A History Mystery: Roosevelt- Why Lie?

[PoliticalChic]

Notice PC continues the routine of ignoring an important factor in the Great Depression that rational people know is an inescapable factor. Draught and repeated Dust Bowl Storms annihilated the agriculture industries in vast regions of the country and put millions on the roads searching for employment.

A lie that has no bearing on the question: why did FDR lie....like this:

A major lie!

7. If one studies at the feet of Liberal professors and historians.....one imbibes lies. Total, absymal, outrageous lies.

I'll prove it now: According to Liberal star,Arthur Schlesinger, and to the others, the evil industrialists of the 1920s kept pay low and prices high, so that workers didn't have the money to buy the products they were making.

Like this:
a. "Managements disposition [in the 1920s]to maintain prices...meant that workers and farmers weredenied thebenefits ofincreasesin there own productivity. The consequences was the relativedecline of mass purchasing power."
Arthur Schlesinger, "The Crisis of the Old Order."Understanding Bushonomics | Center for American Progress


Got that?


6. Here is that same lie from demagogue Roosevelt, himself:

"Now it is worth remembering, and the cold figures of finance prove it, thatduring that time there was little or no drop in the prices that the consumer had to pay, although those same figures proved that the cost of production fell very greatly; corporate profit resulting from this period was enormous; at the same time little of that profit was devoted to the reduction of prices. The consumer was forgotten.Very little of it went into increased wages; the worker was forgotten, and by no means an adequate proportion was even paid out in dividends--the stockholder was forgotten." Roosevelt's Nomination Address, Chicago, Ill., July 2, 1932



The truth was very much the opposite.

"Hoover: ...keepingwages artificially higheven though bothprofits and prices were falling.Consumer prices plunged almost 25 percent between 1929 and 1933 while nominal wages on average decreased only 15 percent — translating into a substantial increase in wages in real terms,a major component of the cost of doing business. "Great Myths of the Great Depression | Lawrence W. Reed


As economist Richard Ebeling notes, “The‘high-wage’ policy of the Hooveradministration and the trade unions ... succeeded only in pricing workers out of the labor market, generating an increasing circle of unemployment.” Richard M. Ebeling, “Monetary Central Planning and the State, Part XI: The Great Depression and the Crisis of Government Intervention,” Freedom Daily (Fairfax, Virginia: The Future of Freedom Foundation, November 1997), p. 15.



No wonder the indoctrinees consider Roosevelt 'the greatest!" More lies than one can shake a stick at.

Roosevelt lied, and Liberals swear to it.

 

[rightwinger]

Notice PC continues the routine of ignoring an important factor in the Great Depression that rational people know is an inescapable factor. Draught and repeated Dust Bowl Storms annihilated the agriculture industries in vast regions of the country and put millions on the roads searching for employment.

A lie that has no bearing on the question: why did FDR lie....like this:

A major lie!

7. If one studies at the feet of Liberal professors and historians.....one imbibes lies. Total, absymal, outrageous lies.

I'll prove it now: According to Liberal star,Arthur Schlesinger, and to the others, the evil industrialists of the 1920s kept pay low and prices high, so that workers didn't have the money to buy the products they were making.

Like this:
a. "Managements disposition [in the 1920s]to maintain prices...meant that workers and farmers weredenied thebenefits ofincreasesin there own productivity. The consequences was the relativedecline of mass purchasing power."
Arthur Schlesinger, "The Crisis of the Old Order."Understanding Bushonomics | Center for American Progress


Got that?


6. Here is that same lie from demagogue Roosevelt, himself:

"Now it is worth remembering, and the cold figures of finance prove it, thatduring that time there was little or no drop in the prices that the consumer had to pay, although those same figures proved that the cost of production fell very greatly; corporate profit resulting from this period was enormous; at the same time little of that profit was devoted to the reduction of prices. The consumer was forgotten.Very little of it went into increased wages; the worker was forgotten, and by no means an adequate proportion was even paid out in dividends--the stockholder was forgotten." Roosevelt's Nomination Address, Chicago, Ill., July 2, 1932



The truth was very much the opposite.

