Zone1 A very questionable Board rule needs reconsideration

[BackAgain]

If you have an issue with moderator actions take it up privately with the Mod who took the action.

Why? What is the sound administrative purpose served by such a rule?

Why shouldn’t a disputed mod action be aired right here in “feedback?”

For example, let’s say a member has allegedly violated a particular board rule. (We can’t always tell if it’s one of those “never really enforced rules” or one that mods take seriously.) Now, let’s say the mod says s/he is moving it but actually just shuts it and hides it. Why shouldn’t a member be allowed to air his or her complaint about the mod action and seek a restoration of the post or thread? If you complain to a mod, often they don’t even answer.

Why not a little light on the matter? Sunlight is often a powerful disinfectant.

 

[toobfreak]

If you have an issue with moderator actions take it up privately with the Mod who took the action.

Not exactly. If you have an issue to take up with a mod action, though you might address it to just a given mod, they all take a look at it.

 

[okfine]

If you have an issue with moderator actions take it up privately with the Mod who took the action.

Why? What is the sound administrative purpose served by such a rule?

Why shouldn’t a disputed mod action be aired right here in “feedback?”

For example, let’s say a member has allegedly violated a particular board rule. (We can’t always tell if it’s one of those “never really enforced rules” or one that mods take seriously.) Now, let’s say the mod says s/he is moving it but actually just shuts it and hides it. Why shouldn’t a member be allowed to air his or her complaint about the mod action and seek a restoration of the post or thread? If you complain to a mod, often they don’t even answer.

Why not a little light on the matter? Sunlight is often a powerful disinfectant.

I guess you never heard the phrase "Said and Done"

 

[BackAgain]

Not exactly. If you have an issue to take up with a mod action, though you might address it to just a given mod, they all take a look at it.

Not really. Some mods don’t play quite on the level. And other mods either don’t see it or don’t choose to break ranks.

By the way, I acknowledge that this isn’t always true. But it is sometimes. And that’s why it would make sense to get rid of that particular rule.

 

[BackAgain]

I guess you never heard the phrase "Said and Done"

Well, there ^ Is an expectedly mindless reply.

 

[okfine]

Well, there ^ Is an expectedly mindless reply.

You have a problem making heads or tails of it.
You made a thread yesterday and I assume it's still blocking those necessary neurons to compute that rules are rules.

 

[occupied]

You are playing in their sandbox. I can only think of a couple of mod decisions I thought were arbitrary but in the end none of this shit is worth getting upset about.

 

[BackAgain]

You have a problem making heads or tails of it.
You made a thread yesterday and I assume it's still blocking those necessary neurons to compute that rules are rules.

Your mindless drivel continues. You may want to consult a doctor.

 

[okfine]

Your mindless drivel continues. You may want to consult a doctor.

Maybe you never heard the phase "Take it or Leave it"

 

[DudleySmith]

You are playing in their sandbox. I can only think of a couple of mod decisions I thought were arbitrary but in the end none of this shit is worth getting upset about.

Actually nobody comes here to read the mod's posts or kiss up to them.

 

[BackAgain]

Maybe you never heard the phase "Take it or Leave it"

I have. It is not at all relevant to the topic. Of course.

 

[okfine]

I have. It is not at all relevant to the topic. Of course.

Is MM your sock or BF? That is the premise of your OP today and yesterday, IMO.

 

[BackAgain]

Is MM your sock or BF? That is the premise of your OP today and yesterday, IMO.

Unlike you, fume, I don’t use socks.

The premise of my OP was states in my OP.

Comprehension ain’t your strong suit.

 

[okfine]

Unlike you, fume, I don’t use socks.

The premise of my OP was states in my OP.

Comprehension ain’t your strong suit.

I know how your blabber posts start and end. The same every time. You crying.

 

[Dogmaphobe]

If you have a problem with missing chickens, you need to go to the foxes, and all discussion that ensues needs to be kept completely private.

 

[Dogmaphobe]

I know how your blabber posts start and end. The same every time. You crying.

It is always an easy matter to figure out who benefits from corrupt moderation and who doesn't.

 

[BackAgain]

I know how your blabber posts start and end. The same every time. You crying.

Hasn’t happened yet. You project too much.

Why does lying come so naturally to you libturds?

 

[saveliberty]

If you have an issue with moderator actions take it up privately with the Mod who took the action.

Why? What is the sound administrative purpose served by such a rule?

Why shouldn’t a disputed mod action be aired right here in “feedback?”

For example, let’s say a member has allegedly violated a particular board rule. (We can’t always tell if it’s one of those “never really enforced rules” or one that mods take seriously.) Now, let’s say the mod says s/he is moving it but actually just shuts it and hides it. Why shouldn’t a member be allowed to air his or her complaint about the mod action and seek a restoration of the post or thread? If you complain to a mod, often they don’t even answer.

Why not a little light on the matter? Sunlight is often a powerful disinfectant.

Management 101, isolate a problem employee.

 

[miketx]

You have a problem making heads or tails of it.
You made a thread yesterday and I assume it's still blocking those necessary neurons to compute that rules are rules.

More leftist drooling.

 

[miketx]

If you have an issue with moderator actions take it up privately with the Mod who took the action.

Sometimes you don't know who took the action.