2nd Amendment fan! Your fantasy is coming true!

[JGalt]

Gun lovers are fond of saying they need assault weapons to stave off the aggressions of a tyrannical government. Well, if combat troops occupy your town and attack protesters, would you see that as the tyranny you are prepared to fight? If you care about the 2nd amendment, you must also care about the 1st. Or are you going to tell us that ALL PROTESTERS are violent rioters? Or is it the issue they are protesting one you happen to go along with, it's okay for cops to kill suspects.

Or is it your Ramboesque fantasy of fighting "tyranny" just a childish cinematic fantasy?

You don't get it. Combat Troops will be sent to major American super-cities to protect the citizenry from the Rioters.

That's not legal. It's tyranny.

Nope there are several ways to use the Constitution and the Law to deploy armed troops in American cities. Rioting and looting are NOT protected by the 1st Amendment at all and if bad enough can be called insurrection.

The armed forces are NOT to be used as law enforcement. See Posse Commitatus. Those pesky laws!

I suggest YOU read the Rules laws and conditions that allow the military to put down Insurrection.

Proseters are not insurrectionists.

When they riot burn loot and kill cops and National Guard they are when they disobey lawful orders and arm themselves with bricks bottles and clubs they are. And you know they have done that or you are to stupid to breath.

Do you see all protesters as looters?

The protesters are complicit in the looting and arson. Those never would have happened if that hadn't started their silly protesting.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Gun lovers are fond of saying they need assault weapons to stave off the aggressions of a tyrannical government. Well, if combat troops occupy your town and attack protesters, would you see that as the tyranny you are prepared to fight? If you care about the 2nd amendment, you must also care about the 1st. Or are you going to tell us that ALL PROTESTERS are violent rioters? Or is it the issue they are protesting one you happen to go along with, it's okay for cops to kill suspects.

Or is it your Ramboesque fantasy of fighting "tyranny" just a childish cinematic fantasy?

Protesters don’t loot, burn, maim and kill.

 

[JGalt]

Gun lovers are fond of saying they need assault weapons to stave off the aggressions of a tyrannical government. Well, if combat troops occupy your town and attack protesters, would you see that as the tyranny you are prepared to fight? If you care about the 2nd amendment, you must also care about the 1st. Or are you going to tell us that ALL PROTESTERS are violent rioters? Or is it the issue they are protesting one you happen to go along with, it's okay for cops to kill suspects.

Or is it your Ramboesque fantasy of fighting "tyranny" just a childish cinematic fantasy?

If the military is attacking protesters they are fighting the same enemy I would fight. Looting and arson are not acts of free speech.

Protesters and looters are not the same. We're there looters in East Lansing? Are all protesters looters?

Yes. There were rioters in Lansing. No, protesters are not looters/rioters. Stop calling looters protesters

Clean up starts after night of destruction and tear gas - City Pulse

Most businesses that had windows shattered already had crews boarding up storefronts and assessing repairs. Others scrubbed graffiti like “Fuck 12” and “BLM” from brick walls. A car that was burned in the middle of Washington Avenue had already been towed.

lansingcitypulse.com

Stop calling protesters looters!

Looters are looting in protest, so protesters are looters.

ALL protesters are looters?

Let God sort them out. That's what He does best.

'Murcia!

You're clearly not down with American values.

Certainly not down with your version of "American values", that's for damned sure.

 

[miketx]

What American servicemen would cut loose on protesters with an M-61 Vulcan? ...

Not protesters, liar, rioters and looters.

 

[Nosmo King]

Gun lovers are fond of saying they need assault weapons to stave off the aggressions of a tyrannical government. Well, if combat troops occupy your town and attack protesters, would you see that as the tyranny you are prepared to fight? If you care about the 2nd amendment, you must also care about the 1st. Or are you going to tell us that ALL PROTESTERS are violent rioters? Or is it the issue they are protesting one you happen to go along with, it's okay for cops to kill suspects.