"Hoover: ...keepingwages artificially higheven though bothprofits and prices were falling.Consumer prices plunged almost 25 percent between 1929 and 1933 while nominal wages on average decreased only 15 percent — translating into a substantial increase in wages in real terms,a major component of the cost of doing business. "Great Myths of the Great Depression | Lawrence W. Reed


As economist Richard Ebeling notes, “The‘high-wage’ policy of the Hooveradministration and the trade unions ... succeeded only in pricing workers out of the labor market, generating an increasing circle of unemployment.” Richard M. Ebeling, “Monetary Central Planning and the State, Part XI: The Great Depression and the Crisis of Government Intervention,” Freedom Daily (Fairfax, Virginia: The Future of Freedom Foundation, November 1997), p. 15.



No wonder the indoctrinees consider Roosevelt 'the greatest!" More lies than one can shake a stick at.

Roosevelt lied, and Liberals swear to it.

I love bolded text

Especially when it does nothing to help prove your point





.

 

[Camp]

Notice PC continues the routine of ignoring an important factor in the Great Depression that rational people know is an inescapable factor. Draught and repeated Dust Bowl Storms annihilated the agriculture industries in vast regions of the country and put millions on the roads searching for employment.

A lie that has no bearing on the question: why did FDR lie....like this:

A major lie!

7. If one studies at the feet of Liberal professors and historians.....one imbibes lies. Total, absymal, outrageous lies.

I'll prove it now: According to Liberal star,Arthur Schlesinger, and to the others, the evil industrialists of the 1920s kept pay low and prices high, so that workers didn't have the money to buy the products they were making.

Like this:
a. "Managements disposition [in the 1920s]to maintain prices...meant that workers and farmers weredenied thebenefits ofincreasesin there own productivity. The consequences was the relativedecline of mass purchasing power."
Arthur Schlesinger, "The Crisis of the Old Order."Understanding Bushonomics | Center for American Progress


Got that?


6. Here is that same lie from demagogue Roosevelt, himself:

"Now it is worth remembering, and the cold figures of finance prove it, thatduring that time there was little or no drop in the prices that the consumer had to pay, although those same figures proved that the cost of production fell very greatly; corporate profit resulting from this period was enormous; at the same time little of that profit was devoted to the reduction of prices. The consumer was forgotten.Very little of it went into increased wages; the worker was forgotten, and by no means an adequate proportion was even paid out in dividends--the stockholder was forgotten." Roosevelt's Nomination Address, Chicago, Ill., July 2, 1932



The truth was very much the opposite.

"Hoover: ...keepingwages artificially higheven though bothprofits and prices were falling.Consumer prices plunged almost 25 percent between 1929 and 1933 while nominal wages on average decreased only 15 percent — translating into a substantial increase in wages in real terms,a major component of the cost of doing business. "Great Myths of the Great Depression | Lawrence W. Reed


As economist Richard Ebeling notes, “The‘high-wage’ policy of the Hooveradministration and the trade unions ... succeeded only in pricing workers out of the labor market, generating an increasing circle of unemployment.” Richard M. Ebeling, “Monetary Central Planning and the State, Part XI: The Great Depression and the Crisis of Government Intervention,” Freedom Daily (Fairfax, Virginia: The Future of Freedom Foundation, November 1997), p. 15.



No wonder the indoctrinees consider Roosevelt 'the greatest!" More lies than one can shake a stick at.

Roosevelt lied, and Liberals swear to it.

There was no lie being told. You are attributing subjective speculations and opinions to claim a lie is being told. You can not use all of that analytical opinion leading up to a speculative conclusion to prove a lie. It can only be used as a reason for disagreement.
Distortions and omissions invalidate a thesis. Hence, your thesis fails. That means your college professors would have rejected it. It is nothing more than conspiracy trash.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Unemployment averaged 20% over FDR entire first 2 terms

Looks like it dropped to me...agree?

