A 4 min Video With 51 Shocking Facts

[Mojo2]

I'm going to do my Liberal imitation by not clicking on the video.

Persistent ignorance seems to be their preferred state so let me try it and see how it works for me.

OR NOT.

I like being well informed.

Libs just look at information as optional.

 

[1776]

A 20 year old bimbo with her high school education and fast food experience in life....of course, a role model for fluffer.

 

[Missouri_Mike]

Sorry. I got about a minute into it and didn't hear any facts at all. I heard a mishmash of sophomoric and generally false impressions.

"...when I speak on campus..."

Jesus.

Everything they say is true.

Maybe you should listen to the rest of it before making judgement.

Don't waste the other three minutes DGS, I did and it didn't get any better.

What I do find shocking Flopper is you actually thought this was worth posting. The most substance the video had was her showing her hairy arm pits as a badge of...I'm not sure what really. Nothing in the video was shocking or even coherent. Typical lib ranting bullshit.

 

[auditor0007]

Sorry. I got about a minute into it and didn't hear any facts at all. I heard a mishmash of sophomoric and generally false impressions.

"...when I speak on campus..."

Jesus.

Everything they say is true.

Maybe you should listen to the rest of it before making judgement.

Don't waste the other three minutes DGS, I did and it didn't get any better.

What I do find shocking Flopper is you actually thought this was worth posting. The most substance the video had was her showing her hairy arm pits as a badge of...I'm not sure what really. Nothing in the video was shocking or even coherent. Typical lib ranting bullshit.

Not finding any substance in that video would be typical of a conservative, and not at all surprising. Everything she said is pretty much on point, but I do agree with you on the hairy armpits. Not sure what the purpose of those are, but it's her preference. Just not something I find attractive.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

She's a moron. Another illustration of the 1960's neocon, left wing, democrat indoctrination of current young people going on right now.
Same shit us older folks went through during the days of the original and genuine counter culture. Problem is that some of us paid attention to the answers to our challenges and progressed forward while those who didn't are essentially today's university academia. The kids who get brainwashed by them will suffer. Now they'll have to learn -- on their own -- all those answers that we proto liberals already learned.

 

[FA_Q2]

Facts? There is virtually nothing in that video that constitutes a fact. The majority of it is blubbering idiocy.

Let me give her a hint - men and women ARE different. That is not a case of sexism. It is not sexist to expect a woman to shave her armpits and not a man. It is simply the acknowledgement that men and women are different, desire different things and are not biological copies of each other. One of the true insanities of our time is the attempt to bury this is some asinine sea of PC thought. It is sickening.

You know, the opposite of a 'feminist' really is a misogynist. One is not accepted at all though - why is the other.

 

[Flopper]

Facts? There is virtually nothing in that video that constitutes a fact. The majority of it is blubbering idiocy.

Let me give her a hint - men and women ARE different. That is not a case of sexism. It is not sexist to expect a woman to shave her armpits and not a man. It is simply the acknowledgement that men and women are different, desire different things and are not biological copies of each other. One of the true insanities of our time is the attempt to bury this is some asinine sea of PC thought. It is sickening.

You know, the opposite of a 'feminist' really is a misogynist. One is not accepted at all though - why is the other.

No, the opposite of a feminist is not a misogynist. By definition a feminist is a person who believes that men and women should have equal rights and opportunities. A misogynist is a person who dislikes, despises, or is strongly prejudiced against women.

It's interesting that so many people should expect women to shave their armpits. Sleeveless dresses and lot of adverting about a hundred years ago convince women to shave their underarms. Before WWII and the shortage of nylons, leg shaving was not common.

 

[The Rabbi]

Facts? There is virtually nothing in that video that constitutes a fact. The majority of it is blubbering idiocy.

Let me give her a hint - men and women ARE different. That is not a case of sexism. It is not sexist to expect a woman to shave her armpits and not a man. It is simply the acknowledgement that men and women are different, desire different things and are not biological copies of each other. One of the true insanities of our time is the attempt to bury this is some asinine sea of PC thought. It is sickening.

You know, the opposite of a 'feminist' really is a misogynist. One is not accepted at all though - why is the other.

No, the opposite of a feminist is not a misogynist. By definition a feminist is a person who believes that men and women should have equal rights and opportunities. A misogynist is a person who dislikes, despises, or is strongly prejudiced against women.

