sartre play
Gold Member
- May 4, 2015
- 11,569
- 3,765
- 210
COULD become is the correct answer.the evil left will never admit that a child in the womb is a living human being .. the left is perverted ,insane , gender confused, death cult .
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
COULD become is the correct answer.the evil left will never admit that a child in the womb is a living human being .. the left is perverted ,insane , gender confused, death cult .
MEN like you, who will NEVER have to consider the consequence of what being pregnant means.How many innocent human beings do you want to murder in cold blood, to prevent some portion of them from growing up to be criminals?
If you can afford an abortion you can afford birth controlThe tragedy for the mother is that she cannot afford to carry or raise this child because the American economy values profits more than families.
Follow up studies on women who tried and failed to obtain an abortion 5 years later showed the NONE of the families were thriving or even better off than they were before the woman became pregant. Many were homeless or suffering from mental health problems. The children they had before they became pregnant are also suffering.
Contary to the picture painted of wanton single teenagers heartlessly terminating the results of "sowing their wild oats", the majority of women seeking abortions for other than medical reasons, are living in poverty, or just above the poverty line, married or in committed relationships, and already have one or more children.
The tragedy is that in nations with universal health care, mandated maternity leave, and subsidized child care, the abortion rates are half that of the USA. Abortion isn't a moral problem, it's a financial problem which you could easily solve with better employment laws that support low income families.
The USA has made the choice to demonize and punish poor women for having sex with their husbands. So much for being the "Land of the free".
Who will adopt all those unwanted children? I keep asking that question. No one answers.the evil left will never admit that a child in the womb is a living human being .. the left is perverted ,insane , gender confused, death cult .
So, she was too poor to buy contraceptives?The tragedy for the mother is that she cannot afford to carry or raise this child because the American economy values profits more than families.
Follow up studies on women who tried and failed to obtain an abortion 5 years later showed the NONE of the families were thriving or even better off than they were before the woman became pregant. Many were homeless or suffering from mental health problems. The children they had before they became pregnant are also suffering.
Contary to the picture painted of wanton single teenagers heartlessly terminating the results of "sowing their wild oats", the majority of women seeking abortions for other than medical reasons, are living in poverty, or just above the poverty line, married or in committed relationships, and already have one or more children.
The tragedy is that in nations with universal health care, mandated maternity leave, and subsidized child care, the abortion rates are half that of the USA. Abortion isn't a moral problem, it's a financial problem which you could easily solve with better employment laws that support low income families.
The USA has made the choice to demonize and punish poor women for having sex with their husbands. So much for being the "Land of the free".
But she had enough money to buy cigarettes, alcohol, and illegal drugs.So, she was too poor to buy contraceptives?
And pay to murder her childBut she had enough money to buy cigarettes, alcohol, and illegal drugs.
She did not want to raise the child. Would you have adopted the child if she did not have an abortion?And pay to murder her child
It is estimated that one to two million Americans are waiting to adopt---yes we have an adopted child in our family.She did not want to raise the child. Would you have adopted the child if she did not have an abortion?
It is estimated that one to two million Americans are waiting to adopt---yes we have an adopted child in our family.
Who cares who's had one or not?Odds are Oklahoma will never know who has had an abortion for the most part.
children are innocent ..Who will adopt all those unwanted children? I keep asking that question. No one answers.
The illegitimate children of unmarried welfare mothers and criminals nearly always grow up to be as useless and dangerous as their parents. This is true whether they are raised on welfare, or by married couples who should have known better than to adopt them.
Yep. So preventing pregnancies is paramount. A substantial percentage of women not conceiving is what is needed.children are innocent ..
Thats the creepy issue.Who cares who's had one or not?
If you think so try to teach as a substitute teacher in a slum public school.children are innocent ..
And that backlog would be filled in a couple years after an abortion ban, leading to overwhelmed orphanages.It is estimated that one to two million Americans are waiting to adopt---yes we have an adopted child in our family.
Bzzzzzt, logical fallacy, assuming your conclusion, that a zygote is a "baby" or "somebody".If babies aren't alive in the womb then how does abortion exist? After all, how can you kill somebody who was never alive in the first place?
Bzzzzzt, logical fallacy, assuming your conclusion, that a zygote is a "baby" or "somebody".
Be like a pro-choicer. Be intellectually honest, and try asking an honest question.
(I know, not possible for most pro-lifers.)