Compilation: Evidence of Election Fraud Against Trump Voters, With Sources

OP
munkle

munkle

Platinum Member
Joined
Dec 18, 2012
Messages
937
Reaction score
1,088
Points
910
Bitchy little comments like "get over it" is all you Biden girly-men got, never a rebuttal to real evidence, when suddenly you go blind and deaf.
 

LA RAM FAN

Platinum Member
Joined
Mar 1, 2008
Messages
37,051
Reaction score
6,435
Points
1,130
Questions class?



Compilation: Evidence of Election Fraud Against Trump Voters, With Sources

It is almost too much to keep track of. The following is a running partial list of evidence, with notes. As usual in news, early reports are the most accurate before the spin machine gets hold of it and misrepresents the story. We recommend that when you do your own research to confirm these, use less-censored DuckDuckGo as a search engine.





  • The Parallel Vote Dumps 100% for Biden in Two Critical Swing States, at Around the Same Time.
Although a 130,000-plus vote jump 100% vote jump for Biden which puts him in the lead might be explained away once, what are the chances of it happening twice, in two critical swing states, at about the same time frame very early in the morning? Although major media have struggled with “debunks” of two charts confirmed as authentic by FiveThirtyEight, none are remotely adequate. The charts are below.

Click for larger image

In the charts, sudden vote dumps are seen at between 5 and 6:30 in the morning that are all for Biden, something that never happens even once never mind twice. The Michigan jump has been explained as a “clerical error” in which a zero was mistakenly added to a county total then subtracted. But the subtraction is never seen, even in an AP graph purporting to be a more accurate representation of the counting (below.) The AP graph for Michigan merely smooths out the rate at which votes are added to Biden’s total.

Click for larger image

source: Detroit Free Press

However, the “debunk” for the Wisconsin jump is even less convincing. The “debunk” site Snopes, which is on-hand anytime there is a challenge to the official narrative put forth in the major media, can only say that Trump must have been that unpopular among people who send in absentee ballots, even though they were being counted since 7a.m. election day with no 140,000 vote steaks for all Biden.

As if that were already not enough to arouse suspicion, the election-watcher who was tweeting out the FiveThirtyEight charts showing the jumps suddenly had his Twitter account banned (below.)


source

Status: No adequate explanation for the mathematical impossibility of this happening twice, at same time, in two adjacent critical swing states.

the biden lovers can only fling shit in defeat like the monkey trolls they are.:auiqs.jpg:
 

New Topics

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top