8 Families Own all the Private Stock in the Federal Reserve !

[Sicilianthing]

False, tard

Federal Reserve Bank Ownership - FactCheck.org

I don't know if the OP is a retard, but it's obvious he's torpid.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Do you guys always talk in Codes ?

WTF is an OP ?

For the record NOPE i’m Not Torpid either
I’m self funded
All IN
Locked n Loaded
Good Looking
Outspoken
And Seriously don’t believe any of the Bullshit you guys are talking - Flat OUT !

 

[Sicilianthing]

There's a particularly informative, factual, dialogue to be had with regard to the Federal Reserve and the damage done by inflationism.

I don't find ownership of the Federal Reserve to be the premise of it, but I do hope that mere mention of the Federal Reserve around here isn't considered conspiracy theory

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

I told Admin or whoever the phuck they are in Question marks to stop moving my threads and the FED is the most political issue of our time...

 

[Sicilianthing]

There's a particularly informative, factual, dialogue to be had with regard to the Federal Reserve and the damage done by inflationism.

I don't find ownership of the Federal Reserve to be the premise of it, but I do hope that mere mention of the Federal Reserve around here isn't considered conspiracy theory

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

I told Admin or whoever the phuck they are in Question marks to stop moving my threads and the FED is the most political issue of our time...

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

You can think whatever you want, You’re WRONG like most people and that’s a FACT Flat OUT,

Now what else you got ?

 

[usmbguest5318]

WTF is an OP ?

As I use it:

• OP --> opening post
• OP-er --> opening poster (the member who creates a thread)

 

[Sicilianthing]

WTF is an OP ?

As I use it:

• OP --> opening post
• OP-er --> opening poster (the member who creates a thread)

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Noted

 

[usmbguest5318]

False, tard

Federal Reserve Bank Ownership - FactCheck.org

I don't know if the OP is a retard, but it's obvious he's torpid.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Do you guys always talk in Codes ?

WTF is an OP ?

For the record NOPE i’m Not Torpid either
I’m self funded
All IN
Locked n Loaded
Good Looking
Outspoken
And Seriously don’t believe any of the Bullshit you guys are talking - Flat OUT !

For the record NOPE i’m Not Torpid either
I’m self funded
All IN
Locked n Loaded
Good Looking
Outspoken
And Seriously don’t believe any of the Bullshit you guys are talking - Flat OUT !

All well and good, but none of it has a thing to do with the genre of torpidity that one can, as a consequence of your remarks in this thread, ascribe legitimately to you.

 

[Sicilianthing]

False, tard

Federal Reserve Bank Ownership - FactCheck.org

I don't know if the OP is a retard, but it's obvious he's torpid.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Do you guys always talk in Codes ?

WTF is an OP ?

For the record NOPE i’m Not Torpid either
I’m self funded
All IN
Locked n Loaded
Good Looking
Outspoken
And Seriously don’t believe any of the Bullshit you guys are talking - Flat OUT !

For the record NOPE i’m Not Torpid either
I’m self funded
All IN
Locked n Loaded
Good Looking
Outspoken
And Seriously don’t believe any of the Bullshit you guys are talking - Flat OUT !

All well and good, but none of it has a thing to do with the genre of torpidity that one can, as a consequence of your remarks in this thread, ascribe legitimately to you.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

I ascribe to ?
Care to elaborate ?

 

[usmbguest5318]

WTF is an OP ?

As I use it:

• OP --> opening post
• OP-er --> opening poster (the member who creates a thread)

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Noted

FWIW, some members use "OP" to mean "opening post" and "opening poster." You'll need to use contextual clues to discern which meaning they intend in connection with any given use of the abbreviation.

 

[Sicilianthing]

False, tard

Federal Reserve Bank Ownership - FactCheck.org

I don't know if the OP is a retard, but it's obvious he's torpid.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Do you guys always talk in Codes ?

WTF is an OP ?

