911 WTC 7 Silent Thermate Demolition, Debunkers Grab Your Ankles!

[Montrovant]

Of course the buildings experienced acceleration, that's a requirement in a collapse.

Wow man, can you support that statement with scientific evidence? That is a rather tall order .... no?

You do understand, I hope, that when a stationary object begins to move, it accelerates? Well, the buildings were stationary, it is a requirement for some acceleration to have occurred for them to collapse. They cannot collapse without movement.

 

[n0spam4me]

You do understand, I hope, that when a stationary object begins to move, it accelerates?

Right, however when that acceleration continues for the better part of 900 ft and averages 64% of g ..... Then I have an issue with it.

 

[SAYIT]

The NIST investigation was contracted out to companies that have made out handsomely since, if not before the investigation.

Science Applications International Corp. (SAIC) was awarded an administrative services contract to "support" the two-year investigation.
WTC Investigation Contracts

In 2003 SAIC was the #3 government contractor.
2003 Top 100 -- Washington Technology

With a reported $11.17 billion in revenue at the time, it split in Sept 2013 to form the companies SAIC and Leidos Holdings, Inc

SAIC played a large part in the NSA's Trailblazer Project an early take on it's now more widely know phone, email communications surveillance and storage program.

Some of those passing through its Board Room:

Admiral Bobby Inman, former head NSA, Naval Intelligence, Vice Director of DIA and deputy director of the CIA
Robert Gates, former CIA director, Secretary of Defense, Iran-Contra
William B. Black, Jr. went from NSA (1959-1997) to SAIC VP (1997-2000) back to Deputy Director of NSA (2000-2006)
William Perry, former Secretary of Defense, chairman Global Technology Partners, LLC "a defense/aerospace-focused investment banking boutique"
John Deutch, former CIA director, Deputy Secretary of Defense, director of Raytheon
Melvin Laird, Defense Secretary under President Nixon
J.B. Wiesler Vice Chairman, Bank of America
Donald Foley, a top exec at the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), the military agency that invented the Internet, is a current SAIC director.
Retired General Max Thurman, commander of the Panama invasion,
Donald Hicks, Chairman of Hicks & Associates, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary SAIC, former Under Secretary of Defense for Research & Engineering, Senior VP, Marketing & Technology, for Northrop Grumman, head of Applied Physics Section of Boeing Aerospace
Donald Kerr, former head of the Los Alamos National Laboratory.
Jerome Hauer, NY Office of Emergency Management, managing director with Kroll Associates (WTC security), national security advisor with the Department of Health and Human Services
John P. Jumper Chief of Staff of the United States Air Force from September 6, 2001 to September 2, 2005

And that is exactly what I mean by weedy CTs. Your fantasy begins with the shadowy designers, funders and producers of 9/11 then expands to include those who you just smeared with baseless innuendo, all who prepped the buildings for demo including planting explosives or accelerants that were not destroyed during hours of chaotic fires (an impossibility), all who witnessed what had to be weeks of preparation requiring heavy labor and much interior and exterior destruction, all who witnessed the attack on the WTC and The Pentagon, all who recorded or photographed it, all who responded including the FDNY which lost hundreds of responders, the clean-up people and all who volunteered, the entire mainstream media and all involved gov't agencies, their individual agents and, of course, any non-gov't investigators such as SAIC, etc, etc, etc...
You get the idea.
When you think any 9/11 CT through you find they must have consisted of millions of players which, of course, is an absolutely absurd concept.
So tell me ... what is your motivation?
Please don't give me that "just looking for the truth" BS or you will be relegated to the idiot can with the moron who insists "no planes were hijacked on 9/11" and that the fires in those buildings were "staged and controlled."

 

[CAPTCHATHIS]

The NIST investigation was contracted out to companies that have made out handsomely since, if not before the investigation.

Science Applications International Corp. (SAIC) was awarded an administrative services contract to "support" the two-year investigation.
WTC Investigation Contracts

In 2003 SAIC was the #3 government contractor.
2003 Top 100 -- Washington Technology

With a reported $11.17 billion in revenue at the time, it split in Sept 2013 to form the companies SAIC and Leidos Holdings, Inc

SAIC played a large part in the NSA's Trailblazer Project an early take on it's now more widely know phone, email communications surveillance and storage program.

