A Different Type of Secession is Already Happening in USA

A DIFFERENT TYPE OF SECESSION IS ALREADY HAPPENING IN USA



By Jeff Crouere
The secession of 1860 will not happen again, but a different kind is already taking place
Lately there has been so much frustration with the last election and the direction of our country that some Trump supporters have been talking about “secession.” Many conservatives and libertarians are asking if it makes sense for certain states to leave the union the way South Carolina left in 1860, after the election of Abraham Lincoln as President of the United States.
Whether it makes “sense” or not, we can be assured that it will not happen. Although the South Carolina state legislature voted in November of 1860 to initiate the process of secession, no state legislature would do that today. This is because most modern state legislatures, even conservative ones, do not have many members who are angry enough at the federal government to support seceding from it.
Americans who live in rural and some suburban areas are executing a secession of their own
Who can forget what happened to Mark and Patricia McCloskey in St. Louis?
Urban areas have been failing Financialally for years

In large cities, politicians spend vast sums of money on enormous municipal government systems which include inefficient departments featuring payrolls that are too large and are too expensive. Other characteristics include broken infrastructure, rampant homelessness, and an overly generous municipal pension system.
How much longer will productive taxpayers living in rural and suburban communities agree to subsidize large cities? Sooner or later, these citizens will say “Enough is enough, we want out!” They will want the urban centers to form their own “United Cities of America,” with their own laws and lifestyles. Simultaneously, Americans living in non-urban areas will want to forge closer bonds of their own as similarities are recognized even more.
The secession of 1860 will not happen again, but a different kind is already taking place.

Comment:
We have seen this happening daily in the Blue Plantation Sanctuary cities and their surronding areas like New York, Chicago, Baltimore, Minneapolis, St, Louis, San Francisco, Los Angeles, Seattle and Portland, while the people in rural and suburban areas pay the taxes to the state and get little in the way of safety and support from the City and State.
Premise is totally backwards. High density population in cities generates more taxes than rural communities. Cities are also where the tax paying businesses are and where wealthy folks choose to live.

Urban supports rural, not the other way around.
The problem is that Urban doesn't support anyone. It is a weird way to look at things. No one disputes that they generate huge amounts of money, but yet they are still in massive debt and hurting their entire states. Illinois without Chicago would be Indiana, and people are all ready leaving from Illinois to Inidana in huge numbers. Cities don't prop anyone up. They are money sucking pits.
 
A DIFFERENT TYPE OF SECESSION IS ALREADY HAPPENING IN USA



By Jeff Crouere
The secession of 1860 will not happen again, but a different kind is already taking place
Lately there has been so much frustration with the last election and the direction of our country that some Trump supporters have been talking about “secession.” Many conservatives and libertarians are asking if it makes sense for certain states to leave the union the way South Carolina left in 1860, after the election of Abraham Lincoln as President of the United States.
Whether it makes “sense” or not, we can be assured that it will not happen. Although the South Carolina state legislature voted in November of 1860 to initiate the process of secession, no state legislature would do that today. This is because most modern state legislatures, even conservative ones, do not have many members who are angry enough at the federal government to support seceding from it.
Americans who live in rural and some suburban areas are executing a secession of their own
Who can forget what happened to Mark and Patricia McCloskey in St. Louis?
Urban areas have been failing Financialally for years

In large cities, politicians spend vast sums of money on enormous municipal government systems which include inefficient departments featuring payrolls that are too large and are too expensive. Other characteristics include broken infrastructure, rampant homelessness, and an overly generous municipal pension system.
How much longer will productive taxpayers living in rural and suburban communities agree to subsidize large cities? Sooner or later, these citizens will say “Enough is enough, we want out!” They will want the urban centers to form their own “United Cities of America,” with their own laws and lifestyles. Simultaneously, Americans living in non-urban areas will want to forge closer bonds of their own as similarities are recognized even more.
The secession of 1860 will not happen again, but a different kind is already taking place.

Comment:
We have seen this happening daily in the Blue Plantation Sanctuary cities and their surronding areas like New York, Chicago, Baltimore, Minneapolis, St, Louis, San Francisco, Los Angeles, Seattle and Portland, while the people in rural and suburban areas pay the taxes to the state and get little in the way of safety and support from the City and State.
Premise is totally backwards. High density population in cities generates more taxes than rural communities. Cities are also where the tax paying businesses are and where wealthy folks choose to live.

