) Liberalism creates a feedback loop. It is usually impossible for a non-liberal to change a liberal's mind about political issues because liberalism works like so: only liberals are credible sources of information. How do you know someone's liberal? He espouses liberal doctrine. So, no matter how plausible what you say may be, it will be ignored if you're not a liberal and if you are a liberal, of course, you probably agree with liberal views. This sort of close-mindedness makes liberals nearly impervious to any information that might undermine their beliefs.
^^^ tell me about that one I had to argue with a liberal today for 6 hours and 15 pages to prove he was lying and Obama did in fact meddle in Israels election
Rep. Elijah Cummings hits Obama while putting his foot in his mouth
.
.
"Obama has been sending taxpayer dollars, at least $350,000 to fund anti-Likud, anti-Netanyahu groups in Israel for (the) election."
Blog claims U.S. funded anti-Netanyahu election effort in Israel
Here is the Senate report you stupid ****
Majority Media | Media | Homeland Security & Governmental Affairs Committee
Senate Report: State Department Funded Effort to Overthrow Netanyahu
11:27 AM, JUL 12, 2016 | By
JIM SWIFT
Nothing in that report states the money was used to overthrow Netanyahu. And how could it since there were no elections scheduled when the money was given. Netanyahu called for an election in December, 2014,
after the money was given to OneVoice.
Netanyahu Fires Ministers and Calls for Elections
Dayam, you rightards are idiots. Even basic common sense eludes you.
You refuse to go to that link huh cock sucker?
OK I will argue it again
From politico
Senate report: State Dept. grant also aided campaign to unseat Netanyahu
Facebook
The report found no wrongdoing by the State Department. | AP Photo/Oded Balilty, File
Senate report: State Dept. grant also aided campaign to unseat Netanyahu
By
BURGESS EVERETT
07/12/2016 11:49 AM EDT
Updated 07/12/2016 12:23 PM EDT
A State Department grant intended to rally support for peace between Israel and Palestine also helped set up political infrastructure that was later used for a campaign opposing Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in 2015, according to a bipartisan Senate investigative report released on Tuesday.
The report found no legal wrongdoing by the State Department, since the $349,000 in grants for OneVoice were used to further the Middle East process as intended. But shortly after Netanyahu called an election for 2015, the voter databases constructed with the grant money were activated for Victory 15, an unsuccessful effort to defeat Netanyahu.
Story Continued Below
Sens. Rob Portman (R-Ohio) and Claire McCaskill (D-Mo.) each signed off on the investigation, which was conducted by Portman’s Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations. In releasing the report, Portman criticized the State Department for lax oversight and for undermining a U.S. ally.
“The State Department ignored warning signs and funded a politically active group in a politically sensitive environment with inadequate safeguards,” Portman said. “It is completely unacceptable that U.S. taxpayer dollars were used to build a political campaign infrastructure that was deployed — immediately after the grant ended — against the leader of our closest ally in the Middle East.”
The investigation is notable for its bipartisan sheen. McCaskill highlighted the conclusion that it showed “no wrongdoing” by President Barack Obama’s administration but said the report “certainly highlights deficiencies in the Department’s policies that should be addressed in order to best protect taxpayer dollars.”
.