It's interesting that so many people should expect women to shave their armpits. Sleeveless dresses and lot of adverting about a hundred years ago convince women to shave their underarms. Before WWII and the shortage of nylons, leg shaving was not common.

Link?
Before WW2 deodorant wasn't common either. But that's no excuse.

The video was shocking only in the sense that anyone believed there were demonstrable "facts" in it.

 

[Missouri_Mike]

Maybe you should listen to the rest of it before making judgement.

Don't waste the other three minutes DGS, I did and it didn't get any better.

What I do find shocking Flopper is you actually thought this was worth posting. The most substance the video had was her showing her hairy arm pits as a badge of...I'm not sure what really. Nothing in the video was shocking or even coherent. Typical lib ranting bullshit.

Not finding any substance in that video would be typical of a conservative, and not at all surprising. Everything she said is pretty much on point, but I do agree with you on the hairy armpits. Not sure what the purpose of those are, but it's her preference. Just not something I find attractive.

The ignorant rant's you approve of? She didn't say anything on point or had a point in any of this video.

Is this seriously your best representative here?

 

[Flopper]

Facts? There is virtually nothing in that video that constitutes a fact. The majority of it is blubbering idiocy.

Let me give her a hint - men and women ARE different. That is not a case of sexism. It is not sexist to expect a woman to shave her armpits and not a man. It is simply the acknowledgement that men and women are different, desire different things and are not biological copies of each other. One of the true insanities of our time is the attempt to bury this is some asinine sea of PC thought. It is sickening.

You know, the opposite of a 'feminist' really is a misogynist. One is not accepted at all though - why is the other.

No, the opposite of a feminist is not a misogynist. By definition a feminist is a person who believes that men and women should have equal rights and opportunities. A misogynist is a person who dislikes, despises, or is strongly prejudiced against women.

It's interesting that so many people should expect women to shave their armpits. Sleeveless dresses and lot of adverting about a hundred years ago convince women to shave their underarms. Before WWII and the shortage of nylons, leg shaving was not common.

Link?
Before WW2 deodorant wasn't common either. But that's no excuse.

The video was shocking only in the sense that anyone believed there were demonstrable "facts" in it.

"In the West, the practice began for cosmetic reasons around 1915 in the United States and United Kingdom, when one or more magazines showed a woman in a dress with shaved underarms"
Underarm hair - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Women first started shaving their legs during WW2 because of a Nylon shortage. Strange World News

 

[buckeye45_73]

Lets break this down a bit....

So she's a feminist because there is an emphasis on tits? and sex?

Isnt that what the feminist and new left wanted?

Didn't the conservatives fight to keep nudity out of movies?

Don't they have issues with all this sexuality?

Remember when Jema Jamison came out for Romney? She did it for fiscal reasons, but remember how stunned people were that a porn star would come out for people who didn't like her profession?

So how do democrats reconcile that feminists want LESS sexuality?

And isn't the "feminist: in this video, FOR sexuality and making it more common and such?

The problem with liberals is there is a double standard for sex, but instead of trying to reduce it among men.....they increased it among women, and now we have a lot more STDS, abortions, teen pregnancies, ect.....

 

[MaxGrit]

I'm convinced she's a feminist mainly because she's stupid.

 

[Flopper]

If you look at the video carefully, you'll there are a lot of the facts such as number of women in congress, 700 bills to regulate a woman's body, number of women in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics jobs, number of media executives, and difference in what men and women make in a life time can be easily verified. I check on several and they were right on. Other comments such as boobs are used to sell everything from soap to burgers and movie ratings for male and female organisms are common knowledge.

I think the real problem that some people have with this video is not the facts but rather how they are presented. If this same information was presented by a 250 pound lesbian who's ugly as sin, no one would care because that's the kind of piece they would expect. However, for this to come from an attractive young girl with a huge internet following, 67 million hits on her videos and nearly a million subscribers to her web site; that is disturbing.

 

[MaxGrit]

She is missing the forest for the trees. What she's too stupid to realize is that the feminist movement is actually harmful to women.

 

[The Rabbi]

If you look at the video carefully, you'll there are a lot of the facts such as number of women in congress, 700 bills to regulate a woman's body, number of women in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics jobs, number of media executives, and difference in what men and women make in a life time can be easily verified. I check on several and they were right on. Other comments such as boobs are used to sell everything from soap to burgers and movie ratings for male and female organisms are common knowledge.

