A sobering question regarding US bombing Iran nuke program

[Mac-7]

I support using US military bombing Iran nuke site

But what if the bunker buster bomb fails to dtop Iran from building atomic warheads and achieving nuclear capability?

Even if we destroy their nuclear reactor are they far enough along already to assemble one or more nuclear warheads?

 

[Woodznutz]

No matter. The stage is being set for the end time war that will bring most of the major powers to the 'plain of Megiddo'.

 

[1srelluc]

Blah, the enriched uranium Iran already has (605.8 pounds enriched to 80-odd%) can be put in canisters and driven around the country in the back of a Toyoda PU.

They are said to have 900# of 50-60% enriched uranium so make that two Toyoda PUs.

Least you forget.....The uranium in the “Little Boy” bomb dropped on Hiroshima, for example, had an average enrichment level of 80 percent, a level Iran has already achieved.

 

[Cassandro]

I support using US military bombing Iran nuke site

But what if the bunker buster bomb fails to dtop Iran from building atomic warheads and achieving nuclear capability?

Even if we destroy their nuclear reactor are they far enough along already to assemble one or more nuclear warheads?

Everything will be coordinated with the Israelis. The bombs will be used, if at all, as demolition devices after the area has been secured and neutralized.

 

[kyzr]

Very good questions as to what happens if we bombed Fordow.
1. Would the Fordow bombing be successful, or not?
2. Would Iran attack US bases?
3. What happens if we don't bomb Fordow?
4. We know what a "regime change" war would look like, a total mess.
5. We know that "nation building" is always a mess.
6. Is taking out Iranian leaders until we get one we can live with the best option?
7. We can't leave the 86-year old Ayatollah in power. He wants a nuke and he hates the US.

Trump probably gets input from the Saudis and Qataris and Kuwaitis and they have skin in the game if Iran gets a nuke. What do they recommend?
Would NATO back our regime change play? I agree that we need to bring US troops out of danger until the dust settles.
Would the UN (Russia and China) call regime change illegal? (Yes)

 

[HikerGuy83]

If Iran was stupid enough to use a nuke, they'd cease to exist following the counter attack.

 

[HikerGuy83]

If I am in Iran, I don't like being told what I can and cannot have. Especially when others have it.

But that is the nature of living in a global community.

People are not going to respect what I don't like when my leaders are whack-jobs

 

[Oddball]

I support using US military bombing Iran nuke site

But what if the bunker buster bomb fails to dtop Iran from building atomic warheads and achieving nuclear capability?

Even if we destroy their nuclear reactor are they far enough along already to assemble one or more nuclear warheads?

How dare you ask such questions, that don't presume total 100% Murican military success?

What are you, a mullah lover?

 

[westwall]

If Iran was stupid enough to use a nuke, they'd cease to exist following the counter attack.

Which is kinda their goal. 72 virgins and all that.

 

[JohnDB]

 

[Mac-7]

How dare you ask such questions, that don't presume total 100% Murican military success?

What are you, a mullah lover?

Even you’re attempt at absurdity is weak

Are there any rational libs on this forum?

 

[toobfreak]

Sorry, I don't have half an hour to waste on waiting to find out what Kirk's position is when you should have summarized that in your OP.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

I support using US military bombing Iran nuke site

But what if the bunker buster bomb fails to dtop Iran from building atomic warheads and achieving nuclear capability?

Even if we destroy their nuclear reactor are they far enough along already to assemble one or more nuclear warheads?

By itself, this is the DUMBEST Narrative in human history

Iran has been "2 weeks away" since the 90s. Even with help from Russia and China

It's odd, they don't have a "bomb" but more than enough material for a dirty bomb if that what they really wanted to do

If fact, who needs nukes at all?!

We just want regime change in Iran, the "2 weeks away" is a very convenient way to achieve it.

Why can't the CIA go in and do what they did in Ukraine in 2014 is the real question

 

[Oddball]

Even you’re attempt at absurdity is weak

Are there any rational libs on this forum?

1) I'm not a "lib", and you know it.

2) My absurdity points to a reality: the very real possibility that even the Murcan mother-of-all-bunker-busters still might not be enough to take out Fordow.

 

[Oddball]

By itself, this is the DUMBEST Narrative in human history

Iran has been "2 weeks away" since the 90s. Even with help from Russia and China

It's odd, they don't have a "bomb" but more than enough material for a dirty bomb if that what they really wanted to do

If fact, who needs nukes at all?!

We just want regime change in Iran, the "2 weeks away" is a very convenient way to achieve it.

Why can't the CIA go in and do what they did in Ukraine in 2014 is the real question

But if we spend a squillion-jillion dollars on the Golden Dome, nobody can set off a dirty bomb in a Murcan city!

 

[The Duke]

No matter. The stage is being set for the end time war that will bring most of the major powers to the 'plain of Megiddo'.

Hmm..that's a word that popped into my head this morning.

 

[Woodznutz]

Hmm..that's a word that popped into my head this morning.

Great minds think alike.

 

[Oddball]

Which is kinda their goal. 72 virgins and all that.

You really think that even the mullahs want the 72 virgins so badly that they'd risk the annihilation of their people?

 

[wtb]

Oh, now that is certainly informative! I've been wondering when those would leave Missouri.

 

[JohnDB]

Even you’re attempt at absurdity is weak

Are there any rational libs on this forum?

I don't think so. Not anymore. There have been a rare few....but with Iranian and Russian bots feeding them their party lines....nope.