skookerasbil
Platinum Member
This thread definately calls for a quick check of the USMessageBoard Political forum scoreboard.......................
97% of Scientists agree..........Al Gore knows what he is talking about
- Thread starter rightwinger
- Start date
Father Time
I'll be Still Alive
- Nov 29, 2008
- 5,130
- 450
- 83
All a hoax s0n...................you stupid fcukk. You still think this is about the environment.This is what happens to people who spend their lives living in the middle of fcukking nowhere. You become a mental case.
I call Poe's Law.
Mr. Shaman
Senior Member
- May 4, 2010
- 23,892
- 822
- 48
....And, it's lookin' like the (remaining) 3% are finally straggling-in.....
April 04, 2011
"A team of UC Berkeley physicists and statisticians that set out to challenge the scientific consensus on global warming is finding that its data-crunching effort is producing results nearly identical to those underlying the prevailing view.
The Berkeley Earth Surface Temperature project was launched by physics professor Richard Muller, a longtime critic of government-led climate studies, to address what he called "the legitimate concerns" of skeptics who believe that global warming is exaggerated.
But Muller unexpectedly told a congressional hearing last week that the work of the three principal groups that have analyzed the temperature trends underlying climate science is "excellent.... We see a global warming trend that is very similar to that previously reported by the other groups."
The hearing was called by GOP leaders of the House Science & Technology committee, who have expressed doubts about the integrity of climate science. It was one of several inquiries in recent weeks as the Environmental Protection Agency's efforts to curb planet-heating emissions from industrial plants and motor vehicles have come under strenuous attack in Congress.
The Berkeley project's biggest private backer, at $150,000, is the Charles G. Koch Charitable Foundation.
Oil billionaires Charles and David Koch are the nation's most prominent funders of efforts to prevent curbs on the burning of fossil fuels, the largest contributor to planet-warming greenhouse gases.
The $620,000 project is also partly funded by the federal Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, where Muller is a senior scientist. Muller said the Koch foundation and other contributors will have no influence over the results, which he plans to submit to peer-reviewed scientific journals.
Although in his testimony Muller praised the "integrity" of previous studies, he said estimates of human-caused warming need to be "improved."
Other scientists noted that temperature is only one factor in climate change. "Even if the thermometer had never been invented, the evidence is there from deep ocean changes, from receding glaciers, from rising sea levels and receding sea ice and spring snow cover," Thorne said.
"All the physical indicators are consistent with a warming world. There is no doubt the trend of temperature is upwards since the early 20th century. And that trend is accelerating."
. . . .
Last edited:
....And, it's lookin' like the (remaining) 3% are finally straggling-in.....
April 04, 2011
"A team of UC Berkeley physicists and statisticians that set out to challenge the scientific consensus on global warming is finding that its data-crunching effort is producing results nearly identical to those underlying the prevailing view.
The Berkeley Earth Surface Temperature project was launched by physics professor Richard Muller, a longtime critic of government-led climate studies, to address what he called "the legitimate concerns" of skeptics who believe that global warming is exaggerated.
But Muller unexpectedly told a congressional hearing last week that the work of the three principal groups that have analyzed the temperature trends underlying climate science is "excellent.... We see a global warming trend that is very similar to that previously reported by the other groups."
The hearing was called by GOP leaders of the House Science & Technology committee, who have expressed doubts about the integrity of climate science. It was one of several inquiries in recent weeks as the Environmental Protection Agency's efforts to curb planet-heating emissions from industrial plants and motor vehicles have come under strenuous attack in Congress.
The Berkeley project's biggest private backer, at $150,000, is the Charles G. Koch Charitable Foundation.
Oil billionaires Charles and David Koch are the nation's most prominent funders of efforts to prevent curbs on the burning of fossil fuels, the largest contributor to planet-warming greenhouse gases.
The $620,000 project is also partly funded by the federal Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, where Muller is a senior scientist. Muller said the Koch foundation and other contributors will have no influence over the results, which he plans to submit to peer-reviewed scientific journals.
Although in his testimony Muller praised the "integrity" of previous studies, he said estimates of human-caused warming need to be "improved."
