If they want to study something that makes a difference to anybody, they would do the study on people who use cocaine. And even then is that something the federal government should be doing when the national debt and the massive interest constantly increasing on that debt threatens to significantly do harm to the American people?
Why don't you be honest and say that it was wiped out by 9/11? In 2001, the Senate went Democrat.
You are absolutely hilarious!
And the Congress has never refused to raise the debt limit in the last 84 years either. As they ALWAYS raise it and invariable include a LOT of additional pork spending into every CR, I can see why Trump wants to do away with the debt limit entirely for now. It not only would save the American taxpayers billions and billions if Congress doesn't have opportunity to insert all that pork into the CRs but he won't be wasting his time doing this all over again a few months down the road.
Frustrating isn’t it?
I think giving Trump, DOGE and the other reformers in his administration and Congress a chance to do things differently, to make things better, to shake up a destructive status quo, might change the perspective of a lot of Americans.
Doesn’t matter that those incredibly expensive but useless experiments would only be a blip in the overall budget. The death of one black American is a drop in the bucket, compared to the massacre of black children by the abortion industry. Liberals worked up an a fury that killed hundreds of other people about George Floyd.
It's not. It's the OP's MO. Shotgun something and the minute you're called on it, run away and hide in "the meaning". Problem is, there is none.
We won't fix the deficit until we eliminate wasteful, inefficient, ineffective, unnecessary, corrupt spending and figure out how to prevent Congress from continuing to cause that to happen. We have the best chance we have had in a very long time for Trump, DOGE, other reformers to make that happen. Maybe they will fail. But they certainly deserve a chance to try.
Oh, sure man! I am certain two useless wars (for the outcome achieved, money spent and loss of life) had nothing to do with it, and he just never found is footing, clean up to the economic collapse of the banking industry. You know, how we all enjoyed the ride and the security of the direction of his leadership.
Fact! The debt ceiling is worthless because they ALWAYS raise it. And every so many months that we hit that debt ceiling, that gives Congress opportunity to insert many billions more pork into every CR bill that raises it. Trump wants to not be burdened with that in his early months in office but his intention is to eliminate as much bad spending by government as possible/reasonable and put us back onto a fiscally beneficial road.
That's why I'm seeing Chip Roy, though I do believe he is operating from a place of integrity, is short sighted to oppose the revised CR bill. All Trump wants is to get it done, get inaugurated, and get to work on making things better, especially economically, and doesn't want to be burdened with another of these debt ceiling fights in the early months of his Presidency. Yes the revised bill is imperfect and doesn't include the spending cuts Roy wants. But he isn't going to get what he wants with the current Senate and President. Why not do the best they can, which is the revised bill, and then help Trump and company fix things beginning January 20?
You've obviously never worked with a funding budget to run some entity, organization, government or whatever. Most especially a budget like our federal budget in which each department/agency gets more money only if they spend what they have been allocated. That is a blueprint for wasteful, inefficient, ineffective, unnecessary, even corrupt spending of great magnitude when you get into tens of billions of dollars. Your chart is meaningless to illustrate any of that.
OK Perfessor
If you are going to cite history to make your point here, please use honest history and not the propaganda version.Oh, sure man! I am certain two useless wars (for the outcome achieved, money spent and loss of life) had nothing to do with it, and he just never found is footing, clean up to the economic collapse of the banking industry. You know, how we all enjoyed the ride and the security of the direction of his leadership.
What's that hot mess?Oh, sure man! I am certain two useless wars (for the outcome achieved, money spent and loss of life) had nothing to do with it, and he just never found is footing, clean up to the economic collapse of the banking industry. You know, how we all enjoyed the ride and the security of the direction of his leadership.
You said 2000. We didn't go into Afghanistan until October 2001 and Iraq until 2003. You seem to be missing a lot of context. As per usual, you seem to run short on facts.Oh, sure man! I am certain two useless wars (for the outcome achieved, money spent and loss of life) had nothing to do with it, and he just never found is footing, clean up to the economic collapse of the banking industry. You know, how we all enjoyed the ride and the security of the direction of his leadership.