Or is it your Ramboesque fantasy of fighting "tyranny" just a childish cinematic fantasy?

You don't get it. Combat Troops will be sent to major American super-cities to protect the citizenry from the Rioters.

That's not legal. It's tyranny.

Nope there are several ways to use the Constitution and the Law to deploy armed troops in American cities. Rioting and looting are NOT protected by the 1st Amendment at all and if bad enough can be called insurrection.

The armed forces are NOT to be used as law enforcement. See Posse Commitatus. Those pesky laws!

I suggest YOU read the Rules laws and conditions that allow the military to put down Insurrection.

Proseters are not insurrectionists.

When they riot burn loot and kill cops and National Guard they are when they disobey lawful orders and arm themselves with bricks bottles and clubs they are. And you know they have done that or you are to stupid to breath.

Do you see all protesters as looters?

The protesters are complicit in the looting and arson. Those never would have happened if that hadn't started their silly protesting.

True or false: protesting is a constitutionally protected right?

 

[Nosmo King]

Gun lovers are fond of saying they need assault weapons to stave off the aggressions of a tyrannical government. Well, if combat troops occupy your town and attack protesters, would you see that as the tyranny you are prepared to fight? If you care about the 2nd amendment, you must also care about the 1st. Or are you going to tell us that ALL PROTESTERS are violent rioters? Or is it the issue they are protesting one you happen to go along with, it's okay for cops to kill suspects.

Or is it your Ramboesque fantasy of fighting "tyranny" just a childish cinematic fantasy?

You don't get it. Combat Troops will be sent to major American super-cities to protect the citizenry from the Rioters.

That's not legal. It's tyranny.

Cite the law please!

Posse Comitatus Act of 1878

 

[RetiredGySgt]

Gun lovers are fond of saying they need assault weapons to stave off the aggressions of a tyrannical government. Well, if combat troops occupy your town and attack protesters, would you see that as the tyranny you are prepared to fight? If you care about the 2nd amendment, you must also care about the 1st. Or are you going to tell us that ALL PROTESTERS are violent rioters? Or is it the issue they are protesting one you happen to go along with, it's okay for cops to kill suspects.

Or is it your Ramboesque fantasy of fighting "tyranny" just a childish cinematic fantasy?

You don't get it. Combat Troops will be sent to major American super-cities to protect the citizenry from the Rioters.

That's not legal. It's tyranny.

Nope there are several ways to use the Constitution and the Law to deploy armed troops in American cities. Rioting and looting are NOT protected by the 1st Amendment at all and if bad enough can be called insurrection.

The armed forces are NOT to be used as law enforcement. See Posse Commitatus. Those pesky laws!

I suggest YOU read the Rules laws and conditions that allow the military to put down Insurrection.

Proseters are not insurrectionists.

When they riot burn loot and kill cops and National Guard they are when they disobey lawful orders and arm themselves with bricks bottles and clubs they are. And you know they have done that or you are to stupid to breath.

Do you see all protesters as looters?

The protesters are complicit in the looting and arson. Those never would have happened if that hadn't started their silly protesting.

True or false: protesting is a constitutionally protected right?

PEACEFUL gatherings are legal with a permit. Looting rioting and arson are NOT peaceful. Nor are they protected by the Constitution.

 

[JGalt]

Gun lovers are fond of saying they need assault weapons to stave off the aggressions of a tyrannical government. Well, if combat troops occupy your town and attack protesters, would you see that as the tyranny you are prepared to fight? If you care about the 2nd amendment, you must also care about the 1st. Or are you going to tell us that ALL PROTESTERS are violent rioters? Or is it the issue they are protesting one you happen to go along with, it's okay for cops to kill suspects.

Or is it your Ramboesque fantasy of fighting "tyranny" just a childish cinematic fantasy?

You don't get it. Combat Troops will be sent to major American super-cities to protect the citizenry from the Rioters.

