7 reasons why liberals are incapable of understanding the world

[NYcarbineer]

This is so true about liberals









1) Liberalism creates a feedback loop. It is usually impossible for a non-liberal to change a liberal's mind about political issues because liberalism works like so: only liberals are credible sources of information. How do you know someone's liberal? He espouses liberal doctrine. So, no matter how plausible what you say may be, it will be ignored if you're not a liberal and if you are a liberal, of course, you probably agree with liberal views. This sort of close-mindedness makes liberals nearly impervious to any information that might undermine their beliefs.



.

That is a perfect description of modern conservatism, just replace the liberal references with 'conservative'.

 

[Wyatt earp]

This is so true about liberals









1) Liberalism creates a feedback loop. It is usually impossible for a non-liberal to change a liberal's mind about political issues because liberalism works like so: only liberals are credible sources of information. How do you know someone's liberal? He espouses liberal doctrine. So, no matter how plausible what you say may be, it will be ignored if you're not a liberal and if you are a liberal, of course, you probably agree with liberal views. This sort of close-mindedness makes liberals nearly impervious to any information that might undermine their beliefs.



.

That is a perfect description of modern conservatism, just replace the liberal references with 'conservative'.

Funy I grew up listening to your side, you didn't on my side.



.

 

[danielpalos]

Liberals understand the World, alleged conservatives are just clueless and Causeless, and have nothing but right wing fantasy, as a result.

No you don't you cherry pick it and tune out things you don't want to hear

.

Like what? Cherry picking a form of special pleading, which may be considered a fallacy.

I am a federalist, not a fallacist.

Just stringing a bunch of words together again and trying to make it sound good again ...huh?


.

simply being incompetent and claiming equal work for equal pay in the non-porn sector?

 

[Wyatt earp]

Liberals understand the World, alleged conservatives are just clueless and Causeless, and have nothing but right wing fantasy, as a result.

No you don't you cherry pick it and tune out things you don't want to hear

.

Like what? Cherry picking a form of special pleading, which may be considered a fallacy.

I am a federalist, not a fallacist.

Just stringing a bunch of words together again and trying to make it sound good again ...huh?


.

simply being incompetent and claiming equal work for equal pay in the non-porn sector?

Non-porn ?

Weirdo


.

 

[Wyatt earp]

Liberals understand the World, alleged conservatives are just clueless and Causeless, and have nothing but right wing fantasy, as a result.

No you don't you cherry pick it and tune out things you don't want to hear

.

Like what? Cherry picking a form of special pleading, which may be considered a fallacy.

I am a federalist, not a fallacist.

Just stringing a bunch of words together again and trying to make it sound good again ...huh?


.

simply being incompetent and claiming equal work for equal pay in the non-porn sector?

Non-porn ?

Weirdo


.

Daniel why do you even post? No one ever understands your babbling...



.

 

[JonKoch]

And you cupcakes always amaze me you can't accept reality and ALWAYS blame others when your policies fail.


8 years of Dubya/GOP "job creator" policies were derailed by Barney Frank, minority member of the GOP majority House where simple majority ruled? LMAOROG

I never blamed the black guy for the housing bubble, dumbass.

Nope, you just tried to blame the gay guy who had zero power in the GOP majority House. You blamed the black guy for not fixing 8 years of GOP "job creator" problems faster!

I give the black guy credit for being the best gun salesman in history, and creating more part time jobs in history.

Feb 7, 2014


The Spectacular Myth of Obama's Part-Time America—in 5 Graphs
A falsifiable claim, falsified

The first thing you would expect to see from a Part-Time America is that the number of part-time jobs added would rival the number of full-time jobs added. But in the last year, new full-time jobs outnumbered part-time jobs by 1.8 million to 8,000. For every new part-time job, we're creating 225 full-time positions.

Okay, but one year is just one year! Let's keep looking.

The second thing we should expect to see from Part-Time America is a growing number of part-time jobs since Obama came into office and started passing laws. Here's a graph showing the number of people working part-time for economic reasons since March 2010, the month Obamacare was passed.






