Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
So...now that they are moving again on the coup......here are 7 times the democrat news organizations claimed the Ukraine interfered with the U.S. elections...
Nolte: 7 Times the Media Reported Ukraine Meddled in the 2016 Election
The proof is below:
Politico: Jan 11, 2017
Ukrainian efforts to sabotage Trump backfire
Donald Trump wasn’t the only presidential candidate whose campaign was boosted by officials of a former Soviet bloc country.
Ukrainian government officials tried to help Hillary Clinton and undermine Trump by publicly questioning his fitness for office. They also disseminated documents implicating a top Trump aide in corruption and suggested they were investigating the matter, only to back away after the election. And they helped Clinton’s allies research damaging information on Trump and his advisers, a Politico investigation found.
A Ukrainian-American operative who was consulting for the Democratic National Committee met with top officials in the Ukrainian Embassy in Washington in an effort to expose ties between Trump, top campaign aide Paul Manafort and Russia, according to people with direct knowledge of the situation.
CNN: July 12, 2017
But multiple Democratic sources said that a DNC contractor, whose work included organizing political events for Ukranian-Americans, did tell DNC operatives that Ukrainian officials would be willing to deliver damaging information on Trump’s campaign and, most notably, Paul Manafort, his then-campaign head who has previously advised Viktor Yanukovych, the former Ukrainian President who has close ties to Moscow.
CBS: July 13, 2017
It wasn’t so much the Clinton campaign, per se, but a Democratic operative working with the Democratic National Committee did reach out to the Ukrainian government in an attempt to get damaging information about the Trump campaign.
That operative’s name is Alexandra Chalupa, a Ukrainian-American former Clinton White House aide who was tasked with ethnic outreach on behalf of the Democratic Party.
…
Chalupa continued her research into Manafort and his ties to Russia, an issue that would dog Manafort until he resigned a few months later. And part of that research involved working with the Ukrainian embassy in Washington and officials in Kiev. Ukraine was worried about a Trump administration cozying up to Moscow, as Russia invaded and seized territory from Ukraine shortly after Yankukovych’s ouster.
…
Is it normal for campaigns to work with foreign governments like this?
No.
…
t’s deeply unusual for an American campaign to be working with foreign assets like this, regardless of whether it’s Ukraine or Russia.
New York Times: December 12, 2018
Ukraine Court Rules Manafort Disclosure Caused ‘Meddling’ in U.S. Election
A court in Ukraine has ruled that officials in the country violated the law by revealing, during the 2016 presidential election in the United States, details of suspected illegal payments to Paul Manafort.
In 2016, while Mr. Manafort was chairman of the Trump campaign, anti-corruption prosecutors in Ukraine disclosed that a pro-Russian political party had earmarked payments for Mr. Manafort from an illegal slush fund. Mr. Manafort resigned from the campaign a week later.
The court’s ruling that what the prosecutors did was illegal comes as the Ukrainian government, which is deeply reliant on the United States for financial and military aid, has sought to distance itself from matters related to the special counsel’s investigation of Russia’s interference in the 2016 presidential race.
…
The Kiev District Administrative Court, in a statement issued Wednesday, said that Artem Sytnik, the head of the National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine, the agency that had released information about the payments, had violated the law. The court’s statement said this violation “resulted in meddling in the electoral process of the United States in 2016 and damaged the national interests of Ukraine.”
Daily Beast: December 12, 2018
Two Ukrainian officials meddled in the 2016 U.S. presidential election by leaking a secret ledger showing $12.7 million in payments between Ukraine’s ousted pro-Russian President Viktor Yanukovych and Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort, a Ukrainian court said Wednesday.
The Kyiv district court ruled that National Anti-Corruption Bureau Director Artem Sytnyk and legislator Serhiy Leshchenko broke the law by revealing that Manafort’s name and signature appeared on the ledger.
The disclosure “led to interference in the electoral processes of the United States in 2016 and harmed the interests of Ukraine as a state,” the court said.
Newsweek: December 12, 2018
Two Ukrainian officials interfered in the 2016 U.S. presidential election when they revealed details of illegal cash payments worth millions of dollars from the country’s former ruling party, the Party of Regions, to President Donald Trump’s former campaign manager Paul Manafort, a court in the country’s capital, Kiev, determined on Wednesday.
Artem Sytnyk, director of the National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine, and Serhiy Leshchenko, a parliamentarian who was once an investigative reporter, played a central role in finding and publishing secret records, nicknamed the “black ledger,” with information about $12.7 million of undisclosed cash payments made by Ukraine’s ousted pro-Russian President Viktor Yanukovych to Manafort.
The Week: January 11, 2017
Hillary Clinton also got foreign help in the election — from Ukraine
Ukrainian government officials helped boost Hillary Clinton and worked to sabotage Donald Trump’s political campaign during the 2016 election, a Politico investigation has found. In one instance, a Ukrainian-American operative consulting with the Democratic National Committee even had a hand in exposing Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort’s ties to Russia, which eventually resulted in his ousting from the Trump campaign.
This is how breathlessly and shamelessly corrupt the media are…
News orgs don't have "political parties" DUMBASS. Even if Mitt Romney thinks corporations are people my friend, they can't register to vote so by definition they can't be "democrats", nor could they be "Democrats", a distinction that continues to fly over your hood of illiteracy.
News flash: Corporations are in what they're in for PROFIT, not for politics. It's astounding somebody would need a lesson on how capitalism works. Wait, are you in Russia?
Wrong again, you moron....they are dominated by members of the democrat party and put their politics ahead of their ratings....
THIS JUST IN.
No one needs a political party to work for a news organization. Seems it has no function.
Know what does have a function in commercial media?
PROFIT.
PERIOD, FULL STOP.
NOBODY in media, news or otherwise, makes a damn dime from ideologies. They make billions of damn dimes from COMMERCIALS. That's the whole reason they EXIST.
PERIOD, FULL STOP.
And before you ask, no they don't make a damn dime off the fact that you're butthurt about what the news is. Unless they start selling butthurt cream.
Just stop. It's embarrassing.So...now that they are moving again on the coup......here are 7 times the democrat news organizations claimed the Ukraine interfered with the U.S. elections...
Nolte: 7 Times the Media Reported Ukraine Meddled in the 2016 Election
The proof is below:
Politico: Jan 11, 2017
Ukrainian efforts to sabotage Trump backfire
Donald Trump wasn’t the only presidential candidate whose campaign was boosted by officials of a former Soviet bloc country.
Ukrainian government officials tried to help Hillary Clinton and undermine Trump by publicly questioning his fitness for office. They also disseminated documents implicating a top Trump aide in corruption and suggested they were investigating the matter, only to back away after the election. And they helped Clinton’s allies research damaging information on Trump and his advisers, a Politico investigation found.
A Ukrainian-American operative who was consulting for the Democratic National Committee met with top officials in the Ukrainian Embassy in Washington in an effort to expose ties between Trump, top campaign aide Paul Manafort and Russia, according to people with direct knowledge of the situation.
