Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
We can also look at cities with good gun control.Whats going to happen if we got rid of the guns? Use trucks more?
You reactionaries are going to want to ban them as well.
Well we can look at countries with good gun control to answer that question. Looks like just less mass killings.
Cities don't have walls. Easy to get guns in and out obviously. Funny how you jump around. Fact is mass murder is unique to the US. Places with good gun control don't have a mass murder problem, and yes they have trucks.
Mass murder is unique to the USA?
Yes happens here weekly. Everywhere else it happens every few years and usually involves international terrorists.
It's not about you; it's about the type of gun and the damage it can do. To me it is a form of risk reduction. Nothing is perfect and I'm not saying you did anything wrong.Outlawing semiautomatic weapons isn't the only answer, you're right. Absolutely. But getting those goddamned things out of every American closet would really help. This latest nutcase also bought his guns legally, and owned them even though he was arrested earlier this year for assault with a deadly weapon, and it was against his wife. A neighbor called and told the cops the shooter was acting pretty nutty prior to the shooting and firing hundreds of rounds in his backyard. Ignore, ignore, ignore. Then BANG. So you're right. There's more to it than just doing a buy back of semi's.Exactly MINDLESS. Thanks!You're right I am reacting to three mindless mass murders in two months. If that's wrong, I'm in the wrong universe.My point was, people will kill however they can. I do, indeed, have a point.
But you are a reactionary so...
Why do you want to take my weapons? I did nothing wrong.
I shoot hundreds of rounds when I go shooting with my wife and daughters .
The last three whack jobs that went on a shooting spree used semi automatic rifles. The last two wore tactical gear.
Background checks?
If all these nutsos want them then I suggest that the idea some one wants them is a sign they are mentally off.
The more they assault type rifles want, the more whacked they are. Probably at least at by the square of that number.
Have two, 4 times as as crazy. Have 4, 16 times as crazy.
Next, add another factor of ten for every piece of "tactical gear" they own.
Really, you are way off the deep end if you have to dress up in this tactical gear.
Real sane gun owners wouldn't own an assault type rifle. Not good for hunting, not good for self defense. They would be safe.
Just those crazy fucks running around in tactical gear toting their AR-15, round them up & send them to the psycho ward.
This last asshole was on bail for assault with a deadly weapon and the weapon itself and the magazines were ALREADY illegal. How'd that gun ban work out?
We sure have weak gun control.
Really? EVERYTHING that the asshole used was already banned. Hard to get more severe than that. Seems like progressive assholes, and violent criminals don't seem to give a shit about your pesky little laws. Go figure.
Seems you have made it way too easy to get deadly weapons.
We don't have to do better because you are doing nothing but regurgitating the same old control freak rhetoric.OK, good job whackos
We got the truck argument.
We got the definition of assault rifle argument
We got the good guy with a gun argument
We got input from the Limbaugh dittoheads
I know you can do better.
The last three whack jobs that went on a shooting spree used semi automatic rifles. The last two wore tactical gear.
Background checks?
If all these nutsos want them then I suggest that the idea some one wants them is a sign they are mentally off.
The more they assault type rifles want, the more whacked they are. Probably at least at by the square of that number.
Have two, 4 times as as crazy. Have 4, 16 times as crazy.
Next, add another factor of ten for every piece of "tactical gear" they own.
Really, you are way off the deep end if you have to dress up in this tactical gear.
Real sane gun owners wouldn't own an assault type rifle. Not good for hunting, not good for self defense. They would be safe.
Just those crazy fucks running around in tactical gear toting their AR-15, round them up & send them to the psycho ward.
I thought you said they were semi-automatics. If that is the case, they are not an assault rifle. I think like most gun grabbers, you are hopelessly confused.
Here we go again. Out comes the retarded response that Assault type rifles can't be semi-automatic.
Well., sheepdip, there was an assault rifle ban & guess the fuck what, it banned certain semi-automatic rifles.
