5.7% of Clinton Foundation Actually went to Charity

[rightwinger]

"rightwinger"" is one of the government kleptocrats who steals the 94 cents so that only 6 cents on the dollar actually does anything other than go straight into the pockets of Democrats...

Actually, I am a world renowned paid message board poster

 

[Flash]

The Clinton get rich quick scheme of setting up a scam charity to launder the money they got from selling government influence to foreign countries and corporations was a pretty sweet deal.. Actually less than 6% overhead.

Tony Soprano would be green with envy.

 

[longknife]

I wonder where the rest of the donations went. Well, here's the story.



Just 5.7 percent of the Clinton Foundation’s massive 2014 budget actually went to charitable grants, according to the tax-exempt organization’s IRS filings. The rest went to salaries and employee benefits, fundraising and “other expenses.”



The Clinton Foundation spent a hair under $91.3 million in 2014, the organization’s IRS filings show. But less than $5.2 million of that went to charitable grants.



That number pales in comparison to the $34.8 million the foundation spent on salaries, compensation and employee benefits.



Another $50.4 million was marked as “other expenses,” while the remaining almost $851K was marked as “professional fundraising expenses.”



Read more: Just 5.7 Percent Of Clinton Foundation Budget Actually Went To Charitable Grants

 

[PurpleOwl]

whats worse the fact that trump supporters really believe that all major news outlets are conspiring together to cover up some kind of crime this charity did, or that they know there is nothing wrong with this charity, yet their still screaming this lie, just because?

 

[edthecynic]

I wonder where the rest of the donations went. Well, here's the story.



Just 5.7 percent of the Clinton Foundation’s massive 2014 budget actually went to charitable grants, according to the tax-exempt organization’s IRS filings. The rest went to salaries and employee benefits, fundraising and “other expenses.”



The Clinton Foundation spent a hair under $91.3 million in 2014, the organization’s IRS filings show. But less than $5.2 million of that went to charitable grants.



That number pales in comparison to the $34.8 million the foundation spent on salaries, compensation and employee benefits.



Another $50.4 million was marked as “other expenses,” while the remaining almost $851K was marked as “professional fundraising expenses.”



Read more: Just 5.7 Percent Of Clinton Foundation Budget Actually Went To Charitable Grants

Jesus! How many time does the DailyLiar have to be caught lying before you stupid lying gossips stop mindlessly parroting their lies?????

They have an A rating with 88% of their money spent on charity programs.

Bill, Hillary & Chelsea Clinton Foundation | Charity Ratings | America's Most Independent Charity Watchdog | CharityWatch

 

[Jroc]

I wonder where the rest of the donations went. Well, here's the story.



Just 5.7 percent of the Clinton Foundation’s massive 2014 budget actually went to charitable grants, according to the tax-exempt organization’s IRS filings. The rest went to salaries and employee benefits, fundraising and “other expenses.”



The Clinton Foundation spent a hair under $91.3 million in 2014, the organization’s IRS filings show. But less than $5.2 million of that went to charitable grants.



That number pales in comparison to the $34.8 million the foundation spent on salaries, compensation and employee benefits.



Another $50.4 million was marked as “other expenses,” while the remaining almost $851K was marked as “professional fundraising expenses.”



Read more: Just 5.7 Percent Of Clinton Foundation Budget Actually Went To Charitable Grants

Jesus! How many time does the DailyLiar have to be caught lying before you stupid lying gossips stop mindlessly parroting their lies?????

They have an A rating with 88% of their money spent on charity programs.

Bill, Hillary & Chelsea Clinton Foundation | Charity Ratings | America's Most Independent Charity Watchdog | CharityWatch

Charity watchdog: Clinton Foundation a ‘slush fund’

The Clinton Foundation’s finances are so messy that the nation’s most influential charity watchdog put it on its “watch list” of problematic nonprofits last month.

The Clinton family’s mega-charity took in more than $140 million in grants and pledges in 2013 but spent just $9 million on direct aid.

The group spent the bulk of its windfall on administration, travel, and salaries and bonuses, with the fattest payouts going to family friends.

