7 reasons why liberals are incapable of understanding the world

[JonKoch]

"Obama has been sending taxpayer dollars, at least $350,000 to fund anti-Likud, anti-Netanyahu groups in Israel for (the) election."

Blog claims U.S. funded anti-Netanyahu election effort in Israel

Here is the Senate report you stupid ****



Majority Media | Media | Homeland Security & Governmental Affairs Committee







Senate Report: State Department Funded Effort to Overthrow Netanyahu

11:27 AM, JUL 12, 2016 | By JIM SWIFT

The group received nearly $350,000 in grants from the U.S. State Department to support peace negotiations between Israelis and the Palestinian Authority over a 14-month grant period ending in November 2014. In December 2014, Israeli elections were called following the collapse of peace negotiations.

The Subcommittee’s investigation concludes that OneVoice Israel complied with the terms of its State Department grants.

...“While this report shows no wrongdoing by the Administration, and should put to rest such allegations, it certainly highlights deficiencies in the Department’s policies that should be addressed in order to best protect taxpayer dollars,”


OOPS, OBAMA HUH? LMAOROG

Yes they admitted they didn't do anything wrong




But it says they medded in Israels election..


God you liberals are stupid *****.





The entire argument is Obama meddled in israels election



And god you liberals are like retarded children




.

Trumpettes are ******* liars. Just like their leader.

Funding One Voice is not meddling.

You want to see meddling, look at Trump & the Russians.

Just waiting for a shred of evidence champ.

 

[jknowgood]

Right wingers are delusional. They truly believe ignorance give them insight. That everything can be looked at in a way that's simple. Because they are simpletons.

Too bad they don't spend more time building and creating. Their obvious envy is pathetic. They can only build their self esteem by tearing others down. If you have nothing to show your only option is as a credit snatcher. For instance, like trying to take credit for taking down Bin Laden. Or after Republicans ruined the economy under Bush, the Democrats brought us back to prosperity. And so Republicans whine, "You didn't bring us far enough so you failed". Worse, their only policies are the very ones that ruined the economy under Bush. They have learned nothing of value. And still, they toot a rusty and old out of tune horn. Sad. It's not even a horn. It's a kazoo.

You do know that the economy crashed after the democrats took over in 2007?

From Bush's President's Working Group on Financial Markets March 2008

"The Presidents Working Group's March policy statement acknowledged that turmoil in financial markets clearly was triggered by a dramatic weakening of underwriting standards for U.S. subprime mortgages, beginning in late 2004 and extending into 2007."

FACTS on Dubya's great recession

It actually started decades ago, even Carter had something to do with it. It grew legs under clinton, Bush warned about it in 2006. While Barney Frank told him he was crazy. Nope democrats own the housing bubble.

 

[Wyatt earp]

Here is the Senate report you stupid ****



Majority Media | Media | Homeland Security & Governmental Affairs Committee







Senate Report: State Department Funded Effort to Overthrow Netanyahu

11:27 AM, JUL 12, 2016 | By JIM SWIFT

The group received nearly $350,000 in grants from the U.S. State Department to support peace negotiations between Israelis and the Palestinian Authority over a 14-month grant period ending in November 2014. In December 2014, Israeli elections were called following the collapse of peace negotiations.

The Subcommittee’s investigation concludes that OneVoice Israel complied with the terms of its State Department grants.

...“While this report shows no wrongdoing by the Administration, and should put to rest such allegations, it certainly highlights deficiencies in the Department’s policies that should be addressed in order to best protect taxpayer dollars,”


OOPS, OBAMA HUH? LMAOROG

Yes they admitted they didn't do anything wrong




But it says they medded in Israels election..


God you liberals are stupid *****.





The entire argument is Obama meddled in israels election



And god you liberals are like retarded children




.

Trumpettes are ******* liars. Just like their leader.

Funding One Voice is not meddling.

You want to see meddling, look at Trump & the Russians.

If it's proven the Russians meddled, God bless them, they saved our Constitution from you and your liberal ilk ...the enemy with in America




.

Now you are supporting a foreign government meddling in our election. Wow, you really do hate this country. Why is it you fucktards try to cheat to win elections? Can't you assholes win by better governing???? (ref Bush Jr). Can't you have any good ideas?

You pass laws to suppress the vote through UNCONSTITUTIONAL voter photo ID laws. You cheat by gross gerrymandering, you cheat by making it more difficult to vote by curtailing early voting, purging voter roles, and creating long lines at Democrat majority districts polling places.

Why don't you give a shit about that? Now its OK if a foreign government helps you win.

Why top do think it is OK to piss on the Constitution to try to win elections?

Republicans suck at running this country. Clinton handed Bush a balanced budget & what happened? The worst recession in 80- ******* years.

Its been long enough for YOUR team to produce jobs bills, infrastructure bills, bills that actually help Americans. Instead we go crazy people carry guns, mining companies polluting,. financial advisors given the OK to dupe customers.

