6 Dem congressmen/woman call for INSURRECTION against the trump administration

[Billiejeens]

Go back to Tacoville.

Damn
You're scary stupid

 

[mac allen]

Damn
You're scary stupid

Isn't it past your bedtime, pops?

 

[Billiejeens]

Isn't it past your bedtime, pops?

Scary stupid

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Scary stupid

He just graduated to my ignore list.

 

[TemplarKormac]

The OP literally has the truth social post in it. He isn't calling for putting political opponents to death there?

Do you think the military can't disobey orders that are unlawful, as a matter of law?

You ought to do your research on liberal media outlets like Daily KOS. They are on the level of Media Matters.

It doesn't matter that the Truth Social post was on it. They could have cited Jesus himself, and they would still have no credibility. They butcher and mangle the news to fit a leftist narrative, so no. Trump is under the mistaken assumption that treason law applies here (it doesn't), but the fact remains that these people need to be punished for trying to encourage our military to essentially (to use a naval term) mutiny against their CinC..

 

[Billiejeens]

He just graduated to my ignore list.

Thats lazy behavior

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Thats lazy behavior

No, I can't stand stupid in large doses. if he says something really stupid, you can quote him and I'll look at it!

 

[TemplarKormac]

It literally takes 5 seconds to go to his "Truth Social" site and verify if it's true. I just did (AGAIN...it seems I'm always having to verify his insane, inflammatory or embarassingly juvenile posts) and sure enough, it's there.

You can cite a fact directly, but deliberately misconstrue its context. It happens all the time, buttercup. It's all about how you frame cited facts. Context, narrative, talking points. In a nutshell, it's how you spin it.

It doesn't take me 5 seconds to know, because it took me 15 years to understand the practice. The mendaciousness it takes for a rag like that to blow it out of context is mind-blowing. The title speaks for itself.

 

[Billiejeens]

The simple fact is, Congressmen and Women telling people to NOT BREAK THE LAW is not "seditious behavior", and Trump's behavior is, quite frankly, ridiculous (again, and again, and again)

Thats not what they were doing.

 

[schmidlap]

Why would any American argue that illegal orders should be obeyed, and anyone who claims otherwise should be executed?

That's not just unpatriotic; it's deranged.

 

[Billiejeens]

Why would any American argue that illegal orders should be obeyed, and anyone who claims otherwise should be executed?

That's not just unpatriotic; it's deranged.

You really have to be the stupidest father ****** on the planet.

Seriously.

 

[dudmuck]

Why would any American argue that illegal orders should be obeyed, and anyone who claims otherwise should be executed?

That's not just unpatriotic; it's deranged.

 

[TemplarKormac]

Not what he said. Nowhere near in fact. You know that and can't handle the truth. You are simply a lying sack of shit because that's what you wanted him to say, and don't have the honesty to admit it. Your TDS us rotting your brain. seek help!

In fact the BBC is in a world of hurt because they edited his comments out of context. And what do we have here? Leftists and self-proclaimed moderates doing the same thing.

 

[candycorn]

Insane, lying thread title.

There's no downside or penalty for such things on USMB. So people keep doing it.

 

[TemplarKormac]

Now you can describe for us how refusing an illegal order represents lack of respect for the chain of command.

See you in never, because that's the dumbest shit anyone has ever heard.

Ah, but I have a life to live, mon ami! I cannot answer your childish whims when it fancies you.

Now, you need to tell us all what orders he has already given which are illegal. And no, "it's illegal because I hate Trump and it eviscerates my liberal proclivities!" doesn't count.

 

[TemplarKormac]

Jay Jones, who was elected DA of Virginia.

Bingo!

 

[TemplarKormac]

Who decides whether or not the order is unlawful?

The UCMJ, and Federal Statute, if not the Courts.

 

[TemplarKormac]

OK, then tap out of the discussion.

While you're at it, you could look at the illegal orders being issued to ICE, and what is happening because of them. A somewhat analogous example.

ICE? That is apples to oranges. Don't move the goalposts.

 

[BackAgain]

Yes, he did.

SEDITIOUS BEHAVIOR, punishable by DEATH!

https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/115582703277798715

Maybe take your own advice.

I've said it before. It's mind-blowing to me that people would lie about something so easily refuted.

I'll give you a pro-tip. The less lies you tell, the fewer you have to remember. I know it's a novel concept, but you can try.

Again: there was no statement about threatening the 6 Democrap vermin.

Why lie so much? We can all read and see your blatant, glaring dishonesty.

 

[schmidlap]

If anyone needs clarification, no, saying that illegal orders should not be followed is not "seditious behavior, punishable by death."

​