CNN: July 12, 2017
But multiple Democratic sources said that a DNC contractor, whose work included organizing political events for Ukranian-Americans, did tell DNC operatives that Ukrainian officials would be willing to deliver damaging information on Trump’s campaign and, most notably, Paul Manafort, his then-campaign head who has previously advised Viktor Yanukovych, the former Ukrainian President who has close ties to Moscow.
CBS: July 13, 2017
It wasn’t so much the Clinton campaign, per se, but a Democratic operative working with the Democratic National Committee did reach out to the Ukrainian government in an attempt to get damaging information about the Trump campaign.
That operative’s name is Alexandra Chalupa, a Ukrainian-American former Clinton White House aide who was tasked with ethnic outreach on behalf of the Democratic Party.
…
Chalupa continued her research into Manafort and his ties to Russia, an issue that would dog Manafort until he resigned a few months later. And part of that research involved working with the Ukrainian embassy in Washington and officials in Kiev. Ukraine was worried about a Trump administration cozying up to Moscow, as Russia invaded and seized territory from Ukraine shortly after Yankukovych’s ouster.
…
Is it normal for campaigns to work with foreign governments like this?
No.
…
t’s deeply unusual for an American campaign to be working with foreign assets like this, regardless of whether it’s Ukraine or Russia.
New York Times: December 12, 2018
Ukraine Court Rules Manafort Disclosure Caused ‘Meddling’ in U.S. Election
A court in Ukraine has ruled that officials in the country violated the law by revealing, during the 2016 presidential election in the United States, details of suspected illegal payments to Paul Manafort.
In 2016, while Mr. Manafort was chairman of the Trump campaign, anti-corruption prosecutors in Ukraine disclosed that a pro-Russian political party had earmarked payments for Mr. Manafort from an illegal slush fund. Mr. Manafort resigned from the campaign a week later.
The court’s ruling that what the prosecutors did was illegal comes as the Ukrainian government, which is deeply reliant on the United States for financial and military aid, has sought to distance itself from matters related to the special counsel’s investigation of Russia’s interference in the 2016 presidential race.
…
The Kiev District Administrative Court, in a statement issued Wednesday, said that Artem Sytnik, the head of the National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine, the agency that had released information about the payments, had violated the law. The court’s statement said this violation “resulted in meddling in the electoral process of the United States in 2016 and damaged the national interests of Ukraine.”
Daily Beast: December 12, 2018
Two Ukrainian officials meddled in the 2016 U.S. presidential election by leaking a secret ledger showing $12.7 million in payments between Ukraine’s ousted pro-Russian President Viktor Yanukovych and Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort, a Ukrainian court said Wednesday.
The Kyiv district court ruled that National Anti-Corruption Bureau Director Artem Sytnyk and legislator Serhiy Leshchenko broke the law by revealing that Manafort’s name and signature appeared on the ledger.
The disclosure “led to interference in the electoral processes of the United States in 2016 and harmed the interests of Ukraine as a state,” the court said.
Newsweek: December 12, 2018
Two Ukrainian officials interfered in the 2016 U.S. presidential election when they revealed details of illegal cash payments worth millions of dollars from the country’s former ruling party, the Party of Regions, to President Donald Trump’s former campaign manager Paul Manafort, a court in the country’s capital, Kiev, determined on Wednesday.
Artem Sytnyk, director of the National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine, and Serhiy Leshchenko, a parliamentarian who was once an investigative reporter, played a central role in finding and publishing secret records, nicknamed the “black ledger,” with information about $12.7 million of undisclosed cash payments made by Ukraine’s ousted pro-Russian President Viktor Yanukovych to Manafort.
The Week: January 11, 2017
Hillary Clinton also got foreign help in the election — from Ukraine
Ukrainian government officials helped boost Hillary Clinton and worked to sabotage Donald Trump’s political campaign during the 2016 election, a Politico investigation has found. In one instance, a Ukrainian-American operative consulting with the Democratic National Committee even had a hand in exposing Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort’s ties to Russia, which eventually resulted in his ousting from the Trump campaign.
This is how breathlessly and shamelessly corrupt the media are…
News orgs don't have "political parties" DUMBASS. Even if Mitt Romney thinks corporations are people my friend, they can't register to vote so by definition they can't be "democrats", nor could they be "Democrats", a distinction that continues to fly over your hood of illiteracy.
News flash: Corporations are in what they're in for PROFIT, not for politics. It's astounding somebody would need a lesson on how capitalism works. Wait, are you in Russia?
Wrong again, you moron....they are dominated by members of the democrat party and put their politics ahead of their ratings....
THIS JUST IN.
No one needs a political party to work for a news organization. Seems it has no function.
Know what does have a function in commercial media?
PROFIT.
PERIOD, FULL STOP.
NOBODY in media, news or otherwise, makes a damn dime from ideologies. They make billions of damn dimes from COMMERCIALS. That's the whole reason they EXIST.
PERIOD, FULL STOP.
And before you ask, no they don't make a damn dime off the fact that you're butthurt about what the news is. Unless they start selling butthurt cream.
WOW!MSNBC, NBC News top political editor accused of 'trying to intimidate' reporter on 'behalf of the DNC'
the FOX Gossip Channel of all sources!
So...now that they are moving again on the coup......here are 7 times the democrat news organizations claimed the Ukraine interfered with the U.S. elections...
Nolte: 7 Times the Media Reported Ukraine Meddled in the 2016 Election
The proof is below:
Politico: Jan 11, 2017
Ukrainian efforts to sabotage Trump backfire
Donald Trump wasn’t the only presidential candidate whose campaign was boosted by officials of a former Soviet bloc country.
Ukrainian government officials tried to help Hillary Clinton and undermine Trump by publicly questioning his fitness for office. They also disseminated documents implicating a top Trump aide in corruption and suggested they were investigating the matter, only to back away after the election. And they helped Clinton’s allies research damaging information on Trump and his advisers, a Politico investigation found.
A Ukrainian-American operative who was consulting for the Democratic National Committee met with top officials in the Ukrainian Embassy in Washington in an effort to expose ties between Trump, top campaign aide Paul Manafort and Russia, according to people with direct knowledge of the situation.
CNN: July 12, 2017
But multiple Democratic sources said that a DNC contractor, whose work included organizing political events for Ukranian-Americans, did tell DNC operatives that Ukrainian officials would be willing to deliver damaging information on Trump’s campaign and, most notably, Paul Manafort, his then-campaign head who has previously advised Viktor Yanukovych, the former Ukrainian President who has close ties to Moscow.
CBS: July 13, 2017
It wasn’t so much the Clinton campaign, per se, but a Democratic operative working with the Democratic National Committee did reach out to the Ukrainian government in an attempt to get damaging information about the Trump campaign.
That operative’s name is Alexandra Chalupa, a Ukrainian-American former Clinton White House aide who was tasked with ethnic outreach on behalf of the Democratic Party.
