9/11 Explosive Connections - The 9/11 Masterminds

[Soupnazi630]

And when they weren't lying, they would just omit
evidence.

No it is proven that you are the one who lies and willfullly ignores evidence.

 

[the other mike]

According to NIST, the highest temperature reached by the fires was 1,100°C. Yet structural steel does not begin to melt until about 1,482°C (2,700°F). How then did NIST explain the evidence of molten metal?

NIST’s first approach was to omit the evidence of molten metal from its final report.

High-Temperature Thermitic Reactions | Twin Towers

Despite the illegal destruction of most of the structural steel and other debris in the months after 9/11, a sizeable body of forensic evidence has been developed over the years by government investigators and independent researchers. Much of the available evidence indicates the occurrence of...

www.ae911truth.org

 

[Soupnazi630]

According to NIST, the highest temperature reached by the fires was 1,100°C. Yet structural steel does not begin to melt until about 1,482°C (2,700°F). How then did NIST explain the evidence of molten metal?

NIST’s first approach was to omit the evidence of molten metal from its final report.

High-Temperature Thermitic Reactions | Twin Towers

Despite the illegal destruction of most of the structural steel and other debris in the months after 9/11, a sizeable body of forensic evidence has been developed over the years by government investigators and independent researchers. Much of the available evidence indicates the occurrence of...

www.ae911truth.org

Asked and answered yet you lie about it because you are a weak little coward. There was never ANY evidence of molten metal as the towers collapsed or immediately after their collapse.

That is fact you weak little bitch

 

[the other mike]

Ignoring the disinformation trolls......
Here's a first responder account....

 

[Soupnazi630]

Ignoring the disinformation trolls......
Here's a first responder account....

There are no such trolls you simply ignore inconvenient facts proving your lies.

This video has been posted many times over and is irrelevant.

 

[the other mike]

There are no such trolls you simply ignore inconvenient facts proving your lies.

This video has been posted many times over and is irrelevant.

If trolls like you would stop
cluttering the threads with your usual trollisms, then I wouldn't have to keep posting it.

(It's for the kids. You understand)

 

[Soupnazi630]

If trolls like you would stop
cluttering the threads with your usual trollisms, then I wouldn't have to keep posting it.

(It's for the kids. You understand)

No you keep posting it because you have NOTHING.

You ignore the fact that it is not evidence and proves nothing.

Kids do not read this thread you troll.

Everyone here knows you are a liar and proven wrong anf they are adukts.

You are the only kid and are too childish to face that you have been owned

 

[the other mike]

USMB is smart to program their bots
to insult and misspell words, like real people.
Pretty clever.

 

[Soupnazi630]

USMB is smart to program their bots
to insult and misspell words, like real people.
Pretty clever.

They have no such bots.

 

[the other mike]

I
am
not
a
robot

 

[the other mike]

 

[Soupnazi630]

View attachment 541147

Still nothing new and no evidence.

 

[the other mike]

Still nothing new and no evidence.

Many people still believe the official story, so in that respect, there's always something new for someone.

There's no statute of limitations on truth-finding.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Many people still believe the official story, so in that respect, there's always something new for someone.

There's no statute of limitations on truth-finding.

Most people believe the not official official story because it IS the truth. Mosst intelligent people reject your ideas because they are lies and proven so by evidence

 

[the other mike]

Most people believe the not official official story because it IS the truth. Mosst intelligent people reject your ideas because they are lies and proven so by evidence

Spoken like a true Dulles.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Spoken like a true Dulles.

You mean factual and accurate in comparison to your moronic claims.

Yes that is true

 

[MisterBeale]

Even 18 years after 9/11, there is a growing list of people who are questioning the official narrative of what happened, and many like myself believe it was an all-out inside job, planned months, perhaps years in advance. So who was inside and how did they pull it off ?
The trillion dollar question.

On occasion, the public has been asked by George W. Bush to refrain from considering certain conspiracy theories. Bush has made such requests when people were looking into crimes in which he might be culpable. For example, when in 1994 Bush's former company Harken Energy was linked to the fraudulent Bank of Credit and Commerce International (BCCI) through several investors, Bush's spokeswoman, Karen Hughes, shut down the inquiry by telling the Associated Press -- "We have no response to silly conspiracy theories." On another occasion, Bush said in a televised speech -- "Let us never tolerate outrageous conspiracy theories concerning the attacks of September the 11th."

But paradoxically, we have also been asked to believe Bush's own outrageous conspiracy theory about 9/11, one that has proven to be false in many ways. One important way to see the false nature of Bush's conspiracy theory is to note the fact that the World Trade Center buildings could only have fallen as they did through the use of explosives. A number of independent scientific studies have pointed out this fact [1, 2, 3, 4], but it was Bush's own scientists at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), through their inability to provide a convincing defense of the official line, who ultimately proved that explosives were necessary. [2, 5, 6, 7]

This leads us to ask the obvious question -- Who could have placed explosives in the World Trade Center towers ? To answer that question, we should first consider who had access to the buildings, specifically the areas of the buildings that would be relevant to a demolition operation. We should also consider the time periods of interest. Those who had access at the necessary times should be further considered in terms of their ability to obtain the necessary explosive technologies and expertise, their ability to be secretive, and the possibility that they could have benefited from the destruction of the WTC buildings or from the resulting War on Terror. But one thing is certain, unless it was done by one person acting alone, it must have been a conspiracy.
Demolition Access to the WTC Towers: Part One - Tenants

 

[surada]

Bremer, it should be noted, was the Bush-appointed proconsul or administrator of occupied Iraq until the end of June 2004. During Bremer's reign there was no metering of the oil that was exported from Iraq.It is also primarily decisions taken by Bremer that are responsible for the misery and chaos that have afflicted Iraq since the U.S.-led occupation began. Previously, Bremer was the right-hand man for Henry Kissinger & Associates.

There was no oil being exported from Iraq in 2004 that's why there was no metering.

 

[the other mike]

There was no oil being exported from Iraq in 2004 that's why there was no metering.

Right.
Around the same time that billions in cash on pallets didn't vanish
in the desert somewhere.

 

[the other mike]

How the US sent $12bn in cash to Iraq. And watched it vanish

Special flights brought in tonnes of banknotes which disappeared into the war zone.

www.theguardian.com