbal discussion between two other people, thousands of miles away, and you acted like it was a boo-yah gotcha moment.


You were a complete dick about it, and then when called on it, you stonewalled instead of admitting what a piece of shit you were being.
 
No, they're criminals too? Just like MAGA who illegally trespassed on the Capitol.
Many in the mixed left-wing and right-wing multitude were no doubt misled to believe they were not violating any laws by entering through doors guarded by Capitol police officers.
 
Because no democrats were caught there.
Jussie Smollett and his hired boys may have claimed there were no democrats involved but they lied because they all were democrats pretending to be Trump supporters. Don't tell me looting and rioting democrats never pretend to be Trump supporters.
 
Disguised leftists infiltrated mob on J-6, Western Journal 6-23-21
That was based on this court questions/answers. There's no mention of a "leftist infiltrated mob." So why would you say that?



Defense Counsel Brad Geyer: Isn’t it true that you had a lot of people, a large quantity of people walking down two streets that dead-ended at the Capitol?

Mendoza: Yes, sir.

Geyer: And would it be fair to say that at least at some of the leading edges of that crowd, they contained bad people or provocateurs; is that fair?

Mendoza: It’s fair.

Geyer: Dangerous people?

Mendoza: Yes.

Geyer: Violent people?

Mendoza: Yes.

Geyer: Highly trained violent people?

Mendoza: Yes.

Geyer: Highly trained violent people who work and coordinate together?

Mendoza: Yes
 
Your shit talk is dismissed. The lefty riots were DEM riots. They rioted to oppose Trump and because they are anti-American and anti-white scum. Just like the dems.

Your side's use of violence and fear to achieve political goals, is a real issue that need to be addressed.

Your desire to avoid that discussion, is why you stonewall and exaggerate the 1/6 riot.




Yes, we did have to elect Trump. Otherwise, your lawfare would have worked and thus your victory would be postive reinforcement for your police state tactics.

If you want a civil war, that is a good path to get there quickly.







Trump ran on trade and immigration. Completely normal and valid political issues.

That your side went hysterical and scorched earth, is yoru side being the problem.

We cannot have a functioning democracy if your side refuses to allow us to pursue normal political goals, without violence and lawfare.









THe group as a whole were targetted to a degree far beyond the far more numerous dem rioters.

Your denial of this, is just your being a liar.


You don't get to violate our civil rights. You keep going back to that, we are going to notice.

And by notice, I mean fight you.





No. The 1/6 riot was a fluke. Your side is using violence, abuse of power adn fear, as a constant and normal way of doing shit.

YOu keep this up, and division and conflict, and political violence will only increase and escalate.
Who had "dem" flags in those riots?

Who chanted fight for ____ (fill in the blank with a Democrat's name)?

Which riot tried to stop a republican president-elect from being certified?
 
I bet that the fbi did tell teh dems about how pissed off the protestors were. And the dems saw a chance to set up an excuse for some serious police state actions.

All they had to do, was agitate and provoke a riot. Just a little one, and their media would blow it up, to some sort of massive issue.
Trump's FBI did that? Why?
 
no, it's not.


And don't forget, that you ran away, like a little girl from my reasonable question.


What percentage of your personal verbal conversations can you prove?


YOu acted like you had a gorcha moment withe me, and when called on it, instead of having the balls to take the L, you stonewalled like a *****.
Ok, we'll go with Miller lied. Trump didn't tell him 10,000 NG would be needed.

Happy now?
 
Lefties refuse to believe the cop shot the innocent victim for racist reasons. Strangely, I thought lefties frequently claimed cops were racists and murdered innocent victims because of their racist hatred.
Innocent? She was the first member of an angry mob breaching a police barricade.
 
Many in the mixed left-wing and right-wing multitude were no doubt misled to believe they were not violating any laws by entering through doors guarded by Capitol police officers.
Do I have to remind you again you have not posted any proof that any protester who went inside the Capitol was left-wing?
 
That was based on this court questions/answers. There's no mention of a "leftist infiltrated mob." So why would you say that?