…
Chalupa continued her research into Manafort and his ties to Russia, an issue that would dog Manafort until he resigned a few months later. And part of that research involved working with the Ukrainian embassy in Washington and officials in Kiev. Ukraine was worried about a Trump administration cozying up to Moscow, as Russia invaded and seized territory from Ukraine shortly after Yankukovych’s ouster.
…
Is it normal for campaigns to work with foreign governments like this?
No.
…
t’s deeply unusual for an American campaign to be working with foreign assets like this, regardless of whether it’s Ukraine or Russia.
New York Times: December 12, 2018
Ukraine Court Rules Manafort Disclosure Caused ‘Meddling’ in U.S. Election
A court in Ukraine has ruled that officials in the country violated the law by revealing, during the 2016 presidential election in the United States, details of suspected illegal payments to Paul Manafort.
In 2016, while Mr. Manafort was chairman of the Trump campaign, anti-corruption prosecutors in Ukraine disclosed that a pro-Russian political party had earmarked payments for Mr. Manafort from an illegal slush fund. Mr. Manafort resigned from the campaign a week later.
The court’s ruling that what the prosecutors did was illegal comes as the Ukrainian government, which is deeply reliant on the United States for financial and military aid, has sought to distance itself from matters related to the special counsel’s investigation of Russia’s interference in the 2016 presidential race.
…
The Kiev District Administrative Court, in a statement issued Wednesday, said that Artem Sytnik, the head of the National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine, the agency that had released information about the payments, had violated the law. The court’s statement said this violation “resulted in meddling in the electoral process of the United States in 2016 and damaged the national interests of Ukraine.”
Daily Beast: December 12, 2018
Two Ukrainian officials meddled in the 2016 U.S. presidential election by leaking a secret ledger showing $12.7 million in payments between Ukraine’s ousted pro-Russian President Viktor Yanukovych and Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort, a Ukrainian court said Wednesday.
The Kyiv district court ruled that National Anti-Corruption Bureau Director Artem Sytnyk and legislator Serhiy Leshchenko broke the law by revealing that Manafort’s name and signature appeared on the ledger.
The disclosure “led to interference in the electoral processes of the United States in 2016 and harmed the interests of Ukraine as a state,” the court said.
Newsweek: December 12, 2018
Two Ukrainian officials interfered in the 2016 U.S. presidential election when they revealed details of illegal cash payments worth millions of dollars from the country’s former ruling party, the Party of Regions, to President Donald Trump’s former campaign manager Paul Manafort, a court in the country’s capital, Kiev, determined on Wednesday.
Artem Sytnyk, director of the National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine, and Serhiy Leshchenko, a parliamentarian who was once an investigative reporter, played a central role in finding and publishing secret records, nicknamed the “black ledger,” with information about $12.7 million of undisclosed cash payments made by Ukraine’s ousted pro-Russian President Viktor Yanukovych to Manafort.
The Week: January 11, 2017
Hillary Clinton also got foreign help in the election — from Ukraine
Ukrainian government officials helped boost Hillary Clinton and worked to sabotage Donald Trump’s political campaign during the 2016 election, a Politico investigation has found. In one instance, a Ukrainian-American operative consulting with the Democratic National Committee even had a hand in exposing Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort’s ties to Russia, which eventually resulted in his ousting from the Trump campaign.
This is how breathlessly and shamelessly corrupt the media are…
News orgs don't have "political parties" DUMBASS. Even if Mitt Romney thinks corporations are people my friend, they can't register to vote so by definition they can't be "democrats", nor could they be "Democrats", a distinction that continues to fly over your hood of illiteracy.
News flash: Corporations are in what they're in for PROFIT, not for politics. It's astounding somebody would need a lesson on how capitalism works. Wait, are you in Russia?
Wrong again, you moron....they are dominated by members of the democrat party and put their politics ahead of their ratings....
THIS JUST IN.
No one needs a political party to work for a news organization. Seems it has no function.
Know what does have a function in commercial media?
PROFIT.
PERIOD, FULL STOP.
NOBODY in media, news or otherwise, makes a damn dime from ideologies. They make billions of damn dimes from COMMERCIALS. That's the whole reason they EXIST.
PERIOD, FULL STOP.
And before you ask, no they don't make a damn dime off the fact that you're butthurt about what the news is. Unless they start selling butthurt cream.
You didn't know? Every time the NYTimes loses more sales by pushing Democrat lies, George Soros comes to the rescue. And he does it for other liberal newsmedias that American Citizens have become disenchanted with over the constant lying and fluffing the Clinton Cabal.
Here's just one sample, and it took me less than 10 seconds to find it online: George Soros Invested $3 Million in New York Times Stock Holdings This Year
So...now that they are moving again on the coup......here are 7 times the democrat news organizations claimed the Ukraine interfered with the U.S. elections...
Nolte: 7 Times the Media Reported Ukraine Meddled in the 2016 Election
The proof is below:
Politico: Jan 11, 2017
Ukrainian efforts to sabotage Trump backfire
Donald Trump wasn’t the only presidential candidate whose campaign was boosted by officials of a former Soviet bloc country.
Ukrainian government officials tried to help Hillary Clinton and undermine Trump by publicly questioning his fitness for office. They also disseminated documents implicating a top Trump aide in corruption and suggested they were investigating the matter, only to back away after the election. And they helped Clinton’s allies research damaging information on Trump and his advisers, a Politico investigation found.
A Ukrainian-American operative who was consulting for the Democratic National Committee met with top officials in the Ukrainian Embassy in Washington in an effort to expose ties between Trump, top campaign aide Paul Manafort and Russia, according to people with direct knowledge of the situation.
CNN: July 12, 2017
But multiple Democratic sources said that a DNC contractor, whose work included organizing political events for Ukranian-Americans, did tell DNC operatives that Ukrainian officials would be willing to deliver damaging information on Trump’s campaign and, most notably, Paul Manafort, his then-campaign head who has previously advised Viktor Yanukovych, the former Ukrainian President who has close ties to Moscow.
CBS: July 13, 2017
It wasn’t so much the Clinton campaign, per se, but a Democratic operative working with the Democratic National Committee did reach out to the Ukrainian government in an attempt to get damaging information about the Trump campaign.
That operative’s name is Alexandra Chalupa, a Ukrainian-American former Clinton White House aide who was tasked with ethnic outreach on behalf of the Democratic Party.
…
Chalupa continued her research into Manafort and his ties to Russia, an issue that would dog Manafort until he resigned a few months later. And part of that research involved working with the Ukrainian embassy in Washington and officials in Kiev. Ukraine was worried about a Trump administration cozying up to Moscow, as Russia invaded and seized territory from Ukraine shortly after Yankukovych’s ouster.
…
Is it normal for campaigns to work with foreign governments like this?
No.
…
t’s deeply unusual for an American campaign to be working with foreign assets like this, regardless of whether it’s Ukraine or Russia.
New York Times: December 12, 2018
Ukraine Court Rules Manafort Disclosure Caused ‘Meddling’ in U.S. Election
A court in Ukraine has ruled that officials in the country violated the law by revealing, during the 2016 presidential election in the United States, details of suspected illegal payments to Paul Manafort.