That's not legal. It's tyranny.

Nope there are several ways to use the Constitution and the Law to deploy armed troops in American cities. Rioting and looting are NOT protected by the 1st Amendment at all and if bad enough can be called insurrection.

The armed forces are NOT to be used as law enforcement. See Posse Commitatus. Those pesky laws!

I suggest YOU read the Rules laws and conditions that allow the military to put down Insurrection.

Proseters are not insurrectionists.

When they riot burn loot and kill cops and National Guard they are when they disobey lawful orders and arm themselves with bricks bottles and clubs they are. And you know they have done that or you are to stupid to breath.

Do you see all protesters as looters?

The protesters are complicit in the looting and arson. Those never would have happened if that hadn't started their silly protesting.

True or false: protesting is a constitutionally protected right?

Lincoln didn't think so, did he? He locked up lots of Democrats.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

Gun lovers are fond of saying they need assault weapons to stave off the aggressions of a tyrannical government. Well, if combat troops occupy your town and attack protesters, would you see that as the tyranny you are prepared to fight? If you care about the 2nd amendment, you must also care about the 1st. Or are you going to tell us that ALL PROTESTERS are violent rioters? Or is it the issue they are protesting one you happen to go along with, it's okay for cops to kill suspects.

Or is it your Ramboesque fantasy of fighting "tyranny" just a childish cinematic fantasy?

You don't get it. Combat Troops will be sent to major American super-cities to protect the citizenry from the Rioters.

That's not legal. It's tyranny.

Cite the law please!

Posse Comitatus Act of 1878

Insurrection act supersedes that act.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Gun lovers are fond of saying they need assault weapons to stave off the aggressions of a tyrannical government. Well, if combat troops occupy your town and attack protesters, would you see that as the tyranny you are prepared to fight? If you care about the 2nd amendment, you must also care about the 1st. Or are you going to tell us that ALL PROTESTERS are violent rioters? Or is it the issue they are protesting one you happen to go along with, it's okay for cops to kill suspects.

Or is it your Ramboesque fantasy of fighting "tyranny" just a childish cinematic fantasy?

You don't get it. Combat Troops will be sent to major American super-cities to protect the citizenry from the Rioters.

That's not legal. It's tyranny.

Nope there are several ways to use the Constitution and the Law to deploy armed troops in American cities. Rioting and looting are NOT protected by the 1st Amendment at all and if bad enough can be called insurrection.

The armed forces are NOT to be used as law enforcement. See Posse Commitatus. Those pesky laws!

I suggest YOU read the Rules laws and conditions that allow the military to put down Insurrection.

Proseters are not insurrectionists.

When they riot burn loot and kill cops and National Guard they are when they disobey lawful orders and arm themselves with bricks bottles and clubs they are. And you know they have done that or you are to stupid to breath.

Do you see all protesters as looters?

The protesters are complicit in the looting and arson. Those never would have happened if that hadn't started their silly protesting.

True or false: protesting is a constitutionally protected right?

Peaceful, yes. Looting, maiming, killing and burning are not protected. “Protesters” killed and filmed the death of a 77-yr old retired police officer. That doesn’t bother you though. How hypocritical.

 

[Nosmo King]

Gun lovers are fond of saying they need assault weapons to stave off the aggressions of a tyrannical government. Well, if combat troops occupy your town and attack protesters, would you see that as the tyranny you are prepared to fight? If you care about the 2nd amendment, you must also care about the 1st. Or are you going to tell us that ALL PROTESTERS are violent rioters? Or is it the issue they are protesting one you happen to go along with, it's okay for cops to kill suspects.

Or is it your Ramboesque fantasy of fighting "tyranny" just a childish cinematic fantasy?

Protesters don’t loot, burn, maim and kill.

Are ALL protesters looters and rioters?