"But by 1938, it was back up to nearly 20 percent as the economy slumped again. The stock market crashed nearly 50 percent between August 1937 and March 1938. The “economic stimulus” of Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s New Deal had achieved a real “first”: a depression within a depression!" Great Myths of the Great Depression | Lawrence W. Reed

Had to bring up 1938 didn't you?

Shows what happened when FDR listened to conservatives and tried to ease back on Government spending

LOL name one Conservative FDR listened to

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Unemployment averaged 20% over FDR entire first 2 terms

Looks like it dropped to me...agree?

Sure it did.

When did WWII Start? When did Hitler conquer France?

Can't read a graph?

Why don't you remind us what happened to unemployment while Hoover was President? Remind you of Bush?

Topic: FDR's historic 2 full term economic failure

You: Boooooooooooooooooooooooooosh

See the problem?

 

[Syriusly]

Another of PC's obsessive FDR threads.

He sure does hate that FDR led America out of the Depression and to victory in World War 2

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Another of PC's obsessive FDR threads.

He sure does hate that FDR led America out of the Depression and to victory in World War 2

FDR entire first 2 terms had average UE of 20%, thats some leadership

 

[PoliticalChic]

Notice PC continues the routine of ignoring an important factor in the Great Depression that rational people know is an inescapable factor. Draught and repeated Dust Bowl Storms annihilated the agriculture industries in vast regions of the country and put millions on the roads searching for employment.

A lie that has no bearing on the question: why did FDR lie....like this:

A major lie!

7. If one studies at the feet of Liberal professors and historians.....one imbibes lies. Total, absymal, outrageous lies.

I'll prove it now: According to Liberal star,Arthur Schlesinger, and to the others, the evil industrialists of the 1920s kept pay low and prices high, so that workers didn't have the money to buy the products they were making.

Like this:
a. "Managements disposition [in the 1920s]to maintain prices...meant that workers and farmers weredenied thebenefits ofincreasesin there own productivity. The consequences was the relativedecline of mass purchasing power."
Arthur Schlesinger, "The Crisis of the Old Order."Understanding Bushonomics | Center for American Progress


Got that?


6. Here is that same lie from demagogue Roosevelt, himself:

"Now it is worth remembering, and the cold figures of finance prove it, thatduring that time there was little or no drop in the prices that the consumer had to pay, although those same figures proved that the cost of production fell very greatly; corporate profit resulting from this period was enormous; at the same time little of that profit was devoted to the reduction of prices. The consumer was forgotten.Very little of it went into increased wages; the worker was forgotten, and by no means an adequate proportion was even paid out in dividends--the stockholder was forgotten." Roosevelt's Nomination Address, Chicago, Ill., July 2, 1932



The truth was very much the opposite.

"Hoover: ...keepingwages artificially higheven though bothprofits and prices were falling.Consumer prices plunged almost 25 percent between 1929 and 1933 while nominal wages on average decreased only 15 percent — translating into a substantial increase in wages in real terms,a major component of the cost of doing business. "Great Myths of the Great Depression | Lawrence W. Reed


As economist Richard Ebeling notes, “The‘high-wage’ policy of the Hooveradministration and the trade unions ... succeeded only in pricing workers out of the labor market, generating an increasing circle of unemployment.” Richard M. Ebeling, “Monetary Central Planning and the State, Part XI: The Great Depression and the Crisis of Government Intervention,” Freedom Daily (Fairfax, Virginia: The Future of Freedom Foundation, November 1997), p. 15.



No wonder the indoctrinees consider Roosevelt 'the greatest!" More lies than one can shake a stick at.

Roosevelt lied, and Liberals swear to it.

I love bolded text

Especially when it does nothing to help prove your point





.

I know you imagine your posts are clever....but the word is vapid.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Notice PC continues the routine of ignoring an important factor in the Great Depression that rational people know is an inescapable factor. Draught and repeated Dust Bowl Storms annihilated the agriculture industries in vast regions of the country and put millions on the roads searching for employment.

A lie that has no bearing on the question: why did FDR lie....like this:

A major lie!

7. If one studies at the feet of Liberal professors and historians.....one imbibes lies. Total, absymal, outrageous lies.

