7 reasons why liberals are incapable of understanding the world

[Norman]

This is so true about liberals






7 Reasons Why Liberals Are Incapable of Understannding the wotld

To understand American politics, you have to understand this fundamental law: Conservatives think liberals are stupid. Liberals think conservatives are evil. —Charles Krauthammer




1) Liberalism creates a feedback loop. It is usually impossible for a non-liberal to change a liberal's mind about political issues because liberalism works like so: only liberals are credible sources of information. How do you know someone's liberal? He espouses liberal doctrine. So, no matter how plausible what you say may be, it will be ignored if you're not a liberal and if you are a liberal, of course, you probably agree with liberal views. This sort of close-mindedness makes liberals nearly impervious to any information that might undermine their beliefs.

2) Liberals sources of information are ever present. Conservatives are regularly exposed to the liberal viewpoint whether they want to be or not. That's not necessarily so for liberals. Imagine the average day for liberals. They get up and read their local newspaper. It has a liberal viewpoint. They take their kids to school, where the teachers are liberal. Then they go to work, listen to NPR which has a liberal viewpoint on the way home, and then turn on the nightly news which also skews leftward. From there, they turn on TV and watch shows created by liberals that lean to the left, if they have any political viewpoint at all. Unless liberals actively seek out conservative viewpoints, which is unlikely, the only conservative arguments they're probably going to hear are going to be through the heavily distorted, poorly translated, deeply skeptical lens of other liberals



3)Liberals emphasize feeling superior, not superior results.Liberalism is all about appearances, not outcomes. What matters to liberals is how a program makes them FEEL about themselves, not whether it works or not. Thus a program like Headstart, which sounds good because it's designed to help children read, makes liberals feel good about themselves, even though the program doesn't work and wastes billions

4) Liberals are big believers in moral relativism. This spins them round and round because if the only thing that's wrong is saying that there's an absolute moral code, then you lose your ability to tell cause from effect, good from bad, and right from wrong. Taking being non-judgmental to the level that liberals do leaves them paralyzed, pondering "why they hate us" because they feel incapable of saying, “That's wrong," and doing something about

5)Liberals tend to view people as parts of groups, not individuals. One of the prejudices of liberalism is that they see everyone as part of a group, not as an individual. This can lead to rather bizarre disparities when say, a man from a group that they consider to be powerless, impoverished victims becomes the leader of the free world -- and he's challenged by a group of lower middle class white people who've banded together because individually they're powerless.


6) Liberals take a dim view of personal responsibility. Who's at fault if a criminal commits a crime? The criminal or society? If someone creates a business and becomes a millionaire, is that the result of hard work and talent or luck? If you're dirt poor, starving, and haven't worked in 5 years, is that a personal failing or a failure of the state?


7) Liberals give themselves far too much credit just for being liberal.



.

It's like asking a thief how to produce things.

"Just take it from others".

The liberal answer to everything...

 

[edthecynic]

 

[Billo_Really]

What? I don't give a damn, what pisses me off is liberals keep saying that the same shit over and over they know is a lie.

That's not specific. What is pissing you off over the Victory 15 issue?

 

[Billo_Really]

That's not the argument ...

Then what specifically is the argument?

 

[Dragonlady]

) Liberalism creates a feedback loop. It is usually impossible for a non-liberal to change a liberal's mind about political issues because liberalism works like so: only liberals are credible sources of information. How do you know someone's liberal? He espouses liberal doctrine. So, no matter how plausible what you say may be, it will be ignored if you're not a liberal and if you are a liberal, of course, you probably agree with liberal views. This sort of close-mindedness makes liberals nearly impervious to any information that might undermine their beliefs.


^^^ tell me about that one I had to argue with a liberal today for 6 hours and 15 pages to prove he was lying and Obama did in fact meddle in Israels election

Rep. Elijah Cummings hits Obama while putting his foot in his mouth


.

.