Where is this great orange leader that knows more about ISIS than the generals? He claims he inherited this mess yet can't come up with shit to fix it.

OMG OMG OMG we have to ban Muslims from entering for 90 days so we can put this extreme vetting in place. Its been over 90 days & the orange jackass has no plan in place. WTF. Why don't you care he lies to you over & over?

And you slobber all over him.

'You shold be asamed to be that ******* stupid to elect a liar, business cheat, womnen assaulting jackass like Donald Trump.

Now its OK if a foreign government helps you win.

Of course it is , if our media can not do its job and report on corruption, we need outside sources to tell us the truth..



No?


.

 

[JonKoch]

Right wingers are delusional. They truly believe ignorance give them insight. That everything can be looked at in a way that's simple. Because they are simpletons.

Too bad they don't spend more time building and creating. Their obvious envy is pathetic. They can only build their self esteem by tearing others down. If you have nothing to show your only option is as a credit snatcher. For instance, like trying to take credit for taking down Bin Laden. Or after Republicans ruined the economy under Bush, the Democrats brought us back to prosperity. And so Republicans whine, "You didn't bring us far enough so you failed". Worse, their only policies are the very ones that ruined the economy under Bush. They have learned nothing of value. And still, they toot a rusty and old out of tune horn. Sad. It's not even a horn. It's a kazoo.

You do know that the economy crashed after the democrats took over in 2007?

Yeah, the economy collapsed from toxic mortgages written years earlier when Republicans controlled the Congress and did nothing to stop the hemorrhaging. The credit and real estate markets finally bleed out in 2008 and morons blame the party which just took over.

That would be the democrats that thought that everyone should own a house regardless of they could afford it.

"Another form of easing facilitated the rapid rise of mortgages that didn't require borrowers to fully document their incomes. In 2006, these low- or no-doc loans comprised 81 percent of near-prime, 55 percent of jumbo, 50 percent of subprime and 36 percent of prime securitized mortgages."

Q HOLY JESUS! DID YOU JUST PROVE THAT OVER 50 % OF ALL MORTGAGES IN 2006 DIDN'T BORROWERS TO DOCUMENT THEIR INCOME?!?!?!?

A Yes.




Q WHO THE HELL LOANS HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS TO PEOPLE WITHOUT CHECKING THEIR INCOMES?!?!?

A Banks.

Q WHY??!?!!!?!

A Two reasons, greed and Bush's regulators let them.


Bush's documented policies and statements in timeframe leading up to the start of the Bush Mortgage Bubble include (but not limited to)

Wanting 5.5 million more minority homeowners
Tells congress there is nothing wrong with GSEs
Pledging to use federal policy to increase home ownership
Routinely taking credit for the housing market
Forcing GSEs to buy more low income home loans by raising their Housing Goals
Lowering Invesntment bank's capital requirements, Net Capital rule
Reversing the Clinton rule that restricted GSEs purchases of subprime loans
Lowering down payment requirements to 0%
Forcing GSEs to spend an additional $440 billion in the secondary markets
Giving away 40,000 free down payments
PREEMPTING ALL STATE LAWS AGAINST PREDATORY LENDING


But the biggest policy was regulators not enforcing lending standards.

FACTS on Dubya's great recession

 

[Wyatt earp]

Right wingers are delusional. They truly believe ignorance give them insight. That everything can be looked at in a way that's simple. Because they are simpletons.

Too bad they don't spend more time building and creating. Their obvious envy is pathetic. They can only build their self esteem by tearing others down. If you have nothing to show your only option is as a credit snatcher. For instance, like trying to take credit for taking down Bin Laden. Or after Republicans ruined the economy under Bush, the Democrats brought us back to prosperity. And so Republicans whine, "You didn't bring us far enough so you failed". Worse, their only policies are the very ones that ruined the economy under Bush. They have learned nothing of value. And still, they toot a rusty and old out of tune horn. Sad. It's not even a horn. It's a kazoo.

You do know that the economy crashed after the democrats took over in 2007?

Yeah, the economy collapsed from toxic mortgages written years earlier when Republicans controlled the Congress and did nothing to stop the hemorrhaging. The credit and real estate markets finally bleed out in 2008 and morons blame the party which just took over.

That would be the democrats that thought that everyone should own a house regardless of they could afford it.

Go **** yourself,. Bush was out there pushing home ownership. Are you just stupid or a lying ****?

Bush also warned Barney Frank about Freddie and franie and Barney said don't worry about it


No?


.

 

[jknowgood]

Right wingers are delusional. They truly believe ignorance give them insight. That everything can be looked at in a way that's simple. Because they are simpletons.