Charity watchdog: Clinton Foundation a ‘slush fund’ | New York Post

 

[tyroneweaver]

I'm surprised it's as high as 5.7 pct.

 

[Dragonlady]

whats worse the fact that trump supporters really believe that all major news outlets are conspiring together to cover up some kind of crime this charity did, or that they know there is nothing wrong with this charity, yet their still screaming this lie, just because?

The latest Benghazi investigation was a bust, that found nothing new, and didn't blame Clinton. The email investigation (Republicans' "gotcha" moment), went nowhere. Republicans are ever resourceful, especially when it comes to Clinton witch hunts. They had Judicial Watch (funded by the Koch Bros.) file a complaint of "pay for play" against the Clinton Foundation with the IRS. The IRS is required by law to investigate every complaint received, so the IRS will now investigate the bribery allegations filed by Judicial Watch - at taxpayers' expense of course.

These people have no shame.

 

[Jroc]

The Daily Caller article is misrepresenting the work of the Foundation.

The Clinton Foundations focus is not to give money away, but to use it to run programs. Half of the AIDS drugs given to adults in Africa, are distributed by the Clinton Foundation, and 75% of the AIDS drugs given to children. In many African nations, large scale NGO's which hand money, medicine, food and supplies over to local governments, find their charity is sold on the black market, to benefit the local freedom fighters.

The Clinton Foundation run programs to educate women and girls, and they give micro loans to start small home based businesses.

Charitable Watch gives the Clinton Foundation an A rating, and the IRS says that 88% of their donations are used for programs.

Bill, Hillary & Chelsea Clinton Foundation | Charity Ratings | America's Most Independent Charity Watchdog | CharityWatch

Charity watchdog: Clinton Foundation a ‘slush fund’

The Clinton Foundation’s finances are so messy that the nation’s most influential charity watchdog put it on its “watch list” of problematic nonprofits last month.

The Clinton family’s mega-charity took in more than $140 million in grants and pledges in 2013 but spent just $9 million on direct aid.

The group spent the bulk of its windfall on administration, travel, and salaries and bonuses, with the fattest payouts going to family friends.

Charity watchdog: Clinton Foundation a ‘slush fund’ | New York Post

 

[Jroc]

whats worse the fact that trump supporters really believe that all major news outlets are conspiring together to cover up some kind of crime this charity did, or that they know there is nothing wrong with this charity, yet their still screaming this lie, just because?

The latest Benghazi investigation was a bust, that found nothing new, and didn't blame Clinton. The email investigation (Republicans' "gotcha" moment), went nowhere. Republicans are ever resourceful, especially when it comes to Clinton witch hunts. They had Judicial Watch (funded by the Koch Bros.) file a complaint of "pay for play" against the Clinton Foundation with the IRS. The IRS is required by law to investigate every complaint received, so the IRS will now investigate the bribery allegations filed by Judicial Watch - at taxpayers' expense of course.

These people have no shame.

Hillary lied to the faces of the families of dead Americans.."No shame" indeed

 

[Vandalshandle]

The Daily Caller article is misrepresenting the work of the Foundation.

The Clinton Foundations focus is not to give money away, but to use it to run programs. Half of the AIDS drugs given to adults in Africa, are distributed by the Clinton Foundation, and 75% of the AIDS drugs given to children. In many African nations, large scale NGO's which hand money, medicine, food and supplies over to local governments, find their charity is sold on the black market, to benefit the local freedom fighters.

The Clinton Foundation run programs to educate women and girls, and they give micro loans to start small home based businesses.

Charitable Watch gives the Clinton Foundation an A rating, and the IRS says that 88% of their donations are used for programs.

Bill, Hillary & Chelsea Clinton Foundation | Charity Ratings | America's Most Independent Charity Watchdog | CharityWatch

Charity watchdog: Clinton Foundation a ‘slush fund’

The Clinton Foundation’s finances are so messy that the nation’s most influential charity watchdog put it on its “watch list” of problematic nonprofits last month.

The Clinton family’s mega-charity took in more than $140 million in grants and pledges in 2013 but spent just $9 million on direct aid.