"Obama has been sending taxpayer dollars, at least $350,000 to fund anti-Likud, anti-Netanyahu groups in Israel for (the) election."

Blog claims U.S. funded anti-Netanyahu election effort in Israel

Here is the Senate report you stupid ****



Majority Media | Media | Homeland Security & Governmental Affairs Committee







Senate Report: State Department Funded Effort to Overthrow Netanyahu

11:27 AM, JUL 12, 2016 | By JIM SWIFT

Your assertions are LIES. Obama did not fund a campaign to unseat Netanyahu, nor did he "meddle" in the Israeli elections.

The State Department funded peace efforts and negotiations. When the negotiations collapsed, the NGO used the funds for other purposes, but your post and the blog connected to it implied that Obama tried to get rid of Netanyahu which is "Mostly False".

It's like giving your teenager $30 to go get a pizza, and instead the kid buys liquor with the money. Are you guilty of giving your underage kid liquor?

 

[Billo_Really]

I will never get why liberals protect people at all cost to the point of losing Congress seats like with Obama care, or go to jail like Susan did over white water...or these continuous liberal lyers on here..

Dude I am not talking about you..
One of the normal honest liberals which it seems it's a rare breed on the internet.

.

Unfortunately, I'm also one of the biggest assholes on this board.

 

[Wyatt earp]

[QUOQUOTETE="edthecynic, post: 17309040, member: 13101"]

They were in cahoots with eatch other

Before V15 even existed!

That's your argument si they never talked huh?



And V15 magically appeard?


.

Not magically, but AFTER NaziYahoo called for a special early election in Dec 2014. The "magic" you believe in is Obama and OneVoice knowing in 2013 about NaziYahoo's call for a special early Dec 2014 election. [/QUOTE]
QUOTEQUOTE

Let me guess you still think the kennth star report was a fake also..?

World Tribune


Senate subcommittee: Obama used taxpayer dollars to influence outcome of Israel election


However, “after the State Department grant period ended, OneVoice shifted its focus to influencing the electoral outcome by working to defeat incumbent Prime Minister Netanyahu,” said the subcommittee. “Planning for this effort began during the period when OneVoice was still a State Department grantee.”



.

 

[Wyatt earp]

) Liberalism creates a feedback loop. It is usually impossible for a non-liberal to change a liberal's mind about political issues because liberalism works like so: only liberals are credible sources of information. How do you know someone's liberal? He espouses liberal doctrine. So, no matter how plausible what you say may be, it will be ignored if you're not a liberal and if you are a liberal, of course, you probably agree with liberal views. This sort of close-mindedness makes liberals nearly impervious to any information that might undermine their beliefs.


^^^ tell me about that one I had to argue with a liberal today for 6 hours and 15 pages to prove he was lying and Obama did in fact meddle in Israels election

Rep. Elijah Cummings hits Obama while putting his foot in his mouth


.

.

"Obama has been sending taxpayer dollars, at least $350,000 to fund anti-Likud, anti-Netanyahu groups in Israel for (the) election."

Blog claims U.S. funded anti-Netanyahu election effort in Israel

Here is the Senate report you stupid ****



Majority Media | Media | Homeland Security & Governmental Affairs Committee







Senate Report: State Department Funded Effort to Overthrow Netanyahu

11:27 AM, JUL 12, 2016 | By JIM SWIFT

Your assertions are LIES. Obama did not fund a campaign to unseat Netanyahu, nor did he "meddle" in the Israeli elections.

The State Department funded peace efforts and negotiations. When the negotiations collapsed, the NGO used the funds for other purposes, but your post and the blog connected to it implied that Obama tried to get rid of Netanyahu which is "Mostly False".

It's like giving your teenager $30 to go get a pizza, and instead the kid buys liquor with the money. Are you guilty of giving your underage kid liquor?

I have left wing media

Right wing media

The Senate report..bi partisian

And a back guy

To say Obama did


What do you have?