Huh, nothing there. In fact, the number part-time workers has fallen in the last four years.

Okay, well, raw numbers can be deceiving. After all, the labor force has declined since 2010. So let's graph these part-time workers as a share of the labor force. Surely that will show a rising line...




. dang it.

Maybe I'm being unfair. Three years of data just isn't much context. So let's draw back the lens and look at part-time workers as a share of the labor force since, say, 1980...

... and then compare it to the unemployment rate (in RED) since 1980.

View attachment 128586
View attachment 128585


Okay, now here's something: Part-time work, as a share of the economy, is historically high. But these graphs don't make the point that Obama, or long-term global economic trends, are driving the rise in non-voluntary part-time work. Instead, the rise of part-time work seem to be 100 percent the creation of economic downturns. That's why it seems to be holding hands with unemployment, riding the roller coaster up during recessions, and down during recoveries.

But what about part-time employment for non-economic reasons? The story here is short and sweet: There is no story here...

The Spectacular Myth of Obama's Part-Time America—in 5 Graphs


WHAT ELSE DO YOU HAVE CUPCAKE?

Lol, your graph shows more jobs created under Carter than Regan. Lol

And you cupcakes always amaze me you can't accept reality and ALWAYS blame others when your policies fail.


8 years of Dubya/GOP "job creator" policies were derailed by Barney Frank, minority member of the GOP majority House where simple majority ruled? LMAOROG

I never blamed the black guy for the housing bubble, dumbass.

Nope, you just tried to blame the gay guy who had zero power in the GOP majority House. You blamed the black guy for not fixing 8 years of GOP "job creator" problems faster!

I give the black guy credit for being the best gun salesman in history, and creating more part time jobs in history.

Feb 7, 2014


The Spectacular Myth of Obama's Part-Time America—in 5 Graphs
A falsifiable claim, falsified

The first thing you would expect to see from a Part-Time America is that the number of part-time jobs added would rival the number of full-time jobs added. But in the last year, new full-time jobs outnumbered part-time jobs by 1.8 million to 8,000. For every new part-time job, we're creating 225 full-time positions.

Okay, but one year is just one year! Let's keep looking.

The second thing we should expect to see from Part-Time America is a growing number of part-time jobs since Obama came into office and started passing laws. Here's a graph showing the number of people working part-time for economic reasons since March 2010, the month Obamacare was passed.






Huh, nothing there. In fact, the number part-time workers has fallen in the last four years.

Okay, well, raw numbers can be deceiving. After all, the labor force has declined since 2010. So let's graph these part-time workers as a share of the labor force. Surely that will show a rising line...




. dang it.

Maybe I'm being unfair. Three years of data just isn't much context. So let's draw back the lens and look at part-time workers as a share of the labor force since, say, 1980...

... and then compare it to the unemployment rate (in RED) since 1980.

View attachment 128586
View attachment 128585


Okay, now here's something: Part-time work, as a share of the economy, is historically high. But these graphs don't make the point that Obama, or long-term global economic trends, are driving the rise in non-voluntary part-time work. Instead, the rise of part-time work seem to be 100 percent the creation of economic downturns. That's why it seems to be holding hands with unemployment, riding the roller coaster up during recessions, and down during recoveries.

But what about part-time employment for non-economic reasons? The story here is short and sweet: There is no story here...

The Spectacular Myth of Obama's Part-Time America—in 5 Graphs


WHAT ELSE DO YOU HAVE CUPCAKE?

Lol, your graph shows more jobs created under Carter than Regan. Lol

PER YEAR? YEP


Carter had 9+ million private sector jobs in FOUR YEARS

Ronnie had 14 million in eight years Cupcake



PUT IN THE YEAR AND HIT GO CUPCAKE

Bureau of Labor Statistics Data

 

[danielpalos]

Liberals understand the World, alleged conservatives are just clueless and Causeless, and have nothing but right wing fantasy, as a result.

