- Mar 3, 2013
- 86,407
- 49,405
- 2,605
When I find an article about a human self pollinating, I'll take this seriously.
til then
til then
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It doesn't take a genuis to know about gay stuff when you have a gay child.I was just deferring to your obvious personal experience to know such intimate things of homosexuality
.![]()
Flowers ‘giving up’ on scarce insects and evolving to self-pollinate, say scientists
French wild pansies are producing smaller flowers and less nectar than 20 to 30 years ago in ‘startling’ act of evolution, study showswww.theguardian.com
mods : this may belong in "culture but my esteemed colleagues have made this the defining issue of our generation. i'd rather not talk about this at all, but here goes .....
in much of nature procreation occurs by transferring male material from one flower to the female material in another. sex, therefore , requires a massage de trois with a consenting insect.
well, that is a problem. since "silent spring" the number of available insects has decreased to the point of endangering some species.
darwin , of course, has a plan. the incel plants are evolving into self pollinators. a behavior not previously seen in pansies. what if similar biological changes are occurring near a high school gym class, mysteriously inspiring the former "boys" to join the girl's track team ............
The real reason for the rise of the Tranny Movement is to get a rise out of normative people. Guys violating each other's buttholes has largely been approved of in America, so now the LGBTQ+ people are pushing the envelope to the next frontier. Not just lopping off their own nads, but doing it to children as well.
If the public starts accepting this, they will push the envelope even further.
well, i would never want to accuse the almost speaker of "grooming?"What does that have to do with the topic of this thread?
That is a different subject than your thread title. You are trying to derail your own thread.well, i would never want to accuse the almost speaker of "grooming?"
PolishprinceI have to kind of agree with this.
Trannies have always been around and most people just wrote them off as just weird people that really meant no harm.
i kind of agree, but ever since trump raised "pwning the opposition" to the ultimate political skill, maybe the trannies have a point.The real reason for the rise of the Tranny Movement is to get a rise out of normative people.
and growing tits too.....these type of threads are weird as fuck..................is the source to blame?Boys are already participating in girl's sports.
When I find an article about a human self pollinating, I'll take this seriously.
til then
they get each other pregnant?don't faggots self pollinate each other??????????..................we're already there i'm afraid
give it a couple decadesthey get each other pregnant?
Hey, just busting your balls like you do to everyone else. No hard feelings.It doesn't take a genuis to know about gay stuff when you have a gay child.
how long do you think sex has been "nasty?" religion must have been the instigator of that one.I have been in discussions with people who wonder if It is all a part of evolution and if humans one day will have all the attributes of both sexes no more male and female procreating without a partner. It would take the beauty and pleasure of being human if that happened we would be procreating like certain types of earthworms and that would be a sad thing.
Why would religion be the instigator of what defines sex as being nasty. Sex precedes religion by countless years. I am sure the first time someone determined some forms of sex are nasty it was when STD's were discovered, or sticks were used incorrectly or tonight's dinner was raped after the slaughter.how long do you think sex has been "nasty?" religion must have been the instigator of that one.
the reasons hawaiians hate the missionsries is they taught their women that sex was bad.Why would religion be the instigator of what defines sex as being nasty. Sex precedes religion by countless years. I am sure the first time someone determined some forms of sex are nasty it was when STD's were discovered, or sticks were used incorrectly or tonight's dinner was raped after the slaughter.
We don't need religion when there is common sense
I can't disagree with that.the reasons hawaiians hate the missionsries is they taught their women that sex was bad
good man.we all love moonie..Hey, just busting your balls like you do to everyone else. No hard feelings.