Btw your another one that proves my op right



Liberalism creates a feedback loop. It is usually impossible for a non-liberal to change a liberal's mind about political issues because liberalism works like so: only liberals are credible sources of information. How do you know someone's liberal? He espouses liberal doctrine. So, no matter how plausible what you say may be, it will be ignored if you're not a liberal and if you are a liberal, of course, you probably agree with liberal views. This sort of close-mindedness makes liberals nearly impervious to any information that might undermine their beliefs.



.

 

[Wyatt earp]

Let me guess, "bear" didn't vote for trump, an excuse many republicans will be using soon, while the numbers show they are lemmings and voted in droves. Especially the "christians". lmao what a joke.

No I didn't vote for Trump, he is a liberal...search my files I always said Trump was a liberal


I wanted him to win because he was running as a Republican and piss off you his own kind.

I thought you Lefty's might grow up when you see yourselfs in the mirror


.





View attachment 127924

So the republican party is a joke nominating a liberal then eh? All republican voters are dumbfucks. We all knew that. Guess they stand for nothing. Mine as well be disbanded as it is the now the party of morons who vote for liberals.

Yea he is a liberal he ran as a populist , what do you think there is no liberals in the Republican party and no conservatives in the Democratic party?


How old are you anyways?




.

So you agree republicans are dumb as **** and nominated and voted for a liberal.

Do you know what RINO means?

In Republican name only, Mitch McConnell, Lindsey Graham , john McCain they are all Rinos


.

 

[Wyatt earp]

I will never get why liberals protect people at all cost to the point of losing Congress seats like with Obama care, or go to jail like Susan did over white water...or these continuous liberal lyers on here..

Dude I am not talking about you..
One of the normal honest liberals which it seems it's a rare breed on the internet.

.

Unfortunately, I'm also one of the biggest assholes on this board.

Not what I seen the past 5? Years


.

 

[rightwinger]

Let me guess, "bear" didn't vote for trump, an excuse many republicans will be using soon, while the numbers show they are lemmings and voted in droves. Especially the "christians". lmao what a joke.

No I didn't vote for Trump, he is a liberal...search my files I always said Trump was a liberal


I wanted him to win because he was running as a Republican and piss off you his own kind.

I thought you Lefty's might grow up when you see yourselfs in the mirror


.





View attachment 127924

So the republican party is a joke nominating a liberal then eh? All republican voters are dumbfucks. We all knew that. Guess they stand for nothing. Mine as well be disbanded as it is the now the party of morons who vote for liberals.

Yea he is a liberal he ran as a populist , what do you think there is no liberals in the Republican party and no conservatives in the Democratic party?


How old are you anyways?




.

So you agree republicans are dumb as **** and nominated and voted for a liberal.

Do you know what RINO means?

In Republican name only, Mitch McConnell, Lindsey Graham , john McCain they are all Rinos


.

And Trump?

 

[WheelieAddict]

Let me guess, "bear" didn't vote for trump, an excuse many republicans will be using soon, while the numbers show they are lemmings and voted in droves. Especially the "christians". lmao what a joke.

No I didn't vote for Trump, he is a liberal...search my files I always said Trump was a liberal


I wanted him to win because he was running as a Republican and piss off you his own kind.

I thought you Lefty's might grow up when you see yourselfs in the mirror


.





View attachment 127924

So the republican party is a joke nominating a liberal then eh? All republican voters are dumbfucks. We all knew that. Guess they stand for nothing. Mine as well be disbanded as it is the now the party of morons who vote for liberals.

Yea he is a liberal he ran as a populist , what do you think there is no liberals in the Republican party and no conservatives in the Democratic party?


How old are you anyways?




.

So you agree republicans are dumb as **** and nominated and voted for a liberal.

Do you know what RINO means?

In Republican name only, Mitch McConnell, Lindsey Graham , john McCain they are all Rinos


.

