30-Plus Signs That The Climate Scam Is Collapsing

More dumb fuckery from a dumb liar. September temperature was above all but the warmest years in spite of the ENSO going into a La Nina.
View attachment 1171054

Yawn no one is disputing a warming trend, what YOU didn't notice that the chart doesn't tell us what causes the warming that is why your post was dead on arrival.

That is how stupid you have become over the years of being brainwashed by leftist ideologists.

Still waiting for your trembling attempt to address the content of post one.

I predict there will be no rebutting cogent replies to the CONTENT of the article because climate change cultists are profound science illiterates who have been brainwashed to be dog eared yellow bellied knuckle dragging droolers following leftist enemies of the Republic who are making a profit in the scamming of their swirling eyed followers who don't even notice.

Still waiting

waiting,
waiting,
waiting for your courage to be honest here.
 
The cheapest electric rates in the country comes from 100% green carbon-neutral renewable energy sources ... a complete success ... rates here in the Pacific Northwest to smelt aluminum with ...

"Green" starts with conservation ... just using less energy ... that's the failure point ... all these new power plants and we'll just use more energy ... that won't save the solar system ...

You believed the "dire predictions"? ... you know, that's only happened once in all of human history ... the odds of any being true are pretty remote ... especially since the math has always refuted all claims of climate catastrophe ...

There is absolutely no need to use less energy as carbon is not, in any way, a pollutant.

Meanwhile the greening of the planet is a wonderful thing. Plants, trees, and crops are thriving.

Unfortunately, what is also thriving is the ecoscam industry. Trillions of dollars globally are being siphoned, laundered, and funneled into the bank accounts of elites and their NGO front organizations.

It's really disgusting. The well publicized $2 billion that dropped into Stacy Abrams NGO account when Biden left office is an ice cube off of a much larger glacier.
 
Yawn no one is disputing a warming trend


This is your problem, you play right into their hands.

You accept FUDGE as real. It is NOT REAL. There is NO WARMING, there never was any since CO2 FRAUD started.

Highly correlated satellite and balloon data = NO WARMING in atmosphere
Surface air pressure = NO WARMING in atmosphere



NOBODY WITH AN IQ OVER 5 AND A MOLECULE OF PATRIOTISM TO AMERICA ACCEPTS THE COMPLETELY FUDGED "WARMING" AS REAL.

NOW EITHER BACK IT UP OR SHUT THE **** UP. YOU ARE ANOTHER FAUX SKEPTIC TRYING TO KEEP THE CO2 ONGOING.

WHAT ACTUAL DATA IS THERE SHOWING WARMING?????
 
This is your problem, you play right into their hands.

You accept FUDGE as real. It is NOT REAL. There is NO WARMING, there never was any since CO2 FRAUD started.

Highly correlated satellite and balloon data = NO WARMING in atmosphere
Surface air pressure = NO WARMING in atmosphere



NOBODY WITH AN IQ OVER 5 AND A MOLECULE OF PATRIOTISM TO AMERICA ACCEPTS THE COMPLETELY FUDGED "WARMING" AS REAL.

NOW EITHER BACK IT UP OR SHUT THE **** UP. YOU ARE ANOTHER FAUX SKEPTIC TRYING TO KEEP THE CO2 ONGOING.

WHAT ACTUAL DATA IS THERE SHOWING WARMING?????
There's a good video of the lead meteorologist for the state of North Dakota - he talks about how the Feds replaced the devices at the Fargo Airport, which is the "official" temperature reading for the area.

Never mind how ridiculous it is to make Airport readings the official numbers.

He reported that the new equipment was giving readings 2-3 degrees F higher than his 30 year observations.

When he brought this to the attention of Federal oversight they said the readings were within what they deemed to be acceptable.

Now of course, warming nuts can cite that data as "proof" - never acknowledging that the temperature itself never changed, it was biased manipulation of the data by ideologues within our government that changed it.

And so it goes.
 
There's a good video of the lead meteorologist for the state of North Dakota - he talks about how the Feds replaced the devices at the Fargo Airport, which is the "official" temperature reading for the area.

Never mind how ridiculous it is to make Airport readings the official numbers.

He reported that the new equipment was giving readings 2-3 degrees F higher than his 30 year observations.

When he brought this to the attention of Federal oversight they said the readings were within what they deemed to be acceptable.

Now of course, warming nuts can cite that data as "proof" - never acknowledging that the temperature itself never changed, it was biased manipulation of the data by ideologues within our government that changed it.

And so it goes.