Some of those passing through its Board Room:

Admiral Bobby Inman, former head NSA, Naval Intelligence, Vice Director of DIA and deputy director of the CIA
Robert Gates, former CIA director, Secretary of Defense, Iran-Contra
William B. Black, Jr. went from NSA (1959-1997) to SAIC VP (1997-2000) back to Deputy Director of NSA (2000-2006)
William Perry, former Secretary of Defense, chairman Global Technology Partners, LLC "a defense/aerospace-focused investment banking boutique"
John Deutch, former CIA director, Deputy Secretary of Defense, director of Raytheon
Melvin Laird, Defense Secretary under President Nixon
J.B. Wiesler Vice Chairman, Bank of America
Donald Foley, a top exec at the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), the military agency that invented the Internet, is a current SAIC director.
Retired General Max Thurman, commander of the Panama invasion,
Donald Hicks, Chairman of Hicks & Associates, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary SAIC, former Under Secretary of Defense for Research & Engineering, Senior VP, Marketing & Technology, for Northrop Grumman, head of Applied Physics Section of Boeing Aerospace
Donald Kerr, former head of the Los Alamos National Laboratory.
Jerome Hauer, NY Office of Emergency Management, managing director with Kroll Associates (WTC security), national security advisor with the Department of Health and Human Services
John P. Jumper Chief of Staff of the United States Air Force from September 6, 2001 to September 2, 2005

And that is exactly what I mean by weedy CTs. Your fantasy begins with the shadowy designers, funders and producers of 9/11 then expands to include those who you just smeared with baseless innuendo, all who prepped the buildings for demo including planting explosives or accelerants that were not destroyed during hours of chaotic fires (an impossibility), all who witnessed what had to be weeks of preparation requiring heavy labor and much interior and exterior destruction, all who witnessed the attack on the WTC and The Pentagon, all who recorded or photographed it, all who responded including the FDNY which lost hundreds of responders, the clean-up people and all who volunteered, the entire mainstream media and all involved gov't agencies, their individual agents and, of course, any non-gov't investigators such as SAIC, etc, etc, etc...
You get the idea.
When you think any 9/11 CT through you find they must have consisted of millions of players which, of course, is an absolutely absurd concept.
So tell me ... what is your motivation?
Please don't give me that "just looking for the truth" BS or you will be relegated to the idiot can with the moron who insists "no planes were hijacked on 9/11" and that the fires in those buildings were "staged and controlled."

Yadda, yadda , yadda, blah, blah, blah
Exaggerations, misrepresentation, faulty assumptions and assorted general nonsense
..and your naïveté is beyond belief, feigned or otherwise.

Ohh, I might be relegated to the idiot can. lol

 

[SAYIT]

The NIST investigation was contracted out to companies that have made out handsomely since, if not before the investigation.

Science Applications International Corp. (SAIC) was awarded an administrative services contract to "support" the two-year investigation.
WTC Investigation Contracts

In 2003 SAIC was the #3 government contractor.
2003 Top 100 -- Washington Technology

With a reported $11.17 billion in revenue at the time, it split in Sept 2013 to form the companies SAIC and Leidos Holdings, Inc

SAIC played a large part in the NSA's Trailblazer Project an early take on it's now more widely know phone, email communications surveillance and storage program.

Some of those passing through its Board Room:

Admiral Bobby Inman, former head NSA, Naval Intelligence, Vice Director of DIA and deputy director of the CIA
Robert Gates, former CIA director, Secretary of Defense, Iran-Contra
William B. Black, Jr. went from NSA (1959-1997) to SAIC VP (1997-2000) back to Deputy Director of NSA (2000-2006)
William Perry, former Secretary of Defense, chairman Global Technology Partners, LLC "a defense/aerospace-focused investment banking boutique"
John Deutch, former CIA director, Deputy Secretary of Defense, director of Raytheon
Melvin Laird, Defense Secretary under President Nixon
J.B. Wiesler Vice Chairman, Bank of America
Donald Foley, a top exec at the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), the military agency that invented the Internet, is a current SAIC director.
Retired General Max Thurman, commander of the Panama invasion,
Donald Hicks, Chairman of Hicks & Associates, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary SAIC, former Under Secretary of Defense for Research & Engineering, Senior VP, Marketing & Technology, for Northrop Grumman, head of Applied Physics Section of Boeing Aerospace
Donald Kerr, former head of the Los Alamos National Laboratory.
Jerome Hauer, NY Office of Emergency Management, managing director with Kroll Associates (WTC security), national security advisor with the Department of Health and Human Services
John P. Jumper Chief of Staff of the United States Air Force from September 6, 2001 to September 2, 2005

