KokomoJojo
VIP Member
- Oct 2, 2013
- 2,180
- 185
- 85
LOLOLget serious, thats not proof, I demand proof not hearsay.shitstain, people arent as stupid as you and require proof, you have nothing but lies and speculation, none of which prove anything.Okay was there a plane that hit the "p" as you call it? I'm sure you won't say the word "pentagon" as some sort of diversionary tactic later on. It never ends with you losers.
The passenger remains found at the Pentagon (or "P" as you call it) prove it was AA77. Why you continue to doubt this is something that will keep your therapist amused for years if you could ever afford one. LOL.
I can't blame you that you don't want to buy into the crazy that Koo Koo is trying to sell. Perhaps there is some hope for you. I doubt it.
I can tell you your answer in advance. just shit on the floor and talk to the pile thats all you will ever get from corny.Since you have failed at flt 77 lets move on, so what do you think happened at Shanksville? If you are going to say a plane can you prove it?
until you can prove otherwise.Is it your belief no plane hit the Pentagon?
cough it up
EVERYTHING the guv cant prove is ALWAYS a lie
no proof no plane, sorry
You poor demented thing. Bless your heart. Your desperation is noted.
That was a live interview that morning by the Pentagon by an eye witness who saw a plane fly into the building.
Here's another...
yup another idiot that is too stupid to comprehend that witnesses are discredited when there is no supporting scientific evidence, where there shoud be. you accept wooden nickels is your business, no proof no plane sorry.
They saw it. Eyewitness accounts are first hand, not hearsay as you ridiculously tried to dismiss.
Here's another...
Bullshit, they do not say they saw flt 77 hit the p.
LOLOL
That's only because airlines don't paint flight numbers on planes. How stupid are you??
Here's another...
So AGAIN you have no proof flt77 hit the p. thank you very much, you may step down. next
LOLOL
Deranged lunatic, you said there was no plane.
Here's another to confirm you're insane...
more hearsay, no identifying tail number, and he contradicts the alleged physical evidence as usual, fight it out with corny, you have nothing.
Deranged lunatic, again, direct eyewitness accounts are first hand knowledge. That is not hearsay. The fact that you don't even comprehend what hearsay is or what first hand eyewitness accounts are reveals you don't know what the fuck you're talking about.
Here's another...
anecdotal, useless, aircraft investigations require a parts manifest.
NOTHING you posted proves flt77 went into the pentagon.
deranged is the idiots that accept wooden nickels as fact, I dont, thank you very much.
extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.
waiting
Last edited: