911 WTC 7 Silent Thermate Demolition, Debunkers Grab Your Ankles!

[SAYIT]

... When ever in history was a building totally demolished by actions that were NOT specifically engineered to cause total destruction?

Historically every 100+ story building which has been hit by a Boeing 767 loaded with tons of jet fuel and doing hundreds of miles per hour has been totally destroyed.

 

[eots]

... When ever in history was a building totally demolished by actions that were NOT specifically engineered to cause total destruction?

Historically every 100+ story building which has been hit by a Boeing 767 loaded with tons of jet fuel and doing hundreds of miles per hour has been totally destroyed.

the towers were designed to take multiple air craft strikes..the fuel all burned off on impact...and no plane hit wtc 7 and NIST said fire alone brought down wrc7

 

[SAYIT]

why is it called "FREE FALL", because its freely falling, that is NO resistance at all under the falling mass. So do tell, how is it that ALL resistance was removed, and all at the same time in order for WTC7 to drop at free fall acceleration for 2.25 sec?

Once more for the monumentally dense:
Your 9/11 CT requires a controlled demo, preparation for which would have required a small army of workers and weeks or months and necessitated the gutting of the buildings. I would add that the explosions necessary to destroy key structural supports would have been numerous and very loud and would have left clear evidence of CD explosions.
All of that is just one small facet of the planning, perpetration and cover-up of what would have been the largest, most complex conspiracy in the history of man and no one from within that massive alleged conspiracy has whispered a word in over 13 years. No one.
Stop beating that dead horse, Princess ... the "Truther" Movement is O-V-E-R.

you became a demolition expert when exactly..there are experts in both intelligence and demolition that do not have estimates much much lower than that..and it is a myth that secrets can not be kept

One need not be a demo expert to understand the massive effort involved in a controlled demo of not 1 but 3 100+ story buildings on the same day two Boeing 767s slammed into them. You too could learn the facts if you were truly interested. Clearly you are far too interested in your "If It's Bad ... Jews Did It" agenda to be bothered.

 

[SAYIT]

... When ever in history was a building totally demolished by actions that were NOT specifically engineered to cause total destruction?

Historically every 100+ story building which has been hit by a Boeing 767 loaded with tons of jet fuel and doing hundreds of miles per hour has been totally destroyed.

the towers were designed to take multiple air craft strikes..the fuel all burned off on impact...and no plane hit wtc 7 and NIST said fire alone brought down wrc7

The jet fuel burned long enough (10 minutes) to ignite chaotic fires and no building has ever been built to withstand a direct hit from a Boeing 767 doing hundreds of mph and I believe you knew that when you posted your latest lies.

 

[deep_space]

"3 100+ story buildings on the same day two Boeing 767s slammed into them." Really "3 100+ story buildings" WTC7 was only 47 stories
& the bit about airliners slamming into the towers is pure speculation, what really hit the towers ( if anything ) is speculation at best.

 

[SAYIT]

...& the bit about airliners slamming into the towers is pure speculation, what really hit the towers ( if anything ) is speculation at best.

 

[deep_space]

Laf while you can
MONKEY BOY .......

 

[Montrovant]

"3 100+ story buildings on the same day two Boeing 767s slammed into them." Really "3 100+ story buildings" WTC7 was only 47 stories
& the bit about airliners slamming into the towers is pure speculation, what really hit the towers ( if anything ) is speculation at best.

In the sense that anything witnessed by thousands directly and by millions on live television is speculation.......

 

[eots]

why is it called "FREE FALL", because its freely falling, that is NO resistance at all under the falling mass. So do tell, how is it that ALL resistance was removed, and all at the same time in order for WTC7 to drop at free fall acceleration for 2.25 sec?

Once more for the monumentally dense:
Your 9/11 CT requires a controlled demo, preparation for which would have required a small army of workers and weeks or months and necessitated the gutting of the buildings. I would add that the explosions necessary to destroy key structural supports would have been numerous and very loud and would have left clear evidence of CD explosions.
All of that is just one small facet of the planning, perpetration and cover-up of what would have been the largest, most complex conspiracy in the history of man and no one from within that massive alleged conspiracy has whispered a word in over 13 years. No one.
Stop beating that dead horse, Princess ... the "Truther" Movement is O-V-E-R.

you became a demolition expert when exactly..there are experts in both intelligence and demolition that do not have estimates much much lower than that..and it is a myth that secrets can not be kept

One need not be a demo expert to understand the massive effort involved in a controlled demo of not 1 but 3 100+ story buildings on the same day two Boeing 767s slammed into them. You too could learn the facts if you were truly interested. Clearly you are far too interested in your "If It's Bad ... Jews Did It" agenda to be bothered.

why do you keep saying jews did it ?..I present evidence of prior knowledge from mainstream news sources

 

[eots]

... When ever in history was a building totally demolished by actions that were NOT specifically engineered to cause total destruction?