I'll prove it now: According to Liberal star,Arthur Schlesinger, and to the others, the evil industrialists of the 1920s kept pay low and prices high, so that workers didn't have the money to buy the products they were making.

Like this:
a. "Managements disposition [in the 1920s]to maintain prices...meant that workers and farmers weredenied thebenefits ofincreasesin there own productivity. The consequences was the relativedecline of mass purchasing power."
Arthur Schlesinger, "The Crisis of the Old Order."Understanding Bushonomics | Center for American Progress


Got that?


6. Here is that same lie from demagogue Roosevelt, himself:

"Now it is worth remembering, and the cold figures of finance prove it, thatduring that time there was little or no drop in the prices that the consumer had to pay, although those same figures proved that the cost of production fell very greatly; corporate profit resulting from this period was enormous; at the same time little of that profit was devoted to the reduction of prices. The consumer was forgotten.Very little of it went into increased wages; the worker was forgotten, and by no means an adequate proportion was even paid out in dividends--the stockholder was forgotten." Roosevelt's Nomination Address, Chicago, Ill., July 2, 1932



The truth was very much the opposite.

"Hoover: ...keepingwages artificially higheven though bothprofits and prices were falling.Consumer prices plunged almost 25 percent between 1929 and 1933 while nominal wages on average decreased only 15 percent — translating into a substantial increase in wages in real terms,a major component of the cost of doing business. "Great Myths of the Great Depression | Lawrence W. Reed


As economist Richard Ebeling notes, “The‘high-wage’ policy of the Hooveradministration and the trade unions ... succeeded only in pricing workers out of the labor market, generating an increasing circle of unemployment.” Richard M. Ebeling, “Monetary Central Planning and the State, Part XI: The Great Depression and the Crisis of Government Intervention,” Freedom Daily (Fairfax, Virginia: The Future of Freedom Foundation, November 1997), p. 15.



No wonder the indoctrinees consider Roosevelt 'the greatest!" More lies than one can shake a stick at.

Roosevelt lied, and Liberals swear to it.

There was no lie being told. You are attributing subjective speculations and opinions to claim a lie is being told. You can not use all of that analytical opinion leading up to a speculative conclusion to prove a lie. It can only be used as a reason for disagreement.
Distortions and omissions invalidate a thesis. Hence, your thesis fails. That means your college professors would have rejected it. It is nothing more than conspiracy trash.

I just proved that there were no distortions.....and you buried your foot in your mouth.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Another of PC's obsessive FDR threads.

He sure does hate that FDR led America out of the Depression and to victory in World War 2

Pssst......read your post again....and notice the hallmark of all Leftist posts....you have not a single example of anything not accurate,not true, not spot on.

Now....why is that?

 

[Camp]

Another of PC's obsessive FDR threads.

He sure does hate that FDR led America out of the Depression and to victory in World War 2

FDR entire first 2 terms had average UE of 20%, thats some leadership

No, it didn't and the methods of calculating unemployment have been provided to you on numerous occasions. You are just lying.

 

[rightwinger]

Unemployment averaged 20% over FDR entire first 2 terms

Looks like it dropped to me...agree?

Sure it did.

When did WWII Start? When did Hitler conquer France?

Can't read a graph?

Why don't you remind us what happened to unemployment while Hoover was President? Remind you of Bush?

Topic: FDR's historic 2 full term economic failure

You: Boooooooooooooooooooooooooosh

See the problem?

Similarity?

Republicans did not elect another President for 20 years after creating the Great Depression
Our next Republican President hasn't been born yet

 

[Camp]

Notice PC continues the routine of ignoring an important factor in the Great Depression that rational people know is an inescapable factor. Draught and repeated Dust Bowl Storms annihilated the agriculture industries in vast regions of the country and put millions on the roads searching for employment.

A lie that has no bearing on the question: why did FDR lie....like this:

A major lie!

7. If one studies at the feet of Liberal professors and historians.....one imbibes lies. Total, absymal, outrageous lies.

I'll prove it now: According to Liberal star,Arthur Schlesinger, and to the others, the evil industrialists of the 1920s kept pay low and prices high, so that workers didn't have the money to buy the products they were making.