In 2016, while Mr. Manafort was chairman of the Trump campaign, anti-corruption prosecutors in Ukraine disclosed that a pro-Russian political party had earmarked payments for Mr. Manafort from an illegal slush fund. Mr. Manafort resigned from the campaign a week later.
The court’s ruling that what the prosecutors did was illegal comes as the Ukrainian government, which is deeply reliant on the United States for financial and military aid, has sought to distance itself from matters related to the special counsel’s investigation of Russia’s interference in the 2016 presidential race.
…
The Kiev District Administrative Court, in a statement issued Wednesday, said that Artem Sytnik, the head of the National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine, the agency that had released information about the payments, had violated the law. The court’s statement said this violation “resulted in meddling in the electoral process of the United States in 2016 and damaged the national interests of Ukraine.”
Daily Beast: December 12, 2018
Two Ukrainian officials meddled in the 2016 U.S. presidential election by leaking a secret ledger showing $12.7 million in payments between Ukraine’s ousted pro-Russian President Viktor Yanukovych and Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort, a Ukrainian court said Wednesday.
The Kyiv district court ruled that National Anti-Corruption Bureau Director Artem Sytnyk and legislator Serhiy Leshchenko broke the law by revealing that Manafort’s name and signature appeared on the ledger.
The disclosure “led to interference in the electoral processes of the United States in 2016 and harmed the interests of Ukraine as a state,” the court said.
Newsweek: December 12, 2018
Two Ukrainian officials interfered in the 2016 U.S. presidential election when they revealed details of illegal cash payments worth millions of dollars from the country’s former ruling party, the Party of Regions, to President Donald Trump’s former campaign manager Paul Manafort, a court in the country’s capital, Kiev, determined on Wednesday.
Artem Sytnyk, director of the National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine, and Serhiy Leshchenko, a parliamentarian who was once an investigative reporter, played a central role in finding and publishing secret records, nicknamed the “black ledger,” with information about $12.7 million of undisclosed cash payments made by Ukraine’s ousted pro-Russian President Viktor Yanukovych to Manafort.
The Week: January 11, 2017
Hillary Clinton also got foreign help in the election — from Ukraine
Ukrainian government officials helped boost Hillary Clinton and worked to sabotage Donald Trump’s political campaign during the 2016 election, a Politico investigation has found. In one instance, a Ukrainian-American operative consulting with the Democratic National Committee even had a hand in exposing Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort’s ties to Russia, which eventually resulted in his ousting from the Trump campaign.
This is how breathlessly and shamelessly corrupt the media are…
News orgs don't have "political parties" DUMBASS. Even if Mitt Romney thinks corporations are people my friend, they can't register to vote so by definition they can't be "democrats", nor could they be "Democrats", a distinction that continues to fly over your hood of illiteracy.
News flash: Corporations are in what they're in for PROFIT, not for politics. It's astounding somebody would need a lesson on how capitalism works. Wait, are you in Russia?
Wrong again, you moron....they are dominated by members of the democrat party and put their politics ahead of their ratings....
THIS JUST IN.
No one needs a political party to work for a news organization. Seems it has no function.
Know what does have a function in commercial media?
PROFIT.
PERIOD, FULL STOP.
NOBODY in media, news or otherwise, makes a damn dime from ideologies. They make billions of damn dimes from COMMERCIALS. That's the whole reason they EXIST.
PERIOD, FULL STOP.
And before you ask, no they don't make a damn dime off the fact that you're butthurt about what the news is. Unless they start selling butthurt cream.
Wrong...again.......CNN barely gets any ratings....the only reason they get most of their ratings is the fact they have the airport concession.....you moonbat.......money does not drive the democrat press....they laugh at the idea that they need to make a profit...they are "News" organizations you twit....
Just stop. It's embarrassing.So...now that they are moving again on the coup......here are 7 times the democrat news organizations claimed the Ukraine interfered with the U.S. elections...
Nolte: 7 Times the Media Reported Ukraine Meddled in the 2016 Election
The proof is below:
Politico: Jan 11, 2017
Ukrainian efforts to sabotage Trump backfire
Donald Trump wasn’t the only presidential candidate whose campaign was boosted by officials of a former Soviet bloc country.
Ukrainian government officials tried to help Hillary Clinton and undermine Trump by publicly questioning his fitness for office. They also disseminated documents implicating a top Trump aide in corruption and suggested they were investigating the matter, only to back away after the election. And they helped Clinton’s allies research damaging information on Trump and his advisers, a Politico investigation found.
A Ukrainian-American operative who was consulting for the Democratic National Committee met with top officials in the Ukrainian Embassy in Washington in an effort to expose ties between Trump, top campaign aide Paul Manafort and Russia, according to people with direct knowledge of the situation.
CNN: July 12, 2017
But multiple Democratic sources said that a DNC contractor, whose work included organizing political events for Ukranian-Americans, did tell DNC operatives that Ukrainian officials would be willing to deliver damaging information on Trump’s campaign and, most notably, Paul Manafort, his then-campaign head who has previously advised Viktor Yanukovych, the former Ukrainian President who has close ties to Moscow.
CBS: July 13, 2017
It wasn’t so much the Clinton campaign, per se, but a Democratic operative working with the Democratic National Committee did reach out to the Ukrainian government in an attempt to get damaging information about the Trump campaign.
That operative’s name is Alexandra Chalupa, a Ukrainian-American former Clinton White House aide who was tasked with ethnic outreach on behalf of the Democratic Party.
…
Chalupa continued her research into Manafort and his ties to Russia, an issue that would dog Manafort until he resigned a few months later. And part of that research involved working with the Ukrainian embassy in Washington and officials in Kiev. Ukraine was worried about a Trump administration cozying up to Moscow, as Russia invaded and seized territory from Ukraine shortly after Yankukovych’s ouster.
…
Is it normal for campaigns to work with foreign governments like this?
No.
…
t’s deeply unusual for an American campaign to be working with foreign assets like this, regardless of whether it’s Ukraine or Russia.
New York Times: December 12, 2018
Ukraine Court Rules Manafort Disclosure Caused ‘Meddling’ in U.S. Election
A court in Ukraine has ruled that officials in the country violated the law by revealing, during the 2016 presidential election in the United States, details of suspected illegal payments to Paul Manafort.
In 2016, while Mr. Manafort was chairman of the Trump campaign, anti-corruption prosecutors in Ukraine disclosed that a pro-Russian political party had earmarked payments for Mr. Manafort from an illegal slush fund. Mr. Manafort resigned from the campaign a week later.
The court’s ruling that what the prosecutors did was illegal comes as the Ukrainian government, which is deeply reliant on the United States for financial and military aid, has sought to distance itself from matters related to the special counsel’s investigation of Russia’s interference in the 2016 presidential race.
…
The Kiev District Administrative Court, in a statement issued Wednesday, said that Artem Sytnik, the head of the National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine, the agency that had released information about the payments, had violated the law. The court’s statement said this violation “resulted in meddling in the electoral process of the United States in 2016 and damaged the national interests of Ukraine.”
