Not quite, no. Unless Congress is very very united (hah!), the president has an enormous amount of power over it in the form of a veto.And again for the slow, the system is set up so that Congress has the last word. No matter how you cut it, Congress not the President has the final say on the Budget and on EVERYTHING.
No yours is astounding. bush did not veto any bills duing the GOP controlled congress because the sheep were rubber stamping everything he wanted. That is when the pork was flowing and the red ink began to seep into the economy. The housing market carried the economy as long as it could. Now that it has failed, we are paying the price.Your ignorance is appalling.
Congress still has the fnal word. Just cause they can not agree on something does not change the fact THEY have the ability to override the President.Not quite, no. Unless Congress is very very united (hah!), the president has an enormous amount of power over it in the form of a veto.
There's ton of blacks that don't feel, 'God damn America' to think otherwise is stereotyping blacks, is that what you want to do?If you were black, you may feel the same way. God Bless America? Do you truly think God would bless any nation, let alone one that has wrapped itself in greed and military might?
If you made 20 Million dollars of even 2 mil, yes, you should pay a higher percentage. This has much to do with morality and the fact you hardly didn't anything stupendous enough to earn 2 0r 20 mil.This is an ignorant arguement, so on the one hand you say that the rich should pay more money because they make more. On the other hand, you say when tax cuts are passed out they should get back less because they make more. Do you see the falliacy with this logic?
obviously you, retired gy sgt, and j reeves are afraid of the truth.Eots provided documentation to prove what he was saying is true and you all blantanly ignore it.Get yourself some tin foil, a pair of black and white nikes, a glass of kool-aid, and crawl into a hole. That is only place safe for people lke you. You know, the people that know the "truth." Don't worry another comet will be along soon.
Eots wouldn't know the truth if someone forced it down his throat. He posts links to quotes that are taken out of context. When you look them up you discover the guy never actually meant what Eots claimed he meant. He links to sites that post conflicting information on the same subject. Any lie is good enough for him. And obviously for you.obviously you, retired gy sgt, and j reeves are afraid of the truth.Eots provided documentation to prove what he was saying is true and you all blantanly ignore it.
This essay was based on Philippe Van Parijs workIf you made 20 Million dollars of even 2 mil, yes, you should pay a higher percentage. This has much to do with morality and the fact you hardly didn't anything stupendous enough to earn 2 0r 20 mil.
"On moral grounds, then, we could argue for a flat income tax of 90 percent to return that wealth to its real owners. In the United States, even a flat tax of 70 percent would support all governmental programs (about half the total tax) and allow payment, with the remainder, of a patrimony of about $8,000 per annum per inhabitant, or $25,000 for a family of three. This would generously leave with the original recipients of the income about three times what, according to my rough guess, they had earned."