Like this:
a. "Managements disposition [in the 1920s]to maintain prices...meant that workers and farmers weredenied thebenefits ofincreasesin there own productivity. The consequences was the relativedecline of mass purchasing power."
Arthur Schlesinger, "The Crisis of the Old Order."Understanding Bushonomics | Center for American Progress


Got that?


6. Here is that same lie from demagogue Roosevelt, himself:

"Now it is worth remembering, and the cold figures of finance prove it, thatduring that time there was little or no drop in the prices that the consumer had to pay, although those same figures proved that the cost of production fell very greatly; corporate profit resulting from this period was enormous; at the same time little of that profit was devoted to the reduction of prices. The consumer was forgotten.Very little of it went into increased wages; the worker was forgotten, and by no means an adequate proportion was even paid out in dividends--the stockholder was forgotten." Roosevelt's Nomination Address, Chicago, Ill., July 2, 1932



The truth was very much the opposite.

"Hoover: ...keepingwages artificially higheven though bothprofits and prices were falling.Consumer prices plunged almost 25 percent between 1929 and 1933 while nominal wages on average decreased only 15 percent — translating into a substantial increase in wages in real terms,a major component of the cost of doing business. "Great Myths of the Great Depression | Lawrence W. Reed


As economist Richard Ebeling notes, “The‘high-wage’ policy of the Hooveradministration and the trade unions ... succeeded only in pricing workers out of the labor market, generating an increasing circle of unemployment.” Richard M. Ebeling, “Monetary Central Planning and the State, Part XI: The Great Depression and the Crisis of Government Intervention,” Freedom Daily (Fairfax, Virginia: The Future of Freedom Foundation, November 1997), p. 15.



No wonder the indoctrinees consider Roosevelt 'the greatest!" More lies than one can shake a stick at.

Roosevelt lied, and Liberals swear to it.

There was no lie being told. You are attributing subjective speculations and opinions to claim a lie is being told. You can not use all of that analytical opinion leading up to a speculative conclusion to prove a lie. It can only be used as a reason for disagreement.
Distortions and omissions invalidate a thesis. Hence, your thesis fails. That means your college professors would have rejected it. It is nothing more than conspiracy trash.

I just proved that there were no distortions.....and you buried your foot in your mouth.

No, you didn't and you saying you did is the biggest lie. You are voicing opinions and demanding that they are facts.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Roosevelt to the rescue????


8. "Roosevelt did indeed make a difference, though probably not the sort of difference for which the country had hoped. He started off on the wrong foot when, in his inaugural address, he blamed the Depression on “unscrupulous money changers.” He said nothing about the role of the Fed’s mismanagement and little about the follies of Congress that had contributed to the problem. As a result of his efforts, the economy would linger in depression for the rest of the decade."
Fee, Op. Cit.



...as Dr. Hans Sennholz of Grove City College explains, it was FDR’s policies to come that Americans had genuine reason to fear: In his first 100 days, he swung hard at the profit order.

'Instead of clearing away the prosperity barriers erected by his predecessor, he built new ones of his own. He struck in every known way at the integrity of the U.S. dollar through quantitative increases and qualitative deterioration. He seized the people’s gold holdings and subsequently devalued the dollar by 40 percent. '
Hans F. Sennholz, “The Great Depression,” The Freeman, April 1975, p. 210



Roosevelt: "As a result of his efforts, the economy would linger in depression for the rest of the decade."


And.....in this thread, his three supporters....the "No-No Boys," right out of Turandot: Ping, Pang, and Pong-

 

[rightwinger]

Notice PC continues the routine of ignoring an important factor in the Great Depression that rational people know is an inescapable factor. Draught and repeated Dust Bowl Storms annihilated the agriculture industries in vast regions of the country and put millions on the roads searching for employment.

A lie that has no bearing on the question: why did FDR lie....like this:

A major lie!

7. If one studies at the feet of Liberal professors and historians.....one imbibes lies. Total, absymal, outrageous lies.