For the record NOPE i’m Not Torpid either
I’m self funded
All IN
Locked n Loaded
Good Looking
Outspoken
And Seriously don’t believe any of the Bullshit you guys are talking - Flat OUT !

For the record NOPE i’m Not Torpid either
I’m self funded
All IN
Locked n Loaded
Good Looking
Outspoken
And Seriously don’t believe any of the Bullshit you guys are talking - Flat OUT !

All well and good, but none of it has a thing to do with the genre of torpidity that one can, as a consequence of your remarks in this thread, ascribe legitimately to you.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

I ascribe to ?
Care to elaborate ?

False, tard

Federal Reserve Bank Ownership - FactCheck.org

I don't know if the OP is a retard, but it's obvious he's torpid.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Do you guys always talk in Codes ?

WTF is an OP ?

For the record NOPE i’m Not Torpid either
I’m self funded
All IN
Locked n Loaded
Good Looking
Outspoken
And Seriously don’t believe any of the Bullshit you guys are talking - Flat OUT !

For the record NOPE i’m Not Torpid either
I’m self funded
All IN
Locked n Loaded
Good Looking
Outspoken
And Seriously don’t believe any of the Bullshit you guys are talking - Flat OUT !

All well and good, but none of it has a thing to do with the genre of torpidity that one can, as a consequence of your remarks in this thread, ascribe legitimately to you.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Some say you are one of the Paid Trolls here

 

[Sicilianthing]

WTF is an OP ?

As I use it:

• OP --> opening post
• OP-er --> opening poster (the member who creates a thread)

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Noted

FWIW, some members use "OP" to mean "opening post" and "opening poster." You'll need to use contextual clues to discern which meaning they intend in connection with any given use of the abbreviation.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Naaaaahhhh They can Phuck OFF !
I’m not going to use anything to decipher any of their bullshit... I use plain language in the Reality Zone period.

 

[usmbguest5318]

False, tard

Federal Reserve Bank Ownership - FactCheck.org

I don't know if the OP is a retard, but it's obvious he's torpid.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Do you guys always talk in Codes ?

WTF is an OP ?

For the record NOPE i’m Not Torpid either
I’m self funded
All IN
Locked n Loaded
Good Looking
Outspoken
And Seriously don’t believe any of the Bullshit you guys are talking - Flat OUT !

For the record NOPE i’m Not Torpid either
I’m self funded
All IN
Locked n Loaded
Good Looking
Outspoken
And Seriously don’t believe any of the Bullshit you guys are talking - Flat OUT !

All well and good, but none of it has a thing to do with the genre of torpidity that one can, as a consequence of your remarks in this thread, ascribe legitimately to you.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

I ascribe to ?
Care to elaborate ?

I ascribed to you the quality of torpidity, specifically, intellectual torpidity. Clearly as I don't know you personally, I cannot ascribe to you the trait of physical torpidity. I ascribed to you the trait of intellectual langor because it's clear that in your OP you give no credence to the abundant and readily available information that contradicts the both letter and spirit of your title and OP assertions, but also from your OP, one observes that you made no effort to rigorously verify the veracity of the factual accuracy of so much as the central assertion made in the thread title, which, BTW, is echoed in the OP.

Besides my having ascribed to you the quality of intellectual torpor, it's clear too that you ascribe to at least one fictitious notion about the nature of the Federal Reserve. The mere fact that you created this thread tells us that.

 

[usmbguest5318]

False, tard

Federal Reserve Bank Ownership - FactCheck.org

I don't know if the OP is a retard, but it's obvious he's torpid.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Do you guys always talk in Codes ?

WTF is an OP ?

For the record NOPE i’m Not Torpid either
I’m self funded
All IN
Locked n Loaded
Good Looking
Outspoken
And Seriously don’t believe any of the Bullshit you guys are talking - Flat OUT !

For the record NOPE i’m Not Torpid either
I’m self funded
All IN
Locked n Loaded
Good Looking
Outspoken
And Seriously don’t believe any of the Bullshit you guys are talking - Flat OUT !