Daily Beast: December 12, 2018
Two Ukrainian officials meddled in the 2016 U.S. presidential election by leaking a secret ledger showing $12.7 million in payments between Ukraine’s ousted pro-Russian President Viktor Yanukovych and Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort, a Ukrainian court said Wednesday.
The Kyiv district court ruled that National Anti-Corruption Bureau Director Artem Sytnyk and legislator Serhiy Leshchenko broke the law by revealing that Manafort’s name and signature appeared on the ledger.
The disclosure “led to interference in the electoral processes of the United States in 2016 and harmed the interests of Ukraine as a state,” the court said.
Newsweek: December 12, 2018
Two Ukrainian officials interfered in the 2016 U.S. presidential election when they revealed details of illegal cash payments worth millions of dollars from the country’s former ruling party, the Party of Regions, to President Donald Trump’s former campaign manager Paul Manafort, a court in the country’s capital, Kiev, determined on Wednesday.
Artem Sytnyk, director of the National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine, and Serhiy Leshchenko, a parliamentarian who was once an investigative reporter, played a central role in finding and publishing secret records, nicknamed the “black ledger,” with information about $12.7 million of undisclosed cash payments made by Ukraine’s ousted pro-Russian President Viktor Yanukovych to Manafort.
The Week: January 11, 2017
Hillary Clinton also got foreign help in the election — from Ukraine
Ukrainian government officials helped boost Hillary Clinton and worked to sabotage Donald Trump’s political campaign during the 2016 election, a Politico investigation has found. In one instance, a Ukrainian-American operative consulting with the Democratic National Committee even had a hand in exposing Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort’s ties to Russia, which eventually resulted in his ousting from the Trump campaign.
This is how breathlessly and shamelessly corrupt the media are…
News orgs don't have "political parties" DUMBASS. Even if Mitt Romney thinks corporations are people my friend, they can't register to vote so by definition they can't be "democrats", nor could they be "Democrats", a distinction that continues to fly over your hood of illiteracy.
News flash: Corporations are in what they're in for PROFIT, not for politics. It's astounding somebody would need a lesson on how capitalism works. Wait, are you in Russia?
Wrong again, you moron....they are dominated by members of the democrat party and put their politics ahead of their ratings....
THIS JUST IN.
No one needs a political party to work for a news organization. Seems it has no function.
Know what does have a function in commercial media?
PROFIT.
PERIOD, FULL STOP.
NOBODY in media, news or otherwise, makes a damn dime from ideologies. They make billions of damn dimes from COMMERCIALS. That's the whole reason they EXIST.
PERIOD, FULL STOP.
And before you ask, no they don't make a damn dime off the fact that you're butthurt about what the news is. Unless they start selling butthurt cream.
Just stop. It's embarrassing.So...now that they are moving again on the coup......here are 7 times the democrat news organizations claimed the Ukraine interfered with the U.S. elections...
Nolte: 7 Times the Media Reported Ukraine Meddled in the 2016 Election
The proof is below:
Politico: Jan 11, 2017
Ukrainian efforts to sabotage Trump backfire
Donald Trump wasn’t the only presidential candidate whose campaign was boosted by officials of a former Soviet bloc country.
Ukrainian government officials tried to help Hillary Clinton and undermine Trump by publicly questioning his fitness for office. They also disseminated documents implicating a top Trump aide in corruption and suggested they were investigating the matter, only to back away after the election. And they helped Clinton’s allies research damaging information on Trump and his advisers, a Politico investigation found.
A Ukrainian-American operative who was consulting for the Democratic National Committee met with top officials in the Ukrainian Embassy in Washington in an effort to expose ties between Trump, top campaign aide Paul Manafort and Russia, according to people with direct knowledge of the situation.
CNN: July 12, 2017
But multiple Democratic sources said that a DNC contractor, whose work included organizing political events for Ukranian-Americans, did tell DNC operatives that Ukrainian officials would be willing to deliver damaging information on Trump’s campaign and, most notably, Paul Manafort, his then-campaign head who has previously advised Viktor Yanukovych, the former Ukrainian President who has close ties to Moscow.
CBS: July 13, 2017
It wasn’t so much the Clinton campaign, per se, but a Democratic operative working with the Democratic National Committee did reach out to the Ukrainian government in an attempt to get damaging information about the Trump campaign.
That operative’s name is Alexandra Chalupa, a Ukrainian-American former Clinton White House aide who was tasked with ethnic outreach on behalf of the Democratic Party.
…
Chalupa continued her research into Manafort and his ties to Russia, an issue that would dog Manafort until he resigned a few months later. And part of that research involved working with the Ukrainian embassy in Washington and officials in Kiev. Ukraine was worried about a Trump administration cozying up to Moscow, as Russia invaded and seized territory from Ukraine shortly after Yankukovych’s ouster.
…
Is it normal for campaigns to work with foreign governments like this?
No.
…
t’s deeply unusual for an American campaign to be working with foreign assets like this, regardless of whether it’s Ukraine or Russia.
New York Times: December 12, 2018
Ukraine Court Rules Manafort Disclosure Caused ‘Meddling’ in U.S. Election
A court in Ukraine has ruled that officials in the country violated the law by revealing, during the 2016 presidential election in the United States, details of suspected illegal payments to Paul Manafort.
In 2016, while Mr. Manafort was chairman of the Trump campaign, anti-corruption prosecutors in Ukraine disclosed that a pro-Russian political party had earmarked payments for Mr. Manafort from an illegal slush fund. Mr. Manafort resigned from the campaign a week later.
The court’s ruling that what the prosecutors did was illegal comes as the Ukrainian government, which is deeply reliant on the United States for financial and military aid, has sought to distance itself from matters related to the special counsel’s investigation of Russia’s interference in the 2016 presidential race.
…
The Kiev District Administrative Court, in a statement issued Wednesday, said that Artem Sytnik, the head of the National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine, the agency that had released information about the payments, had violated the law. The court’s statement said this violation “resulted in meddling in the electoral process of the United States in 2016 and damaged the national interests of Ukraine.”
Daily Beast: December 12, 2018
Two Ukrainian officials meddled in the 2016 U.S. presidential election by leaking a secret ledger showing $12.7 million in payments between Ukraine’s ousted pro-Russian President Viktor Yanukovych and Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort, a Ukrainian court said Wednesday.
The Kyiv district court ruled that National Anti-Corruption Bureau Director Artem Sytnyk and legislator Serhiy Leshchenko broke the law by revealing that Manafort’s name and signature appeared on the ledger.
The disclosure “led to interference in the electoral processes of the United States in 2016 and harmed the interests of Ukraine as a state,” the court said.
Newsweek: December 12, 2018
Two Ukrainian officials interfered in the 2016 U.S. presidential election when they revealed details of illegal cash payments worth millions of dollars from the country’s former ruling party, the Party of Regions, to President Donald Trump’s former campaign manager Paul Manafort, a court in the country’s capital, Kiev, determined on Wednesday.
