A Question for Rightwingers

[Listening]

eh.. .you're still a loser.

And you are still Schillian.

if that makes you feel better about yourself... i understand you feel inadequate because you're incapable of having a discussion... or doing much of anything else.

tissue?

And where praytell is your supporting evidence ?

You are pretty consistent with little one or two liners that basically say nothing and add nothing to the argument. If you show me your last reasoned argument or substantive post....I'll point to one of mine.

Let's see it, Schillian.

And, of course, you like terms like loser because you are capable of a discussion.

 

[Dr Grump]

The day I hit 40,000 is the day, I know I will be like Schillian.....don't have a life.

Of course, I'd say that each of my posts has about 100 times the content hers do. She is good for two or three short sentences....

Maybe I should have said 42,000 meaningless posts to a meaningless message board.

Daily post count matters more than overall....

You're both here about the same amount of time with regard to posts...

I would not bother posting on a messagebaord if it was meaningless...

Me thinks you find meaning in strange places...

And you don't

 

[The Rabbi]

And you are still Schillian.

if that makes you feel better about yourself... i understand you feel inadequate because you're incapable of having a discussion... or doing much of anything else.

tissue?

And where praytell is your supporting evidence ?

You are pretty consistent with little one or two liners that basically say nothing and add nothing to the argument. If you show me your last reasoned argument or substantive post....I'll point to one of mine.

Let's see it, Schillian.

And, of course, you like terms like loser because you are capable of a discussion.

Forget it. You might as well ask her to sprout wings and fly to the Moon. She is incapable of anything resembling discussion, much less debate. She is a poseur of the first order. Actually a poseur of the second order, since she is so transparently fake.

 

[Dr Grump]

[quot
Forget it. You might as well ask her to sprout wings and fly to the Moon. She is incapable of anything resembling discussion, much less debate. She is a poseur of the first order. Actually a poseur of the second order, since she is so transparently fake.

Spoken like somebody who gets their arse kicked by her regularly...

 

[jillian]

[quot
Forget it. You might as well ask her to sprout wings and fly to the Moon. She is incapable of anything resembling discussion, much less debate. She is a poseur of the first order. Actually a poseur of the second order, since she is so transparently fake.

Spoken like somebody who gets their arse kicked by her regularly...

eh...the pretend rabbi is sullen and bitter. it makes selling hardware easier if he pretends that i'm not what i am.

i think it makes him feel like he actually has more than microscopic genitalia.

 

[Amelia]

Oh lookie -- two trolls making fun of a rabbi. There's a joke in that somewhere.

 

[Dr Grump]

Oh lookie -- two trolls making fun of a rabbi. There's a joke in that somewhere.

Oh look, a sock adding something interesting to a thread...amazing....

 

[jillian]

Oh lookie -- two trolls making fun of a rabbi. There's a joke in that somewhere.

he's not a rabbi. he's a hardware salesman.

not even close to a rabbi. and probably one of the least talmudic minds i've ever seen.

as for trolls...

you must be looking in the mirror.

 

[The Rabbi]

[quot
Forget it. You might as well ask her to sprout wings and fly to the Moon. She is incapable of anything resembling discussion, much less debate. She is a poseur of the first order. Actually a poseur of the second order, since she is so transparently fake.

Spoken like somebody who gets their arse kicked by her regularly...

eh...the pretend rabbi is sullen and bitter. it makes selling hardware easier if he pretends that i'm not what i am.

i think it makes him feel like he actually has more than microscopic genitalia.

?

And your thinking about my genitals is creepy.

 

[jillian]

Spoken like somebody who gets their arse kicked by her regularly...

eh...the pretend rabbi is sullen and bitter. it makes selling hardware easier if he pretends that i'm not what i am.

i think it makes him feel like he actually has more than microscopic genitalia.

?

And your thinking about my genitals is creepy.

i was thinking about your absence of them and how that's made you bitter and misogynist.

but that's kind of funny from the loser who told me in yiddish to blow him.

 

[nitroz]

Why would any leftist goombah be against it?

Y'all think you're the boss of every ******* thing else.

I wouldn't care. But I think everyone should go through extended training and safety courses in order to do so. You just don't let idiots play with guns.

 

[Clementine]

I know a lot of you have a gun thing going on...

how many of you would support the idea of mandated concealed carry?

"Gun thing going on?" Whatever. It's a right whether people take advantage of it or not. People shouldn't be forced to buy guns any more than they should be forced to buy health insurance.

If you're asking if I support our rights, then yes. Whether or not it's allowed by law, criminals will still have weapons and will still use them. I wish some would focus on that rather than picking on the law abiding citizens.