The group spent the bulk of its windfall on administration, travel, and salaries and bonuses, with the fattest payouts going to family friends.

Charity watchdog: Clinton Foundation a ‘slush fund’ | New York Post

Well, If the New York Post says it, it MUST be true! What does it say about Jade Helm?

 

[Picaro]

Since American laws now allow foreigners to donate to political parties and politicians as long as they have an American corporation or company, it's obvious the overseas 'donors' aren't 'donating' to the Clintons for any other reason than influence peddling and bribery.

 

[edthecynic]

I wonder where the rest of the donations went. Well, here's the story.



Just 5.7 percent of the Clinton Foundation’s massive 2014 budget actually went to charitable grants, according to the tax-exempt organization’s IRS filings. The rest went to salaries and employee benefits, fundraising and “other expenses.”



The Clinton Foundation spent a hair under $91.3 million in 2014, the organization’s IRS filings show. But less than $5.2 million of that went to charitable grants.



That number pales in comparison to the $34.8 million the foundation spent on salaries, compensation and employee benefits.



Another $50.4 million was marked as “other expenses,” while the remaining almost $851K was marked as “professional fundraising expenses.”



Read more: Just 5.7 Percent Of Clinton Foundation Budget Actually Went To Charitable Grants

Jesus! How many time does the DailyLiar have to be caught lying before you stupid lying gossips stop mindlessly parroting their lies?????

They have an A rating with 88% of their money spent on charity programs.

Bill, Hillary & Chelsea Clinton Foundation | Charity Ratings | America's Most Independent Charity Watchdog | CharityWatch

Charity watchdog: Clinton Foundation a ‘slush fund’

The Clinton Foundation’s finances are so messy that the nation’s most influential charity watchdog put it on its “watch list” of problematic nonprofits last month.

The Clinton family’s mega-charity took in more than $140 million in grants and pledges in 2013 but spent just $9 million on direct aid.

The group spent the bulk of its windfall on administration, travel, and salaries and bonuses, with the fattest payouts going to family friends.

Charity watchdog: Clinton Foundation a ‘slush fund’ | New York Post

So typical of the America-hating lying scum Right, after exposing the lies from the first lying source with a link to a top charity watchdog that gave it an A rating using 88% of the money it takes in for charity, the pathological lying scum cite another known lying scum Right-wing rag with another lie. The lying scum NY Post cites Charity Navigator but doesn't link to the Clinton Foundation's rating, an obvious red flag!!! Why you ask? Because it has a 94.74 rating out of 100, that's why!!!!!

Charity Navigator - Rating for The Clinton Foundation

Overall Score & Rating 94.74 (out of 100)

Program Expenses (Percent of the charity’s total expenses spent on the programs
and services it delivers) 86.9%
Administrative Expenses 8.7%
Fundraising Expenses 4.2%
Fundraising Efficiency $0.03
Working Capital Ratio (years) 1.17
Program Expenses Growth 17.3%
Liabilities to Assets 15.3%

 

[edthecynic]

I'm surprised it's as high as 5.7 pct.

Another stupid gossip parroting lies because they are too lazy to check any lying scum Right-wing rumor mill!!!!

 

[Dragonlady]

Not even 10%

Foundation is not on the up and up...............

but honesty is not clinton strong suit

View attachment 89881

It's not your strong suit either. The original article linked to is a year and a half old. At that time, Charity Navigator said it couldn't rate the CF without more information because it has an unusual model, which they needed to look at more closely. Most family foundations raise money and give it to worthy causes. The CF hires staff and does the work itself.

Since the original article was published, Charity Navigator has given the CF a 4 star rating - their highest rating, and lauded them of the efficiency of their fundraising and the 89% dispersal of donations through their work.

Charity Watch also gives the Foundation an A rating. The IRS has confirmed that 89% of funds are returned to programs. African nation's have praised the work of the Foundation which has saved thousands of lives by providing AIDS drugs to 50% of adults with AIDS in Africa and 75% of children.

The Clintons donate nearly all of their public speaking fees to the Foundation.

