About Those J6 “People”

[Lockback]

If you put it to bed, why are you still talking about it? And while you wish it would go away, it's not. It's already being taught in history classes around the country. In response to Trump's revisionist history of that day, some schools are banning portraying it as a peaceful protest. No matter how much you try to run from it, it will still be out there.

I'm talking about it because of your sick, twisted obsession with it that seriously rivals some kind of mental problem.
I don't give a flying F what you think about it. You're obsessive and you're a Leftist. And you're out of touch with the America that watched it all and then collectively said, "Well, we don't give a shit. We're going to re-elect him."
And they did.
And it was glorious.

 

[Political-Junkie]

As I stated previously, how many paid for deep dive forensic examinations of ballots?

I've already answered. Your ask is irrelevant as that is not something states do to certify elections. As I've pointed out, your standards are meaningless given you are not an arbitrator of what states need to do to validate their election results.

 

[Delldude]

Post the policy they violated.

Why did Steven Sund resign then?

To me anyway. If someone says something I believe to be false especially when they repeat a falsehood shown to be a falsehood, I will likely ask for proof.

Where's the proof then?

Your ask is irrelevant as that is not something states do to certify elections

So that makes your claims irrelevant too.

 

[Political-Junkie]

I'm talking about it because of your sick, twisted obsession with it that seriously rivals some kind of mental problem.
I don't give a flying F what you think about it. You're obsessive and you're a Leftist. And you're out of touch with the America that watched it all and then collectively said, "Well, we don't give a shit. We're going to re-elect him."
And they did.
And it was glorious.

Talk to the hand.

 

[Lockback]

Talk to the hand.

Here's my hand, pal.

 

[Political-Junkie]

Why did Steven Sund resign then?



Where's the proof then?


So that makes your claims irrelevant too.

Because he was the Chief of Police of the board in charge of Capitol security and he, and both Sergeant at Arms were pressured to resign by leaders from both parties.

The proof is the CPB rejected NG on 1/3 while trump "offered" 10,000 NG on 1/5.

 

[Political-Junkie]

Here's my hand, pal.

Oooh, rightie mad.

 

[Lockback]

Because he was the Chief of Police of the board in charge of Capitol security and he, and both Sergeant at Arms were pressured to resign by leaders from both parties.

The proof is the CPB rejected NG on 1/3 while trump "offered" 10,000 NG on 1/5.

Sund got railroaded to protect Nancy Pelosi's big fat ass.

 

[Alweysrite!]

Argument from incredulity is a logical fallacy

It was incredible, you got that right. What a sham, you were fooled.

Sorry, you're not my type.

Did you celebrate tranny day with the bidens at the White House?

 

[Political-Junkie]

Sund got railroaded to protect Nancy Pelosi's big fat ass.

Then why was the Senate Sergeant at Arms forced to resign?

 

[Lockback]

Oooh, rightie mad.

Ooooh, lefty stupid and obsessed.
And mad?
No, pal, if I were mad I would have excoriated you. I posted a cartoon with a laughing smilie.
Go change your diaper.

 

[Political-Junkie]

Did you celebrate tranny day with the bidens at the White House?

No, why?

 

[Lockback]

Did you celebrate tranny day with the bidens at the White House?

And don't forget ... it was on Easter Sunday.
I will never forgive that shit president for that.

 

[Political-Junkie]

Ooooh, lefty stupid and obsessed.
And mad?
No, pal, if I were mad I would have excoriated you. I posted a cartoon with a laughing smilie.
Go change your diaper.

Oooh, excoriate. Even more meaningless than an angry finger.

 

[Delldude]

Because he was the Chief of Police of the board in charge of Capitol security and he, and both Sergeant at Arms were pressured to resign by leaders from both parties.

He stated his request for NG was denied, intel wasn't shared . It's all documented, look it up.

The proof is the CPB rejected NG on 1/3 while trump "offered" 10,000 NG on 1/5

It was Bowser and Pelosi who weren't cool with the 'optics'.

Widely reported, look it up.

 

[Lesh]

He stated his request for NG was denied, intel wasn't shared . It's all documented, look it up.


It was Bowser and Pelosi who weren't cool with the 'optics'.

Widely reported, look it up.

He claims he THOUGHT the optics would be bad

That was his decision and that was why HE had to resign

 

[Lockback]

Oooh, excoriate. Even more meaningless than an angry finger.

There is nothing more meaningless than a leftist who's obsessed with something that was overblown that happened 5.5 years ago.
Your diaper rash is getting worse.

 

[Alweysrite!]

No matter how many times you declare I've lost, the Trump administration is still refusing to release anout 40% of the Epstein files, which is in violation of the law. Which really means America is losing, even if you don't understand why.

Looks like the doj has completed their obligation with the Epstein files. Not all of it can be released by the law. Bet you wish Biden hadn't been so lazy and
incompetent. LOL you lose,, get over it.

Perspectives​

• DOJ has completed its release obligations
  • The Department of Justice (DOJ) announced on January 31, 2026, that it had completed the release of the Epstein files, publishing approximately 3 million additional pages, bringing the total to nearly 3.5 million pages, in compliance with the Epstein Files Transparency Act.
    U.S. Department of Justice
    + 3
  • The DOJ stated that a rigorous process was undertaken to protect victims' privacy by redacting identifying information, although some victim names were improperly disclosed in early releases.
    Department of Justice
    + 7
  • Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche suggested there were no more leads to pursue in the case following the release of the files.

 

[Robert W]

Prove Trump offered Democrats 10,000 troops.

Here’s Who REALLY Denied National Guard Troops on January 6—And It Wasn’t Trump

Ever since President Trump federalized the National Guard to restore order in Los Angeles and protec

pjmedia.com

Transcripts Show President Trump's Directives to Pentagon Leadership to "Keep January 6 Safe" Were Deliberately Ignored​

September 20, 2024​

WASHINGTON - Committee on House Administration's Subcommittee on Oversight Chairman Barry Loudermilk (GA-11) revealed that days before January 6, 2021, President Trump met with senior Pentagon leaders urging them to do their jobs to protect lives and property. The transcripts released show Trump gave senior Pentagon leadership directives to keep January 6 peaceful - including using the National Guard - which the Pentagon leaders ignored. This revelation directly contradicts the conclusions drawn in the flawed DoD IG reporton January 6, 2021. In response to these revelations, Chairman Loudermilk released the following statement: “Pentagon leadership prioritized concerns of optics over their duty to protect lives,” said Chairman Loudermilk. “President Trump met with senior Pentagon leaders and directed them to make sure any events on January 6, 2021 were safe. It is very concerning that these Senior Pentagon officials ignored President Trump’s guidance AND misled Congressional Leaders to believe they were doing their job, when they were not. The DoD IG’s report is fundamentally flawed. It does not draw conclusions from the interviews they conducted, but pushes a narrative to keep their hands clean. We have many questions for them, and we will continue to dig until we are satisfied the American people know the truth." Click here or the image below to see the key excerpts from these transcripts. Click here to read the transcripts in full.

 

[Delldude]

He claims he THOUGHT the optics would be bad

That was his decision and that was why HE had to resign

Nah....was Bowser and Pelosi.

You argued this point unsuccessfully before.