Urban supports rural, not the other way around.
The problem is that Urban doesn't support anyone. It is a weird way to look at things. No one disputes that they generate huge amounts of money, but yet they are still in massive debt and hurting their entire states. Illinois without Chicago would be Indiana, and people are all ready leaving from Illinois to Inidana in huge numbers. Cities don't prop anyone up. They are money sucking pits.
Chicago isn't a representative example. They're pretty much bottom of the barrel thanks to the auto companies moving out over the last couple of decades. The exodus of jobs led to an exodus of population and left the city with a huge support staff for people who no longer lived there. The biggest problem they face is unfunded pensions for that huge workforce they had to reduce so suddenly.
 
It hasn't been "debunked" at all. Red states receive the vast majority of federal subsidies and benefits, because no one wants to live in those states.


Debunked.

Against a national average of $1,935 in intergovernmental spending per American, red states receive just $1,879. Blue states get considerably more, at $2,124 per resident.


From YOUR ARTICLE:

Democrats are correct on this fact. The blue states did pay more per capita in federal taxes than the red did. The $12,648 per capita taxation there is 118 percent of the national average. The purple states fell in between the two, slightly below the national average.

Since blue state residents pay more taxes per capita, they should get more back. Duh.

And you Republicans are the ones who supposedly hate taxes so much, remember? Therefore, your red states should be taking a lot less from the Federal government. Talk about hypocritcal.

Therefore, Red States should pay a lot less. Agreed?
 
A DIFFERENT TYPE OF SECESSION IS ALREADY HAPPENING IN USA



By Jeff Crouere
The secession of 1860 will not happen again, but a different kind is already taking place
Lately there has been so much frustration with the last election and the direction of our country that some Trump supporters have been talking about “secession.” Many conservatives and libertarians are asking if it makes sense for certain states to leave the union the way South Carolina left in 1860, after the election of Abraham Lincoln as President of the United States.
Whether it makes “sense” or not, we can be assured that it will not happen. Although the South Carolina state legislature voted in November of 1860 to initiate the process of secession, no state legislature would do that today. This is because most modern state legislatures, even conservative ones, do not have many members who are angry enough at the federal government to support seceding from it.
Americans who live in rural and some suburban areas are executing a secession of their own
Who can forget what happened to Mark and Patricia McCloskey in St. Louis?
Urban areas have been failing Financialally for years

In large cities, politicians spend vast sums of money on enormous municipal government systems which include inefficient departments featuring payrolls that are too large and are too expensive. Other characteristics include broken infrastructure, rampant homelessness, and an overly generous municipal pension system.
How much longer will productive taxpayers living in rural and suburban communities agree to subsidize large cities? Sooner or later, these citizens will say “Enough is enough, we want out!” They will want the urban centers to form their own “United Cities of America,” with their own laws and lifestyles. Simultaneously, Americans living in non-urban areas will want to forge closer bonds of their own as similarities are recognized even more.
The secession of 1860 will not happen again, but a different kind is already taking place.

Comment:
We have seen this happening daily in the Blue Plantation Sanctuary cities and their surronding areas like New York, Chicago, Baltimore, Minneapolis, St, Louis, San Francisco, Los Angeles, Seattle and Portland, while the people in rural and suburban areas pay the taxes to the state and get little in the way of safety and support from the City and State.
Premise is totally backwards. High density population in cities generates more taxes than rural communities. Cities are also where the tax paying businesses are and where wealthy folks choose to live.

Urban supports rural, not the other way around.
The problem is that Urban doesn't support anyone. It is a weird way to look at things. No one disputes that they generate huge amounts of money, but yet they are still in massive debt and hurting their entire states. Illinois without Chicago would be Indiana, and people are all ready leaving from Illinois to Inidana in huge numbers. Cities don't prop anyone up. They are money sucking pits.
Chicago isn't a representative example. They're pretty much bottom of the barrel thanks to the auto companies moving out over the last couple of decades. The exodus of jobs led to an exodus of population and left the city with a huge support staff for people who no longer lived there. The biggest problem they face is unfunded pensions for that huge workforce they had to reduce so suddenly.

Chicago and auto companies????
 