Defense Counsel Brad Geyer: Isn’t it true that you had a lot of people, a large quantity of people walking down two streets that dead-ended at the Capitol?

Mendoza: Yes, sir.

Geyer: And would it be fair to say that at least at some of the leading edges of that crowd, they contained bad people or provocateurs; is that fair?

Mendoza: It’s fair.

Geyer: Dangerous people?

Mendoza: Yes.

Geyer: Violent people?

Mendoza: Yes.

Geyer: Highly trained violent people?

Mendoza: Yes.

Geyer: Highly trained violent people who work and coordinate together?

Mendoza: Yes
The fact that a small group of individuals do not mention the leftist infiltration of the J-6 protests does not prove there were no leftists inciting violence in the crowd that day.
 
Who had "dem" flags in those riots?

Who chanted fight for ____ (fill in the blank with a Democrat's name)?

Which riot tried to stop a republican president-elect from being certified?
It appears that leftists in the crowd inciting violence that day were Jussie Smollett style lying leftist fake Trump supporters.
 
15th post
Innocent? She was the first member of an angry mob breaching a police barricade.
The evidence democrats tried to hide revealed that Babbitt was resisting the violence of others, proving the stupid cop was wicked for shooting her without just cause.

PROOF: Ashli Babbitt Tried To Stop Attack On Capitol Speaker’s Lobby | Tea Party Pac

PROOF: Ashli Babbitt Tried To Stop Attack On Capitol Speaker’s Lobby

(Tea Party PAC) – If you take a long look at the internal police documentation that exists concerning the shooting of Air Force veteran Ashli Babbitt by a U.S. Capitol Police officer during the riots that occurred on January 6th, 2021, then you know there was absolutely no reason for this woman to die.

Not one.

Well, WND is reporting that a brand new analysis performed by the folks over at the Epoch Times has revealed that it was actually Babbitt who “desperately tried to prevent rioters from vandalizing the doors leading to the Speaker’s Lobby at the Capitol that day, even stepping between one troublemaker and officers guarding the doors.”

Many Democrats, along with their boot lickers in the mainstream media, have spun a narrative designed to make Babbitt appear to be a rioter who was enthusiastically taking part in an “insurrection,” which is nothing more than a political claim to push the vilification of conservative Americans.

The report from the Epoch Times said that the “frame-by-frame video evidence” has confirmed that Babbitt was shot and killed by an officer, who, according to witnesses, neglected to issue a verbal warning, as the veteran attempted to get through a broken window.

“Video clips appear to show she tried to prevent the attack, not join it,” the Times stated (screenshots here and here).

The footage comes from John Sullivan, who also goes by the name Jayden X, and reveals that Babbitt “tried to stop the violence against the Speaker’s Lobby at least four times before she climbed into a broken window and was fatally shot by U.S. Capitol Police Lt. Michael Byrd. At one point, she was so distressed at the violence, she jumped up and down in frustration.”

An audio analysis performed of the video taken in the Capitol building also reveals that Babbitt shouted, “Stop! No! Don’t! Wait!,” according to her husband, Aaron Babbitt.
 
Do I have to remind you again you have not posted any proof that any protester who went inside the Capitol was left-wing?
Common sense would say that there were factions of the crowd that were agitators, left wing and right wing along with professional hired Stooges (Fbi cis). All of these subversive groups had a lot to gain that day. What turned a peaceful MAGA protest into this debacle was probably those groups, as MAGA is typically good people like Ashley Babbitt and older patriotic Americans.
The cops did a very poor job that day as well.
 
Last edited:
My verbal conversations have nothing to do with this. Your continued questions about my personal verbal conversations is really you admitting Trump didn't mention having 10,000 National Guard mobilized to anyone other than Miller. Means your attempts to avoid reality are actually contributing to my point that Trump didn't ask anyone but Miller to have 10,000 National Guard mobilized.

Here you are pretending to be retarded to avoid dealing with my point.

ie that only an asshole would demand proof of a verbal discussion.
 
Back
Top Bottom