'72 Terrorists came from countries under Trump's ban

[Lakhota]

Why didn't Trump ban anyone from Turkey, Egypt, or Saudi Arabia...?

 

[ClosedCaption]

Since 9/11, 72 individuals from the seven mostly Muslim countries covered by President Trump's "extreme vetting" executive order have been convicted of terrorism, bolstering the administration's immigration ban.

According to a report out Saturday, at least 17 claimed to be refugees from those nations, three came in as "students," and 25 eventually became U.S. citizens.

The Center for Immigration Studies calculated the numbers of convicted terrorists from the Trump Seven:

— Somalia: 20

— Yemen: 19

— Iraq: 19

— Syria: 7

— Iran: 4

— Libya: 2
Report: 72 convicted of terrorism from 'Trump 7' mostly Muslim countries

The problem however is that DJT left off the 2 most important terrorist Islamic countries from his list -- Saudi A. and Pakistan.

That only seems to be a problem to you because you don't understand the purpose of the ban; it is give the US time to evaluate current vetting procedures with respect to states that don't provide reliable data about would be visitors, states like Syria, Yemen and Iran, but both Saudi Arabia and Pakistan do supply reliable data so they were not on the list.

So they vetted the 9/11 terrorist? Well that's good news.

 

[elektra]

How many Americans did they kill on American soil?

3,000 on 9/11

Yeah, sparky, but none from those SEVEN countries on Trump's ban.

Yet, some did travel from one the countries in the travel ban, to get into the USA. Also, considering that the the 9/11 attack happened in Bush's first year, 8 months after taking office, Trump's action could actually prevent another 9/11. That kind of stuff is hard for you to grasp.

 

[elektra]

They were not born in any of those countries but they had been there and some of them would have been banned for traveling there. So your point is of NO value whatsoever. The birthplace is irrelevant, the place they were trained and radicalized is so you BS does not even hold Jello much less water.

Of course, doing nothing is always better, right, with that kind of logic we could have another 9/11, which is fine with you, as long as it happens while Republicans are in power.

 

[12icer]

Trump has NO business interest, he is no longer in business. But the clintons, the kerrys, eorge soros, and a lot of dimshitscum have business interests in all of those countries. Your lying bullshit is so thin it is like glass.

 

[12icer]

They were not born in any of those countries but they had been there and some of them would have been banned for traveling there. So your point is of NO value whatsoever. The birthplace is irrelevant, the place they were trained and radicalized is so you BS does not even hold Jello much less water.

Of course, doing nothing is always better, right, with that kind of logic we could have another 9/11, which is fine with you, as long as it happens while Republicans are in power.

You need to read not scan!!

 

[Wyatt earp]

Why didn't Trump ban anyone from Turkey, Egypt, or Saudi Arabia...?

Saudi Arabia is easy because they are our allies fighting a proxy war with Iran..



Why do you over look the obvious all the time?


.

 

[12icer]

Actually there were people from the banned countries involved in the planning and execution of 9-11

Imad Eddin Barakat Yarkas was Syrian
Ramzi bin al-Shibh was Yemeni
There were more but I gave two so you couldn't lie and say there was just one or some more of your liberal lying shit.
There were Some Jordanians and others too.
But you said NONE and I say that is a two times proven lie.

 

[2aguy]

Since 9/11, 72 individuals from the seven mostly Muslim countries covered by President Trump's "extreme vetting" executive order have been convicted of terrorism, bolstering the administration's immigration ban.

According to a report out Saturday, at least 17 claimed to be refugees from those nations, three came in as "students," and 25 eventually became U.S. citizens.

The Center for Immigration Studies calculated the numbers of convicted terrorists from the Trump Seven:

— Somalia: 20

— Yemen: 19

— Iraq: 19

— Syria: 7

— Iran: 4

— Libya: 2
Report: 72 convicted of terrorism from 'Trump 7' mostly Muslim countries

Actually, that is the obama seven...not the Trump 7...

 

[elektra]

They were not born in any of those countries but they had been there and some of them would have been banned for traveling there. So your point is of NO value whatsoever. The birthplace is irrelevant, the place they were trained and radicalized is so you BS does not even hold Jello much less water.

Of course, doing nothing is always better, right, with that kind of logic we could have another 9/11, which is fine with you, as long as it happens while Republicans are in power.

You need to read not scan!!

I ain't perfect, sorry.

 

[Dschrute3]

Assad and Russia have repeatedly warned that large numbers of Terrorists are fleeing to Western Europe and the US. But the Left in those places has chose to ignore the warnings. They've put their Citizens in grave danger. I don't understand why those Citizens continue to support the Left. It's very sad and perplexing.

 

[Coyote]

Since 9/11, 72 individuals from the seven mostly Muslim countries covered by President Trump's "extreme vetting" executive order have been convicted of terrorism, bolstering the administration's immigration ban.

According to a report out Saturday, at least 17 claimed to be refugees from those nations, three came in as "students," and 25 eventually became U.S. citizens.

The Center for Immigration Studies calculated the numbers of convicted terrorists from the Trump Seven:

— Somalia: 20

— Yemen: 19

— Iraq: 19

— Syria: 7

— Iran: 4

— Libya: 2
Report: 72 convicted of terrorism from 'Trump 7' mostly Muslim countries

Not exactly true.

Stephen Miller’s claim that 72 from banned countries were implicated in ‘terroristic activity’

The Pinocchio Test
Miller cited this research to say that several dozen people from the seven countries identified in the executive order were involved in “all different kinds of terroristic activity.” But upon closer examination of the cases on the list, it becomes clear that his statement went too far. In fact, this is pretty thin gruel on which to make sweeping claims about the alleged threat posed to the United States by these seven countries, especially because the allegations often did not concern alleged terrorist acts in the United States.

The list does include some people who were convicted of providing material support, such as money or personnel, to groups that are designated as terrorist organizations, such as al-Shabab and al-Qaeda. But it also includes people who were convicted of passport fraud, visa fraud and making fraudulent claims to federal investigators. About two dozen people on this list were not charged with any crimes relating to providing material support to known or suspected terrorist activities or organizations.

Others were believed to be tangentially related to terrorism groups abroad, but did not face terrorism charges. Regardless of the direct or tangential ties that investigators believe each individual may have to terrorist activities, these charges need to be proven in a court of law. Suspected or potential terror links involving these 72 individuals do not confirm Miller’s claim that they were “implicated in terrorist activity.”

Moreover, some people on this list entered the United States — many of them naturalized — decades before they were charged with any of the crimes. That makes Miller’s use of this list to defend Trump’s executive order quite questionable. We award Three Pinocchios.