About that DNC Server.

Better not let bergie or FortFreak see this, least their heads go.....

20120914120348Exploding-head.gif
 
The one the DNC had refused to allow the FBI or the Department of Homeland Security to conduct their own analysis of the server. As a result the FBI was forced to accept the report from CrowdStrike.

Bombshell: Crowdstrike admits 'no evidence' Russia stole emails from DNC server | The Grayzone
Epic thread fail. It's another piece of horseshit meant to confuse you weak minded dupes.


Republican-Led Review Backs Intelligence Findings on Russian Interference

WASHINGTON — For years, President Trump has derided the assessment by American intelligence officials that Russia interfered in the 2016 presidential election to assist his candidacy, dismissing it without evidence as the work of a “deep state” out to undermine his victory.
But on Tuesday, a long-awaited Senate review led by members of Mr. Trump’s own party effectively undercut those allegations. A three-year review by the Republican-led Senate Intelligence Committee unanimously found that the intelligence community assessment, pinning blame on Russia and outlining its goals to undercut American democracy, was fundamentally sound and untainted by politics.
 
The one the DNC had refused to allow the FBI or the Department of Homeland Security to conduct their own analysis of the server. As a result the FBI was forced to accept the report from CrowdStrike.

Bombshell: Crowdstrike admits 'no evidence' Russia stole emails from DNC server | The Grayzone
Epic thread fail. It's another piece of horseshit meant to confuse you weak minded dupes.

Was that sworn testimony, given under pains and penalties of perjury?

Nope.

Moonbat dupe fail.
 
The one the DNC had refused to allow the FBI or the Department of Homeland Security to conduct their own analysis of the server. As a result the FBI was forced to accept the report from CrowdStrike.

Bombshell: Crowdstrike admits 'no evidence' Russia stole emails from DNC server | The Grayzone
Epic thread fail. It's another piece of horseshit meant to confuse you weak minded dupes.


Republican-Led Review Backs Intelligence Findings on Russian Interference

WASHINGTON — For years, President Trump has derided the assessment by American intelligence officials that Russia interfered in the 2016 presidential election to assist his candidacy, dismissing it without evidence as the work of a “deep state” out to undermine his victory.
But on Tuesday, a long-awaited Senate review led by members of Mr. Trump’s own party effectively undercut those allegations. A three-year review by the Republican-led Senate Intelligence Committee unanimously found that the intelligence community assessment, pinning blame on Russia and outlining its goals to undercut American democracy, was fundamentally sound and untainted by politics.

You are either a very clever political operative trying to make the Dems look like fools, or a moron. Which is it?
 
The one the DNC had refused to allow the FBI or the Department of Homeland Security to conduct their own analysis of the server. As a result the FBI was forced to accept the report from CrowdStrike.

Bombshell: Crowdstrike admits 'no evidence' Russia stole emails from DNC server | The Grayzone
Epic thread fail. It's another piece of horseshit meant to confuse you weak minded dupes.


Republican-Led Review Backs Intelligence Findings on Russian Interference

WASHINGTON — For years, President Trump has derided the assessment by American intelligence officials that Russia interfered in the 2016 presidential election to assist his candidacy, dismissing it without evidence as the work of a “deep state” out to undermine his victory.
But on Tuesday, a long-awaited Senate review led by members of Mr. Trump’s own party effectively undercut those allegations. A three-year review by the Republican-led Senate Intelligence Committee unanimously found that the intelligence community assessment, pinning blame on Russia and outlining its goals to undercut American democracy, was fundamentally sound and untainted by politics.
________________________

There is nothing in that long horseshit cover-its-ass pasquinade by Crowdstrike which refutes the SWORN testimony quoted in the cite by the O.P.

WHICH SAYS UNDER OATH:

"Crowdstrike president Shawn Henry said that “we did not have concrete evidence” that alleged Russian hackers actually took the emails from DNC servers".

____

So, what we have is an O.P. who post something of interest, and you immediately call horsehit on it by citing something that has NO relevance at all to it.

This is an example of someone trying to add legitimate information to this board ( A Patriot) and you spamming it up with a nonsensical response that doesn't actually address the O.P. (like a Bolshevik Shill.)

So, get fucked.

---
 

Forum List

Back
Top