ABC Panel Erupts Into Chaos After Chris Christie Dismantles the Credibility of Jan. 6 Committee

[M14 Shooter]

Yes, with the generation of brainwashed knuckleheads we got running around in their youth today, you are right. I'm not for blanket open carry also, but like you I'm 100% for CCW.

My AR pistol is kind hard to conceal.

 

[beagle9]

My AR pistol is kind hard to conceal.

AR's will get you killed by mistaken identity. Best to pull the real McCoy if gonna pull something in self defense.

 

[dudmuck]

Democrats CHEAT and RIG. With their party in shambles cheating and rigging is all they have left.

 

[Nostra]

 

[The5thHorseman]

Christie lays it out. The committee is a kangaroo court:

​

ABC Panel Erupts Into Chaos After Chris Christie Dismantles the Credibility of Jan. 6 Committee

redstate.com

​

​

Former Gov. Chris Christie created a firestorm on ABC News’ “This Week With George Stephanopoulos” on Sunday, with what he had to say about the Jan. 6 Committee. Christie pointed out that, to many Republicans, the Committee doesn’t have any credibility. That’s because they don’t have any real Republicans on the Committee to make any points against the Democratic narrative.​

​

The January 6 committee was “resigned to having a credibility problem because of the membership of the committee and the way that was done,” Christie opened by saying.​

​

“There are lots of Republicans across this country who just say, there’s nobody there to argue the other side. Kinzinger and Cheney don’t argue the other side to the extent that there is [sic] some arguments there,” Christie added before both anchor George Stephanopoulos and Brazile jumped down his throat.​

​

That comment sparked outrage from host George Stephanopoulos and fellow panelist Donna Brazile, both of whom have been Democratic operatives.​

​

...​

​

Stephanopoulos claimed there was “no other side,” and Brazile demanded to know, “What is the other side?” Christie spoke about the ability to grill the witnesses, something they would normally have at a hearing, which is missing here. Instead, he said, accurately, it was a television production. Brazile just kept shouting at Christie and would barely let him get in a word edgewise.​

​

When he finally got the chance to speak, Christie said, “There are lots of people inside the White House who now have convenient memories about things that didn’t have memories about them before.” But, the Trump team/Republicans weren’t given that option because that’s not allowed, to challenge the narrative. You’re not allowed to know that Trump spoke about acting “peacefully and patriotically” at his rally before the riot. You’re not allowed to question why Democrats didn’t conduct this like a normal hearing.​

​

But this is the Democrats’ view in general. Trump is guilty of pushing an “insurrection”–because they say so. He isn’t entitled to a defense. It doesn’t matter what he said, or what evidence might rebut their presumptions. They don’t believe in the rule of law, just the rule of the narrative. That’s why everyone on the Committee — including the Republicans — was already solidly anti-Trump, picked for their bias. That’s why House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) in an unprecedented move, rejected members who were picked by the Republican side who might have questioned the Democrats.​

​

The last person who should be talking about “credibility” is Donna Brazile. Can anyone forget how Brazile divulged debate questions to Clinton camp officials during the Democratic primaries in the 2016 race? Even the left excoriated her​

​

...​

​

But Christie accurately noted it’s because of that basic unfairness about the formation of the Committee, that most of America have turned the Committee off. They know it’s about trying to get Trump, not about the riot or the rule of law.​

​

“t’s very hard for Democrats to be able to make this a cutting issue, especially in the light of huge inflation, gas prices, crime in the streets, open borders, drug overdoses, those things are things that are affecting people’s everyday lives and they don’t see it that way,” Christie reasoned.​

​

That’s the bottom line. Democrats are pushing issues that aren’t the top issues of concern to voters. They thought they would use Jan. 6 to smear Republicans. But people know it’s a biased show; it’s backfiring on them because voters don’t think they care about anything else, including the issues that are most important to Americans.​

Bri,

Did you watch any of it?

The "democratic narrative" is entirely constructed from the sworn testimony of Republicans.

None of whom contradicted the others.

There is no other narrative, Bri.

Live with it.

 

[bripat9643]

Bri,

Did you watch any of it?

The "democratic narrative" is entirely constructed from the sworn testimony of Republicans.

None of whom contradicted the others.

There is no other narrative, Bri.

Live with it.

The ones who contradicted the Dim narrative weren't allowed to testify, you fucking moron. It was "constructed" from the story NAZI Pelosi and Schiffforbrains wanted to tell. "Constructed" is the right word.

 

[Billiejeens]

Bri,

Did you watch any of it?

The "democratic narrative" is entirely constructed from the sworn testimony of Republicans.

None of whom contradicted the others.

There is no other narrative, Bri.

Live with it.

It was an infomercial, nothing more.
A fictionalized depiction based loosely on actual events that may or may not have actually taken place.