Artem Sytnyk, director of the National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine, and Serhiy Leshchenko, a parliamentarian who was once an investigative reporter, played a central role in finding and publishing secret records, nicknamed the “black ledger,” with information about $12.7 million of undisclosed cash payments made by Ukraine’s ousted pro-Russian President Viktor Yanukovych to Manafort.
The Week: January 11, 2017
Hillary Clinton also got foreign help in the election — from Ukraine
Ukrainian government officials helped boost Hillary Clinton and worked to sabotage Donald Trump’s political campaign during the 2016 election, a Politico investigation has found. In one instance, a Ukrainian-American operative consulting with the Democratic National Committee even had a hand in exposing Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort’s ties to Russia, which eventually resulted in his ousting from the Trump campaign.
This is how breathlessly and shamelessly corrupt the media are…
News orgs don't have "political parties" DUMBASS. Even if Mitt Romney thinks corporations are people my friend, they can't register to vote so by definition they can't be "democrats", nor could they be "Democrats", a distinction that continues to fly over your hood of illiteracy.
News flash: Corporations are in what they're in for PROFIT, not for politics. It's astounding somebody would need a lesson on how capitalism works. Wait, are you in Russia?
Wrong again, you moron....they are dominated by members of the democrat party and put their politics ahead of their ratings....
THIS JUST IN.
No one needs a political party to work for a news organization. Seems it has no function.
Know what does have a function in commercial media?
PROFIT.
PERIOD, FULL STOP.
NOBODY in media, news or otherwise, makes a damn dime from ideologies. They make billions of damn dimes from COMMERCIALS. That's the whole reason they EXIST.
PERIOD, FULL STOP.
And before you ask, no they don't make a damn dime off the fact that you're butthurt about what the news is. Unless they start selling butthurt cream.
I know right? I've done this lesson like 48 times on this board alone and they still don't get it. It's like talking to a wall.
Just stop. It's embarrassing.News orgs don't have "political parties" DUMBASS. Even if Mitt Romney thinks corporations are people my friend, they can't register to vote so by definition they can't be "democrats", nor could they be "Democrats", a distinction that continues to fly over your hood of illiteracy.
News flash: Corporations are in what they're in for PROFIT, not for politics. It's astounding somebody would need a lesson on how capitalism works. Wait, are you in Russia?
Wrong again, you moron....they are dominated by members of the democrat party and put their politics ahead of their ratings....
THIS JUST IN.
No one needs a political party to work for a news organization. Seems it has no function.
Know what does have a function in commercial media?
PROFIT.
PERIOD, FULL STOP.
NOBODY in media, news or otherwise, makes a damn dime from ideologies. They make billions of damn dimes from COMMERCIALS. That's the whole reason they EXIST.
PERIOD, FULL STOP.
And before you ask, no they don't make a damn dime off the fact that you're butthurt about what the news is. Unless they start selling butthurt cream.
I know right? I've done this lesson like 48 times on this board alone and they still don't get it. It's like talking to a wall.
like the NY Times, WaPost, NBC, CBS, ABC, Politico is a well know rock ribbed Republican outlet, right?
Just stop. It's embarrassing.News orgs don't have "political parties" DUMBASS. Even if Mitt Romney thinks corporations are people my friend, they can't register to vote so by definition they can't be "democrats", nor could they be "Democrats", a distinction that continues to fly over your hood of illiteracy.
News flash: Corporations are in what they're in for PROFIT, not for politics. It's astounding somebody would need a lesson on how capitalism works. Wait, are you in Russia?
Wrong again, you moron....they are dominated by members of the democrat party and put their politics ahead of their ratings....
THIS JUST IN.
No one needs a political party to work for a news organization. Seems it has no function.
Know what does have a function in commercial media?
PROFIT.
PERIOD, FULL STOP.
NOBODY in media, news or otherwise, makes a damn dime from ideologies. They make billions of damn dimes from COMMERCIALS. That's the whole reason they EXIST.
PERIOD, FULL STOP.
And before you ask, no they don't make a damn dime off the fact that you're butthurt about what the news is. Unless they start selling butthurt cream.
I know right? I've done this lesson like 48 times on this board alone and they still don't get it. It's like talking to a wall.
like the NY Times, WaPost, NBC, CBS, ABC, Politico is a well know rock ribbed Republican outlet, right?
So...now that they are moving again on the coup......here are 7 times the democrat news organizations claimed the Ukraine interfered with the U.S. elections...
Nolte: 7 Times the Media Reported Ukraine Meddled in the 2016 Election
The proof is below:
Politico: Jan 11, 2017
Ukrainian efforts to sabotage Trump backfire
Donald Trump wasn’t the only presidential candidate whose campaign was boosted by officials of a former Soviet bloc country.
Ukrainian government officials tried to help Hillary Clinton and undermine Trump by publicly questioning his fitness for office. They also disseminated documents implicating a top Trump aide in corruption and suggested they were investigating the matter, only to back away after the election. And they helped Clinton’s allies research damaging information on Trump and his advisers, a Politico investigation found.
A Ukrainian-American operative who was consulting for the Democratic National Committee met with top officials in the Ukrainian Embassy in Washington in an effort to expose ties between Trump, top campaign aide Paul Manafort and Russia, according to people with direct knowledge of the situation.
CNN: July 12, 2017
But multiple Democratic sources said that a DNC contractor, whose work included organizing political events for Ukranian-Americans, did tell DNC operatives that Ukrainian officials would be willing to deliver damaging information on Trump’s campaign and, most notably, Paul Manafort, his then-campaign head who has previously advised Viktor Yanukovych, the former Ukrainian President who has close ties to Moscow.
CBS: July 13, 2017
It wasn’t so much the Clinton campaign, per se, but a Democratic operative working with the Democratic National Committee did reach out to the Ukrainian government in an attempt to get damaging information about the Trump campaign.
That operative’s name is Alexandra Chalupa, a Ukrainian-American former Clinton White House aide who was tasked with ethnic outreach on behalf of the Democratic Party.
…
Chalupa continued her research into Manafort and his ties to Russia, an issue that would dog Manafort until he resigned a few months later. And part of that research involved working with the Ukrainian embassy in Washington and officials in Kiev. Ukraine was worried about a Trump administration cozying up to Moscow, as Russia invaded and seized territory from Ukraine shortly after Yankukovych’s ouster.
…
Is it normal for campaigns to work with foreign governments like this?
No.
…
t’s deeply unusual for an American campaign to be working with foreign assets like this, regardless of whether it’s Ukraine or Russia.
New York Times: December 12, 2018
Ukraine Court Rules Manafort Disclosure Caused ‘Meddling’ in U.S. Election
A court in Ukraine has ruled that officials in the country violated the law by revealing, during the 2016 presidential election in the United States, details of suspected illegal payments to Paul Manafort.