It is ALL that way. Originally, after Global Cooling fell apart in the early 1980s, Mann Hansen and Gore, all three of whom worked with Global Cooling, figured out Urban Heat Island Effect would continue as urban areas grew. Hence, the Global "warming" scam was always about defining "Earth temperatures" as just Urban Heat Island Effect (all data points from the surface of growing urban areas) and using that to blame an entity, fossil fuels, with deep pockets. The truth all along is that the only actual warming in the data was Urban Heat Island Effect and the rest of the temp data has always and still reads precisely


NO WARMING in the ATMOSPHERE
NO WARMING in the OCEANS
NO ONGOING NET ICE MELT
NO BREAKOUT in CANE ACTIVITY
NO OCEAN RISE
NO RISE in Surface Air Pressure
 
There is absolutely no need to use less energy as carbon is not, in any way, a pollutant.

Meanwhile the greening of the planet is a wonderful thing. Plants, trees, and crops are thriving.

Unfortunately, what is also thriving is the ecoscam industry. Trillions of dollars globally are being siphoned, laundered, and funneled into the bank accounts of elites and their NGO front organizations.

It's really disgusting. The well publicized $2 billion that dropped into Stacy Abrams NGO account when Biden left office is an ice cube off of a much larger glacier.

Sulfuric acid and nitrous oxide are very dangerous pollutants ...

Yesterday I say a 10-wheeler diesel dump truck puking black smoke everywhere ... that's carbon ... but not pollution? ... I can see why you're not an "elite" ... let me guess, you fill out the Schedule C to pay your taxes ... thank you for paying my fair share of the tax load ...
 
Sulfuric acid and nitrous oxide are very dangerous pollutants ...

Yesterday I say a 10-wheeler diesel dump truck puking black smoke everywhere ... that's carbon ... but not pollution? ... I can see why you're not an "elite" ... let me guess, you fill out the Schedule C to pay your taxes ... thank you for paying my fair share of the tax load ...



Then the "climate scientists" should make the case for banning diesel because it is dirty, not because of "warming" that does not exist...
 
Sulfuric acid and nitrous oxide are very dangerous pollutants ...

Yesterday I say a 10-wheeler diesel dump truck puking black smoke everywhere ... that's carbon ... but not pollution? ... I can see why you're not an "elite" ... let me guess, you fill out the Schedule C to pay your taxes ... thank you for paying my fair share of the tax load ...
You don't pay taxes??

As for emissions, all diesel engines built after 2009 have DEF systems that filter out Sulphur and other pollutants. Which is appropriate.

Carbon Dioxide emissions, as stated, are not pollution.

Trucks built prior to 2009 are exempt from DEF requirements. As such, they are coveted by truckers - especially older Peterbilt 379's.
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: EMH
You don't pay taxes??

I did some research on how The Rich don't pay ... and adjusted my own accounting to take advantage ... look for where the instructions says "if line 56 is below $17,000,000, enter $0 on line 57 and on line 62 of Form 1040 - Tax Liability" ... now just channel all your income into line 56 ...

As for emissions, all diesel engines built after 2009 have DEF systems that filter out Sulphur and other pollutants. Which is appropriate.

Carbon Dioxide emissions, as stated, are not pollution.

Trucks built prior to 2009 are exempt from DEF requirements. As such, they are coveted by truckers - especially older Peterbilt 379's.

Well, I'm glad I poked you with that particular stick ... good information ... yeah, it was an old 10-wheeler puking black smoke ...

I never said carbon dioxide was a pollutant ... I said burning fossil fuels produces pollutants ... in fact, I've declared the fossil fuels themselves as pollution ... that oily sheen all over the fish we just caught ... ewwww ...

Hell's bells ... carbon dioxide is the only safe product of the oil industry ... completely harmless to everything else in the entire universe ... except for helium ...

There is absolutely no need to use less energy as carbon is not, in any way, a pollutant.

There are better reasons to curtail our energy use ...
 
Scary Graph Anthropogenic Component.webp
 
I've been in the skeptical rather than the denier group of this debate aka scam for a very long time now.

For the vast majority, that means you are a denier. Either you drink the Kool-Aid and agree with them 100%, or you are a denier.
 
Back in post #17 I wrote this,

Back in Post #1 on April 28, I made this easy prediction that has been on the ball so far as the predicable warmest/alarmist scream and drool with spittle don't bother with the rebuttal of the article I posted as they are too busy showing their low IQ and plenty of science illiteracy.

Still no rebuttal to the CONTENT of post #1, must be above your IQ grade to handle after all as the article defeated you handily warmest/alarmists.

:cool:
 
Back
Top Bottom