Too bad they don't spend more time building and creating. Their obvious envy is pathetic. They can only build their self esteem by tearing others down. If you have nothing to show your only option is as a credit snatcher. For instance, like trying to take credit for taking down Bin Laden. Or after Republicans ruined the economy under Bush, the Democrats brought us back to prosperity. And so Republicans whine, "You didn't bring us far enough so you failed". Worse, their only policies are the very ones that ruined the economy under Bush. They have learned nothing of value. And still, they toot a rusty and old out of tune horn. Sad. It's not even a horn. It's a kazoo.

You do know that the economy crashed after the democrats took over in 2007?

Yeah, the economy collapsed from toxic mortgages written years earlier when Republicans controlled the Congress and did nothing to stop the hemorrhaging. The credit and real estate markets finally bleed out in 2008 and morons blame the party which just took over.

That would be the democrats that thought that everyone should own a house regardless of they could afford it.

Go **** yourself,. Bush was out there pushing home ownership. Are you just stupid or a lying ****?

So your saying the republicans are compassionate and want people to own their homes and the democrats are against it?

 

[JonKoch]

Right wingers are delusional. They truly believe ignorance give them insight. That everything can be looked at in a way that's simple. Because they are simpletons.

Too bad they don't spend more time building and creating. Their obvious envy is pathetic. They can only build their self esteem by tearing others down. If you have nothing to show your only option is as a credit snatcher. For instance, like trying to take credit for taking down Bin Laden. Or after Republicans ruined the economy under Bush, the Democrats brought us back to prosperity. And so Republicans whine, "You didn't bring us far enough so you failed". Worse, their only policies are the very ones that ruined the economy under Bush. They have learned nothing of value. And still, they toot a rusty and old out of tune horn. Sad. It's not even a horn. It's a kazoo.

You do know that the economy crashed after the democrats took over in 2007?

From Bush's President's Working Group on Financial Markets March 2008

"The Presidents Working Group's March policy statement acknowledged that turmoil in financial markets clearly was triggered by a dramatic weakening of underwriting standards for U.S. subprime mortgages, beginning in late 2004 and extending into 2007."

FACTS on Dubya's great recession

It actually started decades ago, even Carter had something to do with it. It grew legs under clinton, Bush warned about it in 2006. While Barney Frank told him he was crazy. Nope democrats own the housing bubble.

Sure cupcake you keep up with that LONG debunked meme


Q When did the Bush Mortgage Bubble start?

A The general timeframe is it started late 2004.

From Bush's President's Working Group on Financial Markets March 2008

'The Presidents Working Groups March policy statement acknowledged that turmoil in financial markets clearly was triggered by a dramatic weakening of underwriting standards for U.S. subprime mortgages, beginning in late 2004 and extending into 2007.'



Q Did the Community Reinvestment Act under Carter/Clinton caused it?


A "Since 1995 there has been essentially no change in the basic CRA rules or enforcement process that can be reasonably linked to the subprime lending activity. This fact weakens the link between the CRA and the current crisis since the crisis is rooted in poor performance of mortgage loans made between 2004 and 2007. "

http://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/speech/20081203_analysis.pdf

Bush talked about reform. He talked and he talked. And then he stopped reform. (read that as many times as necessary. Bush stopped reform). And then he stopped it again
FACTS on Dubya's great recession


Private sector loans, not Fannie or Freddie, triggered crisis


Private sector loans, not Fannie or Freddie, triggered crisis

 

[JonKoch]

Right wingers are delusional. They truly believe ignorance give them insight. That everything can be looked at in a way that's simple. Because they are simpletons.

Too bad they don't spend more time building and creating. Their obvious envy is pathetic. They can only build their self esteem by tearing others down. If you have nothing to show your only option is as a credit snatcher. For instance, like trying to take credit for taking down Bin Laden. Or after Republicans ruined the economy under Bush, the Democrats brought us back to prosperity. And so Republicans whine, "You didn't bring us far enough so you failed". Worse, their only policies are the very ones that ruined the economy under Bush. They have learned nothing of value. And still, they toot a rusty and old out of tune horn. Sad. It's not even a horn. It's a kazoo.

You do know that the economy crashed after the democrats took over in 2007?

Yeah, the economy collapsed from toxic mortgages written years earlier when Republicans controlled the Congress and did nothing to stop the hemorrhaging. The credit and real estate markets finally bleed out in 2008 and morons blame the party which just took over.

That would be the democrats that thought that everyone should own a house regardless of they could afford it.

Go **** yourself,. Bush was out there pushing home ownership. Are you just stupid or a lying ****?

So your saying the republicans are compassionate and want people to own their homes and the democrats are against it?

OCTOBER 17, 2008

The Economic Blue Screen of Death


Let's look at a graph I used two years ago, from work done by James Kennedy and Alan Greenspan, on the effect of mortgage equity withdrawals (MEWs) on the growth of the US economy.