All well and good, but none of it has a thing to do with the genre of torpidity that one can, as a consequence of your remarks in this thread, ascribe legitimately to you.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

I ascribe to ?
Care to elaborate ?

False, tard

Federal Reserve Bank Ownership - FactCheck.org

I don't know if the OP is a retard, but it's obvious he's torpid.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Do you guys always talk in Codes ?

WTF is an OP ?

For the record NOPE i’m Not Torpid either
I’m self funded
All IN
Locked n Loaded
Good Looking
Outspoken
And Seriously don’t believe any of the Bullshit you guys are talking - Flat OUT !

For the record NOPE i’m Not Torpid either
I’m self funded
All IN
Locked n Loaded
Good Looking
Outspoken
And Seriously don’t believe any of the Bullshit you guys are talking - Flat OUT !

All well and good, but none of it has a thing to do with the genre of torpidity that one can, as a consequence of your remarks in this thread, ascribe legitimately to you.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Some say you are one of the Paid Trolls here

Okay....So they say....That they say it has nothing to do with the factual or contextual merit of my remarks. I suspect you'll notice that those people rarely if ever present strong and substantive refutations of any of my claims, arguments or inferences, but rather constrain themselves to assailing me personally rather than the ideas I express.

To wit, on the relatively rare occasion I bother to asperse someone, I also bother to provide a clear and strong explication of how and why my personal-level rebuke is legitimate. For example: Trump LOST A SEAT!!!! Cry the liberals!!!! Their messiah in chief lost over 1000. LOL!!!

 

[Sicilianthing]

False, tard

Federal Reserve Bank Ownership - FactCheck.org

I don't know if the OP is a retard, but it's obvious he's torpid.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Do you guys always talk in Codes ?

WTF is an OP ?

For the record NOPE i’m Not Torpid either
I’m self funded
All IN
Locked n Loaded
Good Looking
Outspoken
And Seriously don’t believe any of the Bullshit you guys are talking - Flat OUT !

For the record NOPE i’m Not Torpid either
I’m self funded
All IN
Locked n Loaded
Good Looking
Outspoken
And Seriously don’t believe any of the Bullshit you guys are talking - Flat OUT !

All well and good, but none of it has a thing to do with the genre of torpidity that one can, as a consequence of your remarks in this thread, ascribe legitimately to you.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

I ascribe to ?
Care to elaborate ?

I ascribed to you the quality of torpidity, specifically, intellectual torpidity. Clearly as I don't know you personally, I cannot ascribe to you the trait of physical torpidity. I ascribed to you the trait of intellectual langor because it's clear that in your OP you give no credence to the abundant and readily available information that contradicts the both letter and spirit of your title and OP assertions, but also from your OP, one observes that you made no effort to rigorously verify the veracity of the factual accuracy of so much as the central assertion made in the thread title, which, BTW, is echoed in the OP.

Besides my having ascribed to you the quality of intellectual torpor, it's clear too that you ascribe to at least one fictitious notion about the nature of the Federal Reserve. The mere fact that you created this thread tells us that.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

I could careless about any of that, you have a choice that’s it..
You either believe they are still in power or you dont.

Go do your own research if you like, I don’t care.
I’ve studied this for 20years... and no matter what, everything circles back to these entities still in power today and who’ve literally Hijacked your gov’t, commodities, currency, branches, courts, foreign policy, trade and on and on and on ...

 

[Natural Citizen]

I ascribed to you the quality of torpidity, specifically, intellectual torpidity. Clearly as I don't know you personally, I cannot ascribe to you the trait of physical torpidity. I ascribed to you the trait of intellectual langor because it's clear that in your OP you give no credence to the abundant and readily available information that contradicts the both letter and spirit of your title and OP assertions, but also from your OP, one observes that you made no effort to rigorously verify the veracity of the factual accuracy of so much as the central assertion made in the thread title, which, BTW, is echoed in the OP.