A DIFFERENT TYPE OF SECESSION IS ALREADY HAPPENING IN USA



By Jeff Crouere
The secession of 1860 will not happen again, but a different kind is already taking place
Lately there has been so much frustration with the last election and the direction of our country that some Trump supporters have been talking about “secession.” Many conservatives and libertarians are asking if it makes sense for certain states to leave the union the way South Carolina left in 1860, after the election of Abraham Lincoln as President of the United States.
Whether it makes “sense” or not, we can be assured that it will not happen. Although the South Carolina state legislature voted in November of 1860 to initiate the process of secession, no state legislature would do that today. This is because most modern state legislatures, even conservative ones, do not have many members who are angry enough at the federal government to support seceding from it.
Americans who live in rural and some suburban areas are executing a secession of their own
Who can forget what happened to Mark and Patricia McCloskey in St. Louis?
Urban areas have been failing Financialally for years

In large cities, politicians spend vast sums of money on enormous municipal government systems which include inefficient departments featuring payrolls that are too large and are too expensive. Other characteristics include broken infrastructure, rampant homelessness, and an overly generous municipal pension system.
How much longer will productive taxpayers living in rural and suburban communities agree to subsidize large cities? Sooner or later, these citizens will say “Enough is enough, we want out!” They will want the urban centers to form their own “United Cities of America,” with their own laws and lifestyles. Simultaneously, Americans living in non-urban areas will want to forge closer bonds of their own as similarities are recognized even more.
The secession of 1860 will not happen again, but a different kind is already taking place.

Comment:
We have seen this happening daily in the Blue Plantation Sanctuary cities and their surronding areas like New York, Chicago, Baltimore, Minneapolis, St, Louis, San Francisco, Los Angeles, Seattle and Portland, while the people in rural and suburban areas pay the taxes to the state and get little in the way of safety and support from the City and State.

But how do we keep Commie creeps from infesting truly American communities?
The rat fucks are like locusts. See Georgia for example and Texas is already teetering.
 
The populated blue states already subsidize the unpopulated red states.

States like Mississippi and Alabama will become even more worthless if states like California and New York no longer support them and keep them afloat.


Lie. That has been debunked. As an example, they count Social Security benefits in Florida as subsidization. BS. Plus military bases, which of course are of national import.

BTW NY has been losing population for at least 6 decades and CA is now suffering the same fate. But I love how you crap all over the citizens of MS and Al, typical douche lefty that you are.

It hasn't been "debunked" at all. Red states receive the vast majority of federal subsidies and benefits, because no one wants to live in those states.
Yes Florida, Texas, Tennessee and the like are all terrible places to live,,,, so you libs take notice for your own peace of mind stay away from the red states
 
Last edited:
A DIFFERENT TYPE OF SECESSION IS ALREADY HAPPENING IN USA



By Jeff Crouere
The secession of 1860 will not happen again, but a different kind is already taking place
Lately there has been so much frustration with the last election and the direction of our country that some Trump supporters have been talking about “secession.” Many conservatives and libertarians are asking if it makes sense for certain states to leave the union the way South Carolina left in 1860, after the election of Abraham Lincoln as President of the United States.
Whether it makes “sense” or not, we can be assured that it will not happen. Although the South Carolina state legislature voted in November of 1860 to initiate the process of secession, no state legislature would do that today. This is because most modern state legislatures, even conservative ones, do not have many members who are angry enough at the federal government to support seceding from it.
Americans who live in rural and some suburban areas are executing a secession of their own
Who can forget what happened to Mark and Patricia McCloskey in St. Louis?
Urban areas have been failing Financialally for years

In large cities, politicians spend vast sums of money on enormous municipal government systems which include inefficient departments featuring payrolls that are too large and are too expensive. Other characteristics include broken infrastructure, rampant homelessness, and an overly generous municipal pension system.
How much longer will productive taxpayers living in rural and suburban communities agree to subsidize large cities? Sooner or later, these citizens will say “Enough is enough, we want out!” They will want the urban centers to form their own “United Cities of America,” with their own laws and lifestyles. Simultaneously, Americans living in non-urban areas will want to forge closer bonds of their own as similarities are recognized even more.
The secession of 1860 will not happen again, but a different kind is already taking place.

Comment:
We have seen this happening daily in the Blue Plantation Sanctuary cities and their surronding areas like New York, Chicago, Baltimore, Minneapolis, St, Louis, San Francisco, Los Angeles, Seattle and Portland, while the people in rural and suburban areas pay the taxes to the state and get little in the way of safety and support from the City and State.

Golly gee whiz...

How does this explain "gentrification" going on in every major city in the country?
 