In 2016, while Mr. Manafort was chairman of the Trump campaign, anti-corruption prosecutors in Ukraine disclosed that a pro-Russian political party had earmarked payments for Mr. Manafort from an illegal slush fund. Mr. Manafort resigned from the campaign a week later.
The court’s ruling that what the prosecutors did was illegal comes as the Ukrainian government, which is deeply reliant on the United States for financial and military aid, has sought to distance itself from matters related to the special counsel’s investigation of Russia’s interference in the 2016 presidential race.
…
The Kiev District Administrative Court, in a statement issued Wednesday, said that Artem Sytnik, the head of the National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine, the agency that had released information about the payments, had violated the law. The court’s statement said this violation “resulted in meddling in the electoral process of the United States in 2016 and damaged the national interests of Ukraine.”
Daily Beast: December 12, 2018
Two Ukrainian officials meddled in the 2016 U.S. presidential election by leaking a secret ledger showing $12.7 million in payments between Ukraine’s ousted pro-Russian President Viktor Yanukovych and Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort, a Ukrainian court said Wednesday.
The Kyiv district court ruled that National Anti-Corruption Bureau Director Artem Sytnyk and legislator Serhiy Leshchenko broke the law by revealing that Manafort’s name and signature appeared on the ledger.
The disclosure “led to interference in the electoral processes of the United States in 2016 and harmed the interests of Ukraine as a state,” the court said.
Newsweek: December 12, 2018
Two Ukrainian officials interfered in the 2016 U.S. presidential election when they revealed details of illegal cash payments worth millions of dollars from the country’s former ruling party, the Party of Regions, to President Donald Trump’s former campaign manager Paul Manafort, a court in the country’s capital, Kiev, determined on Wednesday.
Artem Sytnyk, director of the National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine, and Serhiy Leshchenko, a parliamentarian who was once an investigative reporter, played a central role in finding and publishing secret records, nicknamed the “black ledger,” with information about $12.7 million of undisclosed cash payments made by Ukraine’s ousted pro-Russian President Viktor Yanukovych to Manafort.
The Week: January 11, 2017
Hillary Clinton also got foreign help in the election — from Ukraine
Ukrainian government officials helped boost Hillary Clinton and worked to sabotage Donald Trump’s political campaign during the 2016 election, a Politico investigation has found. In one instance, a Ukrainian-American operative consulting with the Democratic National Committee even had a hand in exposing Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort’s ties to Russia, which eventually resulted in his ousting from the Trump campaign.
This is how breathlessly and shamelessly corrupt the media are…
News orgs don't have "political parties" DUMBASS. Even if Mitt Romney thinks corporations are people my friend, they can't register to vote so by definition they can't be "democrats", nor could they be "Democrats", a distinction that continues to fly over your hood of illiteracy.
News flash: Corporations are in what they're in for PROFIT, not for politics. It's astounding somebody would need a lesson on how capitalism works. Wait, are you in Russia?
Wrong again, you moron....they are dominated by members of the democrat party and put their politics ahead of their ratings....
THIS JUST IN.
No one needs a political party to work for a news organization. Seems it has no function.
Know what does have a function in commercial media?
PROFIT.
PERIOD, FULL STOP.
NOBODY in media, news or otherwise, makes a damn dime from ideologies. They make billions of damn dimes from COMMERCIALS. That's the whole reason they EXIST.
PERIOD, FULL STOP.
And before you ask, no they don't make a damn dime off the fact that you're butthurt about what the news is. Unless they start selling butthurt cream.
Wrong...again.......CNN barely gets any ratings....the only reason they get most of their ratings is the fact they have the airport concession.....you moonbat.......money does not drive the democrat press....they laugh at the idea that they need to make a profit...they are "News" organizations you twit....
Money drives the ENTIRE COMMERCIAL MEDIA, Whizzo. Doesn't matter if it's news, commentary, weather, movies, fake wrestling, naked people on an island forced to eat bugs, whatever. EVERY ONE OF THEM makes its money from selling commercial time, which is their whole reason for existence, and the more eyeballs they can sell, the more money they make. PERIOD, FULL STOP.
That's why you never see a commercial on C-Span. They're not selling anything, so they don't have to milk ratings. They don't NEED naked people on an island forced to eat bugs or the next typhoon guaranteed to kill you.
Three is no "democrat press". If there were a "democrat press" any one of us could pop up our own TV or radio station or newspaper at will. The closest thing we have to a 'democrat press' is the internet itself -- the entire platform. Of course that again depends on your understanding what the word 'democrat' means, which doesn't seem like it's going to happen in the next decade.
News orgs don't have "political parties" DUMBASS. Even if Mitt Romney thinks corporations are people my friend, they can't register to vote so by definition they can't be "democrats", nor could they be "Democrats", a distinction that continues to fly over your hood of illiteracy.
News flash: Corporations are in what they're in for PROFIT, not for politics. It's astounding somebody would need a lesson on how capitalism works. Wait, are you in Russia?
Wrong again, you moron....they are dominated by members of the democrat party and put their politics ahead of their ratings....
THIS JUST IN.
No one needs a political party to work for a news organization. Seems it has no function.
Know what does have a function in commercial media?
PROFIT.
PERIOD, FULL STOP.
NOBODY in media, news or otherwise, makes a damn dime from ideologies. They make billions of damn dimes from COMMERCIALS. That's the whole reason they EXIST.
PERIOD, FULL STOP.
And before you ask, no they don't make a damn dime off the fact that you're butthurt about what the news is. Unless they start selling butthurt cream.
Wrong...again.......CNN barely gets any ratings....the only reason they get most of their ratings is the fact they have the airport concession.....you moonbat.......money does not drive the democrat press....they laugh at the idea that they need to make a profit...they are "News" organizations you twit....
Money drives the ENTIRE COMMERCIAL MEDIA, Whizzo. Doesn't matter if it's news, commentary, weather, movies, fake wrestling, naked people on an island forced to eat bugs, whatever. EVERY ONE OF THEM makes its money from selling commercial time, which is their whole reason for existence, and the more eyeballs they can sell, the more money they make. PERIOD, FULL STOP.
That's why you never see a commercial on C-Span. They're not selling anything, so they don't have to milk ratings. They don't NEED naked people on an island forced to eat bugs or the next typhoon guaranteed to kill you.
Three is no "democrat press". If there were a "democrat press" any one of us could pop up our own TV or radio station or newspaper at will. The closest thing we have to a 'democrat press' is the internet itself -- the entire platform. Of course that again depends on your understanding what the word 'democrat' means, which doesn't seem like it's going to happen in the next decade.
No, it doesn't you moron...the actual democrat journalists do not care about making money...
great. so your game here is just insult the source and say they lie and whenever said source is used, go HEY - I SAID THEY LIE!!!WOW!MSNBC, NBC News top political editor accused of 'trying to intimidate' reporter on 'behalf of the DNC'
the FOX Gossip Channel of all sources!
"Fox Gossip" is, of course, redundant.
great. so your game here is just insult the source and say they lie and whenever said source is used, go HEY - I SAID THEY LIE!!!WOW!MSNBC, NBC News top political editor accused of 'trying to intimidate' reporter on 'behalf of the DNC'
the FOX Gossip Channel of all sources!