Try looking at the Trump Foundation. No donations to speak by the Donald since 2008. $200 K of Foundation funds used to buy a portrait of Trump. More went on sports memorabilia for his office.

And it was fined by the IRS for make illegal contributions *cough*bribes to the AG in Florida, who then decided NOT to take Trump to court for fraud.

But keep believing Hillary is the corrupt one.

 

[AntonToo]

Not surprised in the least.

Because you are an uncritical sucker for any anti-Hillary bullshit.

Hillary's foundation is not a pass-through middle man the way Trump's is, who simply puts his name on other people's money he re-distributes (when not using it to buy paintings of The Donald) and himself personally contributes barely anything at all.

Foundation does ACTUAL WORK with that money for specific charitable goals.

 

[aris2chat]

Not even 10%

Foundation is not on the up and up...............

but honesty is not clinton strong suit

View attachment 89881

It's not your strong suit either. The original article linked to is a year and a half old. At that time, Charity Navigator said it couldn't rate the CF without more information because it has an unusual model, which they needed to look at more closely. Most family foundations raise money and give it to worthy causes. The CF hires staff and does the work itself.

Since the original article was published, Charity Navigator has given the CF a 4 star rating - their highest rating, and lauded them of the efficiency of their fundraising and the 89% dispersal of donations through their work.

Charity Watch also gives the Foundation an A rating. The IRS has confirmed that 89% of funds are returned to programs. African nation's have praised the work of the Foundation which has saved thousands of lives by providing AIDS drugs to 50% of adults with AIDS in Africa and 75% of children.

The Clintons donate nearly all of their public speaking fees to the Foundation.

Try looking at the Trump Foundation. No donations to speak by the Donald since 2008. $200 K of Foundation funds used to buy a portrait of Trump. More went on sports memorabilia for his office.

And it was fined by the IRS for make illegal contributions *cough*bribes to the AG in Florida, who then decided NOT to take Trump to court for fraud.

But keep believing Hillary is the corrupt one.

 

[edthecynic]

Just 5.7 Percent Of Clinton Foundation Budget Actually Went To Charity

Guess the rest is called OSF "Our Slush Fund."

So the donors did not get that soft, good feeling for helping others around the globe. Just what did they get?

As many times as the Daily Liar has been caught lying, how can anyone be STUPID enough to still believe the premeditated liars?????

The two foremost charity watchdog organizations Charity Navigator (97.47 out of 100 overall rating, and 97.50 out of 100 financial rating) and Charity Watch (A rating and 88% of income going to charity operations) expose this typical Right-wing lie.

Charity Navigator - Rating for The Clinton Foundation

Bill, Hillary & Chelsea Clinton Foundation | Charity Ratings | America's Most Independent Charity Watchdog | CharityWatch

 

[aris2chat]

Just 5.7 Percent Of Clinton Foundation Budget Actually Went To Charity

Guess the rest is called OSF "Our Slush Fund."

So the donors did not get that soft, good feeling for helping others around the globe. Just what did they get?

As many times as the Daily Liar has been caught lying, how can anyone be STUPID enough to still believe the premeditated liars?????

The two foremost charity watchdog organizations Charity Navigator (97.47 out of 100 overall rating, and 97.50 out of 100 financial rating) and Charity Watch (A rating and 88% of income going to charity operations) expose this typical Right-wing lie.

Charity Navigator - Rating for The Clinton Foundation

Bill, Hillary & Chelsea Clinton Foundation | Charity Ratings | America's Most Independent Charity Watchdog | CharityWatch

Charity Navigator Reports are based largely on self-reported data. Clinton Foundation make themselves look like gold.........then so does Charity Navigator

 

[aris2chat]

frontpagemag.com
— 18 min ago

Clinton Foundation Boss: Bribes Just Get You "Courtesy Appointments

Every Clintonworld statement contains within itself a fallback position, an excuse to retreat to once the previous lie has been disproven. Clintonworld will deny that Clinton Foundation donors got special favors before claiming that the special favors they get were meaningless. They were mere "courtesies". There was pay for play... but nothing was really playing…