A one time attempt to stimulate the economy does not equal "redistribution of wealth"

[Annie]

First time on a forum, I"m responding to other people responses, and holy shit, topics often go off into other relms besides what specifically is in the OP.

Nothing to add? Great, then why are you here?

All the posts on first page were directed towards your op,YOU changed the subject. Why? Well, because it was ill formed and bait, to which your perceived inferiors did not rise to. D. G. You are a worthless tool, not even a useful fool.

then what are you if you can't even put forth anything relevant to the thread?

Problem is your threads suck. YOU even think so.

 

[Dr Gregg]

All the posts on first page were directed towards your op,YOU changed the subject. Why? Well, because it was ill formed and bait, to which your perceived inferiors did not rise to. D. G. You are a worthless tool, not even a useful fool.

then what are you if you can't even put forth anything relevant to the thread?

Problem is your threads suck. YOU even think so.

Sure, hence why you are posting in it and many others have to.WHat are you 6 years old with that response?

 

[Oddball]

Now, if every year Obama and the dems pass a stimulus package, you may have a point. But this was a one time thing to try and overcome a horrible economy. so why the insistence on claiming Obama's going to turn the country entirely socialist, or that he's for redistrubuction of wealth, when for decades wealthy people paid a higher percentage in taxes, and occurred under both parties.

That's yet another example of partisan hackery dishonesty. You can make points without resorting to that bullshit, or can the ones that make those claims actually put forth an intelligent argument?

ONE TIME?!?!?!?...Shirley, you jest.

The Keynesian economic alchemists in the District of Criminals have been vainly attempting to centrally control the overall American economy, replete with all sorts of "stimulus" packages and programs, since at least Woodrow Wilson.

Speaking of party man hackery and dishonesty.

 

[The Rabbi]

Now, if every year Obama and the dems pass a stimulus package, you may have a point. But this was a one time thing to try and overcome a horrible economy. so why the insistence on claiming Obama's going to turn the country entirely socialist, or that he's for redistrubuction of wealth, when for decades wealthy people paid a higher percentage in taxes, and occurred under both parties.

That's yet another example of partisan hackery dishonesty. You can make points without resorting to that bullshit, or can the ones that make those claims actually put forth an intelligent argument?

ONE TIME?!?!?!?...Shirley, you jest.

The Keynesian economic alchemists in the District of Criminals have been vainly attempting to centrally control the overall American economy, replete with all sorts of "stimulus" packages and programs, since at least Woodrow Wilson.

Speaking of party man hackery and dishonesty.

Dude, that's pointing out the truth. Dr Greg can't stand that. He doesn't want to be called on facts. He just wants it his way. Maybe he needs to stay at Burger King, s0n.

 

[Annie]

Now, if every year Obama and the dems pass a stimulus package, you may have a point. But this was a one time thing to try and overcome a horrible economy. so why the insistence on claiming Obama's going to turn the country entirely socialist, or that he's for redistrubuction of wealth, when for decades wealthy people paid a higher percentage in taxes, and occurred under both parties.

That's yet another example of partisan hackery dishonesty. You can make points without resorting to that bullshit, or can the ones that make those claims actually put forth an intelligent argument?

ONE TIME?!?!?!?...Shirley, you jest.

The Keynesian economic alchemists in the District of Criminals have been vainly attempting to centrally control the overall American economy, replete with all sorts of "stimulus" packages and programs, since at least Woodrow Wilson.

Speaking of party man hackery and dishonesty.

Dude, that's pointing out the truth. Dr Greg can't stand that. He doesn't want to be called on facts. He just wants it his way. Maybe he needs to stay at Burger King, s0n.

Indeed. The point of not being the first was made in the first page, within 6 posts, which is when the illustrious D G took the twist in the thread, the thread he started. I don't quite know if he's so ignorant that he bought it was the first stimulus or he assumed everyone else was so ignorant to buy it. Either way, he really is a useless fool.

 

[PubliusInfinitum]

Now, if every year Obama and the dems pass a stimulus package, you may have a point. But this was a one time thing to try and overcome a horrible economy. so why the insistence on claiming Obama's going to turn the country entirely socialist, or that he's for redistrubuction of wealth, when for decades wealthy people paid a higher percentage in taxes, and occurred under both parties.

That's yet another example of partisan hackery dishonesty. You can make points without resorting to that bullshit, or can the ones that make those claims actually put forth an intelligent argument?

ROFLMNAO...

That is just sad.

 

[skookerasbil]

Now, if every year Obama and the dems pass a stimulus package, you may have a point. But this was a one time thing to try and overcome a horrible economy. so why the insistence on claiming Obama's going to turn the country entirely socialist, or that he's for redistrubuction of wealth, when for decades wealthy people paid a higher percentage in taxes, and occurred under both parties.

That's yet another example of partisan hackery dishonesty. You can make points without resorting to that bullshit, or can the ones that make those claims actually put forth an intelligent argument?

yeah...........but heres the problem...........

A vast majority of the American population think your rant is a line of bs s0n!!! THATS all that matters...........


go google "simulus" and "poll" you fcukking bozo.........its viewed as an abject failure Thats what happens when you support a close to trillion dollar jobs bill and it creates about 65 jobs.

Yes, another genius who shows how intelligent and informed they are. How you guys do this without being embarrassed is beyond me

Thats right...........I guess Im the asshole here!!! Im sorry s0n..........was it actually 79 jobs created??
Clearly, America thinks the Stimulus bill was wildly successful!!!