And that is exactly what I mean by weedy CTs. Your fantasy begins with the shadowy designers, funders and producers of 9/11 then expands to include those who you just smeared with baseless innuendo, all who prepped the buildings for demo including planting explosives or accelerants that were not destroyed during hours of chaotic fires (an impossibility), all who witnessed what had to be weeks of preparation requiring heavy labor and much interior and exterior destruction, all who witnessed the attack on the WTC and The Pentagon, all who recorded or photographed it, all who responded including the FDNY which lost hundreds of responders, the clean-up people and all who volunteered, the entire mainstream media and all involved gov't agencies, their individual agents and, of course, any non-gov't investigators such as SAIC, etc, etc, etc...
You get the idea.
When you think any 9/11 CT through you find they must have consisted of millions of players which, of course, is an absolutely absurd concept.
So tell me ... what is your motivation?
Please don't give me that "just looking for the truth" BS or you will be relegated to the idiot can with the moron who insists "no planes were hijacked on 9/11" and that the fires in those buildings were "staged and controlled."

Yadda, yadda , yadda, blah, blah, blah
Exaggerations, misrepresentation, faulty assumptions and assorted general nonsense
..and your naïveté is beyond belief, feigned or otherwise.

Ohh, I might be relegated to the idiot can. lol

Indeed. Your non-response is duly noted.

 

[Faun]

"controlled demolitions brought down the WTC, also despite the void of evidence."

The above is opinion ONLY, the evidence is present in abundance if you are willing to look, example: the towers & 7 experienced acceleration as they "collapsed" and all three were totally destroyed.

Note that buildings 3, 4, 5, & 6 were damaged but not totally destroyed ..... Why only WTC 1, 2 & 7?

Possibly because they were nowhere as big and didn't support the massive amount of weight as the 3 skyscrapers which did collapse. And most of building #4 did collapse.

 

[Faun]

o, not "innuendo" ..... look at what happened, the result that was observed required that all the structural bits be cut, or fail because of fire and do so on a schedule.

Then show us the thousands up thousands of cut girders. They would be *everywhere* if your theory were valid. That's 50,000 cuts in the WTC 1 and 2 alone. Remember, roughly 250 outer panels and 47 core columns per floor. With roughly 90 floors in one tower and 80 floors in the other from the impact site to the ground.

That's 50,490 cuts in girders....which we'll round down to 50,000 for the sake of brevity.

That's more cuts than there are girders in the building. Every single girder should not only be cut, but cut multiple times. There should be thousand up thousands of such cuts. And yet when challenged to SHOW US, not allude to them or insinuate them.......we get excuses.

You can't show us....because the cuts your theory requires simply don't exist. Killing your conspiracy yet again.

You seem to be hung-up on seeing evidence that isn't documented because the documentary pix were not done.
Problem with the bit you claim to be the only way that it could have been done, really isn't, don't try to second guess the controlled demolition. Note that the event speaks for itself in that the towers were destroyed and the whole event went off like clock work, with the towers disintegrating as if hit by the energy beam from a KLINGON war-bird .... Not that I'm somekinda disciple of Dr. Judy ..... lets keep an open mind here. The fact is that the energy to destroy both towers had to have been focused, because without focus, the towers would not have been completely destroyed.

But it didn't go off like clockwork. Building 7 came down 7 hours later. If it were a controlled demolition, why not bring it down with the Twin Towers?

Invitation to speculation ..... no thankx!
The facts of the "collapse" of not only 7 but the towers also, proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that all three buidligs were destroyed by controlled demolition.

So where are the videos depicting the Twin Towers exploding where no plane can be seen flying into them??

 

[daws101]

o, not "innuendo" ..... look at what happened, the result that was observed required that all the structural bits be cut, or fail because of fire and do so on a schedule.

Then show us the thousands up thousands of cut girders. They would be *everywhere* if your theory were valid. That's 50,000 cuts in the WTC 1 and 2 alone. Remember, roughly 250 outer panels and 47 core columns per floor. With roughly 90 floors in one tower and 80 floors in the other from the impact site to the ground.

That's 50,490 cuts in girders....which we'll round down to 50,000 for the sake of brevity.

That's more cuts than there are girders in the building. Every single girder should not only be cut, but cut multiple times. There should be thousand up thousands of such cuts. And yet when challenged to SHOW US, not allude to them or insinuate them.......we get excuses.

You can't show us....because the cuts your theory requires simply don't exist. Killing your conspiracy yet again.

You seem to be hung-up on seeing evidence that isn't documented because the documentary pix were not done.
Problem with the bit you claim to be the only way that it could have been done, really isn't, don't try to second guess the controlled demolition. Note that the event speaks for itself in that the towers were destroyed and the whole event went off like clock work, with the towers disintegrating as if hit by the energy beam from a KLINGON war-bird .... Not that I'm somekinda disciple of Dr. Judy ..... lets keep an open mind here. The fact is that the energy to destroy both towers had to have been focused, because without focus, the towers would not have been completely destroyed.