A DIFFERENT TYPE OF SECESSION IS ALREADY HAPPENING IN USA



By Jeff Crouere
The secession of 1860 will not happen again, but a different kind is already taking place
Lately there has been so much frustration with the last election and the direction of our country that some Trump supporters have been talking about “secession.” Many conservatives and libertarians are asking if it makes sense for certain states to leave the union the way South Carolina left in 1860, after the election of Abraham Lincoln as President of the United States.
Whether it makes “sense” or not, we can be assured that it will not happen. Although the South Carolina state legislature voted in November of 1860 to initiate the process of secession, no state legislature would do that today. This is because most modern state legislatures, even conservative ones, do not have many members who are angry enough at the federal government to support seceding from it.
Americans who live in rural and some suburban areas are executing a secession of their own
Who can forget what happened to Mark and Patricia McCloskey in St. Louis?
Urban areas have been failing Financialally for years

In large cities, politicians spend vast sums of money on enormous municipal government systems which include inefficient departments featuring payrolls that are too large and are too expensive. Other characteristics include broken infrastructure, rampant homelessness, and an overly generous municipal pension system.
How much longer will productive taxpayers living in rural and suburban communities agree to subsidize large cities? Sooner or later, these citizens will say “Enough is enough, we want out!” They will want the urban centers to form their own “United Cities of America,” with their own laws and lifestyles. Simultaneously, Americans living in non-urban areas will want to forge closer bonds of their own as similarities are recognized even more.
The secession of 1860 will not happen again, but a different kind is already taking place.

Comment:
We have seen this happening daily in the Blue Plantation Sanctuary cities and their surronding areas like New York, Chicago, Baltimore, Minneapolis, St, Louis, San Francisco, Los Angeles, Seattle and Portland, while the people in rural and suburban areas pay the taxes to the state and get little in the way of safety and support from the City and State.
Premise is totally backwards. High density population in cities generates more taxes than rural communities. Cities are also where the tax paying businesses are and where wealthy folks choose to live.

Urban supports rural, not the other way around.
The problem is that Urban doesn't support anyone. It is a weird way to look at things. No one disputes that they generate huge amounts of money, but yet they are still in massive debt and hurting their entire states. Illinois without Chicago would be Indiana, and people are all ready leaving from Illinois to Inidana in huge numbers. Cities don't prop anyone up. They are money sucking pits.
Chicago isn't a representative example. They're pretty much bottom of the barrel thanks to the auto companies moving out over the last couple of decades. The exodus of jobs led to an exodus of population and left the city with a huge support staff for people who no longer lived there. The biggest problem they face is unfunded pensions for that huge workforce they had to reduce so suddenly.

~~~~~~
Obviously you have your cities boloxed up.. It was Detroit, Flint Michigan and Cleveland Ohio.
In any case you can thank the Democrats for raising taxes on manufacturers thus pushing them to offshore sites to continue to make profits.
That's why China now eats our lunch. All parts neede to assemble an auto are manufactured in China and more than like if it's a Chevy or Ford it's either assembled in Canada or Mexico.
The same thing goes for pharmaceuticals. Pfizer and other manufactuers now have their manufacturing in China.
 
The populated blue states already subsidize the unpopulated red states.

States like Mississippi and Alabama will become even more worthless if states like California and New York no longer support them and keep them afloat.


Lie. That has been debunked. As an example, they count Social Security benefits in Florida as subsidization. BS. Plus military bases, which of course are of national import.

BTW NY has been losing population for at least 6 decades and CA is now suffering the same fate. But I love how you crap all over the citizens of MS and Al, typical douche lefty that you are.

It hasn't been "debunked" at all. Red states receive the vast majority of federal subsidies and benefits, because no one wants to live in those states.
Yes Florida, Texas, Tennessee and the like are all terrible places to live,,,, so you libs take notice for your own peace of mind stay away from the res states
~~~~~~
You should also include North Carolina. Yes horrible place filled with Bible quoting beer drinking, gun toting rednecks.... That's why I live there...
 