I'll prove it now: According to Liberal star,Arthur Schlesinger, and to the others, the evil industrialists of the 1920s kept pay low and prices high, so that workers didn't have the money to buy the products they were making.

Like this:
a. "Managements disposition [in the 1920s]to maintain prices...meant that workers and farmers weredenied thebenefits ofincreasesin there own productivity. The consequences was the relativedecline of mass purchasing power."
Arthur Schlesinger, "The Crisis of the Old Order."Understanding Bushonomics | Center for American Progress


Got that?


6. Here is that same lie from demagogue Roosevelt, himself:

"Now it is worth remembering, and the cold figures of finance prove it, thatduring that time there was little or no drop in the prices that the consumer had to pay, although those same figures proved that the cost of production fell very greatly; corporate profit resulting from this period was enormous; at the same time little of that profit was devoted to the reduction of prices. The consumer was forgotten.Very little of it went into increased wages; the worker was forgotten, and by no means an adequate proportion was even paid out in dividends--the stockholder was forgotten." Roosevelt's Nomination Address, Chicago, Ill., July 2, 1932



The truth was very much the opposite.

"Hoover: ...keepingwages artificially higheven though bothprofits and prices were falling.Consumer prices plunged almost 25 percent between 1929 and 1933 while nominal wages on average decreased only 15 percent — translating into a substantial increase in wages in real terms,a major component of the cost of doing business. "Great Myths of the Great Depression | Lawrence W. Reed


As economist Richard Ebeling notes, “The‘high-wage’ policy of the Hooveradministration and the trade unions ... succeeded only in pricing workers out of the labor market, generating an increasing circle of unemployment.” Richard M. Ebeling, “Monetary Central Planning and the State, Part XI: The Great Depression and the Crisis of Government Intervention,” Freedom Daily (Fairfax, Virginia: The Future of Freedom Foundation, November 1997), p. 15.



No wonder the indoctrinees consider Roosevelt 'the greatest!" More lies than one can shake a stick at.

Roosevelt lied, and Liberals swear to it.

There was no lie being told. You are attributing subjective speculations and opinions to claim a lie is being told. You can not use all of that analytical opinion leading up to a speculative conclusion to prove a lie. It can only be used as a reason for disagreement.
Distortions and omissions invalidate a thesis. Hence, your thesis fails. That means your college professors would have rejected it. It is nothing more than conspiracy trash.

I just proved that there were no distortions.....and you buried your foot in your mouth.

No, you didn't and you saying you did is the biggest lie. You are voicing opinions and demanding that they are facts.

Do your really expect PC any better?

A Columbia degree in Cut and Paste will do that to you

 

[PoliticalChic]

Notice PC continues the routine of ignoring an important factor in the Great Depression that rational people know is an inescapable factor. Draught and repeated Dust Bowl Storms annihilated the agriculture industries in vast regions of the country and put millions on the roads searching for employment.

A lie that has no bearing on the question: why did FDR lie....like this:

A major lie!

7. If one studies at the feet of Liberal professors and historians.....one imbibes lies. Total, absymal, outrageous lies.

I'll prove it now: According to Liberal star,Arthur Schlesinger, and to the others, the evil industrialists of the 1920s kept pay low and prices high, so that workers didn't have the money to buy the products they were making.

Like this:
a. "Managements disposition [in the 1920s]to maintain prices...meant that workers and farmers weredenied thebenefits ofincreasesin there own productivity. The consequences was the relativedecline of mass purchasing power."
Arthur Schlesinger, "The Crisis of the Old Order."Understanding Bushonomics | Center for American Progress


Got that?


6. Here is that same lie from demagogue Roosevelt, himself:

"Now it is worth remembering, and the cold figures of finance prove it, thatduring that time there was little or no drop in the prices that the consumer had to pay, although those same figures proved that the cost of production fell very greatly; corporate profit resulting from this period was enormous; at the same time little of that profit was devoted to the reduction of prices. The consumer was forgotten.Very little of it went into increased wages; the worker was forgotten, and by no means an adequate proportion was even paid out in dividends--the stockholder was forgotten." Roosevelt's Nomination Address, Chicago, Ill., July 2, 1932



The truth was very much the opposite.