I think the real problem that some people have with this video is not the facts but rather how they are presented. If this same information was presented by a 250 pound lesbian who's ugly as sin, no one would care because that's the kind of piece they would expect. However, for this to come from an attractive young girl with a huge internet following, 67 million hits on her videos and nearly a million subscribers to her web site; that is disturbing.

WHo cares how many women in Congress there are.
There are no bills to regulate a woman's body. That's the kind of nonsense I'm calling out here.
That sex is used to sell stuff is hardly new, interesting, or outrageous.

The real problem is you fall for this crap hook line and sinker.

 

[Freewill]

If you look at the video carefully, you'll there are a lot of the facts such as number of women in congress, 700 bills to regulate a woman's body, number of women in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics jobs, number of media executives, and difference in what men and women make in a life time can be easily verified. I check on several and they were right on. Other comments such as boobs are used to sell everything from soap to burgers and movie ratings for male and female organisms are common knowledge.

I think the real problem that some people have with this video is not the facts but rather how they are presented. If this same information was presented by a 250 pound lesbian who's ugly as sin, no one would care because that's the kind of piece they would expect. However, for this to come from an attractive young girl with a huge internet following, 67 million hits on her videos and nearly a million subscribers to her web site; that is disturbing.

If you look at the video too carefully you brain will not just numb it will start to turn to goo.

 

[Flopper]

She is missing the forest for the trees. What she's too stupid to realize is that the feminist movement is actually harmful to women.

How so?

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

If you look at the video carefully, you'll there are a lot of the facts such as number of women in congress, 700 bills to regulate a woman's body, number of women in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics jobs, number of media executives, and difference in what men and women make in a life time can be easily verified. I check on several and they were right on. Other comments such as boobs are used to sell everything from soap to burgers and movie ratings for male and female organisms are common knowledge.

I think the real problem that some people have with this video is not the facts but rather how they are presented. If this same information was presented by a 250 pound lesbian who's ugly as sin, no one would care because that's the kind of piece they would expect. However, for this to come from an attractive young girl with a huge internet following, 67 million hits on her videos and nearly a million subscribers to her web site; that is disturbing.

And the real problem most on the right have with the video is that it relates facts that conflict with errant conservative dogma.

 

[The Rabbi]

If you look at the video carefully, you'll there are a lot of the facts such as number of women in congress, 700 bills to regulate a woman's body, number of women in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics jobs, number of media executives, and difference in what men and women make in a life time can be easily verified. I check on several and they were right on. Other comments such as boobs are used to sell everything from soap to burgers and movie ratings for male and female organisms are common knowledge.

I think the real problem that some people have with this video is not the facts but rather how they are presented. If this same information was presented by a 250 pound lesbian who's ugly as sin, no one would care because that's the kind of piece they would expect. However, for this to come from an attractive young girl with a huge internet following, 67 million hits on her videos and nearly a million subscribers to her web site; that is disturbing.

And the real problem most on the right have with the video is that it relates facts that conflict with errant conservative dogma.

No, the problem is that many of those facts are irrelevant, some are simply wrong, others nugatory. Is it a shock to you that advertisers use sex to sell products? And didnt the early feminists support bra burning, and the like? didnt they support the idea that if men can go around shirtless, women can too?
It's nonsense. No wonder you fall for it.

 

[Flopper]

If you look at the video carefully, you'll there are a lot of the facts such as number of women in congress, 700 bills to regulate a woman's body, number of women in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics jobs, number of media executives, and difference in what men and women make in a life time can be easily verified. I check on several and they were right on. Other comments such as boobs are used to sell everything from soap to burgers and movie ratings for male and female organisms are common knowledge.

I think the real problem that some people have with this video is not the facts but rather how they are presented. If this same information was presented by a 250 pound lesbian who's ugly as sin, no one would care because that's the kind of piece they would expect. However, for this to come from an attractive young girl with a huge internet following, 67 million hits on her videos and nearly a million subscribers to her web site; that is disturbing.

WHo cares how many women in Congress there are.
There are no bills to regulate a woman's body. That's the kind of nonsense I'm calling out here.
That sex is used to sell stuff is hardly new, interesting, or outrageous.

The real problem is you fall for this crap hook line and sinker.

Who cares? I thing you would be surprised at how many women in this country do care.