I find it interesting when people would use the AARP and AMA as somehow being the standard by which Seniors and Doctors are measured. As I posted earlier the AARP is a the number 1 lobby group in Washington D.C. and as a group that provides insurance services under Govt. programs , is that a surprise that they would support a bill that they as a group would get wealthy from? Ask yourself this, if the AARP had intended to represent it's membership i.e. Seniors, don't you find it interesting they would support a bill that cuts 500 Billion from Medicare? So while AARP may support the bill I would not use that as an endorsement by it's membership.
As for the AMA it is much the same as the AARP and has for years been losing membership,
The American Medical Association posted a $28.1 million operating profit in 2005, its sixth consecutive year in the black, but also suffered
its sixth straight year of declining membership despite a national advertising campaign launched last spring to counter the trend.
Chicago-based AMA earned operating profit of about $40 million in 2004, and the decline in 2005 reflects the cost of the national advertising campaign, $22.1 million in 2005, roughly triple what the AMA spent on marketing and promotion in 2004.
AMA profitable in 2005 but membership continues to slide | Crain's Chicago Business
Seeing the increasing divergence between the perception that the AMA seeks to perpetuate among the general public and an increasingly angered physician population, Sermo polled the 100,000 US physicians in our community as to what they thought of the AMA. Within five days, over 4,100 US physicians voted on the poll and discussed it in over 700 comments. The results were nothing short of stunning –
89% of those physicians say, “the AMA does not speak for me” (See full survey results by clicking the image on the right).
So again when you toot the horn of those 2 organizations please use them in the perspective , and that is the Lobby part of AARP and AMA and not it's members may support the bill.