So you agree republicans are dumb as **** and nominate and vote for a liberals. Looks like you say most republicans are liberals and republican voters vote for them. Guess the republican party is just a sham, a joke.

 

[Wyatt earp]

) Liberalism creates a feedback loop. It is usually impossible for a non-liberal to change a liberal's mind about political issues because liberalism works like so: only liberals are credible sources of information. How do you know someone's liberal? He espouses liberal doctrine. So, no matter how plausible what you say may be, it will be ignored if you're not a liberal and if you are a liberal, of course, you probably agree with liberal views. This sort of close-mindedness makes liberals nearly impervious to any information that might undermine their beliefs.


^^^ tell me about that one I had to argue with a liberal today for 6 hours and 15 pages to prove he was lying and Obama did in fact meddle in Israels election

Rep. Elijah Cummings hits Obama while putting his foot in his mouth


.

.

"Obama has been sending taxpayer dollars, at least $350,000 to fund anti-Likud, anti-Netanyahu groups in Israel for (the) election."

Blog claims U.S. funded anti-Netanyahu election effort in Israel

Here is the Senate report you stupid ****



Majority Media | Media | Homeland Security & Governmental Affairs Committee







Senate Report: State Department Funded Effort to Overthrow Netanyahu

11:27 AM, JUL 12, 2016 | By JIM SWIFT

Your assertions are LIES. Obama did not fund a campaign to unseat Netanyahu, nor did he "meddle" in the Israeli elections.

The State Department funded peace efforts and negotiations. When the negotiations collapsed, the NGO used the funds for other purposes, but your post and the blog connected to it implied that Obama tried to get rid of Netanyahu which is "Mostly False".

It's like giving your teenager $30 to go get a pizza, and instead the kid buys liquor with the money. Are you guilty of giving your underage kid liquor?

Who is Bird?


Jeremy Bird - Wikipedia


After Obama's re-election, Bird co-founded 270 Strategies, a political consulting firm.[2] Bird and his consulting partner, Mitch Stewart, are considered two of the brightest young political operatives in American politics.[7] One of Bird's first post-2012 clients was Senator Cory Booker, who won a 2013 special election to become New Jersey's junior senator.[8] In 2013,Ready for Hillary, a group dedicated to setting up the campaign infrastructure of a potential Hillary Clinton presidential run in 2016, announced that they had hired 270 Strategies.[9] The move was seen as a potential sign that a Clinton campaign might share many of the personnel of the Obama campaigns, including Bird.[7] Bird also foundedBattleground Texas, an organization devoted to making Texas politics competitive.[10] Additionally, Bird helped found iVote, a Super PAC dedicated helping Democrats win Secretary of State races.[11] During the 2015 Israeli elections, Bird advised the group V15, which sought to defeat Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.[12] He has also advised the center-left NDP in the run-up to the 2015 Canadian federal election.[13]



.

 

[Wyatt earp]

No I didn't vote for Trump, he is a liberal...search my files I always said Trump was a liberal


I wanted him to win because he was running as a Republican and piss off you his own kind.

I thought you Lefty's might grow up when you see yourselfs in the mirror


.





View attachment 127924

So the republican party is a joke nominating a liberal then eh? All republican voters are dumbfucks. We all knew that. Guess they stand for nothing. Mine as well be disbanded as it is the now the party of morons who vote for liberals.

Yea he is a liberal he ran as a populist , what do you think there is no liberals in the Republican party and no conservatives in the Democratic party?


How old are you anyways?




.

So you agree republicans are dumb as **** and nominated and voted for a liberal.

Do you know what RINO means?

In Republican name only, Mitch McConnell, Lindsey Graham , john McCain they are all Rinos


.

So you agree republicans are dumb as **** and nominate and vote for a liberals. Looks like you say most republicans are liberals and republican voters vote for them. Guess the republican party is just a sham, a joke.