Notice that in both 2001 and 2002, the US economy continued to grow on an annual basis (the "technical" recession was just a few quarters). Their work suggests that this growth was entirely due to MEWs. In fact, MEWs contributed over 3% to GDP growth in 2004 and 2005, and 2% in 2006. Without US homeowners using their homes as an ATM, the economy would have been very sluggish indeed, averaging much less than 1% for the six years of the Bush presidency. Indeed, as a side observation, without home equity withdrawals the economy would have been so bad it would have been almost impossible for Bush to have won a second term.

The Economic Blue Screen of Death

 

[jknowgood]

You do know that the economy crashed after the democrats took over in 2007?

Yeah, the economy collapsed from toxic mortgages written years earlier when Republicans controlled the Congress and did nothing to stop the hemorrhaging. The credit and real estate markets finally bleed out in 2008 and morons blame the party which just took over.

That would be the democrats that thought that everyone should own a house regardless of they could afford it.

Go **** yourself,. Bush was out there pushing home ownership. Are you just stupid or a lying ****?

So your saying the republicans are compassionate and want people to own their homes and the democrats are against it?

OCTOBER 17, 2008

The Economic Blue Screen of Death


Let's look at a graph I used two years ago, from work done by James Kennedy and Alan Greenspan, on the effect of mortgage equity withdrawals (MEWs) on the growth of the US economy.

Notice that in both 2001 and 2002, the US economy continued to grow on an annual basis (the "technical" recession was just a few quarters). Their work suggests that this growth was entirely due to MEWs. In fact, MEWs contributed over 3% to GDP growth in 2004 and 2005, and 2% in 2006. Without US homeowners using their homes as an ATM, the economy would have been very sluggish indeed, averaging much less than 1% for the six years of the Bush presidency. Indeed, as a side observation, without home equity withdrawals the economy would have been so bad it would have been almost impossible for Bush to have won a second term.

The Economic Blue Screen of Death

Lol, you snowflakes always find new ways to amaze me.

 

[JonKoch]

Yeah, the economy collapsed from toxic mortgages written years earlier when Republicans controlled the Congress and did nothing to stop the hemorrhaging. The credit and real estate markets finally bleed out in 2008 and morons blame the party which just took over.

That would be the democrats that thought that everyone should own a house regardless of they could afford it.

Go **** yourself,. Bush was out there pushing home ownership. Are you just stupid or a lying ****?

So your saying the republicans are compassionate and want people to own their homes and the democrats are against it?

OCTOBER 17, 2008

The Economic Blue Screen of Death


Let's look at a graph I used two years ago, from work done by James Kennedy and Alan Greenspan, on the effect of mortgage equity withdrawals (MEWs) on the growth of the US economy.

Notice that in both 2001 and 2002, the US economy continued to grow on an annual basis (the "technical" recession was just a few quarters). Their work suggests that this growth was entirely due to MEWs. In fact, MEWs contributed over 3% to GDP growth in 2004 and 2005, and 2% in 2006. Without US homeowners using their homes as an ATM, the economy would have been very sluggish indeed, averaging much less than 1% for the six years of the Bush presidency. Indeed, as a side observation, without home equity withdrawals the economy would have been so bad it would have been almost impossible for Bush to have won a second term.

The Economic Blue Screen of Death

Lol, you snowflakes always find new ways to amaze me.

And you cupcakes always amaze me you can't accept reality and ALWAYS blame others when your policies fail.


8 years of Dubya/GOP "job creator" policies were derailed by Barney Frank, minority member of the GOP majority House where simple majority ruled? LMAOROG

 

[jknowgood]

That would be the democrats that thought that everyone should own a house regardless of they could afford it.

Go **** yourself,. Bush was out there pushing home ownership. Are you just stupid or a lying ****?

So your saying the republicans are compassionate and want people to own their homes and the democrats are against it?

OCTOBER 17, 2008

The Economic Blue Screen of Death


Let's look at a graph I used two years ago, from work done by James Kennedy and Alan Greenspan, on the effect of mortgage equity withdrawals (MEWs) on the growth of the US economy.

Notice that in both 2001 and 2002, the US economy continued to grow on an annual basis (the "technical" recession was just a few quarters). Their work suggests that this growth was entirely due to MEWs. In fact, MEWs contributed over 3% to GDP growth in 2004 and 2005, and 2% in 2006. Without US homeowners using their homes as an ATM, the economy would have been very sluggish indeed, averaging much less than 1% for the six years of the Bush presidency. Indeed, as a side observation, without home equity withdrawals the economy would have been so bad it would have been almost impossible for Bush to have won a second term.

The Economic Blue Screen of Death

Lol, you snowflakes always find new ways to amaze me.

And you cupcakes always amaze me you can't accept reality and ALWAYS blame others when your policies fail.


8 years of Dubya/GOP "job creator" policies were derailed by Barney Frank, minority member of the GOP majority House where simple majority ruled? LMAOROG

I never blamed the black guy for the housing bubble, dumbass.

 

[JonKoch]

Go **** yourself,. Bush was out there pushing home ownership. Are you just stupid or a lying ****?

