2nd Carrier going to Sea of Japan

JohnPrewett

Silver Member
Oct 31, 2016
974
99
90
Thailand
YLzrlKa.png
 
This is stupid on so many levels, Kim can neither accurately track and target a moving carrier with a ballistic missile nor can they put a nuclear payload on one.

Your hot air input is noted. You don't know what the DPRK can or cannot do. For all you know last week an America hating nation could have given DPRK a couple of nukes.
And a nuke does not have to land right on a carrier to turn it into a molten mess.
 
Your hot air input is noted. You don't know what the DPRK can or cannot do.
Hot air indeed, you somehow believe you've got insight counter to all the experts who state that North Korea is still a long ways of from being able to build the multi-stage nuclear payloads required to arm ballistic missiles.

For all you know last week an America hating nation could have given DPRK a couple of nukes.
You're incredibly naive. Why don't you work out in your little pea brain how another country just gives North Korea a couple of nukes last week and now they have all the facilities to locate, track, target, and launch them at a moving target.

And a nuke does not have to land right on a carrier to turn it into a molten mess.
This is true. However it is pretty far removed from assigning the capability to a country that has only detonated primitive single stage nuclear weapons, what you're doing is fear-mongering and anyone with an ounce of knowledge on the subject can see it for what it is.

Just like MindWars, some of you people have some weird situation in life where you feel good thinking you are impacting others' lives by spreading fear. One could probably write a psychology thesis on the underlying reasons but I suspect it has something to do with feeling weak and insignificant in your life so this is your only outlet to make you feel like you might be making a difference in other people's lives. It's pathetic, you ignorant slob.
 
This is stupid on so many levels, Kim can neither accurately track and target a moving carrier with a ballistic missile nor can they put a nuclear payload on one.

Your hot air input is noted. You don't know what the DPRK can or cannot do. For all you know last week an America hating nation could have given DPRK a couple of nukes.
And a nuke does not have to land right on a carrier to turn it into a molten mess.

Yeah, it does. The way Kim's missiles fly, he would more likely hit Russia.
 
You, not I, are claiming to be positive about DPKR capabilities. You have no grounds to be positive that DPKR cannot launch a missile with a nuke payload.

It is highly probable they could launch a missile with a nuke payload .... and major war most likely would ensue NO MATTER where the missile nuke exploded.

ps: the "experts" don't all agree about what they THINK DPRK has or can do.
 
The GOP will get their war(s). Make no mistake, folks.

In light of WW2, Korea, Vietnam and Obama's war making, it shows a lot of gall for a Dem to speak of GOP war-making.

As for Bush .... yea, that rino Globalist traitor did get USA into latest round of MidEast wars. Bush enabled Obama.
 
The GOP will get their war(s). Make no mistake, folks.

In light of WW2, Korea, Vietnam and Obama's war making, it shows a lot of gall for a Dem to speak of GOP war-making.

As for Bush .... yea, that rino Globalist traitor did get USA into latest round of MidEast wars. Bush enabled Obama.
Today it is the GOP that wants war. Obama's greatest mistake was remaining involved in the middle east, but he was no invader like Dubya. The GOP wants Muslim blood, and there's plenty of money to be made attacking North Korea too.
 
The GOP will get their war(s). Make no mistake, folks.

In light of WW2, Korea, Vietnam and Obama's war making, it shows a lot of gall for a Dem to speak of GOP war-making.

As for Bush .... yea, that rino Globalist traitor did get USA into latest round of MidEast wars. Bush enabled Obama.
Today it is the GOP that wants war. Obama's greatest mistake was remaining involved in the middle east, but he was no invader like Dubya. The GOP wants Muslim blood, and there's plenty of money to be made attacking North Korea too.



Who put troops in Syria bush Jr or Obama?





.
 
The GOP will get their war(s). Make no mistake, folks.

In light of WW2, Korea, Vietnam and Obama's war making, it shows a lot of gall for a Dem to speak of GOP war-making.

As for Bush .... yea, that rino Globalist traitor did get USA into latest round of MidEast wars. Bush enabled Obama.
Today it is the GOP that wants war. Obama's greatest mistake was remaining involved in the middle east, but he was no invader like Dubya. The GOP wants Muslim blood, and there's plenty of money to be made attacking North Korea too.

Obama and Hillary made war in the MidEast from Libya to Syria ..... by air and proxie. The MIC is quite bi-partisan supported.

Show me a partisan Dem or Rep and I'll show you a dunce. Nothing more ridiculous than a Dem getting 'holier than thou' with the GOP over war making
 
When told a 2nd carrier task force was heading to The Sea of Japan Trump said "there aren't any C's in Japan".

And then the staff start looking for new jobs.
 
Has anyone actually checked to see where the boat is? If Trump said it as going there, it could be anywhere.
 

Forum List

Back
Top