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Gun lovers are fond of saying they need assault weapons to stave off the aggressions of a tyrannical government. Well, if combat troops occupy your town and attack protesters, would you see that as the tyranny you are prepared to fight? If you care about the 2nd amendment, you must also care about the 1st. Or are you going to tell us that ALL PROTESTERS are violent rioters? Or is it the issue they are protesting one you happen to go along with, it's okay for cops to kill suspects.

Or is it your Ramboesque fantasy of fighting "tyranny" just a childish cinematic fantasy?

Protesters don’t loot, burn, maim and kill.

Are ALL protesters looters and rioters?

No. Are all police officers racist murderers?

 

[Polishprince]

Gun lovers are fond of saying they need assault weapons to stave off the aggressions of a tyrannical government. Well, if combat troops occupy your town and attack protesters, would you see that as the tyranny you are prepared to fight? If you care about the 2nd amendment, you must also care about the 1st. Or are you going to tell us that ALL PROTESTERS are violent rioters? Or is it the issue they are protesting one you happen to go along with, it's okay for cops to kill suspects.

Or is it your Ramboesque fantasy of fighting "tyranny" just a childish cinematic fantasy?

You don't get it. Combat Troops will be sent to major American super-cities to protect the citizenry from the Rioters.

That's not legal. It's tyranny.

Nope there are several ways to use the Constitution and the Law to deploy armed troops in American cities. Rioting and looting are NOT protected by the 1st Amendment at all and if bad enough can be called insurrection.

The armed forces are NOT to be used as law enforcement. See Posse Commitatus. Those pesky laws!

In a lot of places in this country, the mayors and governors don't want to protect the people.

Charles Bronson demonstrates the need for so called "assault weapons", and why Draconian Gun Control can never be allowed

So you're in the childish cinematic group.

No , I am part of the Law and Order crowd that believes in the right to self defense.

The only reason why the Army is needed in Shit Holes like DeBlasio's NYC , is because the citizens there are generally not armed. If a group of Domestic Terrorists decide to burn and loot, as they have this week, they need to be resisted.

 

[Nosmo King]

Gun lovers are fond of saying they need assault weapons to stave off the aggressions of a tyrannical government. Well, if combat troops occupy your town and attack protesters, would you see that as the tyranny you are prepared to fight? If you care about the 2nd amendment, you must also care about the 1st. Or are you going to tell us that ALL PROTESTERS are violent rioters? Or is it the issue they are protesting one you happen to go along with, it's okay for cops to kill suspects.

Or is it your Ramboesque fantasy of fighting "tyranny" just a childish cinematic fantasy?

You don't get it. Combat Troops will be sent to major American super-cities to protect the citizenry from the Rioters.

That's not legal. It's tyranny.

Cite the law please!

Posse Comitatus Act of 1878

Insurrection act supersedes that act.

Wrong again. The Insurrection Act was modified by Posse Comatatus.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

Gun lovers are fond of saying they need assault weapons to stave off the aggressions of a tyrannical government. Well, if combat troops occupy your town and attack protesters, would you see that as the tyranny you are prepared to fight? If you care about the 2nd amendment, you must also care about the 1st. Or are you going to tell us that ALL PROTESTERS are violent rioters? Or is it the issue they are protesting one you happen to go along with, it's okay for cops to kill suspects.

Or is it your Ramboesque fantasy of fighting "tyranny" just a childish cinematic fantasy?

Protesters don’t loot, burn, maim and kill.

Are ALL protesters looters and rioters?

Lets play your game shall we? Are all the people on the streets of America PEACEFULLY protestors?

 

[RetiredGySgt]

Gun lovers are fond of saying they need assault weapons to stave off the aggressions of a tyrannical government. Well, if combat troops occupy your town and attack protesters, would you see that as the tyranny you are prepared to fight? If you care about the 2nd amendment, you must also care about the 1st. Or are you going to tell us that ALL PROTESTERS are violent rioters? Or is it the issue they are protesting one you happen to go along with, it's okay for cops to kill suspects.