So your saying the republicans are compassionate and want people to own their homes and the democrats are against it?

OCTOBER 17, 2008

The Economic Blue Screen of Death


Let's look at a graph I used two years ago, from work done by James Kennedy and Alan Greenspan, on the effect of mortgage equity withdrawals (MEWs) on the growth of the US economy.

Notice that in both 2001 and 2002, the US economy continued to grow on an annual basis (the "technical" recession was just a few quarters). Their work suggests that this growth was entirely due to MEWs. In fact, MEWs contributed over 3% to GDP growth in 2004 and 2005, and 2% in 2006. Without US homeowners using their homes as an ATM, the economy would have been very sluggish indeed, averaging much less than 1% for the six years of the Bush presidency. Indeed, as a side observation, without home equity withdrawals the economy would have been so bad it would have been almost impossible for Bush to have won a second term.

The Economic Blue Screen of Death

Lol, you snowflakes always find new ways to amaze me.

And you cupcakes always amaze me you can't accept reality and ALWAYS blame others when your policies fail.


8 years of Dubya/GOP "job creator" policies were derailed by Barney Frank, minority member of the GOP majority House where simple majority ruled? LMAOROG

I never blamed the black guy for the housing bubble, dumbass.

Nope, you just tried to blame the gay guy who had zero power in the GOP majority House. You blamed the black guy for not fixing 8 years of GOP "job creator" problems faster!

 

[jknowgood]

So your saying the republicans are compassionate and want people to own their homes and the democrats are against it?

OCTOBER 17, 2008

The Economic Blue Screen of Death


Let's look at a graph I used two years ago, from work done by James Kennedy and Alan Greenspan, on the effect of mortgage equity withdrawals (MEWs) on the growth of the US economy.

Notice that in both 2001 and 2002, the US economy continued to grow on an annual basis (the "technical" recession was just a few quarters). Their work suggests that this growth was entirely due to MEWs. In fact, MEWs contributed over 3% to GDP growth in 2004 and 2005, and 2% in 2006. Without US homeowners using their homes as an ATM, the economy would have been very sluggish indeed, averaging much less than 1% for the six years of the Bush presidency. Indeed, as a side observation, without home equity withdrawals the economy would have been so bad it would have been almost impossible for Bush to have won a second term.

The Economic Blue Screen of Death

Lol, you snowflakes always find new ways to amaze me.

And you cupcakes always amaze me you can't accept reality and ALWAYS blame others when your policies fail.


8 years of Dubya/GOP "job creator" policies were derailed by Barney Frank, minority member of the GOP majority House where simple majority ruled? LMAOROG

I never blamed the black guy for the housing bubble, dumbass.

Nope, you just tried to blame the gay guy who had zero power in the GOP majority House. You blamed the black guy for not fixing 8 years of GOP "job creator" problems faster!

I give the black guy credit for being the best gun salesman in history, and creating more part time jobs in history.

 

[Wyatt earp]

OCTOBER 17, 2008

The Economic Blue Screen of Death


Let's look at a graph I used two years ago, from work done by James Kennedy and Alan Greenspan, on the effect of mortgage equity withdrawals (MEWs) on the growth of the US economy.

Notice that in both 2001 and 2002, the US economy continued to grow on an annual basis (the "technical" recession was just a few quarters). Their work suggests that this growth was entirely due to MEWs. In fact, MEWs contributed over 3% to GDP growth in 2004 and 2005, and 2% in 2006. Without US homeowners using their homes as an ATM, the economy would have been very sluggish indeed, averaging much less than 1% for the six years of the Bush presidency. Indeed, as a side observation, without home equity withdrawals the economy would have been so bad it would have been almost impossible for Bush to have won a second term.

The Economic Blue Screen of Death

Lol, you snowflakes always find new ways to amaze me.

And you cupcakes always amaze me you can't accept reality and ALWAYS blame others when your policies fail.


8 years of Dubya/GOP "job creator" policies were derailed by Barney Frank, minority member of the GOP majority House where simple majority ruled? LMAOROG

I never blamed the black guy for the housing bubble, dumbass.

Nope, you just tried to blame the gay guy who had zero power in the GOP majority House. You blamed the black guy for not fixing 8 years of GOP "job creator" problems faster!

I give the black guy credit for being the best gun salesman in history, and creating more part time jobs in history.

Once again the idiot shoves his foot in his mouth , when bush told Barney the Democrats were in control of Congress



.

 

[JonKoch]

OCTOBER 17, 2008

The Economic Blue Screen of Death


Let's look at a graph I used two years ago, from work done by James Kennedy and Alan Greenspan, on the effect of mortgage equity withdrawals (MEWs) on the growth of the US economy.