Other scientists noted that temperature is only one factor in climate change. "Even if the thermometer had never been invented, the evidence is there from deep ocean changes, from receding glaciers, from rising sea levels and receding sea ice and spring snow cover," Thorne said.
"All the physical indicators are consistent with a warming world. There is no doubt the trend of temperature is upwards since the early 20th century. And that trend is accelerating."
This story deserves a thread of its own. Try not to make it so colorful.
Mr. Shaman
Senior Member
- May 4, 2010
- 23,892
- 822
- 48
....And, it's lookin' like the (remaining) 3% are finally straggling-in.....
April 04, 2011
"A team of UC Berkeley physicists and statisticians that set out to challenge the scientific consensus on global warming is finding that its data-crunching effort is producing results nearly identical to those underlying the prevailing view.
The Berkeley Earth Surface Temperature project was launched by physics professor Richard Muller, a longtime critic of government-led climate studies, to address what he called "the legitimate concerns" of skeptics who believe that global warming is exaggerated.
But Muller unexpectedly told a congressional hearing last week that the work of the three principal groups that have analyzed the temperature trends underlying climate science is "excellent.... We see a global warming trend that is very similar to that previously reported by the other groups."
The hearing was called by GOP leaders of the House Science & Technology committee, who have expressed doubts about the integrity of climate science. It was one of several inquiries in recent weeks as the Environmental Protection Agency's efforts to curb planet-heating emissions from industrial plants and motor vehicles have come under strenuous attack in Congress.
The Berkeley project's biggest private backer, at $150,000, is the Charles G. Koch Charitable Foundation.
Oil billionaires Charles and David Koch are the nation's most prominent funders of efforts to prevent curbs on the burning of fossil fuels, the largest contributor to planet-warming greenhouse gases.
The $620,000 project is also partly funded by the federal Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, where Muller is a senior scientist. Muller said the Koch foundation and other contributors will have no influence over the results, which he plans to submit to peer-reviewed scientific journals.
Although in his testimony Muller praised the "integrity" of previous studies, he said estimates of human-caused warming need to be "improved."
Other scientists noted that temperature is only one factor in climate change. "Even if the thermometer had never been invented, the evidence is there from deep ocean changes, from receding glaciers, from rising sea levels and receding sea ice and spring snow cover," Thorne said.
"All the physical indicators are consistent with a warming world. There is no doubt the trend of temperature is upwards since the early 20th century. And that trend is accelerating."
This story deserves a thread of its own.
The Mods don't appreciate that.....unless it's a pro-Con thread.
Ignoring that a couple decades ago the same scientists thought we were headed into...an ice age...I like the irony that you're citing a poll of people who believe in the scientific method and not opinion as the base of science...
Last edited:
sinister59
Rookie
- Mar 21, 2011
- 884
- 34
- 0
- Banned
- #248
This thread definately calls for a quick check of the USMessageBoard Political forum scoreboard.......................
funny , the right bitches about leaving their kid no debt , but don't care their leaving their kids no planet .
bucs90
Gold Member
- Feb 25, 2010
- 26,545
- 6,030
- 280
So let me get this right.
The Earth goes through warming and cooling cycles. And that big ass fu**ing giant ball of fire in the center of our solar system may affect our temperature?
Well Jesus H Christ, let me go out and buy a NissanLeaf and hug a polar bear.
The Earth goes through warming and cooling cycles. And that big ass fu**ing giant ball of fire in the center of our solar system may affect our temperature?
Well Jesus H Christ, let me go out and buy a NissanLeaf and hug a polar bear.
I remember a Peanuts where Linus thought since it was getting colder and colder every day that it would always do that and summer would never return. Of course he was like 5, I don't know what the left's excuse is...
sinister59
Rookie
- Mar 21, 2011
- 884
- 34
- 0
- Banned
- #251
teabaggers bitch about the national debt but crap on schools don't care how stupid their kids are getting , don't care if their planet is livable . LOL its a money thing .
we no longer have "tornado season " now its any time of the year , the sea levels rising ,
fish and birds dropping dead . bees disappearing , now the sea of japan is radioactive , rain forest going away .
but everything's fine ,
we no longer have "tornado season " now its any time of the year , the sea levels rising ,
fish and birds dropping dead . bees disappearing , now the sea of japan is radioactive , rain forest going away .
but everything's fine ,
Rozman
Gold Member
I think we on the right should try to keep an open mind about global warming.Yes I know the left had to scramble big time when we had some of the worst winter weather in recent memory.Then they said well we will show you so they changed it to climate change.Now when it gets to hot or too cold they have their asses covered.