Besides my having ascribed to you the quality of intellectual torpor, it's clear too that you ascribe to at least one fictitious notion about the nature of the Federal Reserve. The mere fact that you created this thread tells us that.

You try too hard. It shows.

 

[usmbguest5318]

I don't know if the OP is a retard, but it's obvious he's torpid.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Do you guys always talk in Codes ?

WTF is an OP ?

For the record NOPE i’m Not Torpid either
I’m self funded
All IN
Locked n Loaded
Good Looking
Outspoken
And Seriously don’t believe any of the Bullshit you guys are talking - Flat OUT !

For the record NOPE i’m Not Torpid either
I’m self funded
All IN
Locked n Loaded
Good Looking
Outspoken
And Seriously don’t believe any of the Bullshit you guys are talking - Flat OUT !

All well and good, but none of it has a thing to do with the genre of torpidity that one can, as a consequence of your remarks in this thread, ascribe legitimately to you.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

I ascribe to ?
Care to elaborate ?

I ascribed to you the quality of torpidity, specifically, intellectual torpidity. Clearly as I don't know you personally, I cannot ascribe to you the trait of physical torpidity. I ascribed to you the trait of intellectual langor because it's clear that in your OP you give no credence to the abundant and readily available information that contradicts the both letter and spirit of your title and OP assertions, but also from your OP, one observes that you made no effort to rigorously verify the veracity of the factual accuracy of so much as the central assertion made in the thread title, which, BTW, is echoed in the OP.

Besides my having ascribed to you the quality of intellectual torpor, it's clear too that you ascribe to at least one fictitious notion about the nature of the Federal Reserve. The mere fact that you created this thread tells us that.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

I could careless about any of that, you have a choice that’s it..
You either believe they are still in power or you dont.

Go do your own research if you like, I don’t care.
I’ve studied this for 20years... and no matter what, everything circles back to these entities still in power today and who’ve literally Hijacked your gov’t, commodities, currency, branches, courts, foreign policy, trade and on and on and on ...

You either believe they are still in power or you dont.

Who holds an equity interest in Federal Reserve banks isn't a matter of what one believes. It's a matter of what is, that is, who does and does not in fact have an equity interest in the Fed. The fact is that some 8,000 Federal Reserve member banks are equity holders in the Fed. Did you read the article that I and another member linked?

 

[Natural Citizen]

I told Admin or whoever the phuck they are in Question marks to stop moving my threads and the FED is the most political issue of our time...

I've always found it more practical to stick to explaining the problems caused by the FR.

Oddly enough, it's the self-described conservatives who understand it the least. They think they're defending capitalism when we have no such system. And the socialists take advantage of the shortcoming.

 

[Sicilianthing]

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Do you guys always talk in Codes ?

WTF is an OP ?

For the record NOPE i’m Not Torpid either
I’m self funded
All IN
Locked n Loaded
Good Looking
Outspoken
And Seriously don’t believe any of the Bullshit you guys are talking - Flat OUT !

For the record NOPE i’m Not Torpid either
I’m self funded
All IN
Locked n Loaded
Good Looking
Outspoken
And Seriously don’t believe any of the Bullshit you guys are talking - Flat OUT !

All well and good, but none of it has a thing to do with the genre of torpidity that one can, as a consequence of your remarks in this thread, ascribe legitimately to you.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

I ascribe to ?
Care to elaborate ?

I ascribed to you the quality of torpidity, specifically, intellectual torpidity. Clearly as I don't know you personally, I cannot ascribe to you the trait of physical torpidity. I ascribed to you the trait of intellectual langor because it's clear that in your OP you give no credence to the abundant and readily available information that contradicts the both letter and spirit of your title and OP assertions, but also from your OP, one observes that you made no effort to rigorously verify the veracity of the factual accuracy of so much as the central assertion made in the thread title, which, BTW, is echoed in the OP.