No you don't you cherry pick it and tune out things you don't want to hear

.

Like what? Cherry picking a form of special pleading, which may be considered a fallacy.

I am a federalist, not a fallacist.

Just stringing a bunch of words together again and trying to make it sound good again ...huh?


.

simply being incompetent and claiming equal work for equal pay in the non-porn sector?

Non-porn ?

Weirdo


.

that really is, just plain worthless under Any form of Capitalism, when no porn is involved.

 

[edthecynic]

Again isreal said it was not illegal either...
And what was "it"
Meddeling in the isreal election

And that was to cover their asses because the Republican Congress was interfering in the 2015 Israeli election in favor of NaziYahoo.

 

[edthecynic]

He did by giving it to voice one who built up a data base..and they handing it off to bird and V15

Bird was working for OneVoice since 2013, well before the 2015 special early election, so why would Bird hand off to himself what he already had? That TIMELINE keeps biting you in your lying ass!

 

[Wyatt earp]

He did by giving it to voice one who built up a data base..and they handing it off to bird and V15

Bird was working for OneVoice since 2013, well before the 2015 special early election, so why would Bird hand off to himself what he already had? That TIMELINE keeps biting you in your lying ass!

You and your timeline is that your only defense?


Again did the Republicans have ESP and knew that Trump would win , so that's why they didn't vote on garland?



.

 

[RealDave]

OCTOBER 17, 2008

The Economic Blue Screen of Death


Let's look at a graph I used two years ago, from work done by James Kennedy and Alan Greenspan, on the effect of mortgage equity withdrawals (MEWs) on the growth of the US economy.

Notice that in both 2001 and 2002, the US economy continued to grow on an annual basis (the "technical" recession was just a few quarters). Their work suggests that this growth was entirely due to MEWs. In fact, MEWs contributed over 3% to GDP growth in 2004 and 2005, and 2% in 2006. Without US homeowners using their homes as an ATM, the economy would have been very sluggish indeed, averaging much less than 1% for the six years of the Bush presidency. Indeed, as a side observation, without home equity withdrawals the economy would have been so bad it would have been almost impossible for Bush to have won a second term.

The Economic Blue Screen of Death

Lol, you snowflakes always find new ways to amaze me.

And you cupcakes always amaze me you can't accept reality and ALWAYS blame others when your policies fail.


8 years of Dubya/GOP "job creator" policies were derailed by Barney Frank, minority member of the GOP majority House where simple majority ruled? LMAOROG

I never blamed the black guy for the housing bubble, dumbass.

Nope, you just tried to blame the gay guy who had zero power in the GOP majority House. You blamed the black guy for not fixing 8 years of GOP "job creator" problems faster!

I give the black guy credit for being the best gun salesman in history, and creating more part time jobs in history.

The part time jobs lie. My God. More racism from you.

Right wingers are delusional. They truly believe ignorance give them insight. That everything can be looked at in a way that's simple. Because they are simpletons.

Too bad they don't spend more time building and creating. Their obvious envy is pathetic. They can only build their self esteem by tearing others down. If you have nothing to show your only option is as a credit snatcher. For instance, like trying to take credit for taking down Bin Laden. Or after Republicans ruined the economy under Bush, the Democrats brought us back to prosperity. And so Republicans whine, "You didn't bring us far enough so you failed". Worse, their only policies are the very ones that ruined the economy under Bush. They have learned nothing of value. And still, they toot a rusty and old out of tune horn. Sad. It's not even a horn. It's a kazoo.

You do know that the economy crashed after the democrats took over in 2007?

From Bush's President's Working Group on Financial Markets March 2008

"The Presidents Working Group's March policy statement acknowledged that turmoil in financial markets clearly was triggered by a dramatic weakening of underwriting standards for U.S. subprime mortgages, beginning in late 2004 and extending into 2007."

FACTS on Dubya's great recession

It actually started decades ago, even Carter had something to do with it. It grew legs under clinton, Bush warned about it in 2006. While Barney Frank told him he was crazy. Nope democrats own the housing bubble.