I also want to bring it to the attention of my fellow righties that Superman's Father Jor-El was considered a laughing stock and total buffoon when he went before the council on Krypton and predicted the end of all life on the planet.Well they weren't laughing when Jor-El was proved right.
I will not commit to anything yet,after all Al Gore did create the Internet so he must know something.
I also want to bring it to the attention of my fellow righties that Superman's Father Jor-El was considered a laughing stock and total buffoon when he went before the council on Krypton and predicted the end of all life on the planet.Well they weren't laughing when Jor-El was proved right.
I will not commit to anything yet,after all Al Gore did create the Internet so he must know something.
Old Rocks
Diamond Member
Is that the best you can do? Repeating that old lie again? Shows that you are a really fucking dumb individual.
Did scientists predict an impending ice age in the 1970s?
The fact is that around 1970 there were 6 times as many scientists predicting a warming rather than a cooling planet. Today, with 30+years more data to analyse, we've reached a clear scientific consensus: 97% of working climate scientists agree with the view that human beings are causing global warming.
Old Rocks
Diamond Member
Now Dr. Spencer is the fellow that ol' Rush Limpbaugh call his climate scientist. Now look at his graph on this site;
UAH Temperature Update for March, 2011: Cooler Still -0.10 deg. C « Roy Spencer, Ph. D.
The largest analomy for this La Nina is -0.1. For the entire time from 1983 to 1987, the analomy was below -0.1. So we are in a very strong La Nina with the sun in a low TSI phase, and the best that we can do is -0.1?
Last year was a moderate El Nino, with the latter half of the year in a strong La Nina, and it still matched the super El Nino year of 1998.
Now look again at the graph. See the natural variation superimposed over a rising temperature line. The highs continue to get higher, and the lows nowhere near as low as they used to be. The running mean from 2002 to 2007 is higher at all points than any prior mean except that of 1998.
UAH Temperature Update for March, 2011: Cooler Still -0.10 deg. C « Roy Spencer, Ph. D.
The largest analomy for this La Nina is -0.1. For the entire time from 1983 to 1987, the analomy was below -0.1. So we are in a very strong La Nina with the sun in a low TSI phase, and the best that we can do is -0.1?
Last year was a moderate El Nino, with the latter half of the year in a strong La Nina, and it still matched the super El Nino year of 1998.
Now look again at the graph. See the natural variation superimposed over a rising temperature line. The highs continue to get higher, and the lows nowhere near as low as they used to be. The running mean from 2002 to 2007 is higher at all points than any prior mean except that of 1998.
Rozman
Gold Member
My God man are you suggesting we do away with as many humans as possible to correct this anomaly?.....
bripat9643
Diamond Member
- Apr 1, 2011
- 170,170
- 47,360
- 2,180
UK Telegraph[/QUOTE]
What the survey showed is that all the toadies who the government pays to produce evidence of human caused global warming agreed that humans cause global warming.
Who ever would have thunk it?
bripat9643
Diamond Member
- Apr 1, 2011
- 170,170
- 47,360
- 2,180
"Scientists have numbers and stuff"
Hey, now there is compelling proof of global warming!
bripat9643
Diamond Member
- Apr 1, 2011
- 170,170
- 47,360
- 2,180
You're giving him too much credit. Like all the brethren of the Holy Church of Anthropogenic Global Warming, he's too stupid to understand what the problem with his poll is.
Ya know what's really hilarious? The National Academy of Sciences published an obviously unscientific poll!
How ironic is that?
bripat9643
Diamond Member
- Apr 1, 2011
- 170,170
- 47,360
- 2,180
Prove the are frauds, but don't use any of the hard evidence that proves they are frauds?
You kill me!
Similar threads
New Topics
-
-
Zone1 Are atheists more likely to become psychopaths?
- Started by Midnight FM
- Replies: 0
-
-
-
