9/11 Explosive Connections - The 9/11 Masterminds

[Soupnazi630]

Then get the fuck off of MY thread, hillbilly.

Its not your thread and clearly you lied when you claimed he means zero to you.

Your self worth is dependant on the opinions of others.

 

[the other mike]

Even 18 years after 9/11, there is a growing list of people who are questioning the official narrative of what happened, and many like myself believe it was an all-out inside job, planned months, perhaps years in advance. So who was inside and how did they pull it off ?
The trillion dollar question.

On occasion, the public has been asked by George W. Bush to refrain from considering certain conspiracy theories. Bush has made such requests when people were looking into crimes in which he might be culpable. For example, when in 1994 Bush's former company Harken Energy was linked to the fraudulent Bank of Credit and Commerce International (BCCI) through several investors, Bush's spokeswoman, Karen Hughes, shut down the inquiry by telling the Associated Press -- "We have no response to silly conspiracy theories." On another occasion, Bush said in a televised speech -- "Let us never tolerate outrageous conspiracy theories concerning the attacks of September the 11th."

But paradoxically, we have also been asked to believe Bush's own outrageous conspiracy theory about 9/11, one that has proven to be false in many ways. One important way to see the false nature of Bush's conspiracy theory is to note the fact that the World Trade Center buildings could only have fallen as they did through the use of explosives. A number of independent scientific studies have pointed out this fact [1, 2, 3, 4], but it was Bush's own scientists at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), through their inability to provide a convincing defense of the official line, who ultimately proved that explosives were necessary. [2, 5, 6, 7]

This leads us to ask the obvious question -- Who could have placed explosives in the World Trade Center towers ? To answer that question, we should first consider who had access to the buildings, specifically the areas of the buildings that would be relevant to a demolition operation. We should also consider the time periods of interest. Those who had access at the necessary times should be further considered in terms of their ability to obtain the necessary explosive technologies and expertise, their ability to be secretive, and the possibility that they could have benefited from the destruction of the WTC buildings or from the resulting War on Terror. But one thing is certain, unless it was done by one person acting alone, it must have been a conspiracy.
Demolition Access to the WTC Towers: Part One - Tenants

My thread attracted a lot of attention in 3 years.

 

[Soupnazi630]

My thread attracted a lot of attention in 3 years.

It is not your thread and no it hasn't.

 

[the other mike]

It is not your thread and no it hasn't.

Well I don't count you trolls.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Well I don't count you trolls.

You mean your betters who correct your lies and fallacies.

 

[Confederate Soldier]

 

[the other mike]

What's the most evil about it is they could have done it in the middle of the night and hardly anyone would have died. Fucking murderers.

 

[the other mike]

They'll get their day in court.
By the way I wonder how that Durham investigation's going .

 

[Skylar]

Even 18 years after 9/11, there is a growing list of people who are questioning the official narrative of what happened, and many like myself believe it was an all-out inside job, planned months, perhaps years in advance. So who was inside and how did they pull it off ?
The trillion dollar question.

On occasion, the public has been asked by George W. Bush to refrain from considering certain conspiracy theories. Bush has made such requests when people were looking into crimes in which he might be culpable. For example, when in 1994 Bush's former company Harken Energy was linked to the fraudulent Bank of Credit and Commerce International (BCCI) through several investors, Bush's spokeswoman, Karen Hughes, shut down the inquiry by telling the Associated Press -- "We have no response to silly conspiracy theories." On another occasion, Bush said in a televised speech -- "Let us never tolerate outrageous conspiracy theories concerning the attacks of September the 11th."

But paradoxically, we have also been asked to believe Bush's own outrageous conspiracy theory about 9/11, one that has proven to be false in many ways. One important way to see the false nature of Bush's conspiracy theory is to note the fact that the World Trade Center buildings could only have fallen as they did through the use of explosives. A number of independent scientific studies have pointed out this fact [1, 2, 3, 4], but it was Bush's own scientists at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), through their inability to provide a convincing defense of the official line, who ultimately proved that explosives were necessary. [2, 5, 6, 7]

This leads us to ask the obvious question -- Who could have placed explosives in the World Trade Center towers ? To answer that question, we should first consider who had access to the buildings, specifically the areas of the buildings that would be relevant to a demolition operation. We should also consider the time periods of interest. Those who had access at the necessary times should be further considered in terms of their ability to obtain the necessary explosive technologies and expertise, their ability to be secretive, and the possibility that they could have benefited from the destruction of the WTC buildings or from the resulting War on Terror. But one thing is certain, unless it was done by one person acting alone, it must have been a conspiracy.
Demolition Access to the WTC Towers: Part One - Tenants

Is this where you start your 'Larry Silverstein' nonsense?

Or do you even know? You generally have no idea what you're linking to.

 

[the other mike]

Is this where you start your 'Larry Silverstein' nonsense?

Or do you even know? You generally have no idea what you're linking to.

Larry who ?

 

[the other mike]

 

[Skylar]

Same old bullshit from you.

Repeated opinions and no evidence.

And they aren't even his opinions. He just spams videos he's never watched and sites he's never read.

If they try to discuss the flaws in their own theories........its invariably bad for them. As the 911 conspiracies are fantastically far fetched, poorly thought through and are often self contradictory.

Angelo does what most conspiracy theorists do.....spam and run.

 

[the other mike]

Angelo does what most conspiracy theorists do.....spam and run.

Does it look like I'm running ?
From my thread which I started over 3 years ago ?
No.
Which makes you wrong as usual....it must get tiring.

 

[the other mike]

Does it look like I'm running ?
From my thread which I started over 3 years ago ?
No.
Which makes you wrong as usual....it must get tiring.

Almost 3 years ago, I meant to say.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Does it look like I'm running ?
From my thread which I started over 3 years ago ?
No.
Which makes you wrong as usual....it must get tiring.

It is not your thread and yes you run away in fear from any real intelligent discussion.

You never post evidence and consistently run away when faced with it;

 

[the other mike]

 

[the other mike]

NIST lied

 

[the other mike]

USMB is blocking videos now ??
Very telling.

 

[Soupnazi630]

NIST lied

Prove it you lying sack of trash because so far you have strictly presented bullshit with no evidence

 

[the other mike]

Prove it you lying sack of trash because so far you have strictly presented bullshit with no evidence

And when they weren't lying, they would just omit
evidence.