I'm also not a rightwinger.

 

[Dr Grump]

And your thinking about my genitals is creepy.

Liar....

 

[CrusaderFrank]

why would that make the difference?

are you paying more or less for insurance if there's a national pool of money?

The idea of a national pool of money to take care of everybody whether they can afford it or not is socialist economics and wrong in this country. Obamacare is unconstitutional, doesn't matter what a bunch of lawers in black robes say. Lawyers have ruined this country anyway.

There is nothing -- zip, zilch, nada -- in the constitution which requires any particular type of economic system in this country. And as was decided during the 1940's, the federal government using the general welfare clause and commerce clause for the public good is a lawful exercise of constitutional power.

And if you can't understand that the high court IS the final arbiter of the constitution, then you really have no idea what type if country you live in.

Its sad

It's sad that FDR threatened the Court to run roughshod over the Constitution

 

[jillian]

The idea of a national pool of money to take care of everybody whether they can afford it or not is socialist economics and wrong in this country. Obamacare is unconstitutional, doesn't matter what a bunch of lawers in black robes say. Lawyers have ruined this country anyway.

There is nothing -- zip, zilch, nada -- in the constitution which requires any particular type of economic system in this country. And as was decided during the 1940's, the federal government using the general welfare clause and commerce clause for the public good is a lawful exercise of constitutional power.

And if you can't understand that the high court IS the final arbiter of the constitution, then you really have no idea what type if country you live in.

Its sad

It's sad that FDR threatened the Court to run roughshod over the Constitution

and the court stomped on that idea fairly quickly. so he backed down.

your point?

 

[jillian]

I know a lot of you have a gun thing going on...

how many of you would support the idea of mandated concealed carry?

"Gun thing going on?" Whatever. It's a right whether people take advantage of it or not. People shouldn't be forced to buy guns any more than they should be forced to buy health insurance.

If you're asking if I support our rights, then yes. Whether or not it's allowed by law, criminals will still have weapons and will still use them. I wish some would focus on that rather than picking on the law abiding citizens.

I'm also not a rightwinger.

since i don't oppose gun rights when they're addressed in a rational way, i was asking more about a theoretical mandated concealed carry. thank you for your response in that regard.

i'm not seeing how you're not a rightwinger, though. i've read your posts.

 

[WillowTree]

Oh lookie -- two trolls making fun of a rabbi. There's a joke in that somewhere.

Jillian's righwing bash thread has been quite successful wouldn't you say?

 

[jillian]

Oh lookie -- two trolls making fun of a rabbi. There's a joke in that somewhere.

Jillian's righwing bash thread has been quite successful wouldn't you say?

funny, to me it's looked more pretty good except for a few righwingnuts.

luckily there were actually some smart rightwingers who know how to conduct a conversation.

you should watch them and learn.

 

[WillowTree]

Oh lookie -- two trolls making fun of a rabbi. There's a joke in that somewhere.

Jillian's righwing bash thread has been quite successful wouldn't you say?

funny, to me it's looked more pretty good except for a few righwingnuts.

luckily there were actually some smart rightwingers who know how to conduct a conversation.

you should watch them and learn.

face it gurl, this was designed to be a rightwing bash fest, and you've been very successful. take your congrats where you find them. most people on this board are bored with you calling them stupid.

 

[P@triot]

No one should be mandated to carry a gun or buy health insurance.

i appreciate your consistency.

but auto insurance is ok?

Your logic here is so severely flawed, I don't know where to begin. Why do you insist on making stupid arguments that embarass yourself?

First of all, people can choose not to drive. They can take a cab. Take a bus. Walk. Ride a bike. Get a lift from a friend or co-worker. You cannot choose not to be born, stupid. So there is no corelation between the two, stupid. You are being forced to carry insurance just for existing under Obamacare.

Second, the federal government does not mandate auto-insurance. Those decisions are done legally at the state level. Obamacare would be legal at the state level, as seen with what Romney did in Massachusetts. However, it is completely unconstitutional at the federal level.

I don't see how you could claim to be an attorney and be this stupid as to confuse choosing to drive and being forced just because you exist, and the difference between state and federal. You're either lying through your missing teeth on being an attorney, or you are hands down the worst attorney in the history of the world. Considering you can't even make an argument at the most basic level on this site leads me to believe you can't possibly be an attorney. You guys are supposed to be well trained on making an argument and finding loopholes. Instead, all you do is mention things that have no relevance to the issue (like auto insurance ) and then follow that with a really weak insult like a box of tissues.