Buildings 1 and 2 were of a unique design. Unique being TWO OF A KIND. I have asked Eots countless times to name another building BUILT like the Twin Towers. I never get an answer because HE KNOWS there aren't any others. And there never will be because THEY DIDN'T STAY UP!!
It does not in anyway take away from the fact that steel reacts the same no matter the design of the buildings. To look at the fall of WTC 7 and not have at least a peculiar feeling about it, and wonder how the fuck it could fall down in such a short amount of time displaying many characteristics of a CD is to be a fucking idiot.
To then accept that it fell due to sporadic fires after watching other examples of real infernos in other structures is akin to being a brain dead zombie.
NIST manipulated the data to fit a preconceived outcome, and hid their work regarding the computer simulation so it can not be analyzed for replication. These are verifiable true facts that are there if one takes the time and puts forth the effort to look.
The questions remain as to how the temps of these fires reached the levels needed to overcome the steel, at the precise points and the precise times. And why do people insist that they didn't need to be that high to melt it, only high enough to weaken it, but always leave out the mentioning of the extremely high temps in the rubble piles that existed for 3 months. You can't have it both ways. Instantaneously melting the steel would explain the rapid decents rather then weakening of it as that is more gradual of a process, and time consuming. Steel dissipates heat and is thus spread out over a large area causing the building to be weak in some areas more then others, and we can reason, causing a partial, slow collapse of the weakest afflicted parts first.
Just like you can't have the energy used in the gravity only driven collapses, also doing other "work" such as pulverizing the concrete at the same time as it is being used to bend, break, smash steel beams and columns, with the force to laterally eject tons of the mass sideways hundreds of feet away.
In reality a gravity only driven collapse should have reasonably fallen towards the weakest point, and came down in a staggered manner, taking more time during the decent as the falling mass encountered the resistance NIST said it undoubtedly would.
The 9-11 attacks happened to terrorize America and the world into supporting military conquests in the ME. The people in the Bush administration have gone on record as saying this, and when one takes the time to see what positions they were in and what roles they played before, during and after the attacks, it should at the very least give folks a reason to question it all.
We are left to deal with the fact that nothing will ever happen to bring the truth out by the people in charge of keeping it under the rug. The forces allied behind the perpetrators have influenced all the lawmakers into thinking it is political suicide to bring about a new investigation or to even suggest anything other then Al Qaeda and fires from jet fuel, and a series of mistakes and coincidences and a hatred for are freedumbs are to blame. It seems that in their view, bringing the truth about who what and why the 9-11 attacks were allowed to happen, would lead to more upheaval and problems in America then what the attacks actually have done..so they remain
about it for this reason and others probably including the fear of blackmail, or even death for them and family members. I feel that many of them who could have done something then or by now simply took some money to help convince them to stay silent too.
But all in all, 9-11 was allowed to happen with influence from people inside and outside the US and pinned on their own recruits, and it is reasoned that there is nothing anyone can do for now other then to bring awareness to the public and the world at large in hopes the criminals who plan and carry out these things will pause knowing it wont be so easy to trick all of us anymore.