"Fox Gossip" is, of course, redundant.
you won't mind if thats all i give back to you at any point you choose to actually cite a reference? i mean, these are your rules, right?
If capitalism and making money.....and not politics......were their driving force?????? Why didn't ABC (or whichever one) run the Epstein story that reporter was caught on hot mike talking about...…...that story alone would have made them rich and ratings thru the roof.
If capitalism and making money.....and not politics......were their driving force?????? Why didn't ABC (or whichever one) run the Epstein story that reporter was caught on hot mike talking about...…...that story alone would have made them rich and ratings thru the roof.
Good point, in hindsight -- it would indeed have scored them a spike IF it got legs when they would have brought it out. Of course, once the story is out, IF it gets legs, then everybody who touches it gets their own spike, which is why they start stretching.
The network exec who reportedly told the reporter "nobody knows who he is" has a point though. I never heard of the guy until the avalanche of stories and mythologies, which required a first step of explaining who you're talking about and why you should care. That's always an uphill climb, and maybe they didn't want to take that climb on. Maybe they misjudged what would sell and what wouldn't.
great. so your game here is just insult the source and say they lie and whenever said source is used, go HEY - I SAID THEY LIE!!!WOW!MSNBC, NBC News top political editor accused of 'trying to intimidate' reporter on 'behalf of the DNC'
the FOX Gossip Channel of all sources!
"Fox Gossip" is, of course, redundant.
you won't mind if thats all i give back to you at any point you choose to actually cite a reference? i mean, these are your rules, right?
Wow, way to complectify a simple equation.
I've lain this out in the Media forum many times. News is an expensive proposition. Many resources needed -- camera crews flying around, foreign bureaus, stringers everywhere --- so what Rupert Murdoch, who made his fortune selling sleazy tabloid gossip rags around the world --- did to circumvent that expense was, instead of paying all the expenses to run around and find the news, he plunks down talking heads in a single studio to talk ABOUT the news that's already reported. In so doing they deal not with dry facts but with personal feelings, not with the nuts and bolts of policy but about the hearts and minds of politicians -- the people. And how eebil this one is and how heroic that one is.
It's a gossip channel plain and simple. The only difference from the traditional Hollywood gossip fare is that instead of using movie stars and celebrities for fodder, they use politicians, who become the celebrities. After that ---- same game. Always personal, always milking the emotions, because that's what $ELL$ --- as Murdoch well knew from his gossip tabloid rags. Let other real reporters run around and gather the news; Fox Noise is there to sit on its ass and make melodrama out of it. Politics as soap opera.
And if there's any doubt that's what they're doing, consider the garish colors splashed all over the studio, consider the suggestive insidious chyrons always running at the bottom, consider the whoooosh sounds accompanying scene changes, consider all the hiring of statuesque women shaped like the number 8 in short skirts facing the camera in a wide shot. ALL of that is there to snag the emotional brain center and keep the gullible fixated so that they can be sold Vi@gra.
None of that is aimed at intellect; it's all cultivating ratings. Ratings mean attention, and attention means ad rates. Now if you ask me WHY gossip (in any form) sells, I have absolutely no idea. Murdoch doesn't care; all he knows is that it works, and as long as it does, he'll be exploiting it.
If capitalism and making money.....and not politics......were their driving force?????? Why didn't ABC (or whichever one) run the Epstein story that reporter was caught on hot mike talking about...…...that story alone would have made them rich and ratings thru the roof.
Good point, in hindsight -- it would indeed have scored them a spike IF it got legs when they would have brought it out. Of course, once the story is out, IF it gets legs, then everybody who touches it gets their own spike, which is why they start stretching.
The network exec who reportedly told the reporter "nobody knows who he is" has a point though. I never heard of the guy until the avalanche of stories and mythologies, which required a first step of explaining who you're talking about and why you should care. That's always an uphill climb, and maybe they didn't want to take that climb on. Maybe they misjudged what would sell and what wouldn't.
BULLSHIT
True enough that Epstein hadn't been much of a household name......until it was...…..and why was it?????
Because he was a high profile pedophile, and human trafficker with high profile connections......that would make news anyday, anywhere.
And my whole point was that it is politics that drive the media, which you've claimed several times in this thread it's profits. IF it were profits via ratings & viewership, then they'd spend as much time reporting stories such as Epstein as they do about impeaching a duly elected President
great. so your game here is just insult the source and say they lie and whenever said source is used, go HEY - I SAID THEY LIE!!!WOW!MSNBC, NBC News top political editor accused of 'trying to intimidate' reporter on 'behalf of the DNC'
the FOX Gossip Channel of all sources!
"Fox Gossip" is, of course, redundant.
you won't mind if thats all i give back to you at any point you choose to actually cite a reference? i mean, these are your rules, right?
Wow, way to complectify a simple equation.
I've lain this out in the Media forum many times. News is an expensive proposition. Many resources needed -- camera crews flying around, foreign bureaus, stringers everywhere --- so what Rupert Murdoch, who made his fortune selling sleazy tabloid gossip rags around the world --- did to circumvent that expense was, instead of paying all the expenses to run around and find the news, he plunks down talking heads in a single studio to talk ABOUT the news that's already reported. In so doing they deal not with dry facts but with personal feelings, not with the nuts and bolts of policy but about the hearts and minds of politicians -- the people. And how eebil this one is and how heroic that one is.
It's a gossip channel plain and simple. The only difference from the traditional Hollywood gossip fare is that instead of using movie stars and celebrities for fodder, they use politicians, who become the celebrities. After that ---- same game. Always personal, always milking the emotions, because that's what $ELL$ --- as Murdoch well knew from his gossip tabloid rags. Let other real reporters run around and gather the news; Fox Noise is there to sit on its ass and make melodrama out of it. Politics as soap opera.
And if there's any doubt that's what they're doing, consider the garish colors splashed all over the studio, consider the suggestive insidious chyrons always running at the bottom, consider the whoooosh sounds accompanying scene changes, consider all the hiring of statuesque women shaped like the number 8 in short skirts facing the camera in a wide shot. ALL of that is there to snag the emotional brain center and keep the gullible fixated so that they can be sold Vi@gra.
None of that is aimed at intellect; it's all cultivating ratings. Ratings mean attention, and attention means ad rates. Now if you ask me WHY gossip (in any form) sells, I have absolutely no idea. Murdoch doesn't care; all he knows is that it works, and as long as it does, he'll be exploiting it.
You wanna call fox a gossip column great. While I agree they engage in stupid LOOK AT ME tactics like about all media does, anymore, it doesn't disqualify every story they put out. FOX NEWS GIGGLE isn't an instant "I win" card as you like to play it.
Otherwise when you cite a source I can just say they've engaged in "gossip" before, ergo this must be a lie or fake also, ergo I win cause I don't like your source and won't even review the details.
Your rules. Just don't be a little bitch when it comes back at you.