Now, that is that excuse. Which jackass will bring up rental trucks or knives?
The last three whack jobs that went on a shooting spree used semi automatic rifles. The last two wore tactical gear.
Background checks?
If all these nutsos want them then I suggest that the idea some one wants them is a sign they are mentally off.
The more they assault type rifles want, the more whacked they are. Probably at least at by the square of that number.
Have two, 4 times as as crazy. Have 4, 16 times as crazy.
Next, add another factor of ten for every piece of "tactical gear" they own.
Really, you are way off the deep end if you have to dress up in this tactical gear.
Real sane gun owners wouldn't own an assault type rifle. Not good for hunting, not good for self defense. They would be safe.
Just those crazy fucks running around in tactical gear toting their AR-15, round them up & send them to the psycho ward.
This last asshole was on bail for assault with a deadly weapon and the weapon itself and the magazines were ALREADY illegal. The next door neighbor had a restraining order that did fuckall to protect her as she was the second person this asshole murdered, so, yet again....How'd that gun ban work out?
With all the stupid laws being enforced how can those we depend on not enforce any law as basic as gun laws?Well start by punishing those preventing those laws from being implemented even if it means putting the NRA in jails.Cancer isn't either but why try for cures? You can't see your way to want stricter gun laws? That CAN be implemented?Diabetes isn't a right, yet.Not doing anything about gun violence because it can't be stopped is like not trying to do something about diabetes because it can't be stopped
Tell me what new gun laws will do what the ones we already have but do not enforce don't do
No one is preventing existing laws from being enforced.
The parties responsible for not enforcing the laws on the books are government law enforcement and judicial agencies.
Are you going to throw cops, district attorneys and judges in jail for not enforcing the laws we already have on the books?
How about (pathetic) disabled hunters? Should they be allowed to use a semi auto rifle? We are getting into the arena of the absurd when anti-gun left wing angry crazies start recommending weapons for home defense but a Ruger 10-22 semi automatic seems to be the choice for varments of the domestic as well as garden type.. It should be noted that the crazy angry anti-gun left tried to blame Rush Limbaugh for the tragic shooting of Congresswoman Gabby Gifford by a schizophrenic registered democrat.Semi automatic rifles are not legal to hunt in most states. Except the states where the hunters are so pathetic they can't kill a deer with the first shot.How are semi-automatic rifles "not good" for hunting or self defense? The typical anti gun screed is careful to omit the fact that the last three mass murders were committed by registered democrats and left wing hate mongers. How many people recognize the name " James Hodgkinson"? They should except the MSM was careful to bury the story of a crazy Sanders democrat opening fire on a baseball team full of republicans. How many people know that Hodgkinson had a list of republican targets in his pocket and that he might have been in communication with democrat politicians before he opened fire on republicans? Vegas mass murderer Stephen Paddock was probably influenced by the same left wing crazy hatred as Hodgkinson but the story has strangely gone dark. A CBS executive said that she had no sympathy for the Vegas victims because they were all "right wing gun nuts themselves". It gives you an insight into the mainstream liberal mind these days. The Baptist Church killer hated Christians and Christians are often republicans. Every one of the mass murderers violated at least half a dozen laws and it took an NRA member to bring down Kelley.
They are typically not the recommended weapon for home defense. A rather poor choice.
If I wanted top hear Rush Limbaugh, I would tune him in.
This bullshit about these shooters being Democrats works on assholes like you.
These last three were little involved in politics at all.appear to have mental issues
I am referring to hand guns. Good gawd. I cant do this anymore with you... lolTook longer than that for the Vegas shooter, the Sutherland shooter--people heard the long pauses while they reloaded. What are you, the Rifleman?It takes 3 seconds to change magazines.They don't shoot as far as a rifle, do they? They can't be turned back into a sane weapon instead of a weapon of mass destruction?If a guy is going to be nuts and shoot up all and sundry, he can do it one slow bullet at a time and reload after he's shot five.Harley, rather than dismiss me, explain what I said that leads you to believe I want your handgun. Maybe what I want is the high capacity magazines? I know what one of those is.You just did lol
You want to ban shit you dont even understand. Just stop. Good gawd OL
I said rifles. I meant rifles.