A DIFFERENT TYPE OF SECESSION IS ALREADY HAPPENING IN USA



By Jeff Crouere
The secession of 1860 will not happen again, but a different kind is already taking place
Lately there has been so much frustration with the last election and the direction of our country that some Trump supporters have been talking about “secession.” Many conservatives and libertarians are asking if it makes sense for certain states to leave the union the way South Carolina left in 1860, after the election of Abraham Lincoln as President of the United States.
Whether it makes “sense” or not, we can be assured that it will not happen. Although the South Carolina state legislature voted in November of 1860 to initiate the process of secession, no state legislature would do that today. This is because most modern state legislatures, even conservative ones, do not have many members who are angry enough at the federal government to support seceding from it.
Americans who live in rural and some suburban areas are executing a secession of their own
Who can forget what happened to Mark and Patricia McCloskey in St. Louis?
Urban areas have been failing Financialally for years

In large cities, politicians spend vast sums of money on enormous municipal government systems which include inefficient departments featuring payrolls that are too large and are too expensive. Other characteristics include broken infrastructure, rampant homelessness, and an overly generous municipal pension system.
How much longer will productive taxpayers living in rural and suburban communities agree to subsidize large cities? Sooner or later, these citizens will say “Enough is enough, we want out!” They will want the urban centers to form their own “United Cities of America,” with their own laws and lifestyles. Simultaneously, Americans living in non-urban areas will want to forge closer bonds of their own as similarities are recognized even more.
The secession of 1860 will not happen again, but a different kind is already taking place.

Comment:
We have seen this happening daily in the Blue Plantation Sanctuary cities and their surronding areas like New York, Chicago, Baltimore, Minneapolis, St, Louis, San Francisco, Los Angeles, Seattle and Portland, while the people in rural and suburban areas pay the taxes to the state and get little in the way of safety and support from the City and State.

Golly gee whiz...