Yet another whiner dumbass who thinks the CRA had anything to do with the near financial collapse & housing collapse. It was years of deregulation allowing banks to loan more & more against assets. Who repealed Glass Steagal.

Bush wanted control of Fannie & Freddie in the White House. Even the Republican Congress said no.

 

[RealDave]

He did by giving it to voice one who built up a data base..and they handing it off to bird and V15

Bird was working for OneVoice since 2013, well before the 2015 special early election, so why would Bird hand off to himself what he already had? That TIMELINE keeps biting you in your lying ass!

You and your timeline is that your only defense?


Again did the Republicans have ESP and knew that Trump would win , so that's why they didn't vote on garland?



.

As for the Republicans rejecting their Constitutional duty in ignoring Garland, they gambled on the electron. What did they have to lose? They got a campaign issue.

 

[ph3iron]

This is so true about liberals






7 Reasons Why Liberals Are Incapable of Understannding the wotld

To understand American politics, you have to understand this fundamental law: Conservatives think liberals are stupid. Liberals think conservatives are evil. —Charles Krauthammer




1) Liberalism creates a feedback loop. It is usually impossible for a non-liberal to change a liberal's mind about political issues because liberalism works like so: only liberals are credible sources of information. How do you know someone's liberal? He espouses liberal doctrine. So, no matter how plausible what you say may be, it will be ignored if you're not a liberal and if you are a liberal, of course, you probably agree with liberal views. This sort of close-mindedness makes liberals nearly impervious to any information that might undermine their beliefs.

2) Liberals sources of information are ever present. Conservatives are regularly exposed to the liberal viewpoint whether they want to be or not. That's not necessarily so for liberals. Imagine the average day for liberals. They get up and read their local newspaper. It has a liberal viewpoint. They take their kids to school, where the teachers are liberal. Then they go to work, listen to NPR which has a liberal viewpoint on the way home, and then turn on the nightly news which also skews leftward. From there, they turn on TV and watch shows created by liberals that lean to the left, if they have any political viewpoint at all. Unless liberals actively seek out conservative viewpoints, which is unlikely, the only conservative arguments they're probably going to hear are going to be through the heavily distorted, poorly translated, deeply skeptical lens of other liberals



3)Liberals emphasize feeling superior, not superior results.Liberalism is all about appearances, not outcomes. What matters to liberals is how a program makes them FEEL about themselves, not whether it works or not. Thus a program like Headstart, which sounds good because it's designed to help children read, makes liberals feel good about themselves, even though the program doesn't work and wastes billions

4) Liberals are big believers in moral relativism. This spins them round and round because if the only thing that's wrong is saying that there's an absolute moral code, then you lose your ability to tell cause from effect, good from bad, and right from wrong. Taking being non-judgmental to the level that liberals do leaves them paralyzed, pondering "why they hate us" because they feel incapable of saying, “That's wrong," and doing something about

5)Liberals tend to view people as parts of groups, not individuals. One of the prejudices of liberalism is that they see everyone as part of a group, not as an individual. This can lead to rather bizarre disparities when say, a man from a group that they consider to be powerless, impoverished victims becomes the leader of the free world -- and he's challenged by a group of lower middle class white people who've banded together because individually they're powerless.


6) Liberals take a dim view of personal responsibility. Who's at fault if a criminal commits a crime? The criminal or society? If someone creates a business and becomes a millionaire, is that the result of hard work and talent or luck? If you're dirt poor, starving, and haven't worked in 5 years, is that a personal failing or a failure of the state?


7) Liberals give themselves far too much credit just for being liberal.



.

Another cut and paste by a genius who doesn't know the def of liberal.
No Latin in college or no college period?

 

[ph3iron]

) Liberalism creates a feedback loop. It is usually impossible for a non-liberal to change a liberal's mind about political issues because liberalism works like so: only liberals are credible sources of information. How do you know someone's liberal? He espouses liberal doctrine. So, no matter how plausible what you say may be, it will be ignored if you're not a liberal and if you are a liberal, of course, you probably agree with liberal views. This sort of close-mindedness makes liberals nearly impervious to any information that might undermine their beliefs.


