drsmith1072
Senior Member
- Jul 30, 2009
- 6,031
- 250
- 48
To answer your question I would have to assume your opinion is correct... Your opinion is bullshit, so I don't... It's funny as hell that you're trying to pass it off as fact though....
Actually no but thanks for taking the cowards way out.
Actually, yes... I cannot be blamed for your inability to distinguish fact from opinion...
Another day, another Dr. Smith fail...
What substance do you want me to provide to substantiate the fact that he represents the entire state?
More Dr. Smith fail...
Your statement is a fucking OPINION, not a FACT... I do not share your OPINION...and you can't even defend your own claim. Instead you try to hide behind my argument that he does not based on how he and his rhetoirc divided public sector workers from private sector workers.
So why can't you provide anything of substance to support or defend your own claim??
Do you have anything real or are you going to continue running away from your own words with your tail between your legs?
Your "claim" is an OPINION... Why can't you recognize this?
I have to conclude you are either mentally deficient, a useless leftist hack, or (more likely) both....
Have a fucked up day....
Yeah keep running away from your own arguments.
I even quoted you and how you tried to claim he was representing the entire state and not just a minority and yet you cannot provide anything to substantiate the claim that he is represetning the whole of the state. based on how the poll shows a statistical tie or the recall it would seem that almost half the state disagrees with your OPINIONS.
Once again you egnage in "posting opinions without facts". LOL
In response to seawytch claiming walker has been devisive and not listening to people you claimed he "represented the entire state not just the minority who belong to unions" and I asked you to substantiate that claim However, you are still hiding behind the fact that i provided a counter argument within my question explaining how he has been devisive.
So if it helps you keep up ignore my counter argument about how he has been devisive and not representing the "entire state" and prove your argument that he hasn't been devisive and represents the entire state.
You caught up yet??