Notice that in both 2001 and 2002, the US economy continued to grow on an annual basis (the "technical" recession was just a few quarters). Their work suggests that this growth was entirely due to MEWs. In fact, MEWs contributed over 3% to GDP growth in 2004 and 2005, and 2% in 2006. Without US homeowners using their homes as an ATM, the economy would have been very sluggish indeed, averaging much less than 1% for the six years of the Bush presidency. Indeed, as a side observation, without home equity withdrawals the economy would have been so bad it would have been almost impossible for Bush to have won a second term.

The Economic Blue Screen of Death

Lol, you snowflakes always find new ways to amaze me.

And you cupcakes always amaze me you can't accept reality and ALWAYS blame others when your policies fail.


8 years of Dubya/GOP "job creator" policies were derailed by Barney Frank, minority member of the GOP majority House where simple majority ruled? LMAOROG

I never blamed the black guy for the housing bubble, dumbass.

Nope, you just tried to blame the gay guy who had zero power in the GOP majority House. You blamed the black guy for not fixing 8 years of GOP "job creator" problems faster!

I give the black guy credit for being the best gun salesman in history, and creating more part time jobs in history.

Feb 7, 2014


The Spectacular Myth of Obama's Part-Time America—in 5 Graphs
A falsifiable claim, falsified

The first thing you would expect to see from a Part-Time America is that the number of part-time jobs added would rival the number of full-time jobs added. But in the last year, new full-time jobs outnumbered part-time jobs by 1.8 million to 8,000. For every new part-time job, we're creating 225 full-time positions.

Okay, but one year is just one year! Let's keep looking.

The second thing we should expect to see from Part-Time America is a growing number of part-time jobs since Obama came into office and started passing laws. Here's a graph showing the number of people working part-time for economic reasons since March 2010, the month Obamacare was passed.






Huh, nothing there. In fact, the number part-time workers has fallen in the last four years.

Okay, well, raw numbers can be deceiving. After all, the labor force has declined since 2010. So let's graph these part-time workers as a share of the labor force. Surely that will show a rising line...




. dang it.

Maybe I'm being unfair. Three years of data just isn't much context. So let's draw back the lens and look at part-time workers as a share of the labor force since, say, 1980...

... and then compare it to the unemployment rate (in RED) since 1980.

View attachment 128586
View attachment 128585


Okay, now here's something: Part-time work, as a share of the economy, is historically high. But these graphs don't make the point that Obama, or long-term global economic trends, are driving the rise in non-voluntary part-time work. Instead, the rise of part-time work seem to be 100 percent the creation of economic downturns. That's why it seems to be holding hands with unemployment, riding the roller coaster up during recessions, and down during recoveries.

But what about part-time employment for non-economic reasons? The story here is short and sweet: There is no story here...

The Spectacular Myth of Obama's Part-Time America—in 5 Graphs


WHAT ELSE DO YOU HAVE CUPCAKE?

 

[jknowgood]

Lol, you snowflakes always find new ways to amaze me.

And you cupcakes always amaze me you can't accept reality and ALWAYS blame others when your policies fail.


8 years of Dubya/GOP "job creator" policies were derailed by Barney Frank, minority member of the GOP majority House where simple majority ruled? LMAOROG

I never blamed the black guy for the housing bubble, dumbass.

Nope, you just tried to blame the gay guy who had zero power in the GOP majority House. You blamed the black guy for not fixing 8 years of GOP "job creator" problems faster!

I give the black guy credit for being the best gun salesman in history, and creating more part time jobs in history.

Feb 7, 2014


The Spectacular Myth of Obama's Part-Time America—in 5 Graphs
A falsifiable claim, falsified

The first thing you would expect to see from a Part-Time America is that the number of part-time jobs added would rival the number of full-time jobs added. But in the last year, new full-time jobs outnumbered part-time jobs by 1.8 million to 8,000. For every new part-time job, we're creating 225 full-time positions.

Okay, but one year is just one year! Let's keep looking.

The second thing we should expect to see from Part-Time America is a growing number of part-time jobs since Obama came into office and started passing laws. Here's a graph showing the number of people working part-time for economic reasons since March 2010, the month Obamacare was passed.






Huh, nothing there. In fact, the number part-time workers has fallen in the last four years.

Okay, well, raw numbers can be deceiving. After all, the labor force has declined since 2010. So let's graph these part-time workers as a share of the labor force. Surely that will show a rising line...




. dang it.

Maybe I'm being unfair. Three years of data just isn't much context. So let's draw back the lens and look at part-time workers as a share of the labor force since, say, 1980...

... and then compare it to the unemployment rate (in RED) since 1980.

View attachment 128586
View attachment 128585


Okay, now here's something: Part-time work, as a share of the economy, is historically high. But these graphs don't make the point that Obama, or long-term global economic trends, are driving the rise in non-voluntary part-time work. Instead, the rise of part-time work seem to be 100 percent the creation of economic downturns. That's why it seems to be holding hands with unemployment, riding the roller coaster up during recessions, and down during recoveries.

But what about part-time employment for non-economic reasons? The story here is short and sweet: There is no story here...