No one needs to be able to shoot faster or more than that for anything legal or even for self protection.
You basically just dismissed 95% of handguns.
I know they are preferred because a bullet automatically moves in to the chamber as soon as one is fired. The larger magazines mean you don't have to reload as much. So if it is a semi handgun, couldn't magazines be limited to five?
Large quantities of ammunition are nuts, too. What the hell?
Never mind, you're probably too young to know who I mean.
The last three whack jobs that went on a shooting spree used semi automatic rifles. The last two wore tactical gear.
Background checks?
If all these nutsos want them then I suggest that the idea some one wants them is a sign they are mentally off.
The more they assault type rifles want, the more whacked they are. Probably at least at by the square of that number.
Have two, 4 times as as crazy. Have 4, 16 times as crazy.
Next, add another factor of ten for every piece of "tactical gear" they own.
Really, you are way off the deep end if you have to dress up in this tactical gear.
Real sane gun owners wouldn't own an assault type rifle. Not good for hunting, not good for self defense. They would be safe.
Just those crazy fucks running around in tactical gear toting their AR-15, round them up & send them to the psycho ward.
This last asshole was on bail for assault with a deadly weapon and the weapon itself and the magazines were ALREADY illegal. The next door neighbor had a restraining order that did fuckall to protect her as she was the second person this asshole murdered, so, yet again....How'd that gun ban work out?
The law won't stop every one, but does lower the them. It would work better if list were public on smart phones like the sex offenders registry so people could keep an eye on them.
And when a dem breaks a law hang him and when a republican gets caught ,,it's politicalYeah they love seeing deaths and destruction by gunsWell start by punishing those preventing those laws from being implemented even if it means putting the NRA in jails.Cancer isn't either but why try for cures? You can't see your way to want stricter gun laws? That CAN be implemented?
Tell me what new gun laws will do what the ones we already have but do not enforce don't do
The ones preventing the laws from being implemented are progressive groups like the ACLU.
No, what they love seeing is the US Court system rendered completely helpless. They will fight for every violent asshole leftist out there. But a rightwinger who doesn't want to bake a cake..... forget it.
2 dead, 9 injured in shootings in ChicagoOK, good job whackos
We got the truck argument.
We got the definition of assault rifle argument
We got the good guy with a gun argument
We got input from the Limbaugh dittoheads
I know you can do better.
shit, could be an earthquake and eat her up.It's not about you; it's about the type of gun and the damage it can do. To me it is a form of risk reduction. Nothing is perfect and I'm not saying you did anything wrong.Outlawing semiautomatic weapons isn't the only answer, you're right. Absolutely. But getting those goddamned things out of every American closet would really help. This latest nutcase also bought his guns legally, and owned them even though he was arrested earlier this year for assault with a deadly weapon, and it was against his wife. A neighbor called and told the cops the shooter was acting pretty nutty prior to the shooting and firing hundreds of rounds in his backyard. Ignore, ignore, ignore. Then BANG. So you're right. There's more to it than just doing a buy back of semi's.Exactly MINDLESS. Thanks!You're right I am reacting to three mindless mass murders in two months. If that's wrong, I'm in the wrong universe.
Why do you want to take my weapons? I did nothing wrong.
I shoot hundreds of rounds when I go shooting with my wife and daughters .
The ultimate risk reduction is for you to crawl under your bed and stay there, even though there are risks associated even with doing that. The bed could fall, the house could catch fire, etc.
That's not much of a life!
And when a dem breaks a law hang him and when a republican gets caught ,,it's politicalYeah they love seeing deaths and destruction by gunsWell start by punishing those preventing those laws from being implemented even if it means putting the NRA in jails.Tell me what new gun laws will do what the ones we already have but do not enforce don't do
The ones preventing the laws from being implemented are progressive groups like the ACLU.