"Hoover: ...keepingwages artificially higheven though bothprofits and prices were falling.Consumer prices plunged almost 25 percent between 1929 and 1933 while nominal wages on average decreased only 15 percent — translating into a substantial increase in wages in real terms,a major component of the cost of doing business. "Great Myths of the Great Depression | Lawrence W. Reed


As economist Richard Ebeling notes, “The‘high-wage’ policy of the Hooveradministration and the trade unions ... succeeded only in pricing workers out of the labor market, generating an increasing circle of unemployment.” Richard M. Ebeling, “Monetary Central Planning and the State, Part XI: The Great Depression and the Crisis of Government Intervention,” Freedom Daily (Fairfax, Virginia: The Future of Freedom Foundation, November 1997), p. 15.



No wonder the indoctrinees consider Roosevelt 'the greatest!" More lies than one can shake a stick at.

Roosevelt lied, and Liberals swear to it.

There was no lie being told. You are attributing subjective speculations and opinions to claim a lie is being told. You can not use all of that analytical opinion leading up to a speculative conclusion to prove a lie. It can only be used as a reason for disagreement.
Distortions and omissions invalidate a thesis. Hence, your thesis fails. That means your college professors would have rejected it. It is nothing more than conspiracy trash.

I just proved that there were no distortions.....and you buried your foot in your mouth.

No, you didn't and you saying you did is the biggest lie. You are voicing opinions and demanding that they are facts.

I quoted Schlesinger and Roosevelt...and proved them both liars.
Like you.....liars.

Again?
Sure....
I'll prove it now: According to Liberal star,Arthur Schlesinger, and to the others, the evil industrialists of the 1920s kept pay low and prices high, so that workers didn't have the money to buy the products they were making.

Like this:
a. "Managements disposition [in the 1920s]to maintain prices...meant that workers and farmers were denied thebenefits ofincreasesin there own productivity. The consequences was the relativedecline of mass purchasing power."
Arthur Schlesinger, "The Crisis of the Old Order."Understanding Bushonomics | Center for American Progress


Got that?


6. Here is that same lie from demagogue Roosevelt, himself:

"Now it is worth remembering, and the cold figures of finance prove it, thatduring that time there was little or no drop in the prices that the consumer had to pay, although those same figures proved that the cost of production fell very greatly; corporate profit resulting from this period was enormous; at the same time little of that profit was devoted to the reduction of prices. The consumer was forgotten.Very little of it went into increased wages; the worker was forgotten, and by no means an adequate proportion was even paid out in dividends--the stockholder was forgotten." Roosevelt's Nomination Address, Chicago, Ill., July 2, 1932



The truth was very much the opposite.

"Hoover: ...keeping wages artificially higheven though bothprofits and prices were falling.Consumer prices plunged almost 25 percent between 1929 and 1933 while nominal wages on average decreased only 15 percent — translating into a substantial increase in wages in real terms,a major component of the cost of doing business. "Great Myths of the Great Depression | Lawrence W. Reed


As economist Richard Ebeling notes, “The‘high-wage’ policy of the Hooveradministration and the trade unions ... succeeded only in pricing workers out of the labor market, generating an increasing circle of unemployment.” Richard M. Ebeling, “Monetary Central Planning and the State, Part XI: The Great Depression and the Crisis of Government Intervention,” Freedom Daily (Fairfax, Virginia: The Future of Freedom Foundation, November 1997), p. 15.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Notice PC continues the routine of ignoring an important factor in the Great Depression that rational people know is an inescapable factor. Draught and repeated Dust Bowl Storms annihilated the agriculture industries in vast regions of the country and put millions on the roads searching for employment.

A lie that has no bearing on the question: why did FDR lie....like this:

A major lie!

7. If one studies at the feet of Liberal professors and historians.....one imbibes lies. Total, absymal, outrageous lies.

I'll prove it now: According to Liberal star,Arthur Schlesinger, and to the others, the evil industrialists of the 1920s kept pay low and prices high, so that workers didn't have the money to buy the products they were making.

