Vastator
Platinum Member
- Oct 14, 2014
- 22,239
- 9,800
- 950
Evidence..?some Vast, not all......the assertion human assumed a higher social standing than simple nomadic hunter gathers has not....~S~
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Evidence..?some Vast, not all......the assertion human assumed a higher social standing than simple nomadic hunter gathers has not....~S~
Grahm Hancock is a crackpot, and virtually everyone of his whacked out assertions have been easily debunked...
When you come up with a theory a lot of people throw a lot of questions at you and you say well maybe this or maybe that. Just because they shot down some of his replies doesn’t mean we should throw the baby out with the bath water.some Vast, not all......the assertion human assumed a higher social standing than simple nomadic hunter gathers has not....~S~
Evidence..?
Some believe it was aliens who spliced our genes to make us more than monkeys and more like them. A huge leap forward in a very short amount of time.
Adam and eve doesn’t make sense. My dad ignorantly assumes if you go all the way back we have two original humans we are all related to but that’s ridiculous.
Our ancient ancestor crawled out of the water. Thousands of them. They evolved into thousands of other species etc eventually leading to thousands of monkeys who all slowly evolved into humans.
No original 2 humans.
We are over populated. Perhaps Mother Nature and “god” are making gays to fix this problem.Adam and Eve might not make much sense to you, but even you would agree that it makes more sense than Adam and Steve that the religious left promotes.
Whom, are the "they" to which you refer?They are starting to believe sites like the Great pyramid might be older than we think. Ancient alien says the Great pyramid came first and then humans built the smaller shittier ones after. Trying to copy what the aliens did. And it wasn’t just for worship. We don’t know what they used it for or how.
Göbekli Tepe
Göbekli Tepe (Turkish: [ɟœbecˈli teˈpe], 'Potbelly Hill'; Kurdish: Girê Mirazan or Xirabreşkê) is a Neolithic archaeological site in the Southeastern Anatolia Region of Turkey. The settlement was inhabited from c. 9500 to at least 8000 BCE, during the Pre-Pottery Neolithic.
How do we know it’s not 50,000 years old?
He's an actual archeologist. And he's not "just giving his opinion". He's juxtaposing Hancock's speculations, against known facts.All this guy is doing is taking pieces of the theory and saying he could be wrong. Who is this kid? He’s just giving his opinion.
Scientists. How old is the stone? Hard to tell for sure.Whom, are the "they" to which you refer?
I listened to him rambling. I heard many places where this better known guy would have objected or argued back but this was just one side. 1 hour of rambling. And he too speculated or conceded he didn’t know a lot too. Could be he said. But what about.He's an actual archeologist. And he's not "just giving his opinion". He's juxtaposing Hancock's speculations, against known facts.
Do you have any links, from any reliable sources? Names would be great too...Scientists. How old is the stone? Hard to tell for sure.
And WE believe the Great pyramid is newer than the old smaller ones but it might not be. We don’t know for sure. We think.
No I watched ancient aliens last nightDo you have any links, from any reliable sources? Names would be great too...
It's not just him. Numerous actual archeologists have been having a field day dunking on Hancock's grift. YT has a near endless supply...I listened to him rambling. I heard many places where this better known guy would have objected or argued back but this was just one side. 1 hour of rambling. And he too speculated or conceded he didn’t know a lot too. Could be he said. But what about.
Does this guy have a theory that’s well known?
What do you believe?It's not just him. Numerous actual archeologists have been having a field day dunking on Hancock's grift. YT has a near endless supply...
Oh boy...No I watched ancient aliens last night
The findings of peer reviewed researchers, and archeologists who have independently researched and reviewed the evidence, and have come to the same conclusions. There is still plenty of mystery regarding prehistory. But that's no cause for just making shit up...What do you believe?
Lots of good reasons to challenge what we currently believe.The findings of peer reviewed researchers, and archeologists who have independently researched and reviewed the evidence, and have come to the same conclusions. There is still plenty of mystery regarding prehistory. But that's no cause for just making shit up...
Another aspect that raises questions about the pyramids’ age is their precise astronomical alignments. The Great Pyramid, for instance, exhibits a remarkable alignment with specific celestial bodies, including Orion’s Belt. The degree of accuracy required to achieve these alignments with the limited technology available in ancient Egypt is staggering.The findings of peer reviewed researchers, and archeologists who have independently researched and reviewed the evidence, and have come to the same conclusions. There is still plenty of mystery regarding prehistory. But that's no cause for just making shit up...
The findings of peer reviewed researchers, and archeologists who have independently researched and reviewed the evidence, and have come to the same conclusions. There is still plenty of mystery regarding prehistory. But that's no cause for just making shit up...
The sphinx is not the pyramids...Lots of good reasons to challenge what we currently believe.
One intriguing piece of evidence challenging the established timeline is the erosion patterns found on the Sphinx. While the mainstream view attributes the Sphinx to Pharaoh Khafre’s era, some geologists and researchers argue that the erosional features on the monument are indicative of water erosion, possibly caused by heavy rainfall.