Marener
Diamond Member
- Jul 26, 2022
- 61,075
- 25,602
- 2,173
Argument from incredulity is a fallacy.Bullshit.![]()
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Argument from incredulity is a fallacy.Bullshit.![]()
How does it verify the data?To verify the data
Argument from incredulity is a fallacy.

Do you understand that you can see the data without seeing the server?Prove the FBI saw the data that they weren't allow to see for themselves.![]()
Why couldn't the FBI look at it?How does it verify the data?
It doesn’t really matter. If you’d accuse the DNC of taking the data, you’d also accuse them of faking the hardware.Why couldn't the FBI look at it?
It matters to most of us. Just not you and your bias. Why do you think they wouldn't allow it?It doesn’t really matter. If you’d accuse the DNC of taking the data, you’d also accuse them of faking the hardware.
You can’t please conspiracy theorists. They just get more conspiracies.
It’s disruptive to their operation and unnecessary to the investigation.It matters to most of us. Just not you and your bias. Why do you think they wouldn't allow it?
Do you understand that you can see the data without seeing the server?
How does having the server prove the data is real?How do they know the data is real? Take their word for it? Evidence doesn't work like that. That's Democrat banana republic stuff.
Nope ,The FBI wanted to examine the servers for good reason but were not allowed by the DNC , it's because they're dishonest and are hiding something. I didn't expect you however to come up with the right answer. You say it was unnecessary but why should we believe you? there was quite a fight put up at the time . Seems like Extreme bias and deflection on your part.It’s disruptive to their operation and unnecessary to the investigation.
But it doesn’t really matter to you. You won’t accept any answer because you already made up your mind.
The FBI said it wasn’t necessary.Nope ,The FBI wanted to examine the servers for good reason but were not allowed by the DNC , it's because they're dishonest and are hiding something. I didn't expect you however to come up with the right answer. You say it was unnecessary but why should we believe you? there was quite a fight put up at the time . Seems like Extreme bias and deflection on your part.
Just answer the question. Stop being evasive.Chain of custody - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Link?The FBI said it wasn’t necessary.
![]()
Fox News Reports AG Pam Bondi Empaneling Grand Jury to Review Declassified Russiagate Documents - The Last Refuge
As a sidenote, a few days ago it was reported that AG Pam Bondi was “blindsided” with the criminal referral from Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard. The narrative was essentially that the criminal review or expectation was a hot potato handed to Bondi by Gabbard and Bondi was...theconservativetreehouse.com
![]()
DOJ launching grand jury investigation into Russiagate conspiracy allegations: sources
Bondi directed her staff to act on the criminal referral from Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard related to the alleged conspiracy to tie President Donald Trump to Russia, and the Department of Justice is now opening a grand jury investigation into the matter, Fox News Digital has...www.foxnews.com
This is what is needed to prosecute the Obama/Hillary coup cabal. Subpoenas and testimony under oath will expose their seditious plot.
James Comey The Proven liar. One of the propagators of the Russia Russia Russia hoax. No wonder you are so misinformed mourner.
Do you have a credible source?James Comey The Proven liar. One of the propagators of the Russia Russia Russia hoax. No wonder you are so misinformed mourner.
There are conflicting reports about that investigation. One thing is a given the DNC is extremely dishonest like you.
![]()
The FBI Now Says Democrats Were Behind Hack Investigation Delay
The Democratic National Committee refused to give FBI investigators access to their hacked servers, according to an FBI statement, a conclusion the president-elect was quick to embrace.www.buzzfeednews.com
Like cnn, Fox MSNBC or the New York times? Which one of those is credible in your book. What would work for ya?Do you have a credible source?