You have a lot to learn a about politics kid, social liberals fiscal conservatives..



They vote their pocket book, jobs , low taxes, strong defense, freedom and the constitution by voting Republicans.

.

 

[WheelieAddict]

No I didn't vote for Trump, he is a liberal...search my files I always said Trump was a liberal


I wanted him to win because he was running as a Republican and piss off you his own kind.

I thought you Lefty's might grow up when you see yourselfs in the mirror


.





View attachment 127924

So the republican party is a joke nominating a liberal then eh? All republican voters are dumbfucks. We all knew that. Guess they stand for nothing. Mine as well be disbanded as it is the now the party of morons who vote for liberals.

Yea he is a liberal he ran as a populist , what do you think there is no liberals in the Republican party and no conservatives in the Democratic party?


How old are you anyways?




.

So you agree republicans are dumb as **** and nominated and voted for a liberal.

Do you know what RINO means?

In Republican name only, Mitch McConnell, Lindsey Graham , john McCain they are all Rinos


.

And Trump?

You have to understand, "bear" is a typical republican that has no responsibility for anything their party does. They just blame it on liberals. You know that "personal responsibility" they talk about that is complete bullshit.

 

[gipper]

) Liberalism creates a feedback loop. It is usually impossible for a non-liberal to change a liberal's mind about political issues because liberalism works like so: only liberals are credible sources of information. How do you know someone's liberal? He espouses liberal doctrine. So, no matter how plausible what you say may be, it will be ignored if you're not a liberal and if you are a liberal, of course, you probably agree with liberal views. This sort of close-mindedness makes liberals nearly impervious to any information that might undermine their beliefs.


^^^ tell me about that one I had to argue with a liberal today for 6 hours and 15 pages to prove he was lying and Obama did in fact meddle in Israels election

Rep. Elijah Cummings hits Obama while putting his foot in his mouth


.

.

"Obama has been sending taxpayer dollars, at least $350,000 to fund anti-Likud, anti-Netanyahu groups in Israel for (the) election."

Blog claims U.S. funded anti-Netanyahu election effort in Israel

Here is the Senate report you stupid ****



Majority Media | Media | Homeland Security & Governmental Affairs Committee







Senate Report: State Department Funded Effort to Overthrow Netanyahu

11:27 AM, JUL 12, 2016 | By JIM SWIFT

Your assertions are LIES. Obama did not fund a campaign to unseat Netanyahu, nor did he "meddle" in the Israeli elections.

The State Department funded peace efforts and negotiations. When the negotiations collapsed, the NGO used the funds for other purposes, but your post and the blog connected to it implied that Obama tried to get rid of Netanyahu which is "Mostly False".

It's like giving your teenager $30 to go get a pizza, and instead the kid buys liquor with the money. Are you guilty of giving your underage kid liquor?

Proving point one in the OP. You are unaware of the truth and refuse to accept it, when provided.

Liberalism is a mental disorder.

 

[WheelieAddict]

So the republican party is a joke nominating a liberal then eh? All republican voters are dumbfucks. We all knew that. Guess they stand for nothing. Mine as well be disbanded as it is the now the party of morons who vote for liberals.

Yea he is a liberal he ran as a populist , what do you think there is no liberals in the Republican party and no conservatives in the Democratic party?


How old are you anyways?




.

So you agree republicans are dumb as **** and nominated and voted for a liberal.

Do you know what RINO means?

In Republican name only, Mitch McConnell, Lindsey Graham , john McCain they are all Rinos


.

So you agree republicans are dumb as **** and nominate and vote for a liberals. Looks like you say most republicans are liberals and republican voters vote for them. Guess the republican party is just a sham, a joke.

You have a lot to learn a about politics kid, social liberals fiscal conservatives..



They vote their pocket book, jobs , low taxes, strong defense, freedom and the constitution by voting Republicans.

.