 

[Mac-7]

Christie lays it out. The committee is a kangaroo court:

​

ABC Panel Erupts Into Chaos After Chris Christie Dismantles the Credibility of Jan. 6 Committee

redstate.com

​

​

Former Gov. Chris Christie created a firestorm on ABC News’ “This Week With George Stephanopoulos” on Sunday, with what he had to say about the Jan. 6 Committee. Christie pointed out that, to many Republicans, the Committee doesn’t have any credibility. That’s because they don’t have any real Republicans on the Committee to make any points against the Democratic narrative.​

​

The January 6 committee was “resigned to having a credibility problem because of the membership of the committee and the way that was done,” Christie opened by saying.​

​

“There are lots of Republicans across this country who just say, there’s nobody there to argue the other side. Kinzinger and Cheney don’t argue the other side to the extent that there is [sic] some arguments there,” Christie added before both anchor George Stephanopoulos and Brazile jumped down his throat.​

​

That comment sparked outrage from host George Stephanopoulos and fellow panelist Donna Brazile, both of whom have been Democratic operatives.​

​

...​

​

Stephanopoulos claimed there was “no other side,” and Brazile demanded to know, “What is the other side?” Christie spoke about the ability to grill the witnesses, something they would normally have at a hearing, which is missing here. Instead, he said, accurately, it was a television production. Brazile just kept shouting at Christie and would barely let him get in a word edgewise.​

​

When he finally got the chance to speak, Christie said, “There are lots of people inside the White House who now have convenient memories about things that didn’t have memories about them before.” But, the Trump team/Republicans weren’t given that option because that’s not allowed, to challenge the narrative. You’re not allowed to know that Trump spoke about acting “peacefully and patriotically” at his rally before the riot. You’re not allowed to question why Democrats didn’t conduct this like a normal hearing.​

​

But this is the Democrats’ view in general. Trump is guilty of pushing an “insurrection”–because they say so. He isn’t entitled to a defense. It doesn’t matter what he said, or what evidence might rebut their presumptions. They don’t believe in the rule of law, just the rule of the narrative. That’s why everyone on the Committee — including the Republicans — was already solidly anti-Trump, picked for their bias. That’s why House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) in an unprecedented move, rejected members who were picked by the Republican side who might have questioned the Democrats.​

​

The last person who should be talking about “credibility” is Donna Brazile. Can anyone forget how Brazile divulged debate questions to Clinton camp officials during the Democratic primaries in the 2016 race? Even the left excoriated her​

​

...​

​

But Christie accurately noted it’s because of that basic unfairness about the formation of the Committee, that most of America have turned the Committee off. They know it’s about trying to get Trump, not about the riot or the rule of law.​

​

“t’s very hard for Democrats to be able to make this a cutting issue, especially in the light of huge inflation, gas prices, crime in the streets, open borders, drug overdoses, those things are things that are affecting people’s everyday lives and they don’t see it that way,” Christie reasoned.​

​

That’s the bottom line. Democrats are pushing issues that aren’t the top issues of concern to voters. They thought they would use Jan. 6 to smear Republicans. But people know it’s a biased show; it’s backfiring on them because voters don’t think they care about anything else, including the issues that are most important to Americans.​

Donna Brazile is a bitch’s bitch

Her MO is to just keep talking and not allow the other side to speak

 

[Billiejeens]

The ones who contradicted the Dim narrative weren't allowed to testify, you fucking moron. It was "constructed" from the story NAZI Pelosi and Schiffforbrains wanted to tell. "Constructed" is the right word.

It was an infomercial.
Sham wow or Oxiclean do not feature people who say it doesn't work

 

[Billiejeens]

Donna Brazile is a bitch’s bitch

Her MO is to just keep talking and not allow the other side to speak

She gets her time and her affirmative action time.

 

[Concerned American]

Bri,

Did you watch any of it?

The "democratic narrative" is entirely constructed from the sworn testimony of Republicans.

None of whom contradicted the others.

There is no other narrative, Bri.

Live with it.

Who is Ray Epps?

 

[jc456]

The ones who contradicted the Dim narrative weren't allowed to testify, you fucking moron. It was "constructed" from the story NAZI Pelosi and Schiffforbrains wanted to tell. "Constructed" is the right word.

Like a prosecutor only trial with no defendant cross. The outcome will always be guilty

 

[The5thHorseman]

The ones who contradicted the Dim narrative weren't allowed to testify, you fucking moron. It was "constructed" from the story NAZI Pelosi and Schiffforbrains wanted to tell. "Constructed" is the right word.

Who wasn’t "allowed" to testify, Bri?

I want a name.

 

[The5thHorseman]

It was an infomercial, nothing more.
A fictionalized depiction based loosely on actual events that may or may not have actually taken place.

Why would all those Grifty appointees lie?

 

[The5thHorseman]

Who is Ray Epps?

A canard.

 

[jc456]

Who wasn’t "allowed" to testify, Bri?

I want a name.

Cross examiners

 

[The5thHorseman]

Cross examiners

You people are so damned stupid it's depressing

 

[jc456]

You people are so damned stupid it's depressing

It’s truly amazing how you have no idea how our system works in the USA

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

You people are so damned stupid it's depressing

The people you voted for gave us the highest gas prices in history, the highest inflation in 40 years, the highest interest rates in 14 years, the worst border problem ever with record border crossings, just put us another 1.7 trillion in the hole, and instead of addressing these situations, they spent the last two years seeking political revenge. Seems to me you are in no position to call anybody stupid.

 

[bripat9643]

Who wasn’t "allowed" to testify, Bri?

I want a name.

The Republicans had a long list of witnesses.

Don't play stupid.