Or is it your Ramboesque fantasy of fighting "tyranny" just a childish cinematic fantasy?

You don't get it. Combat Troops will be sent to major American super-cities to protect the citizenry from the Rioters.

That's not legal. It's tyranny.

Cite the law please!

Posse Comitatus Act of 1878

Insurrection act supersedes that act.

Wrong again. The Insurrection Act was modified by Posse Comatatus.

No it wasn't dumb ass you have that backwards.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Gun lovers are fond of saying they need assault weapons to stave off the aggressions of a tyrannical government. Well, if combat troops occupy your town and attack protesters, would you see that as the tyranny you are prepared to fight? If you care about the 2nd amendment, you must also care about the 1st. Or are you going to tell us that ALL PROTESTERS are violent rioters? Or is it the issue they are protesting one you happen to go along with, it's okay for cops to kill suspects.

Or is it your Ramboesque fantasy of fighting "tyranny" just a childish cinematic fantasy?

Protesters don’t loot, burn, maim and kill.

Are ALL protesters looters and rioters?

Lets play your game shall we? Are all the people on the streets of America PEACEFULLY protestors?

Doesn’t matter. Once you break curfew you’re a criminal. Curfew imposed by Democrat mayors.

 

[Nosmo King]

Gun lovers are fond of saying they need assault weapons to stave off the aggressions of a tyrannical government. Well, if combat troops occupy your town and attack protesters, would you see that as the tyranny you are prepared to fight? If you care about the 2nd amendment, you must also care about the 1st. Or are you going to tell us that ALL PROTESTERS are violent rioters? Or is it the issue they are protesting one you happen to go along with, it's okay for cops to kill suspects.

Or is it your Ramboesque fantasy of fighting "tyranny" just a childish cinematic fantasy?

Protesters don’t loot, burn, maim and kill.

Are ALL protesters looters and rioters?

No. Are all police officers racist murderers?

No. That's why we need reform to rid ourselves of the bad cops. Babies/bathwater...

 

[Nosmo King]

Gun lovers are fond of saying they need assault weapons to stave off the aggressions of a tyrannical government. Well, if combat troops occupy your town and attack protesters, would you see that as the tyranny you are prepared to fight? If you care about the 2nd amendment, you must also care about the 1st. Or are you going to tell us that ALL PROTESTERS are violent rioters? Or is it the issue they are protesting one you happen to go along with, it's okay for cops to kill suspects.

Or is it your Ramboesque fantasy of fighting "tyranny" just a childish cinematic fantasy?

You don't get it. Combat Troops will be sent to major American super-cities to protect the citizenry from the Rioters.

That's not legal. It's tyranny.

Cite the law please!

Posse Comitatus Act of 1878

Insurrection act supersedes that act.

Wrong again. The Insurrection Act was modified by Posse Comatatus.

No it wasn't dumb ass you have that backwards.

Oh! Dear God! What has Limbaugh been 'teaching' you?

 

[Shawnee_b]

Gun lovers are fond of saying they need assault weapons to stave off the aggressions of a tyrannical government. Well, if combat troops occupy your town and attack protesters, would you see that as the tyranny you are prepared to fight? If you care about the 2nd amendment, you must also care about the 1st. Or are you going to tell us that ALL PROTESTERS are violent rioters? Or is it the issue they are protesting one you happen to go along with, it's okay for cops to kill suspects.

Or is it your Ramboesque fantasy of fighting "tyranny" just a childish cinematic fantasy?

I don't see it as tyranny at all, but a necessity. Mayors, Gov's won't do anything other than say "leave them alone", police are scared and the ones not scared are told to stand down.

I see it as stopping violent basement dwellers with no life and no clue.

Violent protesters are not 1st amendment protected.

Non violent protesters need not fear.

You have anything else stupid to say? Probably.