 

[Wyatt earp]

Rubio’s claim that Obama sent his ‘political machine’ to Israel to defeat Netanyahu

President Obama “can’t say he has businesslike relationship [with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu] or that it isn’t personal when his entire political machine, virtually some of the top people, were in Israel, on the ground, trying to defeat Netanyahu, which is unprecedented. …From Jeremy Bird down to others who were deeply and intricately involved in his campaigns in the past, he sent them down there to start to equivalent of a Super PAC to try to oust Netanyahu.”

–Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.), radio interview with Hugh Hewitt, March 24, 2015



.

 

[WheelieAddict]

) Liberalism creates a feedback loop. It is usually impossible for a non-liberal to change a liberal's mind about political issues because liberalism works like so: only liberals are credible sources of information. How do you know someone's liberal? He espouses liberal doctrine. So, no matter how plausible what you say may be, it will be ignored if you're not a liberal and if you are a liberal, of course, you probably agree with liberal views. This sort of close-mindedness makes liberals nearly impervious to any information that might undermine their beliefs.


^^^ tell me about that one I had to argue with a liberal today for 6 hours and 15 pages to prove he was lying and Obama did in fact meddle in Israels election

Rep. Elijah Cummings hits Obama while putting his foot in his mouth


.

.

"Obama has been sending taxpayer dollars, at least $350,000 to fund anti-Likud, anti-Netanyahu groups in Israel for (the) election."

Blog claims U.S. funded anti-Netanyahu election effort in Israel

Here is the Senate report you stupid ****



Majority Media | Media | Homeland Security & Governmental Affairs Committee







Senate Report: State Department Funded Effort to Overthrow Netanyahu

11:27 AM, JUL 12, 2016 | By JIM SWIFT

Your assertions are LIES. Obama did not fund a campaign to unseat Netanyahu, nor did he "meddle" in the Israeli elections.

The State Department funded peace efforts and negotiations. When the negotiations collapsed, the NGO used the funds for other purposes, but your post and the blog connected to it implied that Obama tried to get rid of Netanyahu which is "Mostly False".

It's like giving your teenager $30 to go get a pizza, and instead the kid buys liquor with the money. Are you guilty of giving your underage kid liquor?

Proving point one in the OP. You are unaware of the truth and refuse to accept it, when provided.

Liberalism is a mental disorder.

Apparently republicans are extremely mentally disordered. According to "bear" they vote for liberals all the time and don't even realize it.

 

[Wyatt earp]

So the republican party is a joke nominating a liberal then eh? All republican voters are dumbfucks. We all knew that. Guess they stand for nothing. Mine as well be disbanded as it is the now the party of morons who vote for liberals.

Yea he is a liberal he ran as a populist , what do you think there is no liberals in the Republican party and no conservatives in the Democratic party?


How old are you anyways?




.

So you agree republicans are dumb as **** and nominated and voted for a liberal.

Do you know what RINO means?

In Republican name only, Mitch McConnell, Lindsey Graham , john McCain they are all Rinos


.

And Trump?

You have to understand, "bear" is a typical republican that has no responsibility for anything their party does. They just blame it on liberals. You know that "personal responsibility" they talk about that is complete bullshit.

This is so true in the OP about you


Liberals sources of information are ever present. Conservatives are regularly exposed to the liberal viewpoint whether they want to be or not. That's not necessarily so for liberals. Imagine the average day for liberals. They get up and read their local newspaper. It has a liberal viewpoint. They take their kids to school, where the teachers are liberal. Then they go to work, listen to NPR which has a liberal viewpoint on the way home, and then turn on the nightly news which also skews leftward. From there, they turn on TV and watch shows created by liberals that lean to the left, if they have any political viewpoint at all. Unlessliberals actively seek out conservative viewpoints, which is unlikely, the onlyconservative arguments they're probablygoing to hear are going to be through the heavily distorted, poorly translated,deeply skeptical lens of other liberals

.