The Spectacular Myth of Obama's Part-Time America—in 5 Graphs


WHAT ELSE DO YOU HAVE CUPCAKE?

Lol, your graph shows more jobs created under Carter than Regan. Lol

 

[AntonToo]

And you cupcakes always amaze me you can't accept reality and ALWAYS blame others when your policies fail.


8 years of Dubya/GOP "job creator" policies were derailed by Barney Frank, minority member of the GOP majority House where simple majority ruled? LMAOROG

I never blamed the black guy for the housing bubble, dumbass.

Nope, you just tried to blame the gay guy who had zero power in the GOP majority House. You blamed the black guy for not fixing 8 years of GOP "job creator" problems faster!

I give the black guy credit for being the best gun salesman in history, and creating more part time jobs in history.

Feb 7, 2014


The Spectacular Myth of Obama's Part-Time America—in 5 Graphs
A falsifiable claim, falsified

The first thing you would expect to see from a Part-Time America is that the number of part-time jobs added would rival the number of full-time jobs added. But in the last year, new full-time jobs outnumbered part-time jobs by 1.8 million to 8,000. For every new part-time job, we're creating 225 full-time positions.

Okay, but one year is just one year! Let's keep looking.

The second thing we should expect to see from Part-Time America is a growing number of part-time jobs since Obama came into office and started passing laws. Here's a graph showing the number of people working part-time for economic reasons since March 2010, the month Obamacare was passed.






Huh, nothing there. In fact, the number part-time workers has fallen in the last four years.

Okay, well, raw numbers can be deceiving. After all, the labor force has declined since 2010. So let's graph these part-time workers as a share of the labor force. Surely that will show a rising line...




. dang it.

Maybe I'm being unfair. Three years of data just isn't much context. So let's draw back the lens and look at part-time workers as a share of the labor force since, say, 1980...

... and then compare it to the unemployment rate (in RED) since 1980.

View attachment 128586
View attachment 128585


Okay, now here's something: Part-time work, as a share of the economy, is historically high. But these graphs don't make the point that Obama, or long-term global economic trends, are driving the rise in non-voluntary part-time work. Instead, the rise of part-time work seem to be 100 percent the creation of economic downturns. That's why it seems to be holding hands with unemployment, riding the roller coaster up during recessions, and down during recoveries.

But what about part-time employment for non-economic reasons? The story here is short and sweet: There is no story here...

The Spectacular Myth of Obama's Part-Time America—in 5 Graphs


WHAT ELSE DO YOU HAVE CUPCAKE?

Lol, your graph shows more jobs created under Carter than Regan. Lol

No it doesn't show that so stop laughing dumbass, you just proved that you don't know how to read a graph.

 

[jknowgood]

I never blamed the black guy for the housing bubble, dumbass.

Nope, you just tried to blame the gay guy who had zero power in the GOP majority House. You blamed the black guy for not fixing 8 years of GOP "job creator" problems faster!

I give the black guy credit for being the best gun salesman in history, and creating more part time jobs in history.

Feb 7, 2014


The Spectacular Myth of Obama's Part-Time America—in 5 Graphs
A falsifiable claim, falsified

The first thing you would expect to see from a Part-Time America is that the number of part-time jobs added would rival the number of full-time jobs added. But in the last year, new full-time jobs outnumbered part-time jobs by 1.8 million to 8,000. For every new part-time job, we're creating 225 full-time positions.

Okay, but one year is just one year! Let's keep looking.

The second thing we should expect to see from Part-Time America is a growing number of part-time jobs since Obama came into office and started passing laws. Here's a graph showing the number of people working part-time for economic reasons since March 2010, the month Obamacare was passed.






Huh, nothing there. In fact, the number part-time workers has fallen in the last four years.

Okay, well, raw numbers can be deceiving. After all, the labor force has declined since 2010. So let's graph these part-time workers as a share of the labor force. Surely that will show a rising line...




. dang it.

Maybe I'm being unfair. Three years of data just isn't much context. So let's draw back the lens and look at part-time workers as a share of the labor force since, say, 1980...

... and then compare it to the unemployment rate (in RED) since 1980.

View attachment 128586
View attachment 128585


Okay, now here's something: Part-time work, as a share of the economy, is historically high. But these graphs don't make the point that Obama, or long-term global economic trends, are driving the rise in non-voluntary part-time work. Instead, the rise of part-time work seem to be 100 percent the creation of economic downturns. That's why it seems to be holding hands with unemployment, riding the roller coaster up during recessions, and down during recoveries.

But what about part-time employment for non-economic reasons? The story here is short and sweet: There is no story here...

The Spectacular Myth of Obama's Part-Time America—in 5 Graphs


WHAT ELSE DO YOU HAVE CUPCAKE?

Lol, your graph shows more jobs created under Carter than Regan. Lol

No it doesn't show that so stop laughing dumbass, you just proved that you don't know how to read a graph.