Like this:
a. "Managements disposition [in the 1920s]to maintain prices...meant that workers and farmers weredenied thebenefits ofincreasesin there own productivity. The consequences was the relativedecline of mass purchasing power."
Arthur Schlesinger, "The Crisis of the Old Order."Understanding Bushonomics | Center for American Progress


Got that?


6. Here is that same lie from demagogue Roosevelt, himself:

"Now it is worth remembering, and the cold figures of finance prove it, thatduring that time there was little or no drop in the prices that the consumer had to pay, although those same figures proved that the cost of production fell very greatly; corporate profit resulting from this period was enormous; at the same time little of that profit was devoted to the reduction of prices. The consumer was forgotten.Very little of it went into increased wages; the worker was forgotten, and by no means an adequate proportion was even paid out in dividends--the stockholder was forgotten." Roosevelt's Nomination Address, Chicago, Ill., July 2, 1932



The truth was very much the opposite.

"Hoover: ...keepingwages artificially higheven though bothprofits and prices were falling.Consumer prices plunged almost 25 percent between 1929 and 1933 while nominal wages on average decreased only 15 percent — translating into a substantial increase in wages in real terms,a major component of the cost of doing business. "Great Myths of the Great Depression | Lawrence W. Reed


As economist Richard Ebeling notes, “The‘high-wage’ policy of the Hooveradministration and the trade unions ... succeeded only in pricing workers out of the labor market, generating an increasing circle of unemployment.” Richard M. Ebeling, “Monetary Central Planning and the State, Part XI: The Great Depression and the Crisis of Government Intervention,” Freedom Daily (Fairfax, Virginia: The Future of Freedom Foundation, November 1997), p. 15.



No wonder the indoctrinees consider Roosevelt 'the greatest!" More lies than one can shake a stick at.

Roosevelt lied, and Liberals swear to it.

There was no lie being told. You are attributing subjective speculations and opinions to claim a lie is being told. You can not use all of that analytical opinion leading up to a speculative conclusion to prove a lie. It can only be used as a reason for disagreement.
Distortions and omissions invalidate a thesis. Hence, your thesis fails. That means your college professors would have rejected it. It is nothing more than conspiracy trash.

I just proved that there were no distortions.....and you buried your foot in your mouth.

No, you didn't and you saying you did is the biggest lie. You are voicing opinions and demanding that they are facts.

Do your really expect PC any better?

A Columbia degree in Cut and Paste will do that to you

When it comes to a discussion of education, you fit in like a Pork BBQ pit in Mecca.


And if you don't watch your step...I'm gonna play our fight song again.

 

[rightwinger]

 

[PoliticalChic]

Another of PC's obsessive FDR threads.

He sure does hate that FDR led America out of the Depression and to victory in World War 2

FDR entire first 2 terms had average UE of 20%, thats some leadership

No, it didn't and the methods of calculating unemployment have been provided to you on numerous occasions. You are just lying.

How's this method of calculating unemployment?

.... imagine a triple line of the unemployed, three across, consisting of those unemployed under Hoover, in 1931. The line would have gonefrom Los Angeles, across the country, to the border of Maine.

What effect did Roosevelt have on the line?

Well, eight years later, in 1939, the length of the line would have gone further, from the Maine border, south to Boston, then on to New York City, then to Philadelphia, on to Washington, D.C.- and finally, into Virginia.
Folsom, "New Deal or Raw Deal"


Think Folsom was wrong?

Check it out at the US Bureau of the Census, 'Historical Statistics of the United States: Colonial Times to 1970, I-126 andUnemployment Statistics during the Great Depression

 

[PoliticalChic]

Really?


Is that what he did?


Economist Jim Powell, in “FDR’s Folly,” notes that a disproportionate amount of FDR’s relief and public works spending “went not to the poorest states such as the South, but to western states were people were better off , apparently because there were ‘swing’ states which could yield FDR more votes in the next election.”


Two things about you:
You believe every bit of Leftist propaganda
and...You are never right.