Historically every 100+ story building which has been hit by a Boeing 767 loaded with tons of jet fuel and doing hundreds of miles per hour has been totally destroyed.

the towers were designed to take multiple air craft strikes..the fuel all burned off on impact...and no plane hit wtc 7 and NIST said fire alone brought down wrc7

The jet fuel burned long enough (10 minutes) to ignite chaotic fires and no building has ever been built to withstand a direct hit from a Boeing 767 doing hundreds of mph and I believe you knew that when you posted your latest lies.

fire fighters reached the 79 th floor and reported small isolated pockets of fire..victims stood in the impact hole

 

[deep_space]

"3 100+ story buildings on the same day two Boeing 767s slammed into them." Really "3 100+ story buildings" WTC7 was only 47 stories
& the bit about airliners slamming into the towers is pure speculation, what really hit the towers ( if anything ) is speculation at best.

In the sense that anything witnessed by thousands directly and by millions on live television is speculation.......

so having an airliner crash into a skyscraper is a guaranteed slam-dunk that the skyscraper will be totally destroyed?

 

[eots]

... When ever in history was a building totally demolished by actions that were NOT specifically engineered to cause total destruction?

Historically every 100+ story building which has been hit by a Boeing 767 loaded with tons of jet fuel and doing hundreds of miles per hour has been totally destroyed.

the towers were designed to take multiple air craft strikes..the fuel all burned off on impact...and no plane hit wtc 7 and NIST said fire alone brought down wrc7

The jet fuel burned long enough (10 minutes) to ignite chaotic fires and no building has ever been built to withstand a direct hit from a Boeing 767 doing hundreds of mph and I believe you knew that when you posted your latest lies.

 

[SAYIT]

The jet fuel burned long enough (10 minutes) to ignite chaotic fires and no building has ever been built to withstand a direct hit from a Boeing 767 doing hundreds of mph and I believe you knew that when you posted your latest lies.

So who the **** is Les Young and why would anyone care what he believes?

 

[eots]

The jet fuel burned long enough (10 minutes) to ignite chaotic fires and no building has ever been built to withstand a direct hit from a Boeing 767 doing hundreds of mph and I believe you knew that when you posted your latest lies.

So who the **** is Les Young and why would anyone care what he believes?

Hi-rise designer..who knows buildings can not fall through themselves at near free-fall speed

 

[SAYIT]

The jet fuel burned long enough (10 minutes) to ignite chaotic fires and no building has ever been built to withstand a direct hit from a Boeing 767 doing hundreds of mph and I believe you knew that when you posted your latest lies.

So who the **** is Les Young and why would anyone care what he believes?

Hi-rise designer..who knows buildings can not fall through themselves at near free-fall speed

Or a nobody who wanted his 15 minutes (or 12mins, 57secs) of YouTube fame and glory. Could you name a few of the skyscrapers he has designed and provide the link?

 

[eots]

The jet fuel burned long enough (10 minutes) to ignite chaotic fires and no building has ever been built to withstand a direct hit from a Boeing 767 doing hundreds of mph and I believe you knew that when you posted your latest lies.

So who the **** is Les Young and why would anyone care what he believes?

Hi-rise designer..who knows buildings can not fall through themselves at near free-fall speed

Or a nobody who wanted his 15 minutes (or 12mins, 57secs) of YouTube fame and glory. Could you name a few of the skyscrapers he has designed and provide the link?

Is that your conspiracy theory..not very logical..and certainly does not explain 3 near free-fall collapse

 

[SAYIT]

So who the **** is Les Young and why would anyone care what he believes?

Hi-rise designer..who knows buildings can not fall through themselves at near free-fall speed

Or a nobody who wanted his 15 minutes (or 12mins, 57secs) of YouTube fame and glory. Could you name a few of the skyscrapers he has designed and provide the link?

Is that your conspiracy theory..not very logical..and certainly does not explain 3 near free-fall collapse

Where is the CT in questioning Young's creds and motivations and where is the list of skyscrapers you claim he has designed?

 

[eots]

So who the **** is Les Young and why would anyone care what he believes?

Hi-rise designer..who knows buildings can not fall through themselves at near free-fall speed

Or a nobody who wanted his 15 minutes (or 12mins, 57secs) of YouTube fame and glory. Could you name a few of the skyscrapers he has designed and provide the link?

Is that your conspiracy theory..not very logical..and certainly does not explain 3 near free-fall collapse

Where is the CT in questioning Young's creds and motivations and where is the list of skyscrapers you claim he has designed?

you made a stupid accusation of seeking fame from a youtube video..his credentials make no difference to you,you have proved that many times

 

[SAYIT]

So who the **** is Les Young and why would anyone care what he believes?

Hi-rise designer..who knows buildings can not fall through themselves at near free-fall speed

Or a nobody who wanted his 15 minutes (or 12mins, 57secs) of YouTube fame and glory. Could you name a few of the skyscrapers he has designed and provide the link?

Is that your conspiracy theory..not very logical..and certainly does not explain 3 near free-fall collapse

Where is the CT in questioning Young's creds and motivations and where is the list of skyscrapers you claim he has designed?

you made a stupid accusation of seeking fame from a youtube video..his credentials make no difference to you,you have proved that many times

Nah. I stated that is a legit alternative view of his motivation. You claimed he is a "hi-rise designer" for which you have so far failed to provide any substantiation.