Lol, on your ignorance, read the last graph.

 

[AntonToo]

Nope, you just tried to blame the gay guy who had zero power in the GOP majority House. You blamed the black guy for not fixing 8 years of GOP "job creator" problems faster!

I give the black guy credit for being the best gun salesman in history, and creating more part time jobs in history.

Feb 7, 2014


The Spectacular Myth of Obama's Part-Time America—in 5 Graphs
A falsifiable claim, falsified

The first thing you would expect to see from a Part-Time America is that the number of part-time jobs added would rival the number of full-time jobs added. But in the last year, new full-time jobs outnumbered part-time jobs by 1.8 million to 8,000. For every new part-time job, we're creating 225 full-time positions.

Okay, but one year is just one year! Let's keep looking.

The second thing we should expect to see from Part-Time America is a growing number of part-time jobs since Obama came into office and started passing laws. Here's a graph showing the number of people working part-time for economic reasons since March 2010, the month Obamacare was passed.






Huh, nothing there. In fact, the number part-time workers has fallen in the last four years.

Okay, well, raw numbers can be deceiving. After all, the labor force has declined since 2010. So let's graph these part-time workers as a share of the labor force. Surely that will show a rising line...




. dang it.

Maybe I'm being unfair. Three years of data just isn't much context. So let's draw back the lens and look at part-time workers as a share of the labor force since, say, 1980...

... and then compare it to the unemployment rate (in RED) since 1980.

View attachment 128586
View attachment 128585


Okay, now here's something: Part-time work, as a share of the economy, is historically high. But these graphs don't make the point that Obama, or long-term global economic trends, are driving the rise in non-voluntary part-time work. Instead, the rise of part-time work seem to be 100 percent the creation of economic downturns. That's why it seems to be holding hands with unemployment, riding the roller coaster up during recessions, and down during recoveries.

But what about part-time employment for non-economic reasons? The story here is short and sweet: There is no story here...

The Spectacular Myth of Obama's Part-Time America—in 5 Graphs


WHAT ELSE DO YOU HAVE CUPCAKE?

Lol, your graph shows more jobs created under Carter than Regan. Lol

No it doesn't show that so stop laughing dumbass, you just proved that you don't know how to read a graph.

Lol, on your ignorance, read the last graph.

Stop being a moron, it shows jobs per year.

There were more jobs created under Reagan but at a slower avg rate than under Carter who was in office only 4 years.

 

[Wyatt earp]

Lol, you snowflakes always find new ways to amaze me.

And you cupcakes always amaze me you can't accept reality and ALWAYS blame others when your policies fail.


8 years of Dubya/GOP "job creator" policies were derailed by Barney Frank, minority member of the GOP majority House where simple majority ruled? LMAOROG

I never blamed the black guy for the housing bubble, dumbass.

Nope, you just tried to blame the gay guy who had zero power in the GOP majority House. You blamed the black guy for not fixing 8 years of GOP "job creator" problems faster!

I give the black guy credit for being the best gun salesman in history, and creating more part time jobs in history.

Feb 7, 2014


The Spectacular Myth of Obama's Part-Time America—in 5 Graphs
A falsifiable claim, falsified

The first thing you would expect to see from a Part-Time America is that the number of part-time jobs added would rival the number of full-time jobs added. But in the last year, new full-time jobs outnumbered part-time jobs by 1.8 million to 8,000. For every new part-time job, we're creating 225 full-time positions.

Okay, but one year is just one year! Let's keep looking.

The second thing we should expect to see from Part-Time America is a growing number of part-time jobs since Obama came into office and started passing laws. Here's a graph showing the number of people working part-time for economic reasons since March 2010, the month Obamacare was passed.






Huh, nothing there. In fact, the number part-time workers has fallen in the last four years.

Okay, well, raw numbers can be deceiving. After all, the labor force has declined since 2010. So let's graph these part-time workers as a share of the labor force. Surely that will show a rising line...




. dang it.

Maybe I'm being unfair. Three years of data just isn't much context. So let's draw back the lens and look at part-time workers as a share of the labor force since, say, 1980...

... and then compare it to the unemployment rate (in RED) since 1980.

View attachment 128586
View attachment 128585


Okay, now here's something: Part-time work, as a share of the economy, is historically high. But these graphs don't make the point that Obama, or long-term global economic trends, are driving the rise in non-voluntary part-time work. Instead, the rise of part-time work seem to be 100 percent the creation of economic downturns. That's why it seems to be holding hands with unemployment, riding the roller coaster up during recessions, and down during recoveries.

But what about part-time employment for non-economic reasons? The story here is short and sweet: There is no story here...

The Spectacular Myth of Obama's Part-Time America—in 5 Graphs


WHAT ELSE DO YOU HAVE CUPCAKE?

So numb nuts if Obama didn't create partime jobs and temporary jobs ..


Why are you crying that Trump wants to cut food stamps?

.