But it didn't go off like clockwork. Building 7 came down 7 hours later. If it were a controlled demolition, why not bring it down with the Twin Towers?

Invitation to speculation ..... no thankx!
The facts of the "collapse" of not only 7 but the towers also, proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that all three buidligs were destroyed by controlled demolition.

you must really thinks that if you repeaT THAT SHIT endlessly it will come true.

 

[daws101]

The NIST investigation was contracted out to companies that have made out handsomely since, if not before the investigation.

Science Applications International Corp. (SAIC) was awarded an administrative services contract to "support" the two-year investigation.
WTC Investigation Contracts

In 2003 SAIC was the #3 government contractor.
2003 Top 100 -- Washington Technology

With a reported $11.17 billion in revenue at the time, it split in Sept 2013 to form the companies SAIC and Leidos Holdings, Inc

SAIC played a large part in the NSA's Trailblazer Project an early take on it's now more widely know phone, email communications surveillance and storage program.

Some of those passing through its Board Room:

Admiral Bobby Inman, former head NSA, Naval Intelligence, Vice Director of DIA and deputy director of the CIA
Robert Gates, former CIA director, Secretary of Defense, Iran-Contra
William B. Black, Jr. went from NSA (1959-1997) to SAIC VP (1997-2000) back to Deputy Director of NSA (2000-2006)
William Perry, former Secretary of Defense, chairman Global Technology Partners, LLC "a defense/aerospace-focused investment banking boutique"
John Deutch, former CIA director, Deputy Secretary of Defense, director of Raytheon
Melvin Laird, Defense Secretary under President Nixon
J.B. Wiesler Vice Chairman, Bank of America
Donald Foley, a top exec at the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), the military agency that invented the Internet, is a current SAIC director.
Retired General Max Thurman, commander of the Panama invasion,
Donald Hicks, Chairman of Hicks & Associates, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary SAIC, former Under Secretary of Defense for Research & Engineering, Senior VP, Marketing & Technology, for Northrop Grumman, head of Applied Physics Section of Boeing Aerospace
Donald Kerr, former head of the Los Alamos National Laboratory.
Jerome Hauer, NY Office of Emergency Management, managing director with Kroll Associates (WTC security), national security advisor with the Department of Health and Human Services
John P. Jumper Chief of Staff of the United States Air Force from September 6, 2001 to September 2, 2005

And that is exactly what I mean by weedy CTs. Your fantasy begins with the shadowy designers, funders and producers of 9/11 then expands to include those who you just smeared with baseless innuendo, all who prepped the buildings for demo including planting explosives or accelerants that were not destroyed during hours of chaotic fires (an impossibility), all who witnessed what had to be weeks of preparation requiring heavy labor and much interior and exterior destruction, all who witnessed the attack on the WTC and The Pentagon, all who recorded or photographed it, all who responded including the FDNY which lost hundreds of responders, the clean-up people and all who volunteered, the entire mainstream media and all involved gov't agencies, their individual agents and, of course, any non-gov't investigators such as SAIC, etc, etc, etc...
You get the idea.
When you think any 9/11 CT through you find they must have consisted of millions of players which, of course, is an absolutely absurd concept.
So tell me ... what is your motivation?
Please don't give me that "just looking for the truth" BS or you will be relegated to the idiot can with the moron who insists "no planes were hijacked on 9/11" and that the fires in those buildings were "staged and controlled."

Yadda, yadda , yadda, blah, blah, blah
Exaggerations, misrepresentation, faulty assumptions and assorted general nonsense
..and your naïveté is beyond belief, feigned or otherwise.

Ohh, I might be relegated to the idiot can. lol

too late!

 

[n0spam4me]

Indeed. Your non-response is duly noted.

I'm not here to satisfy your requirements whatever that may happen to be, what is apparent in your attitude and your lack of genuine scientific inquiry, is that you will never stray from your support of the official story no matter what the evidence indicates.

 

[daws101]

Indeed. Your non-response is duly noted.

I'm not here to satisfy your requirements whatever that may happen to be, what is apparent in your attitude and your lack of genuine scientific inquiry, is that you will never stray from your support of the official story no matter what the evidence indicates.

SPAMMY please refrain from using term and words you don't understand ...