Besides my having ascribed to you the quality of intellectual torpor, it's clear too that you ascribe to at least one fictitious notion about the nature of the Federal Reserve. The mere fact that you created this thread tells us that.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

I could careless about any of that, you have a choice that’s it..
You either believe they are still in power or you dont.

Go do your own research if you like, I don’t care.
I’ve studied this for 20years... and no matter what, everything circles back to these entities still in power today and who’ve literally Hijacked your gov’t, commodities, currency, branches, courts, foreign policy, trade and on and on and on ...

You either believe they are still in power or you dont.

Who holds an equity interest in Federal Reserve banks isn't a matter of what one believes. It's a matter of what is, that is, who does and does not in fact have an equity interest in the Fed. The fact is that some 8,000 Federal Reserve member banks are equity holders in the Fed. Did you read the article that I and another member linked?

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

I’m quite aware, I have the list somewhere in my archives from the 2016 annual Report... but none of those jackasses own any of the Private Stock of the Private foreign Interest Corporation of the Federal Reserve earnings...

Furthermore those thousands of banks are all divided up somewhat to each of the Presiding families to oversee in their respective AOR’s and control.

Dig Deeper please you’re getting warmer...

 

[The2ndAmendment]

There's a particularly informative, factual, dialogue to be had with regard to the Federal Reserve and the damage done by inflationism.

I don't find ownership of the Federal Reserve to be the premise of it, but I do hope that mere mention of the Federal Reserve around here isn't considered conspiracy theory

Basically anyone who defines the term "note" in the phrase "Federal Reserve Note" in the way that a "note" is legally defined by law and then explains the actual functioning of the Federal Reserve NOTE and who the contracted parties are...is automatically labeled a loony conspiracy theorist...on any clearnet public forum/media/messageboard. Very sad.

A "note" requires a Creditor and a Debtor...when we supply that information on whose the Debtor and whose the Lender we get thrashed by moderators no matter what public forum we take it to...and that's saying a lot since a lot of truly crazy conspiracy theories are pushed by both the left and the right on a wide range of issues that don't end up getting deleted or moved (again this applies everywhere on the clearnet, not just USMB).

When Federal Reserve threads are allowed to remain in full public view on the clearnet, internet search engine authorities and algorithms will start to ignore you in search results, hence the entire debate on CSPAN last week about Dems and Repubs looking to "censor" all forms of "fake news" that doesn't originate from "legitimate news sources like ABC and USA Today."

 

[Sicilianthing]

There's a particularly informative, factual, dialogue to be had with regard to the Federal Reserve and the damage done by inflationism.

I don't find ownership of the Federal Reserve to be the premise of it, but I do hope that mere mention of the Federal Reserve around here isn't considered conspiracy theory

Basically anyone who defines the term "note" in the phrase "Federal Reserve Note" in the way that a "note" is legally defined by law and then explains the actual functioning of the Federal Reserve NOTE and who the contracted parties are...is automatically labeled a loony conspiracy theorist...on any clearnet public forum/media/messageboard. Very sad.

A "note" requires a Creditor and a Debtor...when we supply that information on whose the Debtor and whose the Lender we get thrashed by moderators no matter what public forum we take it to...and that's saying a lot since a lot of truly crazy conspiracy theories are pushed by both the left and the right on a wide range of issues that don't end up getting deleted or moved (again this applies everywhere on the clearnet, not just USMB).

When Federal Reserve threads are allowed to remain in full public view on the clearnet, internet search engine authorities and algorithms will start to ignore you in search results, hence the entire debate on CSPAN last week about Dems and Repubs looking to "censor" all forms of "fake news" that doesn't originate from "legitimate news sources like ABC and USA Today."

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Bullseye ! Grand Slam... you nailed it again... keep it coming...
Nice Post...
Perfect and factual.

 

[Natural Citizen]

Bullseye ! Grand Slam... you nailed it again... keep it coming...
Nice Post...
Perfect and factual.

No use. It's in the conspiracy section now.