How does this explain "gentrification" going on in every major city in the country?

~~~~~~
Good question.... Who are the gentry, gentrifying the city slums?
The influx of more affluent residents and businesses into the seedier spots of the city. It is a common and controversial topic in politics and in urban planning. Gentrification often increases the economic value of a neighborhood.

********​
********​
 
A DIFFERENT TYPE OF SECESSION IS ALREADY HAPPENING IN USA



By Jeff Crouere
The secession of 1860 will not happen again, but a different kind is already taking place
Lately there has been so much frustration with the last election and the direction of our country that some Trump supporters have been talking about “secession.” Many conservatives and libertarians are asking if it makes sense for certain states to leave the union the way South Carolina left in 1860, after the election of Abraham Lincoln as President of the United States.
Whether it makes “sense” or not, we can be assured that it will not happen. Although the South Carolina state legislature voted in November of 1860 to initiate the process of secession, no state legislature would do that today. This is because most modern state legislatures, even conservative ones, do not have many members who are angry enough at the federal government to support seceding from it.
Americans who live in rural and some suburban areas are executing a secession of their own
Who can forget what happened to Mark and Patricia McCloskey in St. Louis?
Urban areas have been failing Financialally for years

In large cities, politicians spend vast sums of money on enormous municipal government systems which include inefficient departments featuring payrolls that are too large and are too expensive. Other characteristics include broken infrastructure, rampant homelessness, and an overly generous municipal pension system.
How much longer will productive taxpayers living in rural and suburban communities agree to subsidize large cities? Sooner or later, these citizens will say “Enough is enough, we want out!” They will want the urban centers to form their own “United Cities of America,” with their own laws and lifestyles. Simultaneously, Americans living in non-urban areas will want to forge closer bonds of their own as similarities are recognized even more.
The secession of 1860 will not happen again, but a different kind is already taking place.

Comment:
We have seen this happening daily in the Blue Plantation Sanctuary cities and their surronding areas like New York, Chicago, Baltimore, Minneapolis, St, Louis, San Francisco, Los Angeles, Seattle and Portland, while the people in rural and suburban areas pay the taxes to the state and get little in the way of safety and support from the City and State.
Premise is totally backwards. High density population in cities generates more taxes than rural communities. Cities are also where the tax paying businesses are and where wealthy folks choose to live.

Urban supports rural, not the other way around.
The problem is that Urban doesn't support anyone. It is a weird way to look at things. No one disputes that they generate huge amounts of money, but yet they are still in massive debt and hurting their entire states. Illinois without Chicago would be Indiana, and people are all ready leaving from Illinois to Inidana in huge numbers. Cities don't prop anyone up. They are money sucking pits.
Chicago isn't a representative example. They're pretty much bottom of the barrel thanks to the auto companies moving out over the last couple of decades. The exodus of jobs led to an exodus of population and left the city with a huge support staff for people who no longer lived there. The biggest problem they face is unfunded pensions for that huge workforce they had to reduce so suddenly.

Chicago and auto companies????
My bad, for some reason I had it in me head we were talking about detroit.
 
Unless you need to be close to the government handouts, who the fuck would want to live in any large urban area in this country today?
 
A DIFFERENT TYPE OF SECESSION IS ALREADY HAPPENING IN USA



By Jeff Crouere
The secession of 1860 will not happen again, but a different kind is already taking place
Lately there has been so much frustration with the last election and the direction of our country that some Trump supporters have been talking about “secession.” Many conservatives and libertarians are asking if it makes sense for certain states to leave the union the way South Carolina left in 1860, after the election of Abraham Lincoln as President of the United States.
Whether it makes “sense” or not, we can be assured that it will not happen. Although the South Carolina state legislature voted in November of 1860 to initiate the process of secession, no state legislature would do that today. This is because most modern state legislatures, even conservative ones, do not have many members who are angry enough at the federal government to support seceding from it.
Americans who live in rural and some suburban areas are executing a secession of their own
Who can forget what happened to Mark and Patricia McCloskey in St. Louis?
Urban areas have been failing Financialally for years

In large cities, politicians spend vast sums of money on enormous municipal government systems which include inefficient departments featuring payrolls that are too large and are too expensive. Other characteristics include broken infrastructure, rampant homelessness, and an overly generous municipal pension system.
How much longer will productive taxpayers living in rural and suburban communities agree to subsidize large cities? Sooner or later, these citizens will say “Enough is enough, we want out!” They will want the urban centers to form their own “United Cities of America,” with their own laws and lifestyles. Simultaneously, Americans living in non-urban areas will want to forge closer bonds of their own as similarities are recognized even more.
The secession of 1860 will not happen again, but a different kind is already taking place.

Comment:
We have seen this happening daily in the Blue Plantation Sanctuary cities and their surronding areas like New York, Chicago, Baltimore, Minneapolis, St, Louis, San Francisco, Los Angeles, Seattle and Portland, while the people in rural and suburban areas pay the taxes to the state and get little in the way of safety and support from the City and State.
Premise is totally backwards. High density population in cities generates more taxes than rural communities. Cities are also where the tax paying businesses are and where wealthy folks choose to live.

Urban supports rural, not the other way around.
The problem is that Urban doesn't support anyone. It is a weird way to look at things. No one disputes that they generate huge amounts of money, but yet they are still in massive debt and hurting their entire states. Illinois without Chicago would be Indiana, and people are all ready leaving from Illinois to Inidana in huge numbers. Cities don't prop anyone up. They are money sucking pits.
Chicago isn't a representative example. They're pretty much bottom of the barrel thanks to the auto companies moving out over the last couple of decades. The exodus of jobs led to an exodus of population and left the city with a huge support staff for people who no longer lived there. The biggest problem they face is unfunded pensions for that huge workforce they had to reduce so suddenly.

Chicago and auto companies????
My bad, for some reason I had it in me head we were talking about detroit.

Fair enough. I figured you were referring to Detroit. But, did the entire auto industry move out? How did the city government respond? More taxes and regulations or less? What did the city government do to attract new industry?
 
If Chicago did not exist, wouldn't Illinois be better off? Detroit is killing Michigan. To think the poorly run cities are anything but a drain on their states is laughable.
Quick name another city in Illinois.

Anyone? Bueller? Bueller?

Joliet, Springfield, Rockford, Peoria, Champaign-Urbana, and Skokie...
 
If Chicago did not exist, wouldn't Illinois be better off? Detroit is killing Michigan. To think the poorly run cities are anything but a drain on their states is laughable.
Quick name another city in Illinois.

Anyone? Bueller? Bueller?

Joliet, Springfield, Rockford, Peoria, Champaign-Urbana, and Skokie...
It took you the better part of an hour to look up those other "towns". Do any of them have a post office? LOL
 
If Chicago did not exist, wouldn't Illinois be better off? Detroit is killing Michigan. To think the poorly run cities are anything but a drain on their states is laughable.
Quick name another city in Illinois.

Anyone? Bueller? Bueller?

Joliet, Springfield, Rockford, Peoria, Champaign-Urbana, and Skokie...
It took you the better part of an hour to look up those other "towns". Do any of them have a post office? LOL


I read your response and answered it as soon as I read it seeing I grew up in Crest Hill, Illinois and lived in Harrisburg, Illinois for a few years...

All of those I wrote should have their own Post Office seeing they are towns with populations over ten thousand...

Joliet is a Prison Town and famously known for it appearance in the Sting with Robert Redford and Paul Newman...
 

Forum List

Back
Top