 

[n0spam4me]

This thread is supposed to be about
"911 WTC 7 Silent Thermate Demolition,"

Think about it ..... if the mythical tests for explosives had been done at ground zero, someone could simply trot out the document and dispel all doubt about the issue, however no such test(s) were done, and when an independent researcher does come up with thermite in the dust, no end of flack starts up with all sorts of tangents developing having nothing to do with the scientific validity of the data, but rather discussion about the mode of publishing said results ( etc .... ) that alone speaks volumes about what is going on here.

Bottom line here, I state without any doubt that WTC1, 2 & 7 had to have been controlled demolition(s) with valid scientific foundation under my claim. You are free to simply dismiss evidence, but that would be just YOUR opinion, the facts speak for themselves.

 

[SAYIT]

Indeed. Your non-response is duly noted.

I'm not here to satisfy your requirements whatever that may happen to be, what is apparent in your attitude and your lack of genuine scientific inquiry, is that you will never stray from your support of the official story no matter what the evidence indicates.

Really? That was my reply (which you conveniently truncated) to CaptChat which raises the obvious question: Are you also CaptChat or are you simply every bit as stupid as your posts make you appear? Your choice.

 

[n0spam4me]

Your fantasy begins with the shadowy designers,

To address this one bit, for some truthers, this may be the case, I say MAY be the case however speculation is fruitless and as for me, the starting point for my knowing that 9/11/2001 was an inside job is the fact that the alleged "FLT175" is obviously bogus, and the "collapse" of three steel framed skyscrapers was most certainly controlled demolition. The events of the day as presented, noting the disconnect between the events as seen in the video and the official explanation of what was said to have happened.

and one more thing that should be cataloged in the compelling evidence dept. is the fact that in the "demonstrations" that were promoted to "prove" bits such as Thermite could not possibly have been used to bring down the towers, we have "documentaries" by outfits such as the History channel that show a kind of demonstration that simply heaps up thermite next to a steel column and sets it ablaze and then they say, see.... thermite doesn't destroy buildings ..... However have you seen any of the work of Jonathan Cole?
In his experiments with thermite, steel is most certainly cut and with simple fixtures that anybody could fabricate.

for me, its not about political speculation, its about the physics of the events.

 

[Gary Anderson]

I can't help it if you are intellectually not up for understanding 9/11.

 

[Gary Anderson]

"WTC 1 & 2 were destroyed by the planes that slammed into them and the ensuing fire damage but claiming WTC 7 was felled by silent explosives that no one planted, that survived hours of raging fires in order to be triggered by some shadowy figure and which left no evidence? Yeah ... I'm the dope."

do try to think about the real scene, the alleged scene has WTC7 a raging inferno, when in fact less than a quarter of the floors were showing fire and that fire was most probably a bit of theater, that is fires that had been intentionally set up in advance to look like the whole floor was on fire however only the part near the windows was involved...

Before I waste my time reading the rest of your silliness, please post some proof of what you have said so far. Your failure to do should prove once again to all rational peeps (relax ... I'm not referring to you, Spammy) that the "Truther" Movement is just like the Bowel Movement ... flushable.

You are either a troll or you are challenged. I feel sorry for you if you are challenged.

 

[Gary Anderson]

has anybody seen "sound evidence for demolition"
look it up ...... The NIST is peddling snake oil!

Woo. The irony!

you ******* blind or stoopid or both? Thermate cutter charges do not explode, they make a ffffft sound precisely like an acetyoxy torch because they are torches NOT explosives! Try to pull your head out of your ass.

you fucked up and gobbled the hugger story hook line and sinker and now you pay the price by looking the fool.

But there was no evidence of cut beams. Chalk that one up and try again, Princess.

There are photos of cut beams: photos of 9 11 cut beams - Google Search

 

[n0spam4me]

I can't help it if you are intellectually not up for understanding 9/11.

So you buy it completely that an airliner could penetrate a skyscraper wall and disappear inside said skyscraper ( and do so 2X ) and that steel framed skyscrapers can "collapse" down descending at 64% of g and pulverizing and ejecting thousands of tons of material as it does so and the event repeats, that is first the south tower and then the north tower in the same manner of destruction. and then we have the case of the PENTAGON crash with what is said to be a huge commercial airliner crashed into the PENTAGON and the aircraft disappears inside the building. and then there is the Shanksville scene, where is the aircraft? Do you totally buy it, that is the official explanation about the 19 fanatic hijackers ...?

 

[Gary Anderson]

You may have misunderstood me. I believe that planes hit the towers, however whether they did or did not, the towers came down due to detonation. As far as WTC7 is concerned, our present Secretary of State explained the bottom line years ago:

 

[daws101]

the last four posts are as false as they are humorous.