Taomon
Active Member
- Dec 21, 2007
- 1,563
- 47
- 36
But Pastor Wright is not wrong for that statement.Did you catch that quote the other night from MCcain? God Damn America, oh nevermind that was Obama's pastor....
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
But Pastor Wright is not wrong for that statement.Did you catch that quote the other night from MCcain? God Damn America, oh nevermind that was Obama's pastor....
And again for the slow, the system is set up so that Congress has the last word. No matter how you cut it, Congress not the President has the final say on the Budget and on EVERYTHING.
But Pastor Wright is not wrong for that statement.
If you were black, you may feel the same way. God Bless America? Do you truly think God would bless any nation, let alone one that has wrapped itself in greed and military might?In your warped world sure he's not.
Your ignorance is appalling.
Not quite, no. Unless Congress is very very united (hah!), the president has an enormous amount of power over it in the form of a veto.
If you were black, you may feel the same way. God Bless America? Do you truly think God would bless any nation, let alone one that has wrapped itself in greed and military might?
This is an ignorant arguement, so on the one hand you say that the rich should pay more money because they make more. On the other hand, you say when tax cuts are passed out they should get back less because they make more. Do you see the falliacy with this logic?
Get yourself some tin foil, a pair of black and white nikes, a glass of kool-aid, and crawl into a hole. That is only place safe for people lke you. You know, the people that know the "truth." Don't worry another comet will be along soon.
obviously you, retired gy sgt, and j reeves are afraid of the truth.Eots provided documentation to prove what he was saying is true and you all blantanly ignore it.
If you made 20 Million dollars of even 2 mil, yes, you should pay a higher percentage. This has much to do with morality and the fact you hardly didn't anything stupendous enough to earn 2 0r 20 mil.
http://bostonreview.net/BR25.5/simon.html
"On moral grounds, then, we could argue for a flat income tax of 90 percent to return that wealth to its real owners. In the United States, even a flat tax of 70 percent would support all governmental programs (about half the total tax) and allow payment, with the remainder, of a patrimony of about $8,000 per annum per inhabitant, or $25,000 for a family of three. This would generously leave with the original recipients of the income about three times what, according to my rough guess, they had earned."
We are forced to pick the "least bad" of the bunch, so we have to chose McCain, the least sophomoric of the group.