^^^ tell me about that one I had to argue with a liberal today for 6 hours and 15 pages to prove he was lying and Obama did in fact meddle in Israels election

Rep. Elijah Cummings hits Obama while putting his foot in his mouth


.

.

"Obama has been sending taxpayer dollars, at least $350,000 to fund anti-Likud, anti-Netanyahu groups in Israel for (the) election."

Blog claims U.S. funded anti-Netanyahu election effort in Israel

Don't confuse the white high school trumpies with facts

 

[edthecynic]

"Liberals tend to view people as parts of groups, not individuals."
From a idjit who view liberals as a group.
Come on Trumpettes, Are you really this stupid?

They are! They just mindlessly parrot the lies their MessiahRushie tells them.

May 13, 2010
RUSH: Conservatives remember that "we, the people" are the government. ... We do not divide people by groups. We do not see groups.

December 01, 2011
RUSH: This is an election of the makers versus the takers, and what hangs in the balance really is the American way of life.

 

[edthecynic]

It actually started decades ago, even Carter had something to do with it. It grew legs under clinton, Bush warned about it in 2006. While Barney Frank told him he was crazy. Nope democrats own the housing bubble.

And there it is, blaming Carter for Bush's housing crash. The sub-prime problem began in 2004 with Bush's Dec 2003 passing of the ADDI, which changed the rules to allow no downpayment loans for more than the house was worth to people with bad credit who could not keep up with the payments and who were at least 20% below the standard of living for the neighborhood they were buying into.
Subprime mortgages accounted for 9 percent of all mortgage originations from 1996 through 2004. But that 9% became 21% from 2004 to 2006, 21% of all mortgages were subprime. Twenty-one percent of all mortgages were essentially money given away to people because they were loans made to people that everybody knew going in would never pay them back. And that 21% of the mortgage market being subprime equaled about $600,000 billion in 2006, which was at the time one-fifth of the US home loan market.

 

[Wyatt earp]

This is so true about liberals






7 Reasons Why Liberals Are Incapable of Understannding the wotld

To understand American politics, you have to understand this fundamental law: Conservatives think liberals are stupid. Liberals think conservatives are evil. —Charles Krauthammer




1) Liberalism creates a feedback loop. It is usually impossible for a non-liberal to change a liberal's mind about political issues because liberalism works like so: only liberals are credible sources of information. How do you know someone's liberal? He espouses liberal doctrine. So, no matter how plausible what you say may be, it will be ignored if you're not a liberal and if you are a liberal, of course, you probably agree with liberal views. This sort of close-mindedness makes liberals nearly impervious to any information that might undermine their beliefs.

2) Liberals sources of information are ever present. Conservatives are regularly exposed to the liberal viewpoint whether they want to be or not. That's not necessarily so for liberals. Imagine the average day for liberals. They get up and read their local newspaper. It has a liberal viewpoint. They take their kids to school, where the teachers are liberal. Then they go to work, listen to NPR which has a liberal viewpoint on the way home, and then turn on the nightly news which also skews leftward. From there, they turn on TV and watch shows created by liberals that lean to the left, if they have any political viewpoint at all. Unless liberals actively seek out conservative viewpoints, which is unlikely, the only conservative arguments they're probably going to hear are going to be through the heavily distorted, poorly translated, deeply skeptical lens of other liberals



3)Liberals emphasize feeling superior, not superior results.Liberalism is all about appearances, not outcomes. What matters to liberals is how a program makes them FEEL about themselves, not whether it works or not. Thus a program like Headstart, which sounds good because it's designed to help children read, makes liberals feel good about themselves, even though the program doesn't work and wastes billions

4) Liberals are big believers in moral relativism. This spins them round and round because if the only thing that's wrong is saying that there's an absolute moral code, then you lose your ability to tell cause from effect, good from bad, and right from wrong. Taking being non-judgmental to the level that liberals do leaves them paralyzed, pondering "why they hate us" because they feel incapable of saying, “That's wrong," and doing something about

5)Liberals tend to view people as parts of groups, not individuals. One of the prejudices of liberalism is that they see everyone as part of a group, not as an individual. This can lead to rather bizarre disparities when say, a man from a group that they consider to be powerless, impoverished victims becomes the leader of the free world -- and he's challenged by a group of lower middle class white people who've banded together because individually they're powerless.