No, what they love seeing is the US Court system rendered completely helpless. They will fight for every violent asshole leftist out there. But a rightwinger who doesn't want to bake a cake..... forget it.
They only look at the niggas come voting season.2 dead, 9 injured in shootings in ChicagoOK, good job whackos
We got the truck argument.
We got the definition of assault rifle argument
We got the good guy with a gun argument
We got input from the Limbaugh dittoheads
I know you can do better.
"Eleven people were shot, two fatally, in Chicago between Tuesday morning and early Wednesday."
Why aren't you gun grabbers ever interested in these murders that are weekly in Chitown?
Fantasizing early huh crybaby.And when a dem breaks a law hang him and when a republican gets caught ,,it's politicalYeah they love seeing deaths and destruction by gunsWell start by punishing those preventing those laws from being implemented even if it means putting the NRA in jails.Tell me what new gun laws will do what the ones we already have but do not enforce don't do
The ones preventing the laws from being implemented are progressive groups like the ACLU.
No, what they love seeing is the US Court system rendered completely helpless. They will fight for every violent asshole leftist out there. But a rightwinger who doesn't want to bake a cake..... forget it.
I clearly state that some states that had candy-assed, poor shooting hunters allowed semi-automatics. Heck, they need the herd whittled down.One of my students said he borrowed a friend's semiautomatic rifle to hunt deer last year, but you only pull the trigger once, not a bunch of times. You don't want to tear up the meat.You are sure? Provide a link saying semi-automatic rifles are illegal to hunt with.
The poster said semi-automatic rifles are ILLEGAL to hunt with, which is not correct except in 4 or 5 states.
I cant make my point any more clear. Your reactionary brain just shuts down, dont it?OMG lolBecause it was a ridiculous point.You didn't answer the question.
Makes you think truck mass murders wont go up when we get rid of semi auto rifles?
Our problems arent INANIMATE objects. Its people with no regard for life.
Truck murders have not gone up with gun control anywhere.
You cant see the forest for the trees
Innocent people are getting mowed down by guns and you are talking trucks. That is funny.
They only look at the niggas come voting season.2 dead, 9 injured in shootings in ChicagoOK, good job whackos
We got the truck argument.
We got the definition of assault rifle argument
We got the good guy with a gun argument
We got input from the Limbaugh dittoheads
I know you can do better.
"Eleven people were shot, two fatally, in Chicago between Tuesday morning and early Wednesday."
Why aren't you gun grabbers ever interested in these murders that are weekly in Chitown?
Perhaps it wouldn't HAVE to be about "all" gun owners if gun owners were willing to have more regulation around who can own a gun, etc. I really like the sound of the recent law in California that allows law enforcement to take a person's guns temporarily for good cause and then it is adjudicated by a judge. That law nationwide might have prevented two of the shootings we've recently had.You people make it about ALL gun owners.It's not about you; it's about the type of gun and the damage it can do. To me it is a form of risk reduction. Nothing is perfect and I'm not saying you did anything wrong.Outlawing semiautomatic weapons isn't the only answer, you're right. Absolutely. But getting those goddamned things out of every American closet would really help. This latest nutcase also bought his guns legally, and owned them even though he was arrested earlier this year for assault with a deadly weapon, and it was against his wife. A neighbor called and told the cops the shooter was acting pretty nutty prior to the shooting and firing hundreds of rounds in his backyard. Ignore, ignore, ignore. Then BANG. So you're right. There's more to it than just doing a buy back of semi's.Exactly MINDLESS. Thanks!You're right I am reacting to three mindless mass murders in two months. If that's wrong, I'm in the wrong universe.
Why do you want to take my weapons? I did nothing wrong.
I shoot hundreds of rounds when I go shooting with my wife and daughters .
The current thinking is one person kills with a gun then we have to do something to ALL gun owners .
If that's the way you want to live then be consistent and apply that "logic" to all laws
