A grand jury has just been ordered to investigate the Trump-Russia Collussion Obama Deep Staters

[DonGlock26]

Just answer the question. Stop being evasive.

That is the answer.

 

[DonGlock26]

Do you have a credible source?

LIke MSNBC?

 

[Marener]

That is the answer.

It’s not. If you can accuse them of faking the data, you can accuse them of faking the server.

You can’t please conspiracy theorists like yourself. You’ll always have another level of conspiracy.

 

[DonGlock26]

It’s not. If you can accuse them of faking the data, you can accuse them of faking the server.

You can’t please conspiracy theorists like yourself. You’ll always have another level of conspiracy.

The FBI has no idea what was really on the servers.

 

[Marener]

The FBI has no idea what was really on the servers.

You’d say that no matter what. Your narrative overrides all rational thought.

 

[DonGlock26]

You’d say that no matter what. Your narrative overrides all rational thought.

Negative. I just understand what a chain of custody is. You do not.

Obviously, the DNC did not want the FBI to see their servers. I wonder why?

 

[Marener]

Negative. I just understand what a chain of custody is. You do not.

Obviously, the DNC did not want the FBI to see their servers. I wonder why?

How is the chain of custody materially different whether the FBI gets the hardware or whether they get the forensic data?

It’s not.

 

[DonGlock26]

How is the chain of custody materially different whether the FBI gets the hardware or whether they get the forensic data?

It’s not.

Describe the chain of custody with the FBI possessing the servers and with crowdstrike possessing the servers. Which chain has the least links?

 

[Marener]

Describe the chain of custody with the FBI possessing the servers and with crowdstrike possessing the servers. Which chain has the least links?

They’re the same. Either Crowdstrike hands over the servers or they hand over the data.

 

[DonGlock26]

They’re the same. Either Crowdstrike hands over the servers or they hand over the data.

No, they are not.

 

[Hafar1014]

Democrats are so screwed in many ways. This scandal hits before the midterm election. It will be in the news cycle every day. There will be criminal prosecution but the civil cases will follow shortly.

 

[Marener]

No, they are not.

He says, with no explanation or rationale.

Russia hacked the DNC. Only the low information, conspiratorial hacks still deny this.

 

[Lisa558]

Democrats are so screwed in many ways. This scandal hits before the midterm election. It will be in the news cycle every day. There will be criminal prosecution but the civil cases will follow shortly.

What I find especially encouraging is the report that 2/3rds of voters are paying attention to this. The 1/3rd who aren’t are probably the same 1/3rd who insist that the Obama Crew did nothing wrong and would vote for the Dem no matter what.

 

[Blisterfinger]

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2017/03/20/full-transcript-fbi-director-james-comey-testifies-on-russian-interference-in-2016-election/

Is that the best you have? Comey the liar? Come on moronor do better. Looks like you're wrong on everything as usual.

 

[Marener]

Is that the best you have? Comey the liar? Come on moronor do better. Looks like you're wrong on everything as usual.

It’s not possible to convince freaks like you of anything.

 

[Blisterfinger]

It’s not possible to convince freaks like you of anything.

Especially with weak sauce like that! So explain to me why the DNC did not want their server looked at by the FBI? After all it was the source of the data! I promise I'll look at it with an open mind and not think that you guys are the most dishonest group ever in politics.

 

[Marener]

Especially with weak sauce like that! So explain to me why the DNC did not want their server looked at by the FBI? After all it was the source of the data! I promise I'll look at it with an open mind and not think that you guys are the most dishonest group ever in politics.

You don’t think that ripping out an entire server and replacing it with new hardware wouldn’t be detrimental to operations and costly?

 

[Blisterfinger]

You don’t think that ripping out an entire server and replacing it with new hardware wouldn’t be detrimental to operations and costly?

No, just let them in and examine it. LOL since when are you libs concerned about cost of things? Answer: only when it is in your best interest. Next

 

[popscottpopscott]

You don’t think that ripping out an entire server and replacing it with new hardware wouldn’t be detrimental to operations and costly?

You obviously don't have a clue what went on.. it was never "a" server.
The DNC’s network consisted of dozens of servers and over 100 computers. These included email servers, file servers, and communications infrastructure. Russian-affiliated groups accessed multiple systems within the DNC. They exfiltrated emails, documents, opposition research (e.g., on Donald Trump), and other sensitive data. They then rebuilt the DNC’s entire IT infrastructure, including: New servers, Secure configurations, Updated software, and operating systems, Hardened network architecture

 

[Blisterfinger]

You don’t think that ripping out an entire server and replacing it with new hardware wouldn’t be detrimental to operations and costly?

You and the Democrats are full of shit! Congratulations you lose again LOL

https://thehill.com/policy/national-security/313555-comey-fbi-did-request-access-to-hacked-dnc-servers/