6) Liberals take a dim view of personal responsibility. Who's at fault if a criminal commits a crime? The criminal or society? If someone creates a business and becomes a millionaire, is that the result of hard work and talent or luck? If you're dirt poor, starving, and haven't worked in 5 years, is that a personal failing or a failure of the state?


7) Liberals give themselves far too much credit just for being liberal.



.

Another cut and paste by a genius who doesn't know the def of liberal.
No Latin in college or no college period?

A question for you dumb ass, why would I need to know Latin fixing a Italian injection molding machine? Or a German or Japanese one?

Wouldn't it be better if I knew schematics?


So what's the new term for liberal?

Progressive or meat head ?

I prefer meat head do you..?

 

[edthecynic]

when bush told Barney the Democrats were in control of Congress

LIAR!

 

[Faun]

You said he funneled money in the election. Are you calling yourself an imbecile now for saying that?

He did by giving it to voice one who built up a data base..and they handing it off to bird and V15..


Again that was not the question ...

You said he did it by funneling money to the election.

Now you say he didn't do that?

Just how fluid is your position on this?

What? I never sea sawed...

Do you even no about Saul alinsky, the community organizer who died in 1972 and are hero's of Obama and Hillary?

Again, if you bothered to read the links one more time


Voice one got like $350,000 bucks built up a data base and gave it to V15

That's indirectly which both the Isreal and US government's said was not illegal...

You and edide defended Obama so much that both of you are in capable of comprehending..the question... I never ever said it was illegal .. Wait you thought I wanted Obama to go to jail because of it ?


Again my post on the first page...



^^^ tell me about that one I had to argue with a liberal today for 6 hours and 15 pages to prove he was lying and Obama did in fact meddle in Israels election

Rep. Elijah Cummings hits Obama while putting his foot in his mouth



.

Oh, look... now the forum jester denies ever saying Obama funneled money into the Israeli election.



I suppose then someone else posting this with your account...?

In the last Israeli election, the Obama State Department funneled hundreds of thousands of dollars in taxpayer money to the opposition of Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

The forum Court jester would be you, not comprehending how much money and time it takes to develop data bases ..amusing you want to play stupid once again ...




I get why you are so butthurt and upset snowflake, you thought I was posting Obama should go to jail for it


Admit it..hilarious



View attachment 128549


.

Too ******* retarded. You said money was funneled in to influence the election. How did Obama do that when he didn't know there was going to be an election? The money was sent before the election was known about.

You indeed are the forum jester

 

[Wyatt earp]

) Liberalism creates a feedback loop. It is usually impossible for a non-liberal to change a liberal's mind about political issues because liberalism works like so: only liberals are credible sources of information. How do you know someone's liberal? He espouses liberal doctrine. So, no matter how plausible what you say may be, it will be ignored if you're not a liberal and if you are a liberal, of course, you probably agree with liberal views. This sort of close-mindedness makes liberals nearly impervious to any information that might undermine their beliefs.


^^^ tell me about that one I had to argue with a liberal today for 6 hours and 15 pages to prove he was lying and Obama did in fact meddle in Israels election

Rep. Elijah Cummings hits Obama while putting his foot in his mouth


.

.

"Obama has been sending taxpayer dollars, at least $350,000 to fund anti-Likud, anti-Netanyahu groups in Israel for (the) election."

Blog claims U.S. funded anti-Netanyahu election effort in Israel

Don't confuse the white high school trumpies with facts

So